ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 28, 2008
Eur Respir J 2008, doi:10.1183/09031936.00100207
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/4/997    most recent
09031936.00100207v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rioux, J-P.
Right arrow Articles by Labrecque, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rioux, J-P.
Right arrow Articles by Labrecque, M.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Workplace specific challenges as a contribution to the diagnosis of occupational asthma

J-P. Rioux 1, J-L. Malo 1, J. L’Archevêque 1, K. Rabhi 1, M. Labrecque 1*

1 Dept of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: manon.labrecque{at}UMontreal.CA.


   Abstract

The diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA) can be made by exposing workers to the relevant agent either in a hospital laboratory through specific inhalation challenges (SIC) or at the workplace. As suggested by several authors, workers with negative laboratory SIC can be monitored at the workplace under supervision. Aim: Assess the frequency of and identify factors associated with a positive workplace reaction in workers with negative SIC in the laboratory.

We examined the results of workplace challenges in 99 workers who underwent negative SIC between 1994 and 2004. A positive reaction either in the SIC or in the workplace was a sustained fall in FEV1 of 20% or more.

Twenty-two workers (22.2%) showed positive responses at the workplace. These subjects more often had increased baseline methacholine responsiveness (90.5% vs 67.6%, p=0.05). They also underwent more days of SIC testing (4.9 vs 3.3 days, p=0.004) and were exposed more often to two or more agents (56% vs 28.4%, p=0.002) and for a longer period (363.3 min vs 220.4 min, p=0.002) in the laboratory.

This study illustrates the usefulness of workplace monitoring of airway function in the investigation of OA and identifies factors that are more often associated with a positive reaction.

Keywords:  Asthma in the workplace, occupational asthma, specific challenges







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.