ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 27, 2006
Eur Respir J 2006, doi:10.1183/09031936.00090306
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/2/347    most recent
09031936.00090306v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K.C.
Right arrow Articles by Tam, C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K.C.
Right arrow Articles by Tam, C.M.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Standard anti-tuberculosis treatment and hepatotoxicity: do dosing schedules matter?

K.C. Chang 1*, C.C. Leung 1, W.W. Yew 2, C.M. Tam 1

1 Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Centre for Health Protection, Dept of Health, Hong Kong, CHINA
2 Tuberculosis and Chest Unit, Grantham Hospital, Hong Kong, CHINA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kc_chang{at}dh.gov.hk.


   Abstract

We conducted a nested case-control study to examine whether dosing schedules of standard pyrazinamide-containing anti-tuberculosis treatment (standard treatment) might affect hepatotoxicity.

We identified retrospectively all patients with hepatitis by biochemical criteria from a cohort of 3007 clinic patients who commenced anti-tuberculosis treatment from 1 January to 30 June 2001. Each case with hepatitis between one and nine weeks post-treatment was compared by conditional logistic regression analysis with two controls selected randomly from patients without hepatitis in the same period and matched by gender, age, and standard treatment. Impacts of gender and age were examined by logistic regression analysis of cases and patients without hepatitis.

Hepatitis occurred in 167 patients, of whom 96 qualified as cases. A conditional logistic risk model identified hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriage as the only risk factor (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.1). Logistic regression analysis showed that gender was non-significant but aging increased odds of hepatitis. The risk of hepatitis (95% CI) increased from 2.6% (1.9-3.5%) to 4.1% (3.2-5.3%) as age exceeded 49 years.

Dosing schedules in the first nine weeks have little impact on hepatotoxicity. If patients at risk of both hepatitis and relapse receive standard treatment, daily dosing is preferable.

Keywords:  Dosing schedules, hepatitis, hepatotoxicity, risk factors, treatment, tuberculosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
U. Mack, G. B. Migliori, M. Sester, H. L. Rieder, S. Ehlers, D. Goletti, A. Bossink, K. Magdorf, C. Holscher, B. Kampmann, et al.
LTBI: latent tuberculosis infection or lasting immune responses to M. tuberculosis? A TBNET consensus statement
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2009; 33(5): 956 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. W. Yew and C. C. Leung
Update in Tuberculosis 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2008; 177(5): 479 - 485.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.