ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 24, 2007
Eur Respir J 2007, doi:10.1183/09031936.00073807
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/3/618    most recent
09031936.00073807v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Camps, M.
Right arrow Articles by Marcos, M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Camps, M.
Right arrow Articles by Marcos, M.A.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Virological diagnosis in community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised patients

M. Camps 1, T. Pumarola 1, A. Moreno 2, C. Cervera 2, R. Perelló 2, A. Torres 3, M.T.J. de Anta 1, M.A. Marcos 1

1 Dept of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Spain
2 Dept of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Spain
3 Dept of Pneumology, Institute of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Agustí Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Spain


   Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a serious lower respiratory tract infection associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients.

The present study evaluated the clinical spectrum of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised hosts, the role of respiratory viruses, as well as the yield of viral diagnostic methods.

Conventional microbiological tests were routinely performed in immunocompromised patients with CAP. Nasopharyngeal swabs were processed for respiratory viruses by indirect immunofluorescence assay, cell culture and PCR. We defined 4 groups according to aetiology of CAP: group 1 (non viral), group 2 (mixed, non-viral and viral), group 3 (only viral) and group 4 (unknown aetiology).

Over a one year period, 92 patients were included. An aetiological diagnosis was achieved in 61 (66%) patients: 38 (41%), group 1; 12 (13%), group 2; and 11 (13%), group 3. The most frequent pathogen detected was Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=29, 48%) followed by rhinovirus (n=11, 18%). PCR identified 95% of respiratory viruses. Clinical characteristics could not reliably distinguish among the different aetiologic groups.

Respiratory viruses represent a substantial part of the aetiologies of CAP in immunocompromised patients and its routine assessment through PCR in nasopharyngeal swabs should be considered in the clinical care of these patients.

Keywords:  Community-acquired pneumonia, immunocompromised patients, respiratory virus, virological diagnosis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the European Respiratory Society.