Eur Respir J 2008, doi:10.1183/09031936.00053107
Standard versus patient centred asthma education in the Emergency Department: - a randomised study
1 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Dept of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sheree.smith{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk.
High re-attendance rates are common after asthma emergency department (ED) care. Inadequate patient education has been cited as one potential cause of re-attendances and the optimal format of education is uncertain. To compare the effectiveness of patient centred and standard asthma patient education on ED re-attendances. A randomised controlled trial at two inner city Australian teaching hospitals' EDs where patients received either standard patient education (SPE) or patient centred education (PCE). Both groups received a six topic curriculum. However, PCE patients reordered the topics according to their own priority and controlled the order of education. One hundred forty-six adult patients presenting to EDs with acute asthma were enrolled. At 4 months, ED re-attendances decreased from 22% to 12% in PCE group and were unchanged in the SPE group (between group OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2 to 1.1). In patients discharged after ED care (n=78), the PCE group had fewer re-attendances at 4 and 12 months (OR 0.3, 95%, CI 0.1 to 0.9; OR 0.3 95% CI 0.1 to 0.8). PCE patients with no GP care in the prior 7 days had fewer re-attendances at 4 and 12 months (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.7; OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.6). A trend of better asthma control was evident with a reduction in activity limitation. PCE offers promise as a brief education process in the ED. However, large multi-centre trial of PCE is warranted. Keywords: Asthma, emergency department, patient education
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||