ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 23, 2008
Eur Respir J 2008, doi:10.1183/09031936.00053107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/5/990    most recent
09031936.00053107v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, S.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Standard versus patient centred asthma education in the Emergency Department: - a randomised study

S. Smith 1*, C. Mitchell 2, S. Bowler 3

1 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Dept of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
2 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston Road, Herston 4006 Australia;; and Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba 4102, Australia and;
3 Dept of Medicine, Mater Adult Public Hospital, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane 4101, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sheree.smith{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk.


   Abstract

High re-attendance rates are common after asthma emergency department (ED) care. Inadequate patient education has been cited as one potential cause of re-attendances and the optimal format of education is uncertain.

To compare the effectiveness of patient centred and standard asthma patient education on ED re-attendances.

A randomised controlled trial at two inner city Australian teaching hospitals' EDs where patients received either standard patient education (SPE) or patient centred education (PCE). Both groups received a six topic curriculum. However, PCE patients reordered the topics according to their own priority and controlled the order of education.

One hundred forty-six adult patients presenting to EDs with acute asthma were enrolled. At 4 months, ED re-attendances decreased from 22% to 12% in PCE group and were unchanged in the SPE group (between group OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2 to 1.1). In patients discharged after ED care (n=78), the PCE group had fewer re-attendances at 4 and 12 months (OR 0.3, 95%, CI 0.1 to 0.9; OR 0.3 95% CI 0.1 to 0.8). PCE patients with no GP care in the prior 7 days had fewer re-attendances at 4 and 12 months (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.7; OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.6). A trend of better asthma control was evident with a reduction in activity limitation.

PCE offers promise as a brief education process in the ED. However, large multi-centre trial of PCE is warranted.

Keywords:  Asthma, emergency department, patient education




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
S M S Smith, C Mitchell, S D Bowler, C Heneghan, and R Perera
The health behaviour and clinical characteristics of ambulance users with acute asthma
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2009; 26(3): 187 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.