ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 6, 2008
Eur Respir J 2008, doi:10.1183/09031936.00042908
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/6/1616    most recent
09031936.00042908v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mor, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Iademarco, M.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mor, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Iademarco, M.F.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of tuberculosis surveillance systems in low-incidence industrialized countries

Z. Mor 1, G.B. Migliori 2, S.P. Althomsons 3, R. Loddenkemper 4, L. Trnka 5, M.F. Iademarco 6*

1 Public Health Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel; and Hubert H. Humphrey fellowship program, International Institute of Education, Washington DC
2 WHO Collaborating Centre for TB and Lung Diseases, Fondazione S. Maugeri, Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy
3 Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States; and Northrop Grumman Information Technology, CDC Programs, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
4 German Central Committee against Tuberculosis, Berlin, Germany
5 National TB Surveillance Unit, Fac. Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic
6 Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: iademarcoMF{at}state.gov.


   Abstract

Comparative analysis of national tuberculosis control programmes (NTP) in industrialized, low-tuberculosis-incidence countries is limited. Analysis of applied methods, function, and accumulated experience contributes to improving global tuberculosis control.

A questionnaire addressing NTP surveillance infrastructure and characteristics was completed by 19 industrialized countries, with populations greater than 3 million and annual tuberculosis notified incidence rates less than 16 cases per 100, 000 populations (2003).

All European countries surveyed adopted Euro-TB definitions. Surveillance information, which usually includes names, is transferred electronically to the national level in 17 of the 19 countries. Surveillance systems capture process and social determinants. Case notification to the central level occurred within a median period of seven days, independent of mandatory notification requirements. Average completeness of tuberculosis case-reporting was estimated as 93.5% (range 65%–100%). Integration between HIV and tuberculosis registries was performed in two countries, and in seven others, both databases were cross-matched periodically.

NTP function in industrialized, low-incidence countries utilizes well-established infrastructure and relies on centralized operations. Approaches are consistent with current WHO surveillance recommendations. This study lays collaborative groundwork for additional multinational analyses to enhance global tuberculosis surveillance, which may assist policy makers in countries moving from middle- to low-incidence rates.

Keywords:  Global health, national TB programme, surveillance, tuberculosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. M. Wallace, J. S. Kammerer, M. F. Iademarco, S. P. Althomsons, C. A. Winston, and T. R. Navin
Increasing Proportions of Advanced Pulmonary Tuberculosis Reported in the United States: Are Delays in Diagnosis on the Rise?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2009; 180(10): 1016 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.