ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 9, 2007
Eur Respir J 2007, doi:10.1183/09031936.00024707
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/6/1057    most recent
09031936.00024707v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coker, R.K.
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, M.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coker, R.K.
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, M.R.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Is air travel safe for those with lung disease?

R.K. Coker 1*, R.J. Shiner 1, M.R. Partridge 1

1 Respiratory Medicine, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust and National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: robina.coker{at}imperial.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Airlines commonly report respiratory in-flight emergencies; flight outcomes have not been examined prospectively in large numbers of respiratory patients. We conducted a prospective observational study of flight outcomes in this group.

UK respiratory specialists were invited to recruit patients planning air travel. Centres undertook their usual pre-flight assessment. Within two weeks of return, patients completed a questionnaire documenting symptoms, in-flight oxygen use, and unscheduled healthcare use.

Six hundred and sixteen patients were recruited; 500 (81%) returned questionnaires. The commonest diagnoses were airway (54%) and diffuse parenchymal lung disease (23%). Twelve patients died, seven before flying and five within one month. Pre-flight assessment included oximetry (96%), spirometry (95%), hypoxic challenge (45%) and walk test (10%). Eleven percent did not fly. In those who flew, unscheduled respiratory healthcare use rose from 9% in the four weeks beforehand to 19% in the four weeks after travel. However, when compared with self-reported data during the preceding year, medical consultations rose by just 2%.

In patients flying after careful respiratory specialist assessment, commercial air travel appears generally safe.

Keywords:  Air travel, altitude, COPD, hypoxaemia, hypoxic challenge testing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R. K. Coker, R. Shiner, and M. R. Partridge
Is air travel safe for those with lung disease?
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2008; 32(5): 1423 - 1424.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. C. Winck, M. Drummond, J. Almeida, and J. A. Marques
Air travel and hypoxaemia in real life
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 236 - 237.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
E. Marchand
Is air travel safe for those with lung disease?
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2008; 31(5): 1137 - 1138.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the European Respiratory Society.