ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeper, M. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoeper, M. M.
Eur Respir J 2009; 34:790-791
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2009

The new definition of pulmonary hypertension

M. M. Hoeper

CORRESPONDENCE: M. M. Hoeper, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hanover, Germany. E-mail: hoeper.marius{at}mh-hannover.de

Despite the progress that has been made in the field of pulmonary hypertension (PH) 1–3, there is no unifying and globally accepted definition of the condition. The first official haemodynamic definition of PH was proposed at the First World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension which took place 1973 in Geneva, Switzerland as a World Health Organization (WHO)-sponsored meeting 4. This conference was triggered by the previous epidemic of PH associated with the appetite suppressant aminorex 5. As such, the focus of that meeting was primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), as compared to the other forms of PH. After a long and sometimes heated debate the consensus was to define PPH by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa) >25 mmHg at rest or >30 mmHg during exercise in the presence of a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (Ppcw) ≤15 mmHg.

This definition was later extended to other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) 6. It stood the test of time for >30 yrs, but was challenged during the Fourth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, which took place 2008 in Dana Point, CA, USA. There were several reasons for this: 1) the old definition did not take into account other forms of PH; 2) the threshold of Ppa >25 mmHg at rest does not reflect the upper limit of normal; 3) clinically relevant PH can be present, despite the Ppa being <25 mmHg at rest; 4) the cut-off value of 30 mmHg during exercise was arbitrarily chosen and not supported by published data; and 5) PH is often present in conjunction with elevated Ppcw levels.

Some of these points are addressed in a paper by Kovacs et al. 7 published in the present issue of the European Respiratory Journal. In preparation for the Dana Point meeting, they performed a comprehensive review of the literature published since 1947 in English, German or French language searching for right heart catheterisations performed in healthy individuals. Altogether, they were able to identify data obtained from 1,187 individuals in 47 studies. A meta-analysis of these data showed that the normal Ppa at rest is 14.3±3.3 mmHg. These values are virtually age-independent. Following the customary approach to define an upper level of normal as the mean plus two standard deviations, the upper level of normal for the Ppa at rest would be 20 mmHg. However, provided that the Ppa is normally distributed, one in 40 healthy people will be above this threshold, i.e. 25,000 per million population. Even if the threshold is increased to 25 mmHg, the theoretical prevalence of individuals above this level would still be far beyond the known prevalence of PAH. Conversely, some studies indicate that even Ppa >17–20 mmHg may be associated with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with chronic lung diseases 8–11. As is often the case in medicine, there exists a grey zone where a given value can be considered high, normal or already pathological, depending on the clinical context.

Of equal importance, the findings by Kovacs et al. 7 challenge the exercise component of the old PH definition. The problem with the 1973 WHO consensus was that the cut-off level of 30 mmHg during exercise was not supported by evidence. Kovacs et al. 7 show that, in younger persons aged <50 yrs, Ppa of 35 mmHg can be considered normal during sub-maximal or maximal exercise. More importantly, in contrast to the Ppa at rest, the Ppa during exercise is largely age-dependent, presumably as a result of increasing stiffness of the left ventricle and the pulmonary vessels. Ppa >30 mmHg during mild exercise is seen in ~50% of apparently healthy subjects aged >50 yrs, and Ppa up to 45 mmHg during exercise appear to be normal in this population. Thus, with the previous definition many individuals were incorrectly labelled as pulmonary hypertensive that in fact had simply a physiological exercise response. Taking into account all these variables, it seems impossible to come up with a solid definition of PH during exercise. Further research is ongoing in this field to generate the data that are needed to move forward in this important area of pulmonary vascular disease 12, 13.

The consequences of the findings by Kovacs et al. 7 were intensively discussed at the Fourth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension in Dana Point and it was decided to abandon the exercise criterion. With regard to the definition of PH at rest, it was proposed to introduce the term "borderline PH" for patients with Ppa 20–25 mmHg, but this term was eventually rejected, as it was felt that patients presenting with Ppa in this range should be further studied before being labelled with a diagnosis of PH. Thus, in the proceedings of the Dana Point meeting, the new haemodynamic definition of PH will be a Ppa at rest ≥25 mmHg 14. This definition, which covers all forms of PH, will be adopted by the revised joint PH guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Respiratory Society, in which PH will be divided into pre-capillary and post-capillary forms, based on whether mean Ppcw is ≤15 or >15 mmHg, respectively 15, 16.

The revised haemodynamic definition of PH constitutes an improvement over the old definition, since it takes into account recent data and has broader applicability. Abandoning the exercise criterion is justified by the findings of Kovacs et al. 7 and it will prevent many false diagnoses of PH, as well as unjustified therapies. Limiting the current PH definition to a Ppa at rest ≥25 mmHg is also comprehensible for the time being. All treatment studies performed so far in the field of PH have included only patients fulfilling this criterion. Milder forms of PH, i.e. resting Ppa 20–25 mmHg, are usually found among patients with underlying lung or heart disease, and medical therapies for these forms of PH have not been sufficiently studied. Eventually, with the broadening of our knowledge, the PH definition may have to be revised again.

Kovacs et al. 7 are to be commended for their invaluable contribution and it is likely that their manuscript will serve as a reference paper for a very long time.

Statement of interest

A statement of interest for M.M. Hoeper can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/misc/statements.dtl

REFERENCES

  1. Dupuis J, Hoeper MM. Endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2008;31:407–414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wilkins MR, Wharton J, Grimminger F, et al. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2008;32:198–209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Olschewski H, Gomberg-Maitland M. Prostacyclin therapies for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2008;31:801–901.
  4. Hatano S, Strasser T. Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: Report on a WHO Meeting, Geneva 15–17 October 1973. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1975
  5. Bass O, Gurtner HP. [Evolution of primary vascular pulmonary hypertension following ingestion of aminorex fumarate (Menocil). Preliminary communication]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1973;103:1794[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Galie N, Torbicki A, Barst R, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2004;25:2243–2278.[Free Full Text]
  7. Kovacs G, Berghold A, Scheidl S, et al. Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review. Eur Respir J 2009;34:888–894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Behr J, Ryu JH. Pulmonary hypertension in interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J 2008;31:1357–1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chaouat A, Naeije R, Weitzenblum E. Pulmonary hypertension in COPD. Eur Respir J 2008;32:1371–1385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Oswald-Mammosser M, Weitzenblum E, Quoix E, et al. Prognostic factors in COPD patients receiving long-term oxygen therapy. Importance of pulmonary artery pressure. Chest 1995;107:1193–1198.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hamada K, Nagai S, Tanaka S, et al. Significance of pulmonary arterial pressure and diffusion capacity of the lung as prognosticator in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2007;131:650–656.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Oudiz RJ, Rubin LJ. Exercise-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension: a new addition to the spectrum of pulmonary vascular diseases. Circulation 2008;118:2120–2121.[Free Full Text]
  13. Tolle JJ, Waxman AB, Van Horn TL, et al. Exercise-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2008;118:2183–2189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Badesch DB, Champion HC, Gomez-Sanchez MA, et al. Diagnosis and assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: Suppl., S55–S66
  15. Galie N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2009; In press
  16. Galie N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2009; In press




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeper, M. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoeper, M. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS