Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2008 From the authorsDivisions of 1 Clinical Infectious Diseases, and 2 Immune Cell-Analytics, Research Centre Borstel, Borstel, Germany. We would like to thank S. Barry and colleagues for their comments on our recent article describing the local immunodiagnosis of active smear negative tuberculosis (TB) by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) 1. In contrast to a previous article 2, we demonstrated that relating numbers of spot forming cells by ELISPOT to lymphocytes, rather than to all mononuclear cells, improves the analysis of local recruitment of antigen specific cells to the compartment of infection for the detection of smear-negative pulmonary TB (pTB). Although the ELISPOT is unable to simultaneously assign the quantity and phenotype of a cell, it is known from the use of flow-cytometry that responding cells represent CD4+ T-lymphocytes 3, 4. Based on this knowledge, the combination of ELISPOT results with lymphocyte counts seems a reasonable strategy to increase diagnostic accuracy, and may be of particular interest for resource-poor settings where ELISPOT assays are easier to perform than flow-cytometric approaches.
When analysing mycobacterial-specific immune responses, purified-protein derivate (PPD) naturally generates more intense immune responses in mononuclear cells from the human lung than region of difference-1 (RD) restricted antigens. In a previous publication 1 PPD, early-secretory antigenic target (ESAT)-6 and culture-filtrate protein (CFP)-10 specific immune responses were compared in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) by ELISPOT of patients with smear-negative pTB and in patients with nontuberculous pulmonary diseases. Approximately twice the number of PPD specific interferon (IFN)- While we constantly observe PPD-specific responses of BALMCs in ELISPOT of patients with a past history of pTB, these BALMC responses to RD-1-restricted antigens are usually absent in these patients if they do not have reactivation of TB. A higher sensitivity of an assay that analyses PPD-specific immune responses versus RD-1-restricted immune responses in BALMCs as observed by Breen et al. 7 might, therefore, result in a lower test specificity and could result in a higher number of indeterminate test results. Interim results of an ongoing multicentre study of the TB-NET, comparing the performance of the BAL ELISPOT with RD-1-restricted antigens and Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific nucleic acid amplification technique, still demonstrate a sensitivity of the BAL ELISPOT with ESAT-6 and CFP-10 for the detection of smear-negative pTB of >90% (data not shown) 8. In a small case series of five individuals with infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) at our institution, BALMCs of four patients had positive PPD-specific ELISPOT responses. However, BALMC responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were negative in four individuals in this group. The one individual with an NTM infection and a positive BALMC immune response to the RD-1-selected antigens had an infection with M. kansasii, which is known to encode RD-1 proteins. While the frequency of region of difference-1-specific T-cells for the detection of smear negative tuberculosis in the sputum may be too low 9, 10, assaying the ex vivo reactivity of bronchoalveolar lavage T-cells towards Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens by flow cytometry may further improve the diagnostic accuracy of on-site immune based assays for the diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis. Statement of interest A statement of interest for C. Lange can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/misc/statements.shtml REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||