Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2008 Standardised PCR-based molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis1 Laboratoire Tuberculose et Mycobactéries, Institut Pasteur – Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique, 4 Belgian Lung and Tuberculosis Association, Brussels, Belgium, 2 Genoscreen, and 3 Laboratoire des Mécanismes Moléculaires de la Pathogenèse Bactérienne, INSERM U629, Institut Pasteur, Lille, France. CORRESPONDENCE: M. Fauville-Dufaux, Laboratoire Tuberculose et Mycobactéries, Institut Pasteur, Bruxelles (Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique), rue Engeland 642, 1180 Bruxelles, Belgium. Fax: 32 23733281. E-mail: mfauville{at}pasteur.be Keywords: DNA fingerprinting, epidemiology, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, transmission
Received: May 3, 2007
A population-based molecular epidemiology investigation has been undertaken to evaluate tuberculosis transmission and control in the Brussels-Capital Region (Belgium). All tuberculosis cases reported from January 2003 to December 2004 were investigated. In total, 536 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates (89% of culture-positive samples) were genotyped by the newly standardised 24 loci-based mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem-repeat typing, spoligotyping and IS6110 fingerprinting.
Of all the patients, 30% were grouped based on strain clusters, suggesting a transmission index of 20%. An unsuspected outbreak entailing Tuberculosis in the Brussels-Capital Region is a bi-faceted problem, comprising both persisting recent transmission and "imported diseases". Molecular epidemiology based on real-time genotyping techniques has proven invaluable in better understanding tuberculosis transmission. However, it will most efficiently contribute to tuberculosis control when implemented in an integrated public health system. In Belgium, the evolution of tuberculosis (TB) incidence is similar to that recently observed in many other industrialised countries. TB morbidity and mortality has uniformly declined during the 20th century. A total of 1,128 and 1,226 new cases were reported to the Belgian Lung and Tuberculosis Association (BELTA) in 2003 and 2004, respectively (10.9 and 11.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2003 and 2004, respectively) 1, 2. However, TB incidence in the Brussels-Capital Region is three times higher than in the rest of the country (358 and 342 new cases in 2003 and 2004, which correspond to an incidence of 36.1 and 34.2 per 100,000, respectively) 1, 2. The overall incidence rate in this region has not declined in the same manner as in the rest of Belgium, owing to the impact of imported TB cases associated with the growing immigrant population. Indeed, the Brussels-Capital Region, which has hosted the headquarters of the European Union since 1958, is a cosmopolitan area of approximately 1 million inhabitants, in which the proportion of foreign residents has risen from 7% in 1961 to 26% of the population in 2004 3. This region hosts 30% of all foreign residents registered in Belgium, whereas it hosts only 10% of the country population 4. Moreover, among the foreign-born population of the Brussels-Capital Region, reported TB incidence in 2004 was 99.5 cases per 100,000 persons, including asylum seekers and illegal residents (63.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants when including only foreign-born residents), which is much higher than the incidence of 10.9 per 100,000 inhabitants reported in the Belgian-born population 2. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA fingerprinting has proven to be an invaluable tool for TB control and monitoring as it enables identification of unsuspected transmission between strain-clustered patients and false-positive cultures 5–8. However, only a few countries have managed to integrate molecular typing into their TB control strategy 9, 10. This is partly due to limitations of the available genotyping techniques. The gold standard method, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using IS6110 as a probe, is laborious and requires weeks of culturing of the slow-growing M. tuberculosis 11. PCR-based methods, such as spoligotyping 12 and typing based on 12 loci containing variable numbers of tandem repeats of mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units (MIRU-VNTRs) 13, are applicable to crude DNA extracts from early cultures and are thus much faster. However, they have less discriminatory power than IS6110-RFLP 14. To circumvent these limitations, a newly optimised MIRU-VNTR technique has recently been proposed 15. This system, based on 15 or 24 loci, showed a discriminatory power similar to that of IS6110-RFLP, as recently described 16. In order to estimate the level and evaluate the control of TB transmission in the Brussels-Capital Region, this newly standardised high-resolution genotyping system was used to conduct a prospective population-based molecular epidemiology study from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004. Spoligotyping and IS6110-RFLP were also performed as complementary and control methods, respectively. DNA fingerprinting was then used to determine the genetic diversity and the magnitude of M. tuberculosis transmission rate in this cosmopolitan setting. Predictors of strain clustering were analysed and epidemiological links between patients were examined based on molecular results.
Study subjects From January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004, 700 new TB cases were registered by BELTA in the Brussels-Capital Region. Positive cultures were obtained from 603 patients, of whom 536 cases (89% of culture-positive patients) were genotyped. The remaining 164 (out of 700) patients were not typed due to culture-negative samples (n = 97), culture unavailability (n = 64), or contamination by other microorganisms (n = 3). Six (out of 536) cases were additionally excluded because of probable laboratory cross-contamination, as inferred by genotyping.
Study design Demographic and clinical data, collected by clinicians and nurses using a standardised questionnaire, was obtained from the Belgium Tuberculosis Register. Information was obtained on sex, date and country of birth, nationality, resident status, present address, recent contact (<2 yrs) with a TB patient and socioeconomic status. For the latter parameter, patients were considered underprivileged when being identified as homeless and/or having less than one meal per day.
Methods RTIn–1 = (nc-c)/n (1) where nc is the total number of strain-clustered cases, c is the number of strain-clusters, and n is the total number of cases in the sample 5.
Analysis
Cosmopolitan population Among the 530 patients included in the study, 61.3% were male and the median age was 34 yrs (table 1
Strain-cluster analysis Out of the 530 patients, 157 were grouped into 53 strain clusters of two to 23 patients, resulting in a strain-clustering rate of 20%. Given the resolution and the robustness of the combined spoligotype–MIRU-VNTR analysis 14, especially with this 24-loci-based MIRU-VNTR system, IS6110-RFLP was performed only on a subset (n = 256) of isolates, to further confirm strain clustering defined by MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping. The mutual correspondence between the respective strain clusters was almost perfect 18.
Based on these genotyping results, TB patients were divided into two groups: patients grouped according to strain clusters and patients infected by an isolate with a unique pattern in the population. This molecular epidemiological data was then compared with epidemiological parameters classically considered as plausible risk factors for a patient to be part of a strain cluster, supposedly reflecting recent transmission. These parameters included sex, age, site of disease, socioeconomic status and country of birth (table 2
Molecular guided identification of TB transmission Molecular analysis allowed for the identification of 53 strain clusters (157 patients). Combining molecular and demographic data revealed little cross-national TB transmission (fig. 1
Among the 50 other and smaller strain clusters of two to six patients each (125 patients), five strain clusters comprised exclusively of Belgian-born patients (n = 13), while 24 consisted exclusively of foreign-born patients, either settled (n = 50) or unsettled (n = 7; fig. 1
Suspected epidemiological links in small clusters
The present study is a cross-sectional population-based survey conducted in a group of 530 culture-positive TB patients registered in Brussels during a 2-yr period (2003–2004). This group represents 89% of all of the bacteriologically confirmed cases, corresponding to 75% of all TB cases from the Brussels-Capital Region reported to the TB Register over the study period 1, 2. Molecular analysis of this representative collection provides a snapshot of TB transmission in the European capital, and reveals some aspects with important implications for TB control. Notably, TB in the Brussels-Capital Region is a bi-faceted problem, resulting from largely unsuspected ongoing transmission and a mixture of recently imported cases from high-incidence countries. The current authors used the recently standardised MIRU-VNTR set 15 in combination with spoligotyping, which allowed tracking and rapid detection of strain clusters. The largest strain cluster (n = 23) comprised a strain of a characteristically exceptional S-spoligotype (see supplemental table in 19), referred to as the S-Brussels. This strain was isolated from 10 Belgian-born and 13 foreign-born patients of mixed origin, suggesting recent transmission. Such recent transmission was confirmed after retrospective molecular-guided contact tracing in 11 out of 12 investigated cases. A noteworthy observation is that five and 13 additional TB patients were diagnosed with the same S-Brussels strain in the months preceding and following the period of the investigation, respectively, thus bringing the total number to 41 patients diagnosed with this strain within a 4-yr period. Furthermore, this strain has been identified in a neighbouring region not included in the present study. These data strongly suggest that strain S-Brussels is being actively transmitted in the community. The identification by molecular typing of this unsuspected, large, still-expanding strain-cluster, in addition to other strain-clusters, further demonstrates ongoing TB transmission in the Brussels-Capital Region. The current authors hypothesise that the magnitude of ongoing TB transmission is probably similarly underestimated in numerous other metropolitan areas in developed countries with comparable characteristics, but where molecular epidemiology is not systematically applied.
Within the Brussels-Capital Region, ongoing transmission is significant as 30% of the isolates, corresponding mostly to autochthons and settled residents, were clustered by fingerprint analysis. This corresponds to a strain-clustering rate of 20% in close agreement with the few other studies in similar settings 20. Sex inequalities in TB have been reported 21 but were not observed among strain-clustered patients in the present TB population. No differences were found among patients from different age strata when these strata were defined as age groups of roughly equal sizes. Nevertheless, consistent with the fact that younger patients are more likely to acquire TB from recent transmission, age became a predictor of strain-clustering when age strata of 15 yrs were defined, which resulted in age groups of very disparate sizes (data not shown). Moreover, even if the significance threshold was not reached for the site of disease, patients with a smear-positive pulmonary TB, i.e. patients with a contagious form of the disease, tended to be more often associated with strain clustering. When looking at country/region of origin and socioeconomic status, strain clustering was most frequently encountered in underprivileged Belgian and Western European-born patients, which is consistent with identified risk groups among this population. Contact tracing or analysis of available demographic data confirmed familial or social links for
According to the Belgian TB register, 77% of the active TB cases reported in the Brussels-Capital Region in 2003 and 2004 (79% of the study population) are foreign-born 1, 2. In the present study, more than one-third of the foreign-born TB cases (37.9%) were asylum seekers and illegal residents. The familial link observed in strain-clusters among settled immigrants and the limited strain-clustering in foreign-born unsettled patients suggest that they are imported cases of TB, rather than the outcome of recent transmission within the Brussels-Capital Region. This suggestion is further supported by the diversity of strains, which often correlates with the reported clonal types of the respective countries of origin of the patients 22. Consequently, the influx of foreigners from high-TB incidence areas to the Brussels-Capital Region justifies the ongoing modifications of the existing measures in TB control policy. These modifications include better access to drugs and healthcare facilities for high-risk groups comprising underprivileged persons and asylum seekers. In addition, for the latter population, regular radiographical screening or Mantoux test screenings (<5 yrs) are now performed over a 2-yr period after the time of arrival. However, in view of recent evaluations, this follow-up period should be extended to
The present study has some limitations. Demographic data proved to be insufficient to determine links for 81 patients and contact tracing was not performed. Strain-clustering could partly result from coincidental reactivation of an endemic strain. However, many strain-clustered cases in other studies appear to result from casual contacts and involve complex chains of transmission or source cases outside the study period or the study area 6, 7, 20, 25. Intensive epidemiological investigation must be combined with rapid genotyping techniques in order to better identify such links, thereby facilitating the implementation of appropriate control measures 26. It is noteworthy that in the present study, recent contact (<2 yrs) with a TB patient was noticed by initial classical epidemiological surveillance only for Transmission still accounts for 20% of the cases, underlining the need for ongoing tuberculosis control. Nonetheless, the present study indicates that tuberculosis in the Brussels-Capital Region is now mainly an "imported" disease. Most cases among foreign-born patients are probably caused by infection in the country of origin, underlining the relevance of global tuberculosis control. Consistent with this hypothesis, strain clustering was less common in unsettled residents (13.3%) as compared with settled foreign-born subjects (34.4%; p<0.001). Cross-national transmission was limited and primarily suspected to occur from Belgian-born to foreign-settled patients, or within the foreign community. Control policies should encompass reorganised close coordination between clinicians, diagnostic laboratories and public healthcare workers, to address this complex epidemiological situation. In the present study, which represents the first large-scale use of a recently standardised, fast and high-resolution PCR-based typing method 15, it was found that systematic Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA fingerprinting was no longer the limiting step for prospective monitoring and early control of tuberculosis transmission. With this method, classical risk factors for tuberculosis transmission were identified, but its potential for more efficient intervention and prevention could not be exploited, due to strong limitations in classical epidemiological investigations and subsequent interventions. Therefore, it is only when implemented in an integrated public health system that such a real-time molecular typing method will most efficiently contribute to identify and prevent chains of transmission.
C. Allix-Béguec was a fellow of the Brussels-Capital Region. P. Supply is a researcher at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).
A statement of interest for P. Supply can be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/misc/statements.shtml
The authors would like to thank P. Sonck for his technical assistance in IS6110-RFLP and the nurses from BELTA (Brussels, Belgium) for epidemiological investigation. The authors would also like to thank A. Dediste and Ms Lafontaine (Saint-Pierre Hospital, Brussles, Belgium), O. Denis (Erasme Hospital, Brussels), M. Delmee and J. Christael-Degraux (Saint-Luc Hospital, Brussels), B. Mulongo and M. Wegge ( Saint-Jean Hospital, Brussels), D. Pierard and M. Seghers (AZ-VUB hospital, Brussels) for their kind and helpful collaboration, by providing positive cultures and collecting some patient data. This study would not have been possible without their collaboration.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||