Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2007 Pulmonary hypertension in patients with pulmonary fibrosis awaiting lung transplant1 Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Section, Washington Hospital Center, 3 Dept of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, 2 United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, and 4 INOVA Transplant Center, Fairfax Inova Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA. CORRESPONDENCE: A. F. Shorr, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Section, Washington Hospital Center, Room 2A-38D, 110 Irving St, NW, Washington DC 20010, USA. Fax: 1 2022910386. E-mail: afshorr{at}dnamail.com Keywords: Epidemiology, haemodynamics, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension
Received: August 16, 2006
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) may complicate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but the prevalence of PH in IPF remains undefined. The present authors sought to describe the prevalence of PH in IPF.
The lung transplant registry for the USA (January 1995 to June 2004) was analysed and IPF patients who had undergone right heart catheterisation (RHC) were identified. PH was defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (
Of the 3,457 persons listed, 2,525 (73.0%) had undergone RHC. PH affected 46.1% of subjects; Pulmonary hypertension is common in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients awaiting lung transplant, but the elevations in mean pulmonary arterial pressure are moderate. Lung volumes alone do not explain the pulmonary hypertension. Given the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension and its relationship with surrogate markers for quality of life (e.g. activities of daily living), future trials of therapies for this may be warranted. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a disease of unknown aetiology associated with progressive parenchymal fibrosis 1. Patients with IPF face substantial morbidity and mortality, and report substantially impaired quality of life 2. Lung transplant (LT) represents the lone intervention that potentially improves survival in IPF 3. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is evolving as an important factor that can adversely affect outcomes in chronic lung disease. In advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), therapy directed at controlling the pulmonary artery pressure has been recommended 4. In fibrotic lung diseases more akin to IPF, such as sarcoidosis, secondary PH is common and is a marker for early death 5, 6. Less is known about PH in IPF. Epidemiologically, several retrospective analyses indicate that PH in IPF may be frequent 7–9. Illustrating the emerging interest in PH and IPF, Ghofrani et al. 10 examined the impact of sildenafil on pulmonary haemodynamics in lung fibrosis and concluded that it caused pulmonary vasodilation and improved gas exchange. Others have also explored inhaled agents in IPF related to PH 11. With the advent of newer options for treating PH, coupled with the lack of effective therapies for IPF, targeting PH appears attractive. However, before studying interventions it is important to define the prevalence and extent of this process. With improved information regarding the prevalence of and clinical factors associated with PH in IPF, clinicians can better determine whom to evaluate for PH, and researchers can design more appropriate clinical trials. Thus, to explore the frequency of PH in IPF, the present authors retrospectively analysed the United States LT registry. The specific objectives were to describe the prevalence of PH in IPF, to assess the severity of PH in this population and to identify clinical variables that correlated with PH.
Subjects Patients with PH and IPF were identified by reviewing the LT registry maintained by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN). All adult subjects listed for LT for IPF between January 1995 and June 2004 were included. The diagnoses of IPF were based on the reports of the referring transplant centre. Surgical lung biopsy was not required for the diagnosis of IPF and, given the time period covered, many patients were listed before the development of the recent consensus statement regarding the clinical diagnosis of IPF. The type of proposed LT did not affect eligibility for enrolment in the present studys cohort. Since the focus of the study was PH, patients were required to have undergone right heart catheterisation (RHC) as part of their transplant evaluation. Subjects who did not have an RHC were excluded. There were no additional exclusion criteria.
End-points
Study co-variates
Sensitivity analysis
Statistics
All factors that were significant were entered in the univariate analysis at the
During the 9.5-yr study period, 3,457 persons were listed for LT for IPF. The final cohort comprised 2,525 (73.0%) subjects who had RHC data available. Those who had undergone RHC were not systematically different from those who did not have an RHC in terms of either demographic characteristics, measures of pulmonary physiology, or assessments of comorbidities. The mean age of the entire study population undergoing RHC was 53.4±8.7 yrs and 61.4% were male. Those not undergoing RHC had a mean age of 54.8±6.3 yrs and 63.3% were male. The mean FVC in both the RHC and non-RHC populations was 50%. Diabetes was reported to occur in nearly 10% of all of these patients, irrespective of whether they had an RHC performed. PH was common, affecting 46.1% of all IPF patients listed for LT. Among those with PH, the pa measured 34.2±9.9 mmHg. Nearly one in 10 subjects had severe PH.
Nonsevere PH
The PCO2 was marginally higher, while the FVC was slightly lower in PH subjects. However, the FEV1 was lower in persons with PH (50.0±16.5 versus 52.7±16.5% predicted, p<0.0001). Similarly, individuals with PH required more supplemental oxygen (2.3±1.9 versus 2.9±2.1 L·min–1, p<0.0001). Furthermore, those with PH in IPF were nearly 80% more likely (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.50–2.11, p<0.0001) to require >3 L·min–1 of oxygen. Results of invasive haemodynamic monitoring indicated that the cardiac index was equivalent between those with and without PH, although the Ppcw was higher in the PH cohort.
In multivariate analysis (table 2
Severe PH Comparisons between those with normal pa values and patients with severe PH are also shown in table 1 pa values and was, in fact, numerically higher in those with worse pa values. The FEV1 did not differ as a function of the pa. Interestingly, although the PCO2 was higher in those with mild and moderate elevations of pa compared with those with normal pa values, the PCO2 was lowest in the severe PH patients.
Multivariate analysis (table 3
Sensitivity analysis Out of the entire population, 18% had a Ppcw >15. After excluding patients with Ppcw >15, the results of the logistic regressions to identify factors independently related to PH varied somewhat from those observed in the entire PH population. Table 4 pa elevations. Younger age along with the PCO2 were "protective". In general, factors independently associated with severe PH also correlated with severe, isolated PH. For example, African-Americans again faced a nearly two-fold increased probability of having severe PH. In addition to variables noted in the overall analysis of severe PH, a low 6-min walk distance and need for assistance with ADLs additionally were associated with the presence of severe, isolated PH.
This large retrospective analysis reveals that PH is common in persons with IPF awaiting LT. Although PH affects 45% of these subjects, severe PH is relatively infrequent. Multivariate analysis indicates that several variables are independently associated with PH and severe PH, but that only three factors, FEV1, the need for supplemental oxygen and an elevated Ppcw, consistently correlate with the presence of PH across varying degrees of severity. In the sensitivity analysis of persons who meet the definition for isolated PH (e.g. elevated pa and Ppcw <15 mmHg), FEV1, need for assistance with ADLs, Ppcw and oxygen use appear linked to all degrees of this.
Several earlier analyses have gauged the prevalence of PH in IPF. King et al. 7 found that 20% of those with IPF had evidence of PH. However, the presence of PH was only assessed by chest radiography 7. In a study of 25 persons, Agarwal et al. 12 determined that 36% had PH; however, these authors 12 relied only on echocardiography, which may overestimate or underestimate pulmonary arterial pressure in persons with interstitial lung disease 13. In a larger analysis also relying on echocardiography, Nadrous et al. 8 concluded that PH was common in advanced IPF and that it correlated with both a lower DL,CO and a lower resting arterial oxygen tension 8. The study by Nadrous et al. 8 was limited in that there was the potential for substantial selection bias as only 136 (28%) out of 487 of patients with IPF had undergone echocardiography 8. Finally, relying on RHC, Lettieri et al. 9 noted that PH was documented in approximately one-third of persons with IPF 9. Additionally, these authors demonstrated that even moderate elevations of
The present analysis confirms the findings of these earlier reports and clearly demonstrates that PH is a common complication of IPF. More importantly, the present study builds on these efforts, in that it represents the largest experience with RHC in IPF. As a result, the larger sample size used herein allows more certainty as to the estimation of the prevalence of PH in IPF. Additionally, since only RHC was relied on, the estimates of
Pathophysiologically, the factors independently related to the presence of PH suggest some mechanisms as to the evolution of PH in IPF. The correlation between lower FEV1 and PH implies that superimposed airflow limitation may accelerate potential elevations in the The following three factors correlated with PH across the range of pressure elevations: FEV1, the need for supplemental oxygen and Ppcw. In the cohort without elevated Ppcw, assistance with ADLs also appeared important. The interaction between ADLs and PH is likely to underscore the morbidity burden associated with PH. In other words, inability to perform ADLs does not cause PH but reflects the burden of this on a patient's performance status 2. Multiple potential factors could account for the association between the need for supplemental oxygen and PH. This may indicate the impact of chronic pulmonary vasoconstriction due to alveolar hypoxia, although the connection between chronic alveolar hypoxia and pulmonary vasoconstriction has not been conclusively demonstrated. It could also represent that, due to regulations regarding the use of supplemental oxygen, these patients might simply be more likely to have oxygen prescribed as a result of underlying cor pulmonale. Conversely, PH may cause hypoxaemia due to both a low cardiac output and low central venous oxygen saturations, along with increased perfusion of pulmonary shunt vessels or low ventilation/perfusion ratio areas.
The interaction between Ppcw and PH appears to be more complicated. The correlation between the two suggests that some component of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is contributing to PH in IPF. However, several aspects of the present data reveal that more nuanced issues may be involved. First, there was no independent relationship between CI and PH. If LV dysfunction was contributing to PH, one would predict that the CI would be lower in those with PH. Secondly, despite the association between PH and Ppcw, the average Ppcws in the population were, nonetheless, in the normal range. Thirdly, the gradient between the It might be hypothesised that progressive parenchymal destruction would lead to PH in IPF. However, in the present study, a strong correlation between FVC and PH was not observed. Similarly, the two other studies expressly exploring the nexus between FVC and PH, those by Nadrous et al. 8 and by Lettieri et al. 9, also did not report a positive relationship between FVC and PH. Likewise, in an analysis of the physiology of PH in lung fibrosis, Leuchte et al. 16 did not note a correlation between PH and FVC. These results, together with data from the present study, imply that issues other than decrements in FVC contribute to PH. Alternatively, the failure of the present study to detect an interaction between FVC and PH may reflect that many subjects already had advanced IPF with low FVC. However, this is doubtful, since both the mean FVC and SD around the FVCs across all three populations studied (normal, mild-to-moderate PH and severe PH) were similar.
African-Americans faced a greater probability of suffering from severe PH. This observation is troubling, given that earlier analyses noted previously show that PH portends worse outcomes in IPF. This connection between severe The present study has several limitations. The retrospective design exposes the analysis to bias. However, unlike the data generated in other reports dealing with PH in IPF, the UNOS/OPTN registry represents data collected contemporaneously at listing. Thus, recall bias and coding bias are unlikely. Additionally, some of the patients listed for LT for IPF may not have had IPF, but some other form of interstitial lung disease. However, the demographic distribution indicates that this is not likely, as the cohort resembles the general composition of patients with IPF. Information was also lacking on certain variables that could have been of interest, such as DL,CO. Consequently, the noting of a relationship between the need for supplemental oxygen and PH may simply indicate that the need for supplemental oxygen is a surrogate for a lower DL,CO. Finally, only patients who were actually listed for LT were studied. Information on potential subjects not evaluated for LT was not available; this limits the generalisability of the present conclusions. If the cohort included persons with less advanced IPF, it might have been possible to detect a correlation between lung function and PH. Despite these considerations, the present study is the largest experience with RHC in IPF. In conclusion, pulmonary hypertension is common in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Generally, the degree of pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is mild to moderate, with few subjects developing severe pulmonary hypertension by the time of listing for lung transplant. Several clinical variables correlate with the presence of pulmonary hypertension. In light of the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, coupled with the absence of highly effective therapies for this disease, clinical trials of agents directed at controlling the mean pulmonary arterial pressure in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis seem warranted.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||