Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006 Acetylcholine induces contractile and relaxant effects in canine nasal venous systemsDept of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China. CORRESPONDENCE: M. A. Lung, Dept of Physiology, University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Medicine Building, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. Fax: 852 28559730. E-mail: makylung{at}hkucc.hku.hk Keywords: Acetylcholine, nasal venous vessels, nitric oxide, vasocontraction, vasorelaxation
Received: June 29, 2005
Acetylcholine (ACh) induces nasal congestion at low doses but decongestion at high doses. The current study investigated the vascular mechanisms underlying this biphasic nasal airway response in dogs. Collecting and outflow veins from anterior and posterior nasal venous systems and the septal mucosa (containing sinusoidal venous plexuses) were isolated. The in vitro isometric tension of the vascular segments was monitored to reflect vascular reactivity. Immunohistochemical localisation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-diaphorase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was performed. ACh did not affect the venous plexuses but contracted the anterior collecting vein and the outflow veins of both systems in a concentration-dependent manner; the responses were unaffected by nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester (L-NAME). ACh relaxed posterior collecting veins at low concentrations but contracted them at higher concentrations; L-NAME enhanced the contractions but inhibited the relaxations, with the inhibition reversed by L-arginine. NADPH-diaphorase and eNOS were located predominantly in the posterior collecting veins. The fact that acetylcholine at low concentrations relaxes posterior collecting veins but contracts other collecting and outflow veins implies that the agonist in vivo may induce nasal congestion by increasing posterior blood volume. At higher concentrations, acetylcholine contracts posterior collecting veins as well, implying diminished blood volume in both venous systems, and consequently nasal decongestion. The induced contraction in posterior collecting veins is nitric oxide-independent, while the induced relaxation is nitric oxide-dependent. Nasal obstruction, one of the cardinal signs of rhinitis, is commonly believed to be due to blood congestion in the venous sinusoids of the nasal mucosa 1. Anteriorly, venous blood is drained via the high-pressure and high-flow dorsal nasal vein (DNV), while posteriorly it is drained via the low-pressure and low-flow sphenopalatine vein (SPV) 2, 3. The collecting and outflow veins of both systems are large and highly muscular in nature. Since the collecting veins are located within the nasal cavity, their dilatation can considerably increase mucosal blood volume 3. The outflow veins are situated outside the nasal cavity and their dilatation will favour venous outflow 3. Mucosal congestion, thereby nasal obstruction, may be related to dilatation of venous sinusoids and/or collecting veins and constriction of outflow veins. Opposite changes in the mechanisms would lead to mucosal decongestion and relief of nasal obstruction. The current authors have previously studied the action of acetylcholine (ACh; 5x10-450 µg·kg-1·min-1, intra-arterially) on nasal airway resistance in anaesthetised dogs 4. The doses given did not elicit systemic effects, indicating that the doses are within the physiological dose range and the responses are probably the local effects of the autacoid on the nasal vasculature. ACh, in doses of <5µg·kg-1·min-1, increases nasal airway resistance; the posterior venous outflow is increased while the anterior venous outflow is decreased in noses with constant-flow vascular perfusion. In doses >5µg·kg-1·min-1, ACh decreases nasal airway resistance; both venous outflows are increased whether the nose is subject to spontaneous blood flow or constant-flow vascular perfusion. The results indicate that ACh probably exerts differential action on different components of the nasal vascular bed in a dose-dependent manner. In order to elucidate the probable vascular mechanisms underlying the biphasic muscarinic control of nasal airway resistance, the current in vitro study investigated the action of exogenous ACh on the different segments of the two nasal venous systems.
Tissue preparation The Committee on the Use of Live Animals for Teaching and Research of the University of Hong Kong approved the study. Mongrel dogs (weighing 1525 kg) of either sex were anaesthetised with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg·kg-1, i.v.) and then killed by an overdose of the same anaesthetic (200 mg·kg-1, i.v.). DNV, anterior collecting vein (ACV), SPV, lateral collecting vein (LCV), septal collecting vein (SCV) and septal mucosa (SM) were isolated from the nasal cavity (fig. 1
Tissue bath studies The venous ring or mucosal strip was suspended in an organ chamber filled with 5 mL modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution, which was bubbled with 95% O2:5% CO2 and maintained at 37°C. The tissue segment was connected to a Grass FT03 force displacement transducer (Grass-Telefactor, West Warwick, RI, USA) and changes in isometric force were recorded and fed to a computer. After a 30-min equilibrium period, the tissue segment was stretched to its optimal resting tension as previously described 5. The optimal resting tension was determined in preliminary experiments by constructing the lengthtension relationship of the isolated tissue segment. The optimal tensions used to set up various tissue segments were as follows: 2.0 g for LCV; 1.5 g for SCV; 1.0 g for ACV; 1.5 g for DNV; 1.0 g for SPV; and 1.0 g for SM. The tissue was allowed to equilibrate for another 60 min, with washes every 20 min during the equilibration period. The tissue segment was then exposed to 80 mM KCl until two reproducible contractions (variation <10%) developed. Nicotinic ACh receptors have been found to be present in sensory nerve endings 6 and vascular endothelial cells 7. In order to eliminate any nicotinic effects that may be elicited if nicotinic ACh receptors are present in the nasal vascular ring or strip, an inhibitor of nicotinic receptor (hexamethonium 1x10-5 M) was added to the tissue bath after the washout of KCl and 30 min before a protocol began. An inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (echothiophate 1x10-7 M) was also added 8, 9. At the end of an experiment, the maximal relaxation or passive tone of the vessel was determined by adding a maximal dose of NaNO2 (5x10-2 M) 10. The total active tone (TAT) in the present study was defined as the difference between the tone at 80 mM KCl and the tone at 5x10-2 M NaNO2.
Study design To study whether the response to ACh was nitric oxide (NO)-dependent, a cumulative concentrationresponse curve was determined after the tissue was incubated for 30 min with either: the vehicle; nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester (L-NAME; an NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor) alone; or L-NAME in combination with L-arginine (a NOS substrate) 11, 12. The concentration of L-NAME (1x10-5 M) used was found to be effective in inhibiting the relaxation induced by calcium ionophore A23187 [GenBank] (1x10-91x10-3 M) in PE-pre-contracted vascular segments. The concentration of L-arginine (1x10-23x10-2 M) given was sufficient to prevent the inhibition caused by L-NAME in A23187 [GenBank] -induced relaxation.
Immunohistochemistry Immunolocalisation of multiple NOS isoforms was performed using reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-diaphorase staining 13. The sections were incubated in a moist chamber at 37°C in the dark for 90 min with a solution containing nitroblue tetrazolium (0.1 mg·mL-1), ß-NADPH (0.5 mg·mL-1) and Triton X-100 (0.3%) in PBS (pH 7.3). The reaction was stopped by washing with PBS. Sections were counter-stained with 1% neutral red for 30 s, washed with distilled water, dehydrated through graded alcohols, cleared in toluene, mounted in resin and examined and photographed under a light microscope. Immunohistochemical localisation of endothelial NOS (eNOS) isoforms was performed 13. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies for eNOS that are reactive to canine tissues (PA1-037; Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO, USA) were used. Staining was performed using the Vectastain Elite ABC kits (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). To quench endogenous peroxidase activity, the sections were incubated for 30 min with 0.9% hydrogen peroxide in 60% methanol:40% PBS. To block nonspecific staining, the sections were incubated for 20 min with 10% blocking serum. After blotting excess blocking serum from the sections, the sections were incubated for 18 h at 4°C with primary antiserum (1:1000) diluted with blocking serum. After rinsing three times with PBS, the sections were incubated for 60 min with biotinylated secondary antibodies (1:200). After three further rinses with PBS, the sections were incubated for 60 min with Vectastain ABC reagents (1:200). The sections were washed once with PBS and then incubated for 7 min with diaminobenzidine substrate solution. The reaction was stopped by rinsing in distilled water. The sections were dehydrated through graded alcohols, cleared in toluene, mounted in resin and examined and photographed under a light microscope.
Drugs All solutions were freshly prepared before each experiment by dissolving the compounds in distilled water. All drugs were added in volumes of 15 µL, i.e. 0.3% of the organ bath volume. Identical volumes of the drug vehicle had no effect on all tissue preparations. Concentrations of agents were expressed as the final concentration in the tissue bath.
Analysis of data
Exogenous ACh-induced responses in tissues at resting tension At resting tension, ACh caused relaxation at concentrations of 1x10-91x10-3 M but contraction at higher concentrations ( 1x10-2 M) in LCV and SCV (p<0.05, maximal response versus baseline). ACh caused concentration-dependent contraction in ACV, DNV and SPV (p<0.05, maximal response versus baseline), but had no significant action on SM at all concentrations (maximal response versus baseline; fig. 2a
pD2 and Emax values for relaxation were not significantly different between LCV and SCV (table 1
Exogenous ACh-induced responses in tissues at PE-raised tension At PE-raised tone, the response patterns of ACV, DNV, SPV and SM to ACh were similar to those at resting tension, i.e. contraction in ACV, DNV and SPV and insignificant action in SM (fig. 2b
At PE-raised tone, the response patterns of LCV and SCV to ACh were different from those at resting tension. ACh produced concentration-dependent relaxation in LCV and SCV and the small contraction at high concentrations of ACh was not seen (fig. 2b
The effects of L-NAME on responses of nasal blood vessels to ACh
At resting tension, L-NAME almost abolished the relaxant response but enhanced the contractile response of LCV and SCV to ACh (fig. 3
At PE-raised tone, L-NAME markedly inhibited the relaxant response of LCV and SCV to ACh. L-arginine (1x10-23x10-2 M) reversed this inhibitory effect (fig. 4
Immunohistochemical localisation of NOS in nasal venous vessels NADPH-diaphorase, a reliable marker for multiple isoforms of NOS in tissues after aldehyde fixation, was located in both the endothelial and tunica media of all nasal collecting and outflow veins, being most prominently stained in the LCV (fig. 5b
Previous in vivo studies have shown that ACh, within physiological dose range, elicits nasal congestion at low doses but decongestion at high doses 4. The current in vitro study investigated the actions of exogenous ACh on various segments of the nasal venous vascular bed to elucidate the vascular mechanisms underlying the biphasic nasal airway response.
At resting tension, ACh caused relaxation of LCV and SCV at concentrations
ACh at lower concentrations (
ACh at higher concentrations (
Previous in vivo animal studies have shown that N-nitro-L-arginine, a NOS inhibitor, is effective in increasing nasal patency 14, suggesting the involvement of NO in basal nasal vascular regulation. The current authors showed that L-NAME, another NOS inhibitor, increased the resting tension of LCV, SCV, ACV, SPV and DNV but not SM. This indicates NO involvement in the control of the resting vascular tone in both posterior and anterior venous systems but not in sinusoidal venous plexuses. The action of L-NAME on resting tone is larger in the posterior collecting veins (change of 4563% in tone) than in other veins (change of 2227% in tone), suggesting regional differences in NOs influence on the basal nasal venous tone, being pronounced in the posterior collecting veins but weaker in other veins. The results of histochemical localisation of NADPH-diaphorase have confirmed that NOS isoforms are differentially distributed in various nasal venous vessels, being most prominent in the posterior collecting veins (fig. 5 The relaxant responses of posterior collecting veins to ACh were inhibited by L-NAME and the inhibitory effect of L-NAME was antagonised by an NO precursor, L-arginine, indicating that the relaxant responses are related to NO synthesis. The contractile responses of ACV, DNV and SPV to ACh were unaffected by L-NAME but the contractile response of posterior collecting veins was enhanced, suggesting that the ACh-induced contraction is independent of the NO pathway but it can be modified by NO in the posterior collecting veins. The latter finding implies a relatively more pronounced influence of NO in posterior collecting veins than in other veins. This is in accordance with the pattern of regional distribution of NOS/eNOS immunoreactivity in the nasal venous vasculature, being most pronounced in the posterior collecting veins. Thus, the current in vitro study has demonstrated clearly that there are regional differences in NO-dependent relaxation responses to ACh in the nasal venous vasculature. Similar results have been found in the other venous vessels of dog, such as external jugular vein, superior and inferior vena cavae, and brachiocephalic vein 16, while Lacroix et al. 17 reported that NOS inhibition does not modify the nasal vascular conductance to ACh in vivo. Vascular conductance depends primarily on the tone of the resistance vessels rather than on that of the venous vessels. In the current authors preparation, with nicotinic receptors being blocked by hexamethonium in the tissue bath, ACh can only elicit vascular response via activation of muscarinic receptors. The effects at low concentrations probably represent the actions of ACh in physiological or pathophysiological situations while those at high concentrations are most likely pharmacological effects. An increase in the number of muscarinic receptors has been found in the nasal mucosa of human and animal models with nasal allergy 18, 19. It is highly probable that the pathogenesis of hyper-reactive nasal symptoms may be associated partly with the differential changes in the number or the reactivity of muscarinic receptors in different segments of the venous vascular bed. Activation of muscarinic receptors in the posterior collecting veins will increase vascular capacitance, while activation of muscarinic receptors in the outflow veins will impair venous drainage. Both mechanisms acting together can easily promote nasal congestion, especially when the number and/or reactivity of the muscarinic receptors is increased. Radiolabelled ligand binding, autoradiography, competitive binding analysis and immunological studies suggest that muscarinic receptor subtypes are present in the sinusoidal blood vessels of human inferior turbinate mucosa 20, 21. Further studies are required to characterise the muscarinic receptor subtype(s) present on the collecting and outflow veins of the nasal venous systems. The human nasal mucosa shows prominent similarities with the canine nasal mucosa: cavernous venous plexuses; muscular collecting veins (cushion or throttle veins); anterior venous drainage via dorsal nasal vein; and posterior venous drainage via the sphenopalatine vein 1. It is probable that results from the current study are applicable to human nasal mucosa. Hence, the development of highly selective antagonists for the muscarinic receptor subtype(s) present on the nasal collecting and outflow veins have potential to be of great therapeutic value in the treatment of congestion in hyperreactive nasal mucosa.
The authors would like to thank J.C.C. Wang and C.H. Lai for their helpful comments, K.K. Tsang and K. Tsang for technical assistance, the Laboratory Animal Unit at Hong Kong University and the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Dept of the Hong Kong SAR government for supplying experimental animals.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||