Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006 Enhanced chemo-responsiveness in patients with sleep apnoea and end-stage renal diseaseDepts of 1 Medicine, and 2 Anaesthesia & Physiology, University of Toronto, and 3 Dept of Medicine, Humber River Regional Hospital, Toronto, ON, and 4 Dept of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. CORRESPONDENCE: P. J. Hanly, 1421 Health Sciences Center, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1 Canada. Fax: 1 4032836151. E-mail: phanly{at}ucalgary.ca Keywords: Chemoreflex, dialysis, kidney failure, respiratory control
Received: June 27, 2005
Although sleep apnoea is very common in patients with end-stage renal disease, the physiological mechanisms for this association have not yet been determined. The current authors hypothesised that altered respiratory chemo-responsiveness may play an important role. In total, 58 patients receiving treatment with chronic dialysis were recruited for overnight polysomnography. A modified Read rebreathing technique, which is used to assess basal ventilation, ventilatory sensitivity and threshold, was completed before and after overnight polysomnography. Patients were divided into apnoeic (n = 38; apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) 35±22 events·h-1) and nonapnoeic (n = 20; AHI 3±3 events·h-1) groups, with the presence of sleep apnoea defined as an AHI >10 events·h-1. While basal ventilation and the ventilatory recruitment threshold were similar between groups, ventilatory sensitivity during isoxic hypoxia (partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) 6.65 kPa) and hyperoxia (PO2 19.95 kPa) was significantly greater in apnoeic patients. Overnight changes in chemoreflex responsiveness were similar between groups. In conclusion, these data indicate that the responsiveness of both the central and peripheral chemoreflexes is augmented in patients with sleep apnoea and end-stage renal disease. Since increased ventilatory sensitivity to hypercapnia destabilises respiratory control, the current authors suggest this contributes to the pathogenesis of sleep apnoea in this patient population. Sleep apnoea has been reported in up to 5070% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) 1, which is at least 10 times higher than the prevalence reported in the general population 2. The pathogenesis of sleep apnoea in patients with ESRD remains unclear. Although sleep apnoea is not corrected by conventional haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis 35, it has been reversed both by nocturnal haemodialysis and kidney transplantation 68, indicating that its pathophysiology is uniquely associated with the development of chronic renal failure. Previous investigators have observed features of both central and obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with ESRD 39, which suggests that its pathogenesis is related to both destabilisation of central respiratory control and upper airway occlusion. During nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, respiratory drive operates predominantly under chemoreflex control 10. Changes in chemoreflex responsiveness can promote periodic breathing during sleep by destabilising central respiratory control 11. The chemoreflex response depends on the ventilatory recruitment threshold, which is the level of carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) at which ventilation begins to respond to CO2, as well as the sensitivity or slope of the ventilatory response above the threshold. Increased chemoreflex sensitivity can destabilise respiratory control by increasing the likelihood of lowering PCO2 below the "apnoeic threshold" 12. Increased threshold can destabilise respiratory control by increasing plant gain 11. Due to the metabolic hyperbola that models the control of PCO2 by pulmonary gas exchange, a high ventilatory threshold destabilises respiratory control as small increases in ventilation result in large decreases in PCO2, which increases the likelihood of ventilatory overshoot. Periodic breathing can be associated with upper airway occlusion during sleep, possibly because of disproportionately greater drive to the inspiratory pump muscles than the upper airway dilators 13, 14. More recently, ventilatory instability has been reported in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) reflected by a high "loop gain" 15, suggesting a role for central destabilisation in the pathogenesis of OSA. Chemoreflex responsiveness may be altered by the metabolic changes that accompany renal failure, such as metabolic acidosis 16, and possibly by uraemia or the accumulation of so-called "middle molecules"; therefore, it is likely that it contributes to the development of central or OSA or both. While altered chemoreflex responsiveness has been described in patients with ESRD 1719, the association between chemoreflex responsiveness and sleep apnoea in such patients has not been determined. Chemoreflex responsiveness changes throughout the 24-h cycle among healthy subjects 20, 21 and recent data from the current authors laboratory 22 suggest that chemoreflex responsiveness may change significantly overnight in patients with OSA, raising the possibility that changes in chemoreflex responsiveness are related to the intermittent hypoxaemia and/or sleep disruption that such patients experience. It is not known whether overnight changes in chemoreflex responsiveness are modified by the development of ESRD or the initiation of chronic haemodialysis or whether they differ between those who have sleep apnoea and those who do not. The objectives of the present study were to measure chemoreflex responsiveness in patients with ESRD in a comprehensive and standardised manner, to assess whether it changes overnight and to determine whether responsiveness is altered in a manner that could contribute to the development of sleep apnoea. These questions were addressed by comparing measurements of chemoreflex responsiveness before and after overnight polysomnography in a large group of patients with ESRD. The measurements used included ventilatory sensitivity, which is a major determinant of respiratory control system stability, and the ventilatory recruitment threshold, which is a reflection of the acidbase status 23 and also determines plant gain. In addition, since the subjects were awake while these measurements were made, the sub-threshold ventilation was also measured. This basal ventilation or nonchemoreflex drive to breathe is sometimes called the wakefulness drive to breathe because it is absent during sleep 24. Therefore, basal ventilation reflects the state of awareness or arousal 25.
Patient recruitment and polysomnography The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the research ethics board at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada), and all patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Patients receiving conventional haemodialysis (CHD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) were recruited for overnight polysomnography, which was performed and scored by registered polysomnographic technologists according to published criteria 26 as previously described 6. Patients receiving CHD (in-centre during the day for 4 h, 3 days·week-1) underwent polysomnography within 24 h of their last dialysis session. Patients receiving PD (continuous cycler-assisted PD nocturnally with three to five exchanges during sleep and/or three to five manual exchanges throughout the day with a single exchange overnight) continued dialysis during polysomnography. At the time of polysomnography, patients completed a sleep history questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. A detailed history of each patient's renal failure was obtained, including the cause of renal failure, duration of dialysis treatment, dialysis schedule and medications. A venous blood sample (35 mL) was drawn from the lower arm pre- and post-polysomnography to determine electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine. Dialysis adequacy was assessed in patients receiving CHD using the per cent reduction in urea (PRU) per dialysis session (PRU = (pre-BUNpost-BUN)/(pre-BUN)x100) 27 and dialyser coefficient representing dialysis adequacy, a measure of urea clearance, corrected for body size, was used for patients receiving PD since PRU cannot assess the adequacy of this modality 28.
Chemoreflex responsiveness
Measurements were obtained during isoxic hypoxia (partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) 6.65 kPa) and isoxic hyperoxia (PO2 19.95 kPa), and changes in ventilation were measured as the level of PCO2 rose. The main test parameters obtained were: sub-threshold or basal ventilation (VEb); ventilatory recruitment threshold for carbon dioxide (T); and supra-threshold slope, termed ventilatory sensitivity (S; fig. 1
Analysis Mean data and SD were analysed using repeated measures of ANOVA, Pearsons correlation, multiple linear regression analysis and unpaired t-tests. Nominal data were analysed using Chi-squared analysis. All p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Patient demographics In total, 58 patients (37 male, 21 female) aged 2769 yrs were studied. Of these, 51 patients were receiving treatment with CHD and seven were treated with PD. Patients were divided into an apnoeic group and nonapnoeic group based on an apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) of 10 events·h-1 during their overnight sleep study. Table 1
Polysomnographic and gas exchange data Polysomnographic data are shown in table 2
Total sleep time and sleep efficiency did not differ between groups. Apnoeic patients had a significantly greater proportion of stage 1 NREM sleep and a smaller proportion of slow-wave sleep. There were no inter-group differences in other sleep stages or the frequency of periodic limb movements. The apnoeic group had a significantly greater number of arousals from sleep that were predominantly associated with apnoeas and hypopnoeas.
Chemoreflex responsiveness
There was a significant positive correlation between hypoxic and hyperoxic ventilatory sensitivity and the severity of sleep apnoea, reflected by the AHI, and between hyperoxic ventilatory sensitivity and BMI (table 6
A high prevalence of sleep apnoea was found in patients with ESRD, which is consistent with previous reports in this patient population 36, 9. The majority of the apnoeas and hypopnoeas observed were obstructive events, which contrasts with many previous studies that reported a more heterogeneous apnoea profile consisting of central, mixed and obstructive events 46, 8. The current study patients with sleep apnoea were heavier, older and were predominantly male, which may explain the predominance of obstructive events. However, these differences were small and neither BMI nor age were predictors of apnoea severity when included in regression analysis models. Nevertheless, these findings support the notion that sleep apnoea is common in patients with ESRD and that its pathogenesis is influenced by factors that are uniquely associated with ESRD over and above the mechanisms that cause sleep apnoea in the general population. One of these potential mechanisms is altered respiratory chemoreflex responsiveness. During NREM sleep, respiratory drive operates predominantly under chemoreflex control 10. Increased dependence on chemical control makes the system more vulnerable to changes in the level of arterial PCO2 in response to ventilatory stimuli. Increased chemoreflex threshold and/or sensitivity can lead to ventilatory instability and oscillations in respiratory output by increasing the likelihood of lowering PCO2 below the apnoeic threshold 12. High ventilatory threshold destabilises respiratory control because a small increase in ventilation causes a large decrease in PCO2 11. High ventilatory sensitivity destabilises respiratory control by facilitating an increased ventilatory response to sufficient ventilatory stimuli 11. In other words, increased ventilatory threshold and/or sensitivity lead to ventilatory instability by increasing loop gain 11. In the present study, apnoeic patients were found to have a higher ventilatory sensitivity to hypercapnia during both hypoxic and hyperoxic rebreathing tests. The ventilatory sensitivity also showed a significant positive correlation with apnoea severity. These data indicate that the sensitivity of both the central and peripheral chemoreceptors is increased in patients with sleep apnoea and ESRD, which the current authors anticipate destabilises respiratory control by increasing feedback and, therefore, loop gain 11. Altered chemoreflex responsiveness has been well described in the pathogenesis of central sleep apnoea, including idiopathic central sleep apnoea 34, apnoea at high altitude 35 and CheyneStokes respiration in patients with congestive heart failure 36. Most of the apnoeas and hypopnoeas in the study patients were classified as obstructive events according to conventional polysomnographic criteria. However, there is abundant evidence that oscillation in respiratory control does occur in patients with OSA. Periodic breathing was observed over 20 yrs ago following tracheostomy for the treatment of severe OSA 37, 38 and, more recently, ventilatory instability reflected by a high loop gain, has been reported in patients with severe OSA 15. Furthermore, there is evidence that upper airway closure can occur during central sleep apnoea. Airway narrowing and closure was identified by bronchoscopic evaluation in healthy individuals with central apnoea that occurred spontaneously or was induced experimentally by transient hyperventilation 39. Earlier studies attributed this phenomenon to disproportionate activation of the inspiratory muscles, which was greater or earlier than activation of the upper airway dilator muscles 14. Others studies have reported that upper airway closure is more likely to occur during central apnoea in individuals whose upper airway is functionally or anatomically predisposed to collapse during sleep 40. Consequently, the increased ventilatory sensitivity that was observed during wakefulness in the present studys patients may have led to ventilatory instability and obstructive apnoea during sleep.
The mechanisms responsible for increased ventilatory sensitivity among the apnoeic study patients are unclear. Chemoreflex responsiveness can be increased by metabolic acidosis; acetazolamide-induced metabolic acidosis enhances central chemosensitivity and reduces the ventilatory threshold to hypercapnia 41, 42. However, the current blood gas data did not indicate acidosis, at least in the first 24 h after dialysis. Moreover, there was no difference in pH between apnoeic and nonapnoeic patients (table 4
A single previous study reported that dialysis and uraemia may be associated with increased chemoreflex responsiveness 18. It was suggested that removal of urea from the blood causes an influx of water into the brain where clearance of urea is slower, which may cause a "dilutional acidosis" at the central chemoreceptor, thereby increasing central chemoreflex sensitivity and threshold. However, no difference was found in either the severity of uraemia nor in the adequacy of dialysis in apnoeic patients compared with those without apnoea (table 1 In the nonrenal failure population, OSA is associated with altered chemoreflex responsiveness 44. This literature found increased ventilatory threshold and sub-threshold ventilation among apnoeic patients with no difference in ventilatory sensitivity, which differs from the current findings. While it is possible that the present findings were due to inherent differences between the apnoeic and nonapnoeic groups that were not related to renal failure, this seems unlikely, given the high prevalence of sleep apnoea in ESRD. It is also possible that increased ventilatory sensitivity is an adaptive response to the frequent bouts of hypoxia 45, hypercapnia and/or arousals associated with OSA. If this were true, greater overnight changes in chemoreflex measures in the apnoeic patients would have been anticipated, but this was not the case. Consequently, the current authors believe that the differences in chemoreflex responsiveness that were observed between apnoeics and nonapnoeics were due to the presence of renal failure. It is possible that increased ventilatory sensitivity is a consequence of factors that occur in chronic renal failure which were not measured in the present study, such as changes in autonomic tone 19 and/or the clearance of medium-sized molecules. Significant evening to morning changes were also found in the chemoreflex responsiveness measurements. Specifically, the current authors found a decrease in the rrCO2 and ventilatory threshold overnight and a trend towards an overnight increase in ventilatory sensitivity that did not reach statistical significance, indicating an overnight increase in chemoreceptor activity. However, these changes were not specific to either the hypoxic or hyperoxic rebreathing test responses nor were they specific to apnoeic or nonapnoeic patients. Although the decline in the rrCO2 during the rebreathing tests and the overnight increase in ventilatory sensitivity would tend to destabilise respiratory control, these effects would be opposed by the overnight decrease in ventilatory threshold, which tends to stabilise the system. Previous reports from the current authors laboratory in the nonrenal failure population 22 demonstrated an overnight decrease in ventilatory threshold that was confined to nonapnoeic patients and an overnight increase in ventilatory sensitivity that was confined to patients with OSA. The current findings are consistent with some previous studies', assessing the effect of circadian rhythm on chemoreflex control, which showed an evening to morning decline in metabolic rate 46 and an increase in chemoreflex sensitivity 20, but in contrast to others showing an evening to morning increase in ventilatory threshold 21. It is not possible to determine how much of the overnight changes in chemoreflex responsiveness in the present study were due to renal failure, sleep apnoea or circadian influences, although the positive correlation (r = 0.640, p = 0.014) between AHI and hypoxic ventilatory sensitivity in those with AHI <10 events·h-1 (nonapnoeic group) suggests that sleep apnoea may have some impact in patients with mild apnoea. The study has some limitations that should be addressed. First, measurements of chemoreflex responsiveness were carried out during wakefulness and correlated with other respiratory measurements that were performed during sleep. The current authors acknowledge that the interaction between chemoreflex responsiveness and sleep onset plays a pivotal role in the development of sleep apnoea. However, it is believed that the manifestations of altered respiratory control observed during wakefulness continued during sleep and, therefore, contributed to the pathogenesis of sleep apnoea. Secondly, chemoreflex responsiveness varies significantly between individuals, which can make it difficult to find significant differences between groups of subjects. The fact that the present authors were able to find significant differences between apnoeics and nonapnoeics, despite this inherent variability in the measurement, makes the current findings more robust. Finally, the current study design was cross-sectional and consequently cannot infer causality between augmented chemoreflex responsiveness and sleep apnoea. Nevertheless, as outlined in the previous paragraphs, it is believed that the changes in chemoreflex responsiveness were not a consequence of OSA and that, more likely, they contributed to its pathogenesis. In conclusion, sleep apnoea in end-stage renal disease is associated with an increase in respiratory chemoreflex sensitivity to hypercapnia during both hypoxic and hyperoxic conditions. These data indicate an increase in the sensitivity of both the central and peripheral chemoreflex responses. Increased chemoreflex sensitivity destabilises respiratory control, and so may contribute to the pathogenesis of sleep apnoea in end-stage renal disease. Further studies are required to confirm a causal relationship between increased chemoreflex sensitivity and obstructive sleep apnoea in this patient population, which the current authors anticipate will provide the basis for new therapeutic options.
The authors would like to thank J. Gabor and S. Mahammed for their technical assistance, and S. Crombach, J. Zaltzman and R. Prasad for their assistance with patient recruitment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||