| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Clinique des Maladies Respiratoires, Lille, France.
CORRESPONDENCE: C-H. Marquette, Clinique des Maladies Respiratoires, Hôpital Albert Calmette, CHRU de Lille, 59037 Lille cedex, France. Fax: 33 320445611. E-mail: c-marquette{at}chru-lille.fr
Keywords: Drainage, pleura, pneumothorax, surgery, treatment
Received: September 7, 2005
Accepted October 31, 2005
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
All patients had an 8.5 F distally multiperforated polyurethane pigtail catheter inserted via the anterior route, at the bedside without any guidance, using the Seldinger technique. A one-way Heimlich valve was connected to the catheter, allowing the air to flow spontaneously outwards for 24–48 h. Thereafter, if the lung failed to re-expand wall suction was applied. Patients with an air leak persisting for >4 days were referred for surgery. Primary end-points were success rates at 24 h and 1 week, and 1 yr recurrence-free survival.
In total, 41 consecutive patients entered the study. They were typically thin, young, smoking males. No procedure-related complications were observed. The need for pain relief medication was minimal. Within the first 24 h, most of the patients were able to walk around and half of them were able to take a shower with their catheter in place. The 24-h and 1-week success rates were 61 and 85%, respectively, and the actuarial 1-yr recurrence rate was 24%. Four patients underwent surgical pleurodesis because of a persistent air leak. The length of stay when excluding the four surgical cases was 2.3±1.3 days.
When 24-h and 1-week success rates and recurrence at 12 months were taken as end-points, the method described here is as effective as simple manual needle aspiration or a conventional chest tube thoracotomy. These results support further studies assessing this "one system, serial-steps approach" in an outpatient management algorithm.
Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), a common disease in daily pulmonary practice, has an estimated incidence of 7.4 out of 100,000 for males and 1.2 out of 100,000 for females (age-adjusted incidence) and usually occurs during the second or third decade in healthy "active" young people 1, 2.
Primary therapeutic goals for PSP include removal of air from the pleural space and prevention of recurrences. The recent guidelines of the British Thoracic Society (BTS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend that small PSP in patients without breathlessness should be observed for 3–6 h and discharged on the provision that a repeat chest radiograph excludes progression over time; only in large or symptomatic PSP should air evacuation be proposed 3–5.
The absence of generally accepted and methodologically sound recommendations may account for the extensive variation in practice for air evacuation techniques, reported in observational studies 4, 6. Air evacuation may be achieved by simple manual needle aspiration (MA), by a small bore tube or a conventional chest tube, the tubes being attached to a one-way valve or to a water-seal device, with or without active suctioning. Currently chest tube thoracotomy remains by far, with some exceptions 7, the most popular technique 6, 8, 9.
Prospective comparative studies 10–12 showed that a significant amount of the healthcare expenditure related to PSP management could be saved if MA was used as the first step for air evacuation. Simple MA followed by immediate catheter removal proved safe and effective in up to 60% of the patients 10–12 and allowed half of the study population to be managed in the emergency room only, without further hospitalisation 12. Nevertheless, with this rational and cost-saving approach, nearly half of all patients are hospitalised and result in undergoing a standard anterior or axillary tube thoracostomy 10–12. An alternative approach that integrated the lack of invasiveness along with the outpatient character and the low cost of MA, while avoiding unnecessary discomfort and costs related to secondary tube thoracostomy for those patients who failed MA, would be a worthwhile development 4.
The use of small-calibre, indwelling catheters attached to a one-way valve or to a water-seal device, instead of the intravenous or thoracocentesis needle catheter, allows air evacuation to continue if the initial MA attempts fail. Such small catheters have proved successful in mixed pneumothorax (PTX) populations, most of them being iatrogenic 13–24. The purpose of the present study was to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of a comprehensive therapeutic algorithm that used small-calibre catheters connected to a one-way valve in first episodes of PSP. The current authors also wanted to see whether the recent BTS and ACCP recommendations for chest tube management 4, 5 apply to such small-calibre catheters.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
1 million inhabitants, totalling 72,000 emergency room admissions per year.
Study population and inclusion criteria
Patients with a first episode of PSP were eligible for inclusion if either of the following applied: 1) complaints of breathlessness or chest pain, regardless of the size of the PTX; or 2) if, on the plain posterio-anterior radiograph, the PTX was considered "large" according to the ACCP definition (distance from apex to cupola 
3 cm 4) or to the BTS definition (presence of a visible rim of air 2 cm between the lung margin and the chest wall 5). Patients were excluded if they had a history of PTX, whatever the side, or with an underlying lung disease.
Verbal informed consent was requested from patients in order to participate in the study. The protocol was approved by the present authors' institutional Ethical Committee (Comité Consultatif de Protection des Personnes dans la Recherche Biomédicale de Lille, France).
Procedures and protocol
The catheters were inserted in the second or third anterior intercostal space on the midclavicular line. The whole procedure was performed at the bedside, with the patient in the semi-recumbent position, without fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance.
A Fuhrman pleural/pneumopericardial drainage set with a Heimlich valve (references C-PPD-850 and C-CASP-A-FORD; COOK® critical care, Bloomington, IN, USA) were used throughout the study. The Fuhrman catheter is an 8.5 F distally multiperforated polyurethane pigtail catheter, which is commonly marketed for evacuation of air from the pericardial sac or to drain fluid from the pleural space in neonates and infants. Its design enables the insertion of the catheter with the Seldinger technique.
The procedure was carried out aseptically at the bedside following the usual steps of the guidewire tube thoracostomy procedure (Seldinger technique). The Heimlich valve was attached to the catheter with a three-way stopcock inserted between the catheter and the valve. A folded sterile gauze was placed "as a pillow" under the catheter in order to avoid inadvertent kinking (fig. 1
) and the insertion point, the gauze and most of the catheter length were sealed with transparent adhesive dressings. Additional adhesive tapes were used to secure the Heimlich valve on the skin. If the patient did not tolerate the PTX (dyspnoea), the attending physician could decide to connect the valve to a four-chamber suction system set at –10 to –20 cmH2O.
|
If, at 24 h, lung expansion was complete, or when only a very small rim of apical air was present, the catheter was withdrawn without clamping and the patient was discharged on the same day (fig. 2). If not, pleural drainage via the one-way valve was continued for an additional period of 24 h, followed by the catheter's withdrawal in cases of success.
|
If the air leak persisted for >2 days, i.e. no lung re-expansion obtained on the fourth day of hospitalisation, a thoracoscopy with talc pleurodesis or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was considered.
At any time, prescription of plain relief medication was left to the discretion of the attending physician, with special attention being paid to the need for morphine derivatives.
Definitions, end-points and statistics
Primary end-points were 24-h and 1-week success rates (success was defined as complete or nearly complete, i.e. only a very small rim of apical air, persistent lung expansion, without the need for any additional procedure and without recurrence) and actuarial 1-yr recurrence rate, defined as the time to ipsilateral recurrence. Recurrence-free survival was calculated from the date of the first episode to the date of recurrence or the last day of follow-up. The Kaplan–Meyer method was used.
Secondary end-points were: 6- and 48-h success rates; safety; patient's discomfort, as assessed by the need for pain relief medications; patient's comfort, as assessed by ambulatory status; ability to take a shower; and length of stay. Demographic and descriptive data are given as mean±SD.
As this study was primarily intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a serial-steps approach with a single system, no control population (parallel or historical) was included.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
. Thirteen PTX (32%) could be defined as large according to the ACCP definition only, one (2%) according to the BTS definition only and 27 (66%) according to both definitions. The only case where a PTX showed a presence of a visible rim of air 2 cm between the lung margin and the chest wall without apical PTX had "dependent" PTX with a large rim or air between the lower lobe and the diaphragm. All the catheters were inserted at the bedside by the attending emergency physician without additional fluoroscopic, computed tomography or ultrasound guidance. Insertion was uneventful in all patients, except one who experienced extrathoracically aberrant catheter placement. This patient had a relatively thick chest wall and underwent a second attempt at insertion successfully. Subsequent course in this patient was uneventful.
|
Protocol violation occurred in three patients. Shortly after catheter insertion, two patients with a complete PTX experienced chest pain, which was interpreted as "bad tolerance" and erroneously led the attending physician to apply immediate suction instead of simple connection of the catheter to the Heimlich valve. One patient with complete lung re-expansion at 48 h had his catheter clamped for 24 h before withdrawal. A subsequent course was uneventful.
No accidental catheter dislodgments were observed. A total of 20 (48.8%) patients were able to take a shower within the first 24 h, while having their catheter in place. Eight patients did not require pain relief medications during the first 3 days after catheter placement. In the remaining 33, only two required morphine, despite a liberal use of this class of drugs in the Clinique des Maladies Respiratoires (Hôpital Albert Calmette, Lille, France; table 1
). Of note, the need for morphine in these two patients occurred when wall suction was applied.
Immediate and delayed success rates are displayed in table 2. Analysing the whole group of patients (intention-to-treat analysis) showed that spontaneous lung re-expansion was observed in 15 out of 41 (37%) patients at 6 h and in 25 out of 41 (61%) patients at 24 h. Waiting for another 24 h allowed two additional patients (66%) to achieve complete lung expansion. Excluding from analysis the two patients who were inadvertently applied immediate suction did not significantly change the results, as these patients achieved lung re-expansion at 6 and 24 h, respectively. The size of the PTX (complete PTX versus others) did not impact on success rates. Seven out of the 22 patients with complete PTX had their lung re-expanded at 6 h and 19 at day 7 without the need for any additional procedure and without recurrence.
|
None of the patients were lost for follow-up. Mean duration of follow-up was 321±130 days. Actuarial recurrence rates at 6 months and 1 yr were 22 and 24%, respectively (fig. 3). Two patients had very early ipsilateral PTX recurrence. One who experienced successful re-expansion after 24 h was readmitted because of PTX recurrence 3 days after discharge. The other patient, whose lung failed to re-expand with the valve but re-expanded after being placed on suction for 1 day, was readmitted 2 days after discharge. Both patients immediately underwent a thoracoscopy with talc pleurodesis. These two early recurrences and the four cases that required pleurodesis from the very beginning were considered as failures for the calculation of the 1-week success rate.
|
Two patients experienced contralateral minimal PTX, which did not require hospital admission 5.8 and 7.7 months, respectively, after discharge. These patients were not considered as recurrences for the calculation of the 1-yr success rate.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
There is now a general consensus that a "small" PTX should be observed, provided it is well tolerated and the patient is advised to come back in case of worsening breathlessness 3–5, 25. Large or badly tolerated PTX should have active treatment involving air evacuation. Definition of a "large" PTX is not uniform 4, 5. In the ACCP consensus, PTX was defined as large when "the distance from apex to cupola is 3 cm" 4, whereas, according to the BTS, a PTX was regarded as large if "a rim of air 2 cm is visible between the lung margin and the chest wall" 5. As it remained unclear which of the ACCP and the BTS definitions of a large PTX was the most relevant, the question was deliberately left open to facilitate decision making for the attending physician. Interestingly, the current authors noticed that, in real-life practice, most PTX could be classified as "large" according to the ACCP definition (98%), whereas only 68% could be classified as "large" according to the BTS definition. Accordingly, up to 32% would have been simply observed if the current authors' decision to evacuate air had been based on the BTS definition of large PTX. Since the last ACCP and BTS guidelines were published, this study is the first one to have assessed the size of PTX according to both definitions. From the study's data, it can be inferred that these definitions produce a decision-making conflict in terms of the need for air evacuation, one leading to "overtreatment" and the other to "undertreatment".
Current data suggests that there is little place for recurrence prevention in first PSP episodes and, thus, at least for a first episode, the technique to evacuate the air from the thorax has to be chosen independently of any recurrence prevention technique. Regarding air evacuation, there is now compelling evidence that simple MA should be considered as the primary treatment in uncomplicated PSP 10–12. This has been taken into account in the recently published guidelines of the BTS 5. Nonetheless, hospital admission, chest tubes and suction remain the standard approach in many institutions and represent the first step in large-size PSP according to the ACCP guidelines 4.
Conservatism of physicians is certainly not the only factor accounting for the reluctance of physicians to start with MA when first episodes of PSP present themselves. Whereas, in the prospective series, the immediate success of MA averages 72%, real-life clinical practice is less optimistic, with an immediate success closer to 50%. Nevertheless, this allows half the patients to be discharged without an additional overnight stay. However, this does mean that almost half of the patients culminate with a chest tube, after having tried to pump out 2 L of air from the pleural cavity with a syringe connected to a catheter, which kinks and moves back and forth. Unfortunately, it is difficult to predict failure of MA, except when no resistance is felt after having pumped out 2.5 L of air 26. Thus, except when immediate failure is clinically or radiologically noticed, additional observation (3–6 h) is recommended for safety reasons until full re-expansion of the lung is confirmed 4. In order to avoid prolonged observation after MA, followed by the unnecessary discomfort of secondary tube thoracostomy, many physicians still rely on conventional chest tubes for primary treatment in uncomplicated PSP.
The use of small-calibre catheters was initially reported by radiologists for management of iatrogenic PTX after transthoracic needle biopsies 13–15. Subsequent studies included first episodes and recurrences of PSP, as well as secondary, traumatic and iatrogenic PTX 16–21. Except for one study 16, the catheters were catheter-over-needle systems, with no shielding of the needle tip, and were placed either with 13–15, 23 or without 16–22, 24 radiological or ultrasound guidance. Not surprisingly, suction applied to these small catheters functioned as well as simple MA. When suction failed to give immediate re-expansion, connection to a one-way valve was advised, eventually followed by wall suction if the air leak continued. The failure rate of catheter wall suction when MA had failed ranged from 8–31% 16, 18–21. Most of these studies were retrospective and therefore did not follow clear recommendations regarding the stepwise management of underlying air leaks. In contrast, Vallee et al. 16 followed a standardised approach with a small-calibre catheter in a prospective series of 37 PTX in 35 patients. Half of the cases were spontaneous PTX, but no distinction was made between primary and secondary PTX. A multiperforated polyurethane pigtail catheter, inserted at the bedside with the Seldinger technique, was used. If two MA attempts failed, a Heimlich valve was connected to the catheter and the patient was observed for 1 h. If the PTX persisted, the Heimlich valve was placed at -20 cmH2O suction for 1 h. Persistent PTX was then eventually treated by chest tube thoracostomy. Twenty-two cases (59%) responded to MA. In the remaining 15 cases, seven (47%) responded to Heimlich valve attachment, three (20%) responded to catheter suction and five (33%) required a chest tube thoracostomy. A similar approach was followed, using a serial-steps approach with a single system, in a homogeneous population of patients with a first episode of PSP. The time frames recommended in the recent BTS guidelines were also included in the therapeutic algorithm for deciding when to proceed to the next step, i.e. proceed from water-seal to active suction and from suction to thoracoscopy. Lastly, in order to simplify the procedure, and as it was known from the literature that the catheter connected to a Heimlich valve could be sufficient to obtain lung re-expansion 20, the catheter's MA step was deliberately skipped.
Demographic characteristics of the current study's population agree with common findings in PSP, confirming that this disease usually occurs at rest in tall, thin, young, smoking males. It is noteworthy that all the catheters were put in place at the bedside, without any guidance, by >20 different practitioners, all of whom were familiar with the Seldinger technique. The majority of the patients were able to walk around within the first 24 h, with half of them being able to take a shower with their catheter. Only two patients, who required wall suction of the catheter, needed morphine for chest pain relief. The catheters could be withdrawn after 24 h in 61% of the patients and in two-thirds of the patients after 48 h. At that time (on the second day), if the lung failed to re-expand, the catheter could be used as a conventional tube and active suction applied for another 48 h. In those patients where bubbling was witnessed after 48 h of active suction (i.e. air leak persisting on the fourth day), surgical referral was considered.
To apply underwater seal drainage, the current authors chose to use a mini Heimlich valve, which, when compared with an underwater seal bottle system, is cheaper, less bulky, does not need to be kept upright, and enables the patient to be more mobile. However, bubbling cannot be visualised with this simple system and, hence, a minimal silent air leak can be missed and the catheter can be removed too early. This is certainly what occurred in the current study's two cases that experienced successful re-expansion followed by early (within 7 days) recurrence. These two cases were thus considered as failures for the calculation of the 1-week success rate and as recurrences for the calculation of the recurrence-free survival. Despite this, when 24-h and 1-week success rates are taken as end-points, this method, based on a single procedure with a stepwise approach, does as well as simple MA or conventional chest tube thoracotomy 10–12. In addition, the length of stay compared very well with those reported in recent studies comparing MA and conventional chest tube 10–12.
The current authors are not aware of study recurrence rates using actuarial survival analysis (i.e. recurrence-free survival). Most of the studies provide the crude percentage of recurrence after a variable period of time 12, 21, 27, 28. Despite this, the recurrence rates observed here agree with current data, showing that recurrence rates after a first episode of PSP treated with an air evacuation technique vary from 16–52%, averaging 30%, with the majority occurring in the first year 29. Thus, when recurrence of PTX at 12 months is taken as an end-point, the method described here is as effective as MA or conventional chest tube thoracotomy.
The British Thoracic Society recommends the use of small-calibre catheters as an alternative to manual needle aspiration to reduce the need for repeat aspiration, leaving the catheter in place until full re-expansion of the lung is confirmed 5. The absence of published data regarding the use of such small catheters in the very context of primary spontaneous pneumothorax may explain why they have not gained wider acceptance. This is the first prospective study integrating recent guidelines showing that a stepwise approach with a small-calibre catheter attached to a Heimlich valve kit could be safely proposed as the first and single treatment in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. This approach, which avoids the unnecessary discomfort related to secondary tube thoracostomy in patients who fail simple manual needle aspiration, allowed most of the patients (37 out of 41) to be mobile in hospital during the first 48 h following the procedure. The current authors' believe that further studies are warranted to assess this "one system, serial-steps approach" in an outpatient management algorithm.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Makris, M. Hatthabi, A. Scherpereel, J.-J. Lafitte, and C.-H. Marquette Haemothorax after pig-tail catheter removal in a patient with primary spontaneous pneumothorax Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2007; 24(3): e17 - e17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. T. Henry Simple sequential treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: one step closer. Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 448 - 450. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
