|
|
||||||||
1 Dept of Pharmacology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, and 2 Laboratory of Allergology and Pulmonary Diseases, Dept of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
CORRESPONDENCE: A. J. M. van Oosterhout, Laboratory of Allergology and Pulmonary Diseases, Dept Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Fax: 31 503610570. E-mail: A.J.M.van.Oosterhout{at}path.umcg.nl
Keywords: Allergy, interleukin-10, macrophages, regulatory T-cells, T-helper cell type 2 lymphocytes
Received: July 29, 2004
Accepted August 2, 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) play a crucial downregulatory role in the initiation and progression of allergic asthma. Recently, the current authors demonstrated that ovalbumin (OVA)-loaded M
(OVA-M
) suppress subsequent OVA-induced airway manifestations of asthma and that this effect could be potentiated upon selective activation. In the present study, the authors further delineated the underlying pathway by which M
exert this immunosuppressive effect.
To examine the migration of OVA-M
, cells were labelled with 5'chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) and were administered (i.v.) into OVA-sensitised BALB/c mice. After 20 h, the relevant organs were dissected and analysed using fluorescent microscopy. Allergen-specificity was investigated by treating OVA-sensitised mice with keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH)-M
activated with immunostimulatory sequence oligodeoxynucleotide (ISS-ODN). By lengthening the period between treatment and challenge to 4 weeks it was examined whether OVA-M
exerted an immunosuppressive memory response.
Strikingly, CMFDA-labelled M
were not trapped in the lungs, but migrated to the spleen. ISS-ODN-stimulated KLH-M
failed to suppress OVA-induced airway manifestations of asthma. Moreover, treatment with ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
was still effective after lengthening the period between treatment and challenge.
These data demonstrate that allergen-loaded macrophages can induce an indirect immunosuppressive response that is allergen-specific and long lasting, which are both hallmarks of a memory lymphocyte response.
Allergic asthma is characterised by reversible airway obstruction, increased levels of allergen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)-E, chronic airway inflammation and persistent airway hyperreactivity (AHR). Allergic asthma is driven and maintained by the persistence of a subset of chronically activated memory T-cells 1, 2. The maintenance of immunological homeostasis in the respiratory tract requires fine-tuning of T-cell activation, in order to induce a sufficient inflammatory response against inhaled pathogens, while avoiding excessive responses. Increasing evidence suggests that macrophages (M
) play a pivotal role in both the potentiation and the suppression of inflammatory responses 3.
M
trigger the immune responses against microbial pathogens by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-
4, 5. Moreover, by releasing IL-12 they can specifically skew immune responses towards T-helper cell type 1 (Th1) responses 68. Though M
favour the induction of Th1 responses 9, 10, it has also been demonstrated that M
can induce differentiation towards Th2 lymphocytes 11, 12. To exert immunosuppressive responses M
secrete anti-inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandin (PG)E2, transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß, IL-10 and nitric oxide 3, 5, 13.
Alveolar M
represent the most predominant immune effector cells in the alveolar spaces and conducting airways 3. By secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines alveolar M
direct the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells, while they also play a key role in dampening immune responses against nonpathogenic antigens 5, 14. Alveolar M
have been shown to suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation in vitro 15, 16 and antigen presentation functions of dentritic cells in vitro and in vivo 17. Although depletion of alveolar M
potentiated IgE antibody production in response to inhaled allergen 18 and adoptive transfer of alveolar M
suppresses AHR 19, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain to be elucidated 3.
Previously, the current authors developed a mouse model in which allergen-loaded M
suppressed allergen-induced airway manifestations 20. The anti-inflammatory effects of M
could be potentiated by activating the M
with the selective toll-like receptor (TLR)-9 or -4 ligands immunostimulatory sequence oligodeoxynucleotide (ISS-ODN) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS), respectively, ex vivo 21. Interestingly, IL-10 is upregulated in these activated M
and plays a crucial role in the anti-inflammatory effects of M
in vivo 21. In this study, the mechanisms underlying these anti-inflammatory effects were investigated in more detail. Strikingly, after administration (i.v.), allergen-loaded M
migrated to the spleen. As a consequence, the authors investigated whether M
induce, in the spleen, an indirect allergen-specific and long-term suppressive response.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
OVA (grade V), purified LPS from Escherichia coli 0111:B4, and methacholine (acetyl-ß-methylcholine chloride) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) was obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Fluorescent dye 5'chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) was acquired from Molecular Probes Europe BV (Leiden, The Netherlands). CpG-containing phosphorothioate ISS-ODN was synthesised by Isogen Bioscience BV (Maarsen, The Netherlands). The ISS-ODN used had the sequence 5'-TGACTGTGAACGTTCGAGATGA-3' 23.
Loading and stimulation of macrophages
Peritoneal M
were isolated from naïve BALB/c mice as described previously 20. Subsequently, 1x107 M
·mL1 were loaded with 2 mg·mL1 OVA or 2 mg·mL1 KLH and were stimulated with 10 µg·mL1 LPS or 3 µg·mL1 ISS-ODN 21. After incubation for 3 h at 37°C and 5% CO2, the M
were extensively washed to remove all residual soluble OVA, LPS, and ISS-ODN.
Sensitisation, treatment and challenge
Mice were sensitised to OVA by active sensitisation with 7 i.p. injections of 10 µg OVA in 0.5 mL pyrogen-free saline on alternate days 24. Treatment was performed 17 days after the last sensitisation by administration (i.v.) of 3x105 M
(OVA-loaded or KLH-loaded) in 50 µl saline. As an additional control group, mice were i.v. injected with 50 µl saline. After 14 weeks post treatment, mice were exposed to OVA (2 mg·mL1 saline) aerosol challenges for 5 min on eight consecutive days.
Fluorescent labelling and localisation of macrophages
A total of 1x107 M
·mL1 were loaded with OVA (2 mg·mL1) and stimulated with ISS-ODN (3 µg·mL1) for 3 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. At the last 30 min, 10 µM CMFDA was added to the M
, the M
were then extensively washed. To test the labelling efficiency, 1x105 CMFDA-labelled M
·mL1 were cultured in 96-well round-bottomed plates (Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Kremsmuenster, Austria) in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium-1,640 enriched with 2% foetal calf serum, penicillin/streptomycin (all GIBCO BAL division of Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands) and 50 µM ß-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich). After 20 h, the M
were harvested and cytospins of these M
were analysed using fluorescent microscopy. Subsequently, OVA-sensitised mice were treated (i.v.) with 3x105 M
. After 20 h, blood, lungs, spleen, lymph nodes (axillary, brachial, thoracic), liver and kidneys were collected. Several 6-µm thick cryosections of the tissues were analysed using fluorescent microscopy.
Measurement of airway responsiveness in vivo
Airway responsiveness was measured in conscious, unrestrained mice using barometric whole-body plethysmography by recording respiratory pressure curves (Buxco corp., EMKA Technologies, Paris, France) in response to inhaled methacholine (ranging from 050 mg·mL1 methacholine). Airway responsiveness was expressed in enhanced pause (Penh), as described previously 25.
Determination of ovalbumin-specific immunoglobulin-E levels in serum
After measurement of in vivo airway responsiveness, mice were sacrificed by injection of 1 mL 10% urethane (i.p., Sigma-Aldrich). Mice were bled by cardiac puncture. Subsequently, serum was collected and stored at 70°C until analysis. Serum OVA-specific IgE was measured as described previously 26. A reference standard was obtained by i.p. immunisation of mice with OVA and arbitrarily assigned a value of 1,000 experimental units·mL1 (EU·mL1). The detection level of the IgE ELISA was 0.5 EU·mL1 for IgE.
Analysis of the cellular composition in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed immediately after bleeding of the mice by lavage of the airways through a tracheal cannula with 1 mL saline (37°C) containing 2 µg·mL1 aprotinine (Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands) and 5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich). Cytokines in the supernatant of the first mL of the BAL fluid (BALF) were determined by ELISA. Subsequently, mice were lavaged a total of four times with 1 mL saline (37°C). The cells in the BALF were pooled in cold phosphate-buffered saline (including those from the first mL). Subsequently, cells in the BALF were differentiated into mononuclear cells (monocytes, M
and lymphocytes), eosinophils, and neutrophils as described previously 26.
Cytokine ELISAs
IL-5 ELISA (BD PharMingen, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The detection limit of the IL-5 ELISA was 10 pg·mL1.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SEM. The airway dose-response curves to methacholine were statistically analysed by a general linear model of repeated measurements followed by post hoc comparison between groups. Data were log transformed before analysis to equalise variances in all groups. Statistical analysis on BALF cell counts was performed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test (2-tailed). For ELISA, results were analysed statistically using a t-test (2-tailed, homoscedastic). Results were considered statistically significant at the p<0.05 level.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
suppress anti-inflammatory responses in a mouse model of allergic asthma 20, 21. To gain more insight in the underlying mechanism, the localisation of OVA-M
after administration (i.v.) was examined. Peritoneal M
were loaded with OVA (OVA-M
) and stimulated with ISS-ODN. Subsequently these M
were labelled with the fluorescent dye CMFDA.
As a control, the CMFDA-labelled OVA-M
were cultured for 20 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 and the labelling efficiency was analysed. As shown in figures 1
a) and b), 20 h afters labelling >95% of the M
were still fluorescent.
|
. After 20 h, the blood, lungs, spleen, lymph nodes (axillary, brachial, thoracic), liver and kidney were dissected and analysed for the presence of CMFDA-labelled M
. Analysing the different tissues, no CMFDA-labelled OVA-M
was found throughout the lungs (fig. 1c
were clearly detectable in the spleen (fig. 1df
90%) CMFDA-labelled M
were localised in the marginal zones of the spleen. No CMFDA-labelled M
were detectable in the blood or any other analysed tissue, including the main clearance sites; liver and kidney (data not shown).
Since OVA-M
migrated to the spleen, it was hypothesised that these M
can accomplish an indirect suppressive effect, most probably mediated by the induction of allergen-specific memory lymphocytes.
Allergen-loaded macrophages induce an allergen-specific suppression
Allergen-specificity was examined by treating OVA-sensitised mice with ISS-ODN-stimulated and KLH-loaded M
. In sham-treated mice, the airway responsiveness to increased concentrations of methacholine (1.650 mg·mL1) was significantly (p<0.05) increased upon OVA inhalation challenge. As an example the airway hyperresponsiveness to 50 mg·mL1 methacholine is depicted in figure 2a
. As compared with sham-treated mice, the increase in AHR was significantly (p<0.05; up to 40%) suppressed upon treatment with ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
(fig. 2a
). In contrast, ISS-ODN-stimulated KLH-M
failed to suppress the AHR to methacholine (fig. 2a
).
|
were not capable of suppressing the upregulation of OVA-specific IgE (fig. 2b
suppressed the upregulation of OVA-specific IgE for 68% (p<0.01), as compared with sham-treated mice (fig. 2b
In agreement with these results, ISS-ODN-stimulated KLH-M
failed to suppress both the airway eosinophilia and IL-5 levels in the BALF (fig. 2c
and d), whereas ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
significantly (p<0.05) suppressed these asthma manifestations (89% and 83% compared with sham-treated mice, respectively).
Activated ovalbumin-macrophage induce a long-lasting immunosuppressive effect
By lengthening the time period between M
treatment and OVA inhalation challenge from 1 to 4 weeks, it was possible to investigate whether allergen-loaded M
induced memory suppressive effects. OVA-sensitised mice were treated with OVA-M
, LPS-stimulated OVA-M
, or ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
. After 4 weeks the mice were challenged by OVA inhalation (8 days) and, subsequently, the increase in airway responsiveness to methacholine was measured. In sham-treated mice the airway responsiveness to increased concentrations of methacholine (1.625 mg·mL1) was significantly (p<0.01) increased upon OVA inhalation challenge. As an example the airway hyperresponsiveness to 25 mg·mL1 methacholine is depicted in figure 3a
. After a 4-week interval between treatment and challenge, e.g. after a short-term interval, ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
significantly (p<0.05) suppressed the AHR for up to 48%, as compared with sham-treated mice (fig. 3a
).
|
strongly suppressed (75%, p<0.05) the upregulation of serum OVA-specific IgE levels (fig. 3b
with LPS or ISS-ODN did not further suppress these OVA-specific IgE levels (fig. 3b
Moreover, after a long-term interval between treatment and challenge ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
suppressed significantly (p<0.05) the influx of eosinophils into the lungs for 82%, as compared with sham-treated mice (fig. 3c
). In correlation with the numbers of eosinophils, the IL-5 levels in the BALF were significantly suppressed (81%, p<0.01) upon treatment with ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
(fig. 3d
). LPS-stimulated OVA-M
failed to suppress airway eosinophilia but suppressed significantly (p<0.05) the IL-5 levels in the BALF for 51%, compared with sham-treatment (fig. 3d
).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
play a pivotal role in the activation, as well as suppression of allergic asthma, the mechanism by which they exert these functions is still under debate 3. Previously, the current authors demonstrated that allergen-loaded M
suppress anti-inflammatory responses in a mouse model of allergic asthma 20, 21. This current study shows that allergen-loaded M
migrate to the spleen and induce, locally, an allergen-specific and long-lasting immunosuppressive response, hallmarks of a memory lymphocyte response.
Using animal models of allergic asthma, it has been suggested that M
can exert a direct effect on the immunological homeostasis in the airways. Depletion of alveolar M
increased the IgE responses 18 and adoptive transfer of alveolar M
abrogated AHR 19. Recently, Pynaert et al. 27 showed that spleen M
, loaded with OVA and intratracheal-administered, suppressed airway eosinophilia, probably, by inducing a Th1-mediated counter regulation in the lung 8, 27. In contrast, in the present study evidence was obtained for an indirect mechanism by which M
can suppress anti-inflammatory responses in the lung.
Using CMFDA-labelled M
, it was observed that intravenously-administered M
were not trapped in the lungs, but migrated to the spleen. Twenty hours after treatment, CMFDA-labelled M
were only detectable in the spleen, while no CMFDA-labelled M
were found in the lungs or lymph nodes. This is in agreement with the homing of intravenous-administered M
and dendritic cells generated ex vivo, which transiently migrate to the lungs (within 23 h) followed by accumulation in the spleen and hardly in the lymph nodes 2831. In addition, >95% of interferon-
-stimulated M
reach the spleen within 5 h after i.v. injection, while less than 3% are detected in lung tissue (personal communication: G. Pynaert and J.Grooten, Dept Molecular Biomedical Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium). The accumulation of allergen-loaded M
in the spleen suggests that the M
induce, locally, an indirect immunosuppressive effect. The additional findings that allergen-loaded M
induce an allergen-specific and long-lasting suppressive response clearly demonstrated that allergen-specific suppressor lymphocytes have to be induced in the spleen. However, it cannot be fully excluded that the small numbers of M
in the lungs are also responsible for the induction of suppressor T-cells. M
have to be activated to produce high levels of IL-10 that, in turn, is essential to suppress OVA-induced airway inflammation 21. Since OVA-induced airway inflammation is suppressed even 4 weeks after i.v. administration of M
and it is rather hypothetical that they will still produce high levels of IL-10 at this time, the present data supports a role for allergen-specific suppressor lymphocytes induced by allergen-loaded M
in the spleen. Furthermore, the pivotal role of donor-M
-derived IL-10 21 does not suggest a role for resident M
responding to dead or apoptotic administered allergen-loaded M
.
After treatment with allergen-loaded M
, differential effects were observed dependent on the examined parameters (fig. 3
). This is in agreement with previous observations 21. ISS-ODN-stimulated OVA-M
suppress airway inflammation more effectively compared with unstimulated OVA-M
or LPS-stimulated OVA-M
. This suggests that activation with ISS-ODN is needed for an effective induction of allergen-specific suppressor lymphocytes by OVA-M
in the spleen. As activation of M
is not required for suppression of serum OVA-specific IgE levels (fig. 3
), it can be speculated that allergen-loaded M
suppress allergen-induced airway manifestations via, at least, two different mechanisms of which one is IL-10 dependent 21. OVA-induced airway hyperresponsiveness was measured using the Penh method, the authors would like to stipulate that Penh values may not correlate with changes in pulmonary resistance 32.
Most presumably a T-cell subset is involved, as the IL-10 production by OVA-M
upon recognition of OVA-specific T-cells in vitro, is dependent on major histocompatibility complex class II/T-cell receptor interaction 20. Upon allergen inhalation, the suppressive T-lymphocyte subset will be allergen-specifically activated (fig. 2
) and, thereby, suppresses the Th2-lymphocyte mediated allergic airway inflammation and AHR. These data indicate that therapy with allergen-loaded M
could be used to suppress airway inflammation in an allergen-specific fashion. As a result, the immune system is still functional during therapy and is able to respond to intruders. This suggests that patients that are sensitised to multiple aeroallergens may require M
-based treatment with each allergen, either simultaneously or consecutively. However, it has been shown that multiple vaccinations with immature or mature antigen-presenting cells will not result in toxicity 33.
Although the exact suppressive T-cell subset remains to be elucidated, regulatory T (Treg) cells are likely candidates to be induced by allergen-loaded M
. Treg cells are typically induced in microenvironments with local high levels of IL-10 and antigen presenting cells that present foreign-antigens. Importantly, Treg cells are antigen-specific and have a memory phenotype 34. Antigen-induced Treg cells play a crucial role in the maintenance of T-cell tolerance against foreign-antigens. This T-cell subset exhibits its suppressive activity by secreting the suppressive cytokine IL-10 (type 1 Treg cells) or TGF-ß (Th3 cells) 35. Studies, using mouse models of allergic asthma, demonstrated that allergen-specific Treg cells can mediate the suppression of allergen-induced airway manifestations 3638. In the current study's model no increase of IL-10 levels in the BALF after M
-treatment and subsequent OVA-inhalation challenge was found (data not shown). This suggests that OVA-M
induce a suppressor-lymphocyte subset other than type 1 Treg cells.
The localisation of the allergen-loaded M
in the spleen further supports the concept that Treg cells are induced. Although a few CMFDA-labelled M
were detectable in the T-cell area, most (
90%) CMFDA-labelled M
were localised in the marginal zones of the spleen. Previously, it was demonstrated that in the marginal zone of the spleen antigen-presenting M
, together with marginal zone B-cells and natural killer T-cells that likely secrete suppressive cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-ß, create a microenvironment that induces antigen-specific Treg cells 39, 40. In the current study's model, ISS-ODN-stimulated M
migrate to the marginal zones of the spleen and present, there, the allergen to lymphocytes. Since these M
produce high levels of IL-10 21, it can be hypothesised that a microenvironment is created in which allergen-specific Treg cells could be induced. Experiments in which splenocytes from tolerised mice are transferred to sensitised recipient mice are in progress to establish which suppressor-lymphocyte subset is induced upon interaction with allergen-loaded M
.
Together, it was demonstrated that allergen-loaded macrophages are able to induce, besides direct suppression, an indirect suppression of airway manifestations of asthma in a mouse model. It can be speculated that allergen-loaded macrophages migrate to the spleen and present, locally, the allergen to the immune system while secreting interleukin-10. This causes a microenvironment in which an allergen-specific and long-lasting immunosuppressive response is induced. During the effector-phase, this immunosuppressive response suppresses allergen-induced airway manifestations. The role of macrophages in asthma pathology in general and the specific importance of macrophage-induced immunosuppressive memory responses against asthma manifestations may lead to novel strategies to induce stable suppression of allergen-specific T-helper type 2 responses.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |