Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2005 Clinical utility of CT in children with persistent focal chest abnormalityDepts of 1 Paediatrics, 2 Radiology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy. To the Editors:
We read with interest the article by Li et al. 1 on the contribution of computed tomography (CT) in determining aetiological diagnosis of noncystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis, and in leading to a change in management. We carried out a prospective study in 50 children (26 males; median age: 7.45 yrs, range: 12 months to 17 yrs) with chronic cough for >3 months and persistent focal chest abnormality on at least two conventional chest radiographs (CCR) made at intervals of Sweat test, leukocytes blood count and purified protein derivative test for tuberculosis, electrocardiogram and Doppler echocardiography were normal or negative in all cases. Seven patients were affected by primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), five had previously undergone oesophageal atresia repair, three had common variable immunodeficiency and two were affected by Down's syndrome. Ongoing treatment included regular daily chest physiotherapy in patients with PCD, and periodic intravenous immunoglobulins (Igs) in children with common variable immunodeficiency. CT scans were performed within 1 month from the last CCR. All patients were re-examined every 4 months by the paediatric pulmonologist who had requested the CT scan, with any further investigation planned depending on the result of the CT scan. Further diagnostic tests included: nasal brushing for ciliary structure; sweat test and CF gene mutation analysis; 24-h oesophageal pH-metry; serum Ig plus IgG subclass determination; and bronchoscopy. The definitive diagnosis was made after 12 months on the basis of the clinical course and the results of any additional diagnostic tests performed. At the end of the follow-up period, we compared both CCR and CT with the definitive diagnosis and with the clinical outcome, and evaluated whether or not the clinical management had been modified.
Ultimate diagnoses were: consolidation (31 patients; 60%); bronchiectasis (12 patients; 24%); congenital malformations of the lower respiratory tract (six patients; 12%); and foreign body (FB) inhalation (one patient; 2%). Of the 12 patients with bronchiectasis, one subsequently had evidence of common variable immunodeficiency, two of PCD and two of CF mutations (
Following lung CT, alone or combined with clinical findings and additional tests, the management was changed in 32 children (64%), but remained unmodified in 18 cases (36%; Chi-squared = 6.76; p = 0.009; table 1
Lung CT scans provide superior anatomic definition of airways abnormalities 2, 3. As in non-CF bronchiectasis 1, in children with persistent focal chest abnormality a fundamental question that should be addressed is whether or not chest CT significantly alters patient's care. Cases that benefit from chest CT alone include those in whom CCR fails to adequately explain the clinical course (e.g. children with bronchiectasis or congenital lung malformations) 4. However, CT may also be beneficial when the diagnostic probability that guides decision derives, in addition to lung imaging, from the combined use of ancillary laboratory findings and the progress of clinical symptoms and signs over an established period of time. Evaluating the clinical utility of diagnostic tests in paediatric pulmonary medicine is not an easy task because only a few standard reference tests exist against which to compare testing strategies in selected cases (e.g. lung biopsy or bronchoalveolar lavage findings in interstitial lung disease or surgical confirmation in lung malformations) 5. In patients with chronic cough due to persistent chest disease, a "yes" or "not" response is often insufficient to decide whether the test is worthwhile, since correct diagnosis often relies on a combination of clinical information plus laboratory results. In these cases, the improvement of the final outcome following computed tomography scan, whether alone or combined, can provide the best demonstration of the clinical utility of computed tomography.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||