ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loh, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loh, L. C.
Eur Respir J 2005; 26:363-364
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2005

Tolerance to repeat exposure of inhaled endotoxin: an observation in healthy humans

L. C. Loh

CORRESPONDENCE: Dept of Medicine, Clinical School, International Medical University, Jalan Rasah, Malaysia

To the Editors:

We read with interest the articles on endotoxin research in the May issue of the European Respiratory Journal. The editorial by Bals 1 aptly raised the yet unanswered questions concerning the timing (acute versus chronic) and doses of inhaled endotoxin relevant to health and disease, and the questions of whether the outcome of such exposure is always detrimental.

To this end, we wish to add our own preliminary observation of the possibility of tolerance to repeat exposure of inhaled lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in healthy nonatopic humans at 4 weeks. In a double-blind, crossover study, eight healthy human subjects were randomised to receiving either a single inhaled dose of 50 µg salmeterol or placebo prior to being challenged with a 15-µg dose of Escherichia coli serotype 026:B6 (Sigma, Poole, UK), in two visits separated by 4 weeks. Using 1 week prior as a baseline, sputum induced at the 6th h after LPS challenge showed no significant differences in the increase of total cell counts in the two treatment periods (mean difference (95% confidence interval) salmeterol versus placebo: 10.6x106 cells·mL–1 (–9.71–30.9); p = 0.25) or neutrophils (11.7x106 cells·mL–1 (–8.33–31.92); p = 0.20; unpublished data). The assertion that salmeterol does not protect against airway neutrophilic inflammation was subsequently supported in a more robust study, where subjects were randomised to receiving either daily salmeterol for 3 weeks or placebo, prior to inhaled LPS challenge, in a crossover study 2.

Retrospective power analysis of our results first alerted us to the possibility of intrinsic biological phenomena in a study design of sequential inhaled LPS challenges. Data were then re-analysed with the purpose of looking into the reproducibility of sputum neutrophilia between the two inhaled challenges, treating the effects of the single-dose salmeterol as no more than placebo 2. Our findings showed that following the first LPS challenge, the mean total sputum cell counts increased by 31.23x106 cells·mL–1 (95% CI: 13.27–49.20) and the mean sputum neutrophil counts rose by 30.3x106 cells·mL–1 (12.59–48.11). However, following the second LPS challenge, the mean total sputum cell counts only increased by 11.3x106 cells·mL–1 (2.14–24.89) and mean sputum neutrophil counts by 10.9x106 cells·mL–1 (1.02–22.9). The difference between the means was statistically significant (p = 0.01; mean difference: 19.8x106 cells·mL–1 (6.16–33.56) for total sputum cell counts; 19.4x106 cells·mL–1 (4.73–34.08) for sputum neutrophil counts; fig. 1Go).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1— Comparison of sputum neutrophilia post-inhaled lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 6th h) between two inhaled LPS challenges separated by 4 weeks. {blacksquare}: baseline; •: 6 h post-inhaled LPD; {diamondsuit}: 1 week post-inhaled LPS. **: denotes p = 0.01 between the mean differences.

 
Using such a human experimental model of airway neutrophilia to understand the inhaled effects of endotoxin 3, and to examine for potential anti-inflammatory properties of therapeutic agents 2 appears to be a validated approach. Michel et al. 3 employed a model of weekly inhaled challenges of incremental LPS doses (0.5 µg, 5 µg and 50 µg) to provide evidence for dose responsiveness of LPS in airway inflammation and systemic effects in healthy human subjects. Wallin et al. 2 tested for possible anti-inflammatory effect of salmeterol versus placebo, via findings from bronchoscopy, based on a study design of inhaling 50 µg LPS on two occasions separated by ≥3 weeks. However, none of these studies had observed tolerance towards subsequent LPS challenge(s) in their healthy human subjects at doses of LPS described that were higher than ours. It is possible that tolerance in healthy nonatopic human subjects only occurs in exposure to lower doses of inhaled endoxin. In fact, existing literature indicates that exposure of 30–40 µg inhaled LPS is probably the clinical threshold to induce symptoms and lung function changes for healthy subjects 4.

More research is required to validate our preliminary observation.

REFERENCES

  1. Bals R. Lipopolysaccharide and the lung: a story of love and hate. Eur Respir J 2005;25:776–777.[Free Full Text]
  2. Wallin A, Pourazar J, Sandstrom T. LPS-induced bronchoalveolar neutrophilia; effects of salmeterol treatment. Respir Med 2004;98:1087–1092.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Michel O, Nagy AM, Schroeven M, et al. Dose-response relationship to inhaled endotoxin in normal subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:1157–1164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Thorn J. The inflammatory response in humans after inhalation of bacterial endotoxin: a review. Inflamm Res 2001;50:254–261.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loh, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loh, L. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS