Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2005 Long-term clearance from small airways in patients with cystic fibrosis1 Division of Occupational Medicine, Dept of Public Health Science, Karolinska Institutet and Occupational and Environmental Health, Stockholm, County Council, 2 Stockholm CF center, Dept of Paediatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge site, 3 Division of Inhalation Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, and 4 Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI), Stockholm, Sweden CORRESPONDENCE: M. Lindström, Dept of Paediatrics B57, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge Site, S-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. Fax: 46 858581410. E-mail: maria.lindstrom@phs.ki.se Keywords: Cystic fibrosis, lung deposition, mucociliary clearance, small airways
Received: October 27, 2003
Impaired mucociliary clearance is a hallmark of cystic fibrosis (CF). Early morphological changes first appear in the small airways. Lung clearance was investigated in 11 young CF adults with mild-to-moderate lung disease using a method depositing particles mainly in the small airways. Radiolabelled Teflon particles (6 µm) were inhaled with an extremely slow inhalation flow, 0.05 L·s1. Lung retention was measured immediately following inhalations and, on four occasions up to 21 days. The results were compared with data from healthy subjects. The lung retention at 24 h in % of deposition was 67% (95% confidence interval 5876) in the CF patients, compared to 48% (4253) in the healthy subjects. Clearance on days 17 was larger in the CF patients, 22% (1529) compared to the healthy subjects, 14% (1216). No difference was observed between the CF patients and the healthy subjects in the slow clearance phase at day 7 to day 21, representing small airway clearance. Impaired mucociliary clearance in CF patients results in increased 24-h retention and a prolonged rapid clearance phase. The results of the study do not support the current authors' hypothesis that clearance from small airways is slower in cystic fibrosis patients compared to healthy subjects. Furthermore, the data suggest that mucociliary transport is not the dominant clearance mechanism in small airways. Ciliary activity and rheology of airway surface liquid determine mucociliary clearance (MCC). MCC is one of the primary defence mechanisms in the lung to remove insoluble deposited material. This clearance mechanism is rapid, resulting in clearance of the larger airways within hours of inhalation and is considered to be completed within 24 h in healthy subjects. Any particles remaining in the lung after 24 h represent alveolar deposition 1, 2. However, previous studies of healthy subjects using a shallow bolus technique as well as studies using extremely slow inhalation flow (0.05 L·s1) and 6 µm particles, resulting in particles deposited in the small airways, show that a considerable fraction of particles may be retained after 24 h 35 These studies provide evidence that the rapid clearance phase in the tracheobronchial region is followed by a second, slower clearance phase, though still more rapid than alveolar clearance. This intermediate clearance phase, proposed to represent clearance of particles deposited in the bronchiolar region, has been included in the revised dosimetric model for the human respiratory tract, adopted by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 6. The inherited disease, cystic fibrosis (CF), is characterised by production and accumulation of copious amounts of mucus with increased viscosity in the airways due to defective ion transport across the respiratory epithelium. This results in impaired MCC with recurrent bacterial infections, chronic inflammation, bronchiectasis and airway damage. This eventually culminates in respiratory failure and premature death. Early morphological changes in CF are first observed in the terminal bronchioles 7. The most widely used method to study MCC in CF patients is the use of radiolabelled particles detected with the gamma camera technique. The rate of removal of the inhaled radiolabelled aerosol in the lung can be determined by serial gamma camera images for up to 24 h. Such studies show that MCC is impaired in both central and peripheral regions 8, 9. Impaired MCC is also characteristic in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia, also known as immotile cilia syndrome, and in patients with chronic bronchitis. In these groups coughing clears centrally deposited particles quite effectively. The retained fraction at 24 h (Ret24) may even be smaller than in healthy subjects 10, 11. However, when particles are deposited in small airways, the retained fraction at 72 and 96 h is significantly larger in these patient groups, compared to that of healthy subjects 12, 13. The current study investigated lung clearance in young adults with CF, using a method depositing particles primarily in the small airways. The small airways were defined according to the Weibel model A 14, as generations 915, corresponding to the bronchioles, which have ciliated epithelium and are <2 mm in diameter. The aims of the study were: 1) to test the hypothesis that the retained fraction of particles at 24 h (Ret24) is larger; and 2) that the clearance between day one and day 21 from small airways is slower in patients with CF compared to healthy subjects. It was also hypothesised that the Ret24 increases and the clearance between day 1 and 21 decreases with the severity of the lung disease.
Subjects Eleven patients (four males) attending the Stockholm CF center, aged 18.7±2.5 (mean±SD) yrs, with mild-to-moderate lung disease fulfilled the inclusion criteria and volunteered for the study. The inclusion criteria were: 1) diagnosis of CF in childhood with symptoms characteristic for CF and a positive sweat test (>80 Cl mmoL·L1) 15; 2) aged 15 yrs; 3) a clinically stable condition; 4) no history of organ transplants; and 5) not pregnant. Anthropometric data, genotype, and Bhalla score 16, as well as current bacterial culture and inflammatory parameters (immunoglobulin G) together with the lung function data taken at the onset of the study are shown in table 1 F508, 3659delC and 394delTT. Three patients were considered chronically colonised solely with Staphylococcus aureus and seven patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, of whom two were also colonised with S. aureus, in their lower airways. A patient was considered chronically colonised when the same pathogen was regularly isolated from sputum or nasopharyngeal swabs for a period >6 consecutive months. All patients were on oral mucolytic agents (bromhexin and acetylcystein) and inhaled salbutamol and acetylcystein once to twice daily combined with mucus mobilising and evacuating exercise as part of their daily physiotherapy. None of the patients were prescribed systemic corticosteroids or received nebulised rhDNase or nebulised antibiotics. Despite being in a clinically stable condition, three of the CF patients (No. 6, 9 and 11) showed slightly elevated C-reactive protein, No. 6 being on an i.v. antibiotic treatment initiated at slight signs of low-grade infection 17. Two patients with moderate lung disease coughed spontaneously during the exposure and reported spontaneous cough during the study period of 21 days. The other CF patients only coughed voluntarily together with their daily physiotherapy. Their coughs were not monitored in detail over time.
The pulmonary function was evaluated by forced expirograms (Lung Function Laboratory 2100; SensorMedics, Anaheim, CA, USA). The same technical assistant coached each CF patient. The airway resistance (Raw), was measured using a panting technique within a whole-body plethysmograph (Transmural Body Box 2800; SensorMedics). All lung function parameters were determined according to the criteria proposed by Quanjer et al. 18. Prior to the clearance, data were evaluated and the patients were categorised on the basis of their lung function, one group with mild lung disease (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) >70% of predicted; n = 6), and one group with moderate-to-severe lung disease (FEV1 <70% pred; n = 5). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Human Research at the Karolinska University Hospital and the Isotope Committee at the Karolinska Hospital. All patients and healthy subjects were provided with written information about the study and informed that the exposure of radioactivity to the lung was lower than the radiation dose of a conventional chest radiograph. All the patients and healthy subjects gave their written informed consent to participate in the study. Parental consent was obtained for the patients aged <18 yrs.
Study design
For ethical reasons, present data was compared with previous data from healthy subjects of similar age from the current authors' previous studies. They were nonsmokers, nonasthmatics who had normal lung function. Both the healthy subjects and the CF patients were exposed using the same equipment for particles production procedure and inhalation. Identical inhalation pattern was used and radioactivity was measured in the lung with the same detectors throughout the study in both groups 5, 20, 21. The average anthropomorphic and lung function data (mean±SD) of the healthy subjects are given in table 1
Inhalation of the test particles and measurement of radioactivity Immediately following the inhalation and 24 h later the radioactivity was measured using two 127x51 mm NaI crystals fitted with collimators. The average radioactivity deposited in the lung was 0.1 MBq. The authors believe that hot spot deposition was probably limited as the particles settle mainly by sedimentation and not by impaction. The radioactivity was also measured at 24 h and at day 7 after inhalation using the whole-body scanner with three large NaI detectors, at the Swedish Radiation Protection Institute 20, 24. At day 7, 14 and 21, when the radioactivity in the gastrointestinal tract was insignificant compared to the lung radioactivity, a more sensitive lung counter was used with the subject in supine position.
Theoretical calculation of lung deposition
Statistical analyses
Mean FEV1 in the CF patients was 2.4 L (1.73.4) corresponding to 72±17% pred, compared to 4.2 L (3.25.9) corresponding to 105±13% pred in the healthy subjects. The CF patients with moderately severe lung disease showed growth of P. aeruginosa in their sputum sample, taken at the start of the study, compared with none in the CF group with mild lung disease (table 1
The calculated regional deposition in different airway regions according to the theoretical model showed that the main fraction was deposited in the small conducting airways (generations 915). The deposition pattern did not differ between the healthy subjects and the CF patients, nor did it differ between the two CF groups according to their lung disease (fig. 1
There was a significant clearance after 24 h in all the subjects. The healthy subjects and the CF patients showed a cleared fraction during 21 days of 55% and 50% of Ret24, respectively. There was no statistical difference detected by linear regression of the slope between day 7 and 21. Lung retention at day 7, 14 and 21, in % of Ret24, were similar between the healthy subjects and the two CF groups (fig. 3
The objective of this study was to investigate long-term clearance from small airways in patients with CF. The most important and unexpected finding was similar clearance in the CF patients and the healthy subjects after day 7 up to the last measured point at day 21. Furthermore, an increased fraction of retained particles was found at 24 h in the CF patients compared to that in the healthy subjects. The estimated lung deposition of the inhaled particles was to a large extent deposited in the small airways, and the calculated regional deposition predicted very small differences between the CF patients (irrespective of lung disease) and the healthy subjects. The large Ret24 (67% in the CF patients compared to 48% in the healthy subjects) also indicated a larger deposition in the small airways than that found using normal inhalation flow. If the fraction of particles were deposited more centrally in the lungs, the Ret24 would probably be smaller in the CF patients than in healthy subjects 26, since the CF patients probably clear the central airways faster by their daily physiotherapy and voluntary coughing. If the fraction of particles were deposited in the alveolar region, then the clearance after 24 h would have been much slower than that measured in the current study 27. In patients with asthma, chronic bronchitis or CF, the airways may be narrowed by bronchospasm, oedema or mucus secretion, resulting in a turbulent flow that increases impaction in the larger airways and thereby reduces the penetration to the small airways of the lung. In contrast, in the small airways the airflow is slow due to the large total cross-sectional area and particle sediment by gravity onto the airway surface. By using extremely slow inhalation flow (ESI) and rather large particles, the fraction deposited in small airways increases by sedimentation. Even if there was a difference in FEV1% pred and airway resistance between the CF patients and the healthy subjects the ESI has shown to be robust and rather insensitive to airway obstruction and uneven ventilation 28. The larger Ret24 in the CF patients compared to the healthy subjects was expected. There was also a larger variation in Ret24 in the CF patients compared to later time points and to the healthy subjects at all time points. Furthermore, there was a larger difference between Ret24 and retention of particles at day 7 in the CF patients. The authors' interpretation was that their rapid clearance phase not was completed within 24 h, but continued and was probably completed sometime before day 7. A larger retained fraction at 24 h in the CF patients could also contribute to the faster elimination during day 17. In healthy subjects the rapid clearance phase (from deposition to the first 24 h) is governed mainly by the mucociliary escalator with normal mucus and cilia activity. In CF patients this clearance mechanism is disturbed, and the CF patients might compensate their impaired MCC by a more unpredictable cough clearance. Cough probably has greater impact on clearance from the larger airways where the necessary airflow velocity is achieved, allowing the effects on the rapid clearance phase. The patient (No. 3), who had a Ret24 of 88%, and then cleared 50% of the retained fraction to the next measured point at day 7, might be an illustration of this cough clearance as a compensatory mechanism for impaired MCC. The slow clearance phase, measured from day 7, in percentage of Ret24, was similar in CF patients and healthy subjects. All subjects continued to clear their airways with the same velocity and, on average 50% of the retained particles at 24 h cleared during this period. The similarity between the CF patients and the healthy subjects may be attributable to insufficient power. To increase the power of the differences between the CF patients and the healthy subjects they were also tested with an independent t-test with the same result. MCC is probably not the primary rate determining factor for clearance from the small airways. The contribution of cough to clearance in the small airways is probably limited, though cough as a mechanical force may influence other secondary clearance mechanisms. In a study using a similar method to the current study, bronchiolar clearance was studied for up to 72 h in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, who had healthy lungs but severely reduced muscular strength. There was a significantly lower retention at 72 h (but not after 24 or 48 h) than in the control experiment with continuous positive airway pressure treatment, suggesting that a mechanical force can influence the long-term clearance from small airways 29. Other clearance mechanisms such as phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages, penetration of the test particles though the epithelium or re-transfer with a time delay of particles onto the gel layer, may also contribute to clearance during the slow clearance phase 30. Several factors may be associated with lung clearance such as age, sex, BMI, lung function and airway resistance. The age and sex between the CF and the healthy subjects where similar, although they where not individually matched. The BMI differed, but this factor was included as a marker for nutritional status as a consequence of the CF disease and not as a factor correlated to the lung retention. However, it is still possible that BMI itself, separate from the causality of the CF disease, has an independent effect that may have influenced the observations. The present authors have however, not found any correlation between BMI and lung retention in healthy subjects. FEV1 % pred and airway resistance also differed between CF patients and healthy subjects. As discussed earlier these factors have limited effect on the deposition. However, FEV1 % pred as an individual factor, predicting the lung clearance, was uncertain, and the square correlation coefficient (r2) between FEV1 % pred and Ret24 was 0.27. The CF patients were divided into two subgroups according to their lung function, measured as FEV1 % pred to test if a more serious lung disease was associated with a higher lung retention on group level. The current bacterial airway colonisation showed an association with decreased FEV1 % pred. The CF group with moderately severe lung disease (FEV1 <70% pred) had a higher burden of P. aeruginosa in their airways, which is in concordance with previous findings 31. There was a nonsignificant difference in Ret24 between the two CF groups. This was probably due to the large variability in the rapid clearance phase (reflecting clearance from large airways). At later measured time points this difference became significant, with larger lung retention in % of deposition in CF patients with moderately severe lung disease. It seems that patients with a slower clearance during the first 24 h, can catch up due to a faster clearance during the first week, but that the degree of the lung disease influences the lung retention during the rapid clearance phase (the first week). The patients with the more severe lung disease have a longer exposure to inhaled materials. Whether the prolonged rapid clearance phase is caused by the bacterial colonisation in the airways, or if the slower clearance is primarily associated with the disease, CF, has to be confirmed. The bronchodilatator terbutaline, that has a known stimulating effect on short-term MCC, may have influenced the result of the rapid clearance phase but should not affect the slow clearance phase from small airways 32. Earlier clearance studies, mostly gamma camera studies, on CF patients, have used normal inhalation flow. When normal inhalation flow (>0.2 L·s1) is used, the particles are deposited mainly in larger airways or in the alveolar region and, only to a small extent in the small airways, independent of particle size 24. The breathing pattern and the particle size used highly influence the site of the deposition within the lungs. The deposition is probably the most important determinant of measured MCC 26, 33. It is therefore difficult to evaluate different studies of MCC in which the site of the deposition might have varied. To the best of the authors' knowledge this is the first study on long-term clearance in patients with CF.
Conclusions With extremely slow inhalation flow it is possible for 6-µm particles to target small airways. This inhalation methodology may be of clinical utility in selectively targeting small airways for the deposition of therapeutic drugs such as antibiotics or gene therapy. Further studies are needed to confirm the hypothesis that mechanisms other than mucociliary clearance dominate in the small airways. A study similar to the present investigating long-term clearance from small airways in patients with impaired ciliary activity may be helpful in elucidating clearance mechanisms.
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Heart and Lung foundation, the European Commission (contract no. FIS5-1999-00214, BIODOSE), Karolinska Institutet foundation and, from Free Mason in Stockholm Foundation for Children's Welfare. The authors would like to thank L-L. Söderström, Dept of Clin. Physiology, South Stockholm General Hospital, for technical assistance with the lung function test, I. Östergren, Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI) for skilful technical assistance, U. Bergsten for secretary assistance and M. Lundberg for guidance of radioactivity measurements, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||