|
|
||||||||
Depts of 1 Epidemiology and 2 Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
CORRESPONDENCE: L. Elliott, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, MD A2-05, P.O. Box 12233, RTP, NC 27709, USA. Fax: 1 9199676839. E-mail: elliott1@niehs.nih.gov
Keywords: Agriculture, asthma, childhood disease, ecological study, farming, livestock
Received: January 18, 2004
Accepted July 14, 2004
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
County-specific aggregate measures were used to examine the relationship between the prevalence of asthma and wheeze in 7th and 8th grade school children (aged 1214 yrs) and selected measures of potential exposure to farming in the state of North Carolina. Binomial regression models were fitted to quantify these relationships, with adjustments for parental smoking, socioeconomic status, sex and race. Regression coefficients were reported for an increment of one interquartile range (IQR) in each indicator of exposure.
The prevalence of asthma showed decreasing trends for most indicators of farm exposure. Regression results suggested that the largest decreases in asthma prevalence were associated with the number of farms (5.0% per IQR increment), acreage of hay (7.2% per IQR increment) and beef cattle (7.8% per IQR increment). The pattern of results was similar for wheezing.
In conclusion, the findings of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that certain farm exposures are protective against childhood asthma. Further research with individual-level data is needed to identify the specific protective exposures.
The prevalence of asthma has increased dramatically since the 1980s. In the USA, during the period 19801996, the prevalence of self-reported asthma increased by 75% overall and 74% among children aged 514 yrs 1. In 2001, the prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma among children (017 yrs) and adults (
18 yrs) was 8.7% and 6.9%, respectively 2. The mounting problem of asthma in developed countries worldwide has sparked a variety of clinical and epidemiological research regarding the aetiology and exacerbation of the disease. One focus of recent aetiological research has been the effect of environmental factors on the development and behaviour of the immune system in children. These studies have examined the "hygiene hypothesis" of immunological development, which, in its simplest form, asserts that the developing immune system must be confronted with microbial material in order to function appropriately. Otherwise, the immune system "turns on" mechanisms that create an over-reaction to exposures, resulting in allergy and asthma. Support for the hygiene hypothesis has been found in European, Australian, New Zealand and Canadian studies of farm children, who appear to have asthma less frequently than children who have not grown up on farms 310. The specific farm exposures responsible for this apparent protective effect have not been identified, but it is thought that exposure to endotoxin from livestock and poultry may be a contributing factor in the reduced asthma prevalence among farm children.
An ecological study was conducted using existing data to examine the overall relationship between asthma prevalence and farming exposures in North Carolina, USA. The study sought to determine whether there might be a basis for further research to evaluate the relationship of farming and asthma inNorth Carolina, where there are a variety of farm types and sizes.
| Subjects and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The survey response rate was 66.8% (128,568 out of 192,248) for 7th and 8th grade children enrolled in public school during 19992000. Response rates by school were 88% (499 out of 565) and 99 out of 100 counties. One county hadunusable data due to a broken video tape, leaving the data from 98 out of 100 counties for analyses. Demographic information obtained from the statistical branch of the North Carolina Dept of Public Instruction was used to compare participants with nonparticipants. There were no significant differences in socioeconomic status (enrolment in the free school lunch programme), race, or sex among children who participated and those who did not 12.
County-specific data about agriculture, including numbers of livestock and poultry, and acres of crops, were obtained from the Agricultural Statistics Division of the North Carolina Dept of Agriculture and Consumer Services 13. Statistics on cattle were reported from January 1, 2002, and statistics on hogs, pig, poultry, and crops were reported from December 1, 2001. Counties did not report livestock or poultry if their numbers did not meet the minimum for census; these included <1,000 hogs or pigs, <200 beef or milk cattle and <500,000 broilers (chickens raised for meat). Counties did not report crops if they did not harvest >200 acres.
Data regarding the number of farms and total acreage ofeach county were obtained from the 1997 Census of Agriculture 13. These statistics are compiled and published by the U.S. Dept of Commerce every 5 yrs. Population estimates and descriptions of county populations were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau 14.
Statistical analysis
Binomial regression was used to quantify the relationships between county agricultural characteristics and county prevalence of asthma and undiagnosed wheeze among 7th and 8th grade children who participated in the NCSAS. Variables for farming, such as the numbers of livestock and acres of crops, were scaled using interquartile ranges (IQR) to facilitate comparison of the regression coefficients given the diverse units and ranges of these agricultural indicators. Regression coefficients were reported as the percentage change in prevalence for each scaled unit of exposure. All models were weighted by the number of children participating in the asthma survey in each county and adjusted for the percentage of male and African-American participants, the percentage whose parents smoked and the percentage enrolled in free school lunch programmes (an indicator of socioeconomic status).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These ecological findings are consistent with the hypothesis that some exposures related to farming are protective against childhood asthma. Hypotheses that farming might have protective effects focus on conditions that result in a richer microbial environment, including larger families, exposure to livestock (particularly cattle), and exposure to higher levels of endotoxin, a cell wall component of Gram-negative bacteria 15.
The focus has turned to endotoxin as a protective factor because of its potential to suppress the innate immune responses involved in immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy 15. Endotoxin is ubiquitous in the environment, but levels tend to be high in environments where there are farm animals, such as cows, horses, and pigs 3, and during wheat harvest 17.
As in any ecological study, the finding of an association at the population level does not necessarily imply that the same relationship exists among individuals. Individual-level confounding is particularly difficult to control and may have affected the results, despite adjustments for ecological indicators of smoking, ethnicity and socioeconomic level. Interpretation of the findings for hogs and pigs was complicated by the observation that intensive hog operations are concentrated in areas with high proportions of poor, non-White residents 18. Therefore, race and poverty may be causes of exposure, as well as potential confounders.
Despite the well-known limitations of ecological studies, this study is, nevertheless, useful as a cost-effective initial examination of the overall relationship between asthma and exposures to farming in the USA 19. The few studies examining these relationships in the USA have resulted in equivocal findings. One study measured asthma prevalence in two counties in Iowa, where the predominant land use is farming 20. The potential protective effect of farming was observed in only one of the study counties, and asthma prevalence was similar to that found in large mid-western cities. The authors suggested that there might be little difference in environmental exposures between farm and non-farm residents, since agricultural exposures are ubiquitous in Iowa. A case-control study nested within the Children's Health Study in southern California examined the relationships between asthma and a variety of environmental exposures, and found that children who had ever been exposed to farm animals or crops and crop dust had an increased risk of asthma compared with children who had never had those exposures 21.
The current findings of associations between reduced asthma prevalence among adolescents and indicators of exposure to farming in North Carolina, USA, provide a stimulus for further study with measurement of exposure atthe individual level to investigate exposures that may be protective against the development of asthma.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Mirabelli, S. Wing, S. W. Marshall, and T. C. Wilcosky Asthma Symptoms Among Adolescents Who Attend Public Schools That Are Located Near Confined Swine Feeding Operations Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): e66 - e75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |