|
|
||||||||
1 Depts of Internal Medicine, and 2 Thoracic Surgery, and 3 Service of Nuclear Medicine, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
CORRESPONDENCE: D.B. Piai, Av. Independência, 2600, 13416-230 Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Fax: 55 1934341999. E-mail: dpiai@unipira.com.br
Keywords: Lung cancer, preoperative assessment, scintigraphy, single-photon emission computed tomography
Received: November 4, 2003
Accepted March 31, 2004
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, the postoperative predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (FEV1,ppo) was calculated in 26 patients with lung cancer using FEV1, quantitative lung perfusion scan with planar acquisition (PA) and quantitative lung perfusion scan with tomographic imaging (SPECT).
The estimated FEV1,ppo values obtained using both methods were compared with FEV1 values measured after surgery (mean: 48±44 days; range: 15180 days; median: 32 days). The Pearson's linear correlation coefficient was 0.8840 for FEV1,ppo estimated by PA and 0.8791 for FEV1,ppo estimated by SPECT. The linear correlation coefficient for lobectomy was greater than the coefficient for pneumonectomy using both methods.
In conclusion, both methods show good correlation for real postoperative pulmonary function without demonstrating single-photon emission computed tomography superiority over planar acquisition, and both methods were more effective for estimating postoperative predicted forced expiratory volume in one second in lobectomies than in pneumonectomies.
Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for nonsmall cell lung cancer, and this therapy should be encouraged, as the prognosis worsens for patients who are not operated on. However, the removal of the lung parenchyma in patients, the majority of whom are smokers, and who have compromised cardiovascular and lung conditions, may cause deterioration in ventilatory function and lead to cardiopulmonary failure or death. Therefore, in these patients, a preoperative assessment is extremely important before the appropriate therapy is chosen 14.
Pneumonectomy is well tolerated by the patient if: the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is either
2 L or >60% FEV1 predicted; the maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) is >50% pred; the residual volume/total lung capacity ratio is either <0.5 or the carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of the lung is >60%. Lobectomy is well tolerated by the patient if: the FEV1 is
1 L and if the MVV is
40% pred. Nevertheless, many patients who could benefit from resection surgery show poor functional values that go against an indication for this surgery. In these cases other assessments are needed, such as perfusion or ventilation pulmonary scintigraphy, which are the most frequently used methods, as they provide a regional assessment of lung function and can be used to estimate postoperative pulmonary function, using the predicted postoperative FEV1 (FEV1,ppo) 513. Operative risks in patients with FEV1,ppo 0.81.0 L or >40% FEV1 pred are acceptable for indicating lung resection for both pneumonectomy and lobectomy 1416.
Pulmonary scintigraphy with planar acquisition (PA) provides two-dimensional pulmonary images, and the estimated FEV1,ppo considers all the segments of the lung lobes as having the same volume and function, without considering the spatial overlapping of pulmonary areas with different functions, which could diminish the precision of the method. Conversely, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides images that could help detect radioactivity in each pulmonary lobe, avoiding spatial overlapping, thus making the method of regional pulmonary function assessment more precise. In some hospitals, this method has been used to plan radiotherapy for lung application and also to monitor regional alterations of pulmonary function after radiotherapy in patients with extrapulmonary diseases 1719.
The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of both the PA and SPECT methods for estimating FEV1,ppo in patients with lung cancer during the preoperative period.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Processing and analysis
Semi-quantitative analyses of planar and tomographic images were performed.
In the PA, regions of interest (ROI) were drawn in the anterior and posterior projections around the entire lung and also adjacent to the lungs, in order to subtract the background radiation. The percentage of the function of each lung was calculated by the geometric mean.
The SPECT images were normalised and reconstructed in sagittal planes. Ten sagittal images were generated for each lung. ROI were drawn, in each sagittal image, around the pulmonary lobes, according to their anatomical shape. The perfusion of each lobe was determined by the sum of the 10 ROI in the sagittal images. The per cent perfusion of each lobe was determined in relation to the perfusion of both lungs.
Estimation of postoperative pulmonary function
The FEV1,ppo values for each patient were estimated based on the preoperative FEV1 values, as well as the PA and SPECT pulmonary values. The values estimated by both methods were compared with the postoperative FEV1 values.
In PA, FEV1,ppo was estimated using different formulas for pneumonectomy and lobectomy. For pneumonectomy the formula below was used:
|
| (001) |
|
| (002) |
In SPECT, the same formula was used for the calculation of FEV1,ppo in pneumonectomy and lobectomy:
|
| (003) |
Statistical analysis
The Pearson or the Spearman correlation coefficient was applied, according to its need to verify the concordance between two measures. Values approximately equal to 1 indicated concordance 22, 23.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean PA-estimated FEV1,ppo was 1.73±0.55 L and the Pearson linear correlation coefficient of the postoperative FEV1 was 0.8840 (p<0.0001). The mean SPECT-estimated value of FEV1,ppo was 1.73±0.53 L and the Pearson linear correlation coefficient of the postoperative FEV1 was 0.8791, as shown in tables 2
and 3
. There was no significant difference between FEV1,ppo values estimated by PA and FEV1,ppo values estimated by SPECT (table 3
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study demonstrates a good correlation between FEV1,ppo estimated for both PA as well as SPECT and the real postoperative FEV1. Both methods were more precise in predicting postoperative pulmonary function for lobectomies than for pneumonectomies (table 4
).
The FEV1,ppo estimated by SPECT has been used in the preoperative assessment of patients with lung cancer and the results obtained have been similar to those obtained in this study. Imaeda et al. 24 conducted a study on 33 patients and analysed the precision of SPECT with perfusion-inhalation in the prediction of postoperative pulmonary function. The SPECT sections were correlated with the computerised tomographic images of the thorax for better delimitation of the lobes to be resected. After a postoperative period of 36 months, the correlation between FEV1,ppo and FEV1 was found to be good, with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.800.87, respectively 24.
In the PA-estimated FEV1,ppo, the calculation of the pulmonary function of each lobe is obtained using an antero-posterior projection on a two-dimensional image. It does nottake into consideration the spatial overlapping of the pulmonary lobes and the differences in their size or perfusion. Conversely, in the case of the SPECT-estimated FEV1,ppo, these problems can be resolved by measuring the perfusion for each pulmonary lobe, hoping for a better correlation between FEV1,ppo and real postoperative FEV1. Although the SPECT estimate of FEV1,ppo utilises more sophisticated technological resources, this method was not superior to the PA estimate of FEV1,ppo in this study (linear correlation coefficient: 0.9751; p<0.0001). Perhaps the SPECT estimate of FEV1,ppo could be improved by combining these images with computerised tomography, which does not provide functional images of the lung, but provides precise anatomic information that could diminish the anatomic imprecision of the SPECT images 1719.
In conclusion, the postoperative predicted forced expiratory volume in one second estimated by both methods, planar acquisition and single-photon emission computed tomography, has a good correlation with the real forced expiratory volume in one second, but it did not verify the superiority of single-photon emission computed tomography over planar acquisition. Both methods were more precise inpatients who underwent a lobectomy than in those who underwent a pneumonectomy.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Ohno, H. Koyama, M. Nogami, D. Takenaka, S. Matsumoto, M. Yoshimura, Y. Kotani, and K. Sugimura Postoperative Lung Function in Lung Cancer Patients: Comparative Analysis of Predictive Capability of MRI, CT, and SPECT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 400 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Mineo, O. Schillaci, E. Pompeo, D. Mineo, and G. Simonetti Usefulness of Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Before Lung Cancer Resection in Patients with Ventilatory Obstruction Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1828 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sudoh, K. Ueda, Y. Kaneda, J. Mitsutaka, T.-S. Li, K. Suga, Y. Kawakami, and K. Hamano Breath-hold single-photon emission tomography and computed tomography for predicting residual pulmonary function in patients with lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 994 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |