ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steenbruggen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Roorda, R.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steenbruggen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Roorda, R.J.
Eur Respir J 2004; 23:180-181
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2004


Spirometry in young children

I. Steenbruggen and R.J. Roorda

Dept of Paedriatrics, Isala klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands

To the Editor:

With interest we read the article by Gracchi et al. 1. In recent years we also evaluated the use of computer-animation programs for spirometry with children in our pulmonary function lab. However, we did not find a significant difference in maximal performance with or without the use of the "candles" and the "balloon" program.

In addition we are surprised to see that the authors did find a difference in reproducibility. When the use of an animation program is only for additional support you are not likely to find a difference in reproducibility. It should be noted that an animation program will of course never be able to replace the lung function technician, but should be used as an extra incentive.

The exact circumstances of this study are not quite clear. Was the use of an incentive always accompanied by the same coaching as blowing without the use of an incentive?

In our study we did find an important difference: all children did find the lung function test more attractive with the use of a computer-animation, and as a result we were able to have pulmonary function tests done in younger children.

So we came to the conclusion that the use of a computer-animation program is useful, even for routine use.

References

  1. Gracchi V, Boel M, van der Laag J, van der Ent CK. Spirometry in young children: should computer-animation programs be used during testing?. Eur Respir J 2003;21:872–875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steenbruggen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Roorda, R.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steenbruggen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Roorda, R.J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS