Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2004 doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00017803
Home mechanical ventilation in Hong Kong1 Division of Respiratory Medicine, Dept of Medicine, United Christian Hospital, 2 Dept of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, 3 Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Dept of Health, 4 Dept of Medicine, Ruttonjee Hospital, AND 5 Dept of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China CORRESPONDENCE: C.M. Chu, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Dept of Medicine, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China. Fax: 852 23472325. E-mail: nncmchu@netvigator.com Keywords: asia-Pacific, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, home mechanical ventilation, Hong Kong, registry
Received: February 17, 2003
Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) is increasingly used to treat chronic respiratory failure. This present study was aimed to examine the trend, the disease categories treated and the outcomes of HMV use in Hong Kong. In the year 2002, all adult respiratory units in Hong Kong were invited to report to a multicentre retrospective survey of HMV use. A total of 249 patients (156 males, mean age 62.7±13.8 yrs) were treated since 1980, with 197 (79%) continuing with HMV at the time of the survey. Cumulative number of HMV grew as a cubic function of time since 1980. Currently, there are 2.9 users per 100,000 population. The predominant mode of HMV was noninvasive ventilation by bilevel pressure support ventilators (n=236). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease accounted for 48.6% of all cases. The overall 3-yr HMV continuation rate was 66.2%. Death was the main reason for discontinuation. A rapidly rising trend of home mechanical ventilation use is observed in Hong Kong. In contrast to other series, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the major group treated and bilevel pressure support ventilation was the predominant mode chosen. Most patients tolerate home mechanical ventilation reasonably well, with approximately two-thirds continuing with its use at 36 months. Throughout the world, home mechanical ventilation (HMV) is increasingly employed to treat patients suffering from chronic respiratory failure. Diseases that have been treated by HMV include restrictive thoracic disorders (RTD), neuromuscular disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and various other causes of nocturnal hypoventilation syndrome. The cumulative number of patients being put on HMV has increased tremendously in Europe and the USA 1, 2. The rapid growth of HMV has been attributed to: 1) increased awareness and experience with the indications and technologies; 2) improved support by machine vendors; 3) pressure to reduce hospital stay; and 4) improved life expectancy in treated patient 2. Little is known about the prevalence and the growth of HMV use in the Asia-Pacific region. This present study aimed to examine the trend, the disease categories treated and the outcomes of HMV use in Hong Kong, and to explore the differences in the pattern of use with other parts of the world. These data will be useful not only to healthcare providers but also to clinicians in assessing the feasibility and acceptability of long-term HMV in various disease conditions.
The survey Hong Kong has a population of 6.7 million. More than 95% of all secondary and tertiary medical services are provided by the publicly funded Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HKHA). In the year 2002, consultants of respiratory medicine in all adult medical departments of HKHA hospitals were invited to report to a multicentre retrospective survey of their adult patients (>18 yrs of age) who had ever been managed by HMV. Cases that had been managed by more than one institution were counted only once. Only long-term mechanical ventilation conducted at home for >1 month was surveyed 3. Institutionalised chronic ventilator cases were excluded. The series included one patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy transferred to adult care from paediatric service after the patient had reached 18 yrs. The survey captured the following information: demographic data, mode of ventilation (noninvasive or tracheostomy ventilation), underlying disease, indications for HMV, time of starting ventilation, time and reason of stopping ventilation, if any, in the follow-up period. Data was censored at 36 months, as there were not many patients who were followed up beyond this duration. Most centres had systematically collected data regarding their patients prior to this survey. For the few centres where data was incomplete, a hand search of case records was made. To ensure maximal retrieval of data, especially of previous cases of HMV who may have already died or stopped using HMV at the time of the survey, assistance from the HMV machine vendors were sought to cross-check with their databases.
Statistical analysis
There were 249 cases reported to the survey, from 14 centres of adult respiratory medicine. One centre replied it did not have HMV, two other centres did not meet the deadline of the survey, but they had <10 cases altogether. Eighty per cent of HMV cases were under the care of six major centres.
The first patient on HMV was started in 1980, and the number of patients receiving HMV remained small until 1997 when this number started to grow tremendously (fig. 1
If the growth of HMV numbers continues at the same rate, a cumulative number of 286 (95% confidence interval (CI) 255317) could be projected by the end of 2004 (fig. 1 2.9 HMV users per 100,000 population.
Of the 249 cases notified, there were 156 males (62.7%) and 93 females (37.3%) with a mean age of 62.7±13.8 yrs. The majority (n=236, 94.8%) were treated by noninvasive ventilation (NIV), with the remaining 13 patients (5.2%) receiving tracheostomy ventilation. No particular time trend was noted for tracheostomy ventilation. All NIVs were provided by bilevel pressure-support ventilators. All tracheostomised cases were put on HMV after repeated failures to wean. The disease conditions for which HMV was prescribed are shown in table 1
Patients in the RTD (n=85, 34.1%) were significantly younger and more likely to be tracheostomised than patients in the other subgroups (table 3
COPD (n=121, 48.6%) with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure was the largest subgroup. The majority were maintained on NIV (n=119, 98.3%); only two patients (1.7%) were maintained on invasive ventilation. Most of these patients were elected to be put on HMV as a sequel to acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF), after suffering from repeated episodes of life-threatening respiratory failure (65.3%), or repeated failures to be weaned off ventilation after an acute episode (24%; table 2
An overall actuarial continuation rate of 66.2% was recorded at 36 months of follow-up. The major cause of discontinuation was death (table 4
Indications for commencing HMV were grouped into two subgroups for analyses: sequel to AHRF (failure to be completely weaned or repeated episodes of AHRF, n=188) and other indications (symptomatic hypercapnia, sleep disturbance, failure to respond to continuous positive airway pressure and mixed indications, n=61). Patients who were commenced on HMV because of the sequel to AHRF had asignificantly lower continuation rate at 36 months (59%) versus those started for other reasons (84%, log-rank test, p=0.016; fig. 2b
A tremendous increase in the number of HMV in Hong Kong has been noted in recent years. The predominant mode of HMV was NIV, with only a few tracheostomised patients. Bilevel pressure-support ventilators were used in all NIV cases. COPD accounted for 48.6% of all cases; most patients in this group were started on HMV after repeated weaning failures or repeated episodes of AHRF. The 3-yr HMV continuation rates were 77.9% for the complicated OSA group, 69.9% for the restrictive thoracic group and 57.5% in the COPD group. Patients who were started on HMV because of the sequel to AHRF had a higher discontinuation rate on follow-up, mostly due to death. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this HMV registry isthe first of its type in the Asia-Pacific region. Hancox et al. 5 reported their experience from a single centre in New Zealand. Although some major centres in Australia provide HMV, no national data could be retrieved from available literature 6. Similarly, no national data are available from countries in the Asia-Pacific region. In Europe, complete information on HMV can be obtained in Denmark, Spain, Belgium, Switzerland, France and Sweden 7, 8. The rapidly growing number of patients on HMV in Hong Kong mirrors the development in other countries. In Sweden, it has been estimated that HMV doubled its number in 6 yrs 8. A similar trend has been recorded in Minnesota, USA 9. The rate was even higher in this study; the cumulative number increased as a cubic function of time, and the doubling of numbers has been seen recently in 23 yrs. The current estimate of HMV use is 2.9 per 100,000 population in Hong Kong, which is lower than most European countries with rates of 4.520 per 100,000 2.
Diseases that have been treated by HMV in this survey arevery common conditions in Hong Kong. For example, chronic lung conditions developing from late sequelae to tuberculosis (TB) are often seen, i.e. the TB notification rate had reached a high of
It has been estimated that home care for tracheostomy ventilation would cost There were important differences between the patterns of HMV use in Hong Kong versus those in other countries, in terms of the mode of ventilation and the proportion of various diagnoses. NIV constitutes the majority of HMV use in Hong Kong (94.8%). Bilevel pressure-support ventilation was the only mode chosen for NIV in Hong Kong; no volume-controlled ventilator was used for NIV in Hong Kong. Tracheostomy only accounted for a minority of HMV (5.2%). In Sweden in 1996, tracheostomy accounted for 25% of all HMV; volume-controlled ventilators were used in 75% of patients 8. Volume-cycled ventilators were the predominant mode of HMV used in Europe in a survey conducted in 1992 7. The strikingly low proportion of tracheostomy cases in Hong Kong is probably because of the lack of funding to care for these more complicated and demanding cases at home. The availability and costs of ventilators cannot be excluded as factors influencing the choice of HMV mode. Another possible explanation for the high proportion of pressure-support ventilator use in Hong Kong is that pressure-support ventilation became more readily available and was the preferred mode of ventilation in the majority of patients in the past few years. It was noted that the prescription of pressure-support ventilators also increased considerably in recent years in Sweden 8 and in Switzerland 24. COPD accounted for 48.6% of all cases of HMV in Hong Kong. Compared with the 329% of COPD patients in reported surveys of HMV use 4, 5, 8, 24, 25, the current survey has the highest number of COPD. One explanation is that the current study is the most recent; it has been noted that the proportion of COPD cases increases with time in other series 8, 24. The use of home NIV in stable severe COPD patients is controversial. There have been four randomised studies on the use of NIV in severe stable COPD 2629; only one ofthem has shown favourable results in terms of daytime gaseous exchange, total sleep time, sleep efficiency and quality of life 27. However, Jones et al. 30 have suggested that home NIV may reduce both hospital admissions and clinic visits in severe COPD with hypercapnic respiratory failure. Inaddition, Clini et al. 31 have shown that the addition ofNIV to long-term oxygen therapy significantly reduces intensive care unit admissions in patients with severe COPD and hypercapnia. Nevertheless, a long-term randomised controlled trial of nocturnal NIV in outpatients with severe COPD has shown that NIV does not affect the natural course of the disease 32. In the current survey, the majority of the COPD patients were started on HMV after repeated failure to wean or repeated episodes of life-threatening respiratory failure. Although this practice is in keeping with prevailing guidelines 1, more data from randomised controlled trials are clearly needed. The overall 36-month continuation rate was 66.2%. The 36-month continuation rate in COPD was 57.5%, in the RTD group was 69.9% and the complicated OSA/obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) group was 77.9%. These figures are very similar to those of a Switzerland series, in which the respective 36-month continuation rates for COPD, RTD and OHS subgroups were 49%, 5778% and 76%, respectively 24. In a French series, the 36-month continuation rate for COPD was 56%, and rates for RTD and neuromuscular causes were 5680% 25. Direct comparison of outcomes between the current series and the UK series 4 is difficult because of the shorter follow-up period in the current study. However, 50% of COPD patients discontinued HMV at 19.2 months in the UK series; in the current Hong Kong series, 57.5% of COPD patients were still continuing HMV use at 36 months. In the UK series, 50% of RTD and neuromuscular patients discontinued HMV at 25.251.6 months; in the Hong Kong series, 69.9% were still continuing at 36 months. The total number of HMV ever prescribed in Hong Kong is likely to be slightly underestimated in this survey due to the following limitations. Firstly, paediatric patients were not included, and HMV arranged in the private sector was not surveyed. In addition, the possibility of nonrespiratory specialists (e.g. neurologists and rehabilitation physicians) prescribing HMV to their patients cannot be excluded entirely. However, the medico-legal milieu in Hong Kong discourages such practice and such cases have not been identified in the database of the vendors. Lastly, patients who had been on HMV and then withdrawn or died recently may not have been notified. However, the discrepancy between the surveyed number and the true number of HMV use is likely to be small. Although the first patient started on HMV was recorded in1980, most hospitals have only started the service in the recent few years. Therefore, the observation was ceased at 36 months, as otherwise the end of the survival curves would only be composed of a small number of patients. Moreover, some parameters of interest were not studied (e.g. quality of life with HMV, lung function data, source of reimbursement, compliance to HMV, type of interface for NIV), since the relevant data was far from complete. Notwithstanding these limitations, this survey has provided some useful observations. In particular, the observations of the tremendous growth in HMV use and the projected numbers in the next few years are very useful for healthcare planning. To conclude, a rapidly rising trend of home mechanical ventilation use in chronic respiratory failure has been observed in Hong Kong. It appears that most patients tolerate this form of treatment reasonably well, with approximately two-thirds still continuing with home mechanical ventilation use at 36 months. More research is urgently needed in assessing the cost-effectiveness and compliance with this form of treatment in patients with chronic respiratory failure.
The Hong Kong Thoracic Society would like to dedicate this work to the late Y-M. Tse (19682003), who sacrificed herself in the fight against severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. The authors would like to thank W.K. Lam and M. Ip for their insightful comments on the manuscript. They also gratefully acknowledge the following physicians for their contribution of patient data: H.S. Chan, J. Chan, K.S. Chan, Y.C. Chan, W. Chen, K.L. Choo, H. Kwok, W.K. Lam, H.M. Ma, T. Mok, C.Y. Tam, K. Tsang, P.Y. Tse, M. Wong, M. Wong, L. Yam and W.W. Yew.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||