ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antonelli-Incalzi, R.
Right arrow Articles by the SaRA investigators
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antonelli-Incalzi, R.
Right arrow Articles by the SaRA investigators,
Eur Respir J 2003; 22:444-449
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003


Do GOLD stages of COPD severity really correspond to differences in health status?

R. Antonelli-Incalzi1, C. Imperiale2, V. Bellia3, F. Catalano3, N. Scichilone3, R. Pistelli1, F. Rengo4 and the SaRA investigators

1 Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Catholic University, Rome, 2 San Raffaele Cittadella della Carità Foundation, Taranto, 3 Institute of General Medicine and Pulmonology, University of Palermo, Palermoand and 4 Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Federico II University, Naples, Italy

CORRESPONDENCE: R. Antonelli-Incalzi, Dept ofGeriatrics (CEMI), Università Cattolica, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Roma, Italy. E-mail: raffaele_antonelli@rm.unicatt.it. Fax: 39 063051911

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, elderly, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines, health status

Received: November 5, 2002
Accepted April 18, 2003

The Salute Respiratoria nell'Anziano: Respiratory Health in the Elderly Study (SaRA) was supported by a research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim, Italy.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The purpose of this study was to assess whether different stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity defined according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria correlate with meaningful differences in health status.

A total of 381 COPD patients, aged 73±6 yrs, were classified in the five GOLD stages. Disease-specific (St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and generic indexes of health status were measured in all patients. Multivariate analysis of covariance or Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare health status indexes across the spectrum of GOLD stages of COPD severity.

GOLD stages of COPD severity significantly differed in SGRQ components and Barthel's index, but not in the indexes assessing cognitive and affective status and quality of sleep. The largest variation in health status was observed at the transition from stage IIa to stage IIb, while there were no other significant differences between consecutive stages. Both female sex and comorbidity were associated with a greater impact of COPD on the health status.

In conclusion, the upper limit of stage IIb (forced expiratory volume in one second of 49%) marks a threshold for dramatic worsening of health status. Progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity from stage 0 to stage IIa does not correspond to any meaningful difference in health status.

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) has recently released a four-stage classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity to guide the therapeutic approach 1. In these patients, stage 0 defines the condition characterised by classic clinical symptoms but normal spirometry. Stage I defines patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) of <70%, and an FEV1 of >80% predicted, with or without chronic symptoms that may or may not be aware of disease status. Stage II (FEV1/FVC <70%, FEV1 30–79%) is split into substages IIa (FEV1 50–79%) and IIb (FEV1 30–49%) according to the greater rate of exacerbation experienced by patients in substage IIb, which in turn is inversely related to health status 2. Finally, stage III (FEV1/FVC <70% and either FEV1 <30% pred, hypoxaemia, or clinical signs of right heart failure) is expected to be associated with the worst health status.

However, the GOLD guidelines do not clearly define the rationale supporting the suggested classification scheme. Previous experience shows that worsening health status only reflects increased COPD severity categorised on the basis of FEV1 % pred, to a limited extent. Instead, comorbidity plays an important role in defining health status, mainly in mild-to-moderate COPD 3. The Salute Respiratoria nell'Anziano: Respiratory Health in the Elderly (SaRA) study provides a unique opportunity of verifying whether and to what extent GOLD stages of COPD severity correlate with health status. The availability of disease-specific indexes of health status and of indexes of performance allows detection of the differences between stages. Thus, the present analysis has been performed to test the discriminatory capacity of the GOLD staging system versus health status.


    Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
A detailed description of the SaRA study is available elsewhere 4, 5. Briefly, the SaRA study aims to define the relationship between disease severity and health status and its main determinants in a population aged >64 yrs with chronic respiratory problems. In the present study, 381 patients with a definite diagnosis of COPD or nonobstructive bronchitis were classified according to GOLD stages of COPD severity. A diagnosis of nonobstructive bronchitis, corresponding to GOLD stage 0, was made if patients complained of cough and sputum for ≥3 months·yr–1 for ≥2 yrs consecutively (Chemical Industries Barel (CIBA) criteria), but had normal spirometry.

Patients were considered to be affected by COPD if they fulfilled either of the following criteria: 1) they met the CIBA criteria, had an FEV1/FVC of <70% pred and no change or an FEV1 increase of >12%, but not FEV1 normalisation after 100 µg fenoterol; or 2) they neither met the CIBA criteria nor reported history of wheeze in the last year, had an FEV1/FVC of <70% pred, an FEV1 of <80% pred and an FEV1 increase of <12% after 100 µg fenoterol.

A diagnosis of asthma was made if patients did not meet the CIBA criteria and had either of the following: 1) an FEV1 of >80% pred and a history of wheeze in the last year; 2) an FEV1 of <80% pred, an FEV1 increase of >12% after 100 µg fenoterol and a history of wheeze in the last year; or 3) anFEV1 of <80% pred, an FEV1 increase of >12% after 100 µg fenoterol and no history of wheeze in the last year. Asthmatics were excluded from the study.

Health status was measured using disease-specific indexes ("Symptoms", "Activity" and "Impacts" components and "Total" score of the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and generic indexes assessing cognitive performance (Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)), affective performance (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (15-GDS)), physical performance (Barthel's index, 6-min walking test) and quality of sleep (index of disturbed sleep from the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly questionnaire (EPESE)), respectively 612. The 6-min walking distance is expressed as per cent of the predicted based on age, sex, height and weight (WT % pred) 13. The meanings of individual indexes and information on their validity in older COPD patients are presented in table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Indexes of health status measured in the Salute Respiratoria nell'Anziano: Respiratory Health in the Elderly study

 
Differences in health status indexes among groups were assessed as follows.

1) Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) for indexes with both normal distribution and homogeneous variance: MMSE, WT % pred, SGRQ Impacts, SGRQ Total, EPESE. The effects of three factors (GOLD stage, sex, living conditions (alone, with relatives/others)) and four covariates previously proven (waist:hip ratio, occiput-wall distance, number of comorbid diseases) or the likelihood of affecting the health status in COPD (age) were also assessed 3, 14. TheWilk's lambda coefficient was computed to quantify theeffects of individual factors and their effect on health status. The contribution of individual covariates toward an explanation of the distribution of the dependent variables was expressed by the respective F value. For each dependent variable, a multiple regression versus all the covariates was also performed and the ß coefficient was assumed as a measure of the relationship between the dependent variable and the corresponding covariate. Post hoc differences between stages were assessed by the Scheffè test.

2) Kruskal Wallis test for indexes lacking normal distribution and/or homogeneous variance: 15-GDS, Barthel's index, SGRQ Symptoms and Activity. Differences between stages were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

The linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between SGRQ Total and airway obstruction, as expressed by FEV1 %.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The general characteristics of patients are summarised in table 2Go. A geriatric and poorly educated population was used in this study, a minority of which continued to smoke. About one in four patients was female and one in five lived alone. The average occiput-wall distance of 6.6 cm indirectly testifies that osteoporosis was a common problem. The average nutritional status expressed by the body mass index, was normal, whereas the relatively high waist:hip ratio was consistent with a prevalently visceral distribution of fat. Most of the drugs used were intended for nonrespiratory problems. Cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, visual and hearing impairment were the most common comorbid conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 General characteristics of the patients

 
The demographical characteristics and respiratory function indexes of patients grouped according to GOLD stages are reported in table 3Go. Stages had comparable age and proportion of patients living alone, whereas the prevalence of females was higher in stages 0–IIA. According to classification criteria, both FEV1 % and FEV1/FVC were normal in GOLD stage 0.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Demographical and respiratory function characteristics of patients grouped according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) staging

 
MANCOVA results are reported in table 4Go. Increasing GOLD stage was associated with a dramatic worsening of health status (Wilk's lambda 0.85, p<0.001), as reflected by the SGRQ Impacts and Total, but not by MMSE, WT % pred and EPESE. Female sex was also associated with greater scores in sleep, SGRQ Impacts and Total, i.e. with poorer quality of sleep and worse disease-specific health status (table 5Go). The interaction between living conditions (alone) and sex (female) (Wilk's lambda for interaction 0.95, p=0.02) but not living alone per se (Wilk's lambda 0.96, p=0.054) was associated with worse health status. No interaction between sex and GOLD stage was recorded. Comorbidity (F=2.66, p=0.02) and age (F=2.33, p=0.05), but not the occiput-wall distance (F=0.65, p=0.66) and waist:hip ratio (F=1.15, p=0.33), contributed to determining the distribution of the dependent variables.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Distribution of health status indexes by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages and sex, as assessed by multivariate analysis of covariance

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5 Distribution of health status indexes by sex, as assessed by multivariate analysis of covariance

 
Comorbidity was associated with a higher EPESE score, i.e. with worse quality of sleep (ß=0.175, p<0.01) and higher Impacts (ß=0.137, p=0.02) and Total (ß=0.115, p=0.05) SGRQ scores. Age was associated with higher Total SGRQ score (ß=0.136, p=0.02).

Post-hoc analysis of differences between GOLD stages showed important differences in both SGRQ Impacts and Total between nonconsecutive stages but only between IIa and IIb consecutive stages.

The differences among GOLD stages in health status indexes assessed by the Kruskal Wallis test are reported in table 6Go. Both SGRQ Symptoms and Impacts worsened from stage 0 to stage III, but the only consecutive stages significantly differing in these indexes were IIa and III. Variability in health status scores was very high: 23% of stage 0 and 25.5% of stage I patients scored >64, which correspond to the average score of patients in stage IIb, on the SGRQ Symptoms.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6 Distribution of health status indexes by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages, as assessed by the Kruskal Wallis test

 
Figure 1Go is a box plot showing the distribution of SGRQ scores by GOLD stage. Clinically significant differences, i.e. of a magnitude of >4, in the average value (or median) were observed between all consecutive stages with the exception of 0–I. A consistent overlap of recorded values among stages 0, I and IIa as well as between stages IIb and III is also evident.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.— Box plot showing the distribution of St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage. Numbers on the y-axis show the minimal clinically significant difference. Error bars show sd, small boxes show the mean and larger boxes show the se.

 
The linear regression analysis yielded the following equation:


(001)
Where R=–0.4605 and R2=0.212. Thus, the severity of airway obstruction explains only one fifth of the observed variance in health status, as reflected by the SGRQ Total.


    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The present results demonstrate that the GOLD staging system marks important differences in health status assessed by a disease-specific index or the Barthel index. The age of the patients may explain why the Barthel's index but not the WT % pred could distinguish between groups, as the elderly are exposed to the negative impact of disabling conditions mainly on the basic and instrumental activities of daily living. Accordingly, a test assessing submaximal physical performance is expected to lose part of its discriminatory capacity in an elderly population. Indexes of affective status and quality of sleep could not distinguish GOLD stages, although depression and disturbed sleep are common COPD-related problems. Indeed, depression and sleep problems seem to complicate COPD in its earliest stage but, at variance from physical limitations, their prevalence and severity do not parallel increasing COPD severity. The relatively low size of the stage III population, i.e. of patients most exposed to the risk of cognitive impairment, may explain why MMSE also failed to distinguish GOLD stages.

The present findings have been obtained in a rigorously selected population and corrected for the confounding effect of several variables proven or supposed to affect the health status. Thus, they demonstrate that GOLD staging of COPD corresponds to important differences in health status between stages IIa and IIb, but not between other consecutive stages. This suggests that the boundary between stages IIa and IIb marks a turning point in the evolution of health status in COPD patients. In contrast, no significant change in health status marks the earliest progression of COPD from stage 0 to I and from I to IIa, as well as its ultimate transition from stage IIb to III. The size inequality of groups IIb and III and the consistent overlapping of health status scores recorded in consecutive stages are likely to explain these findings.

An index of airway obstruction accounted for a minority of the explained variance in SGRQ Total score. This finding and the great interindividual variability in health status within a given GOLD stage clearly shows that health status cannot be inferred from the GOLD stage and should be systematically assessed in the individual patient. It would appear that a disease-specific instrument is recommended due to its superior discriminatory capacity. However, a generic index of physical capability, such as the Barthel's index, can represent a valuable alternative because it requires very little time and allows comparison between patients with different main diseases.

The observed greater susceptibility of females to the negative effects of COPD on the health status represents an original finding. Indeed, the authors could find only one report showing that female sex weakens the positive effects of rehabilitation on disease-related health status in COPD 15. A similar sex effect has been reported for cardiovascular rehabilitation programmes 16. Whatever its determinants, the observed phenomenon deserves special consideration. Indeed, females represent a rapidly increasing proportion of all COPD patients, as can be inferred from the dramatically rising prevalence of cigarette smoking among females, as well as from the greater impact of smoke on lung function of females 17, 18. Furthermore, COPD will become the fifth leading cause of disability in affluent countries by year 2020 19. The dramatic rise in the prevalence of female patients is hypothesised to result in a greater than expected effect of COPD on the health status and, as a consequence, the need of care.

Patients classified in the 0 and I GOLD stages have an FEV1 of >80% pred and, thus, are excluded from previous classifications of COPD severity 2022. This prevents any comparison of health status classifications achieved by GOLD and previous staging systems. Nevertheless, the finding that about one of four patients in GOLD stage 0 scored higher than the average patient in GOLD stage IIb suggests that health status frequently deteriorates even in theabsence of bronchial obstruction, possibly because of respiratory symptoms or coexisting nonrespiratory problems. The impact of comorbidity on selected measures of health status in this and in a previous study supports the latter hypothesis 3.

The limitations of this study deserve to be discussed. First, survival bias might have attenuated the differences between the most severe stages. Only a longitudinal study can test thishypothesis. Secondly, the lack of statistically significant differences between consecutive stages other than IIa and IIb does not guarantee that clinically significant differences were absent. Indeed, stages I and IIa, as well as stages IIb and III, differed in SGRQ Total score by six and 12 points, respectively, i.e. of a magnitude well over the clinically relevant minimal difference of four 6. These differences might qualify as statistically significant in a larger population. Finally, distinguishing long-standing asthma from COPD isquite problematic in the elderly 23. The authors' diagnostic criteria were carefully developed and rigorously applied but could not guarantee the absence of occasional misclassifications.

In conclusion, findings from this study show that staging chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines does correspond to important differences in health status, but that health status patterns of consecutive stages overlap remarkably. Further research is needed to verify whether integrating the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage with selected measures of health status will allow definition of subgroups with a distinctive prognosis. Special attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of health status in stages 0 and 1: selected health status patterns might be a marker of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease progression rate. Prospectively assessing these topics will improve knowledge of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classificatory and prognostic implications, as well as of the feasibility of a mixed, i.e. physiopathological-clinical and health-status indicator based, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease staging system. Finally, the important differences in health status between stages IIa and IIb and the lack of significant differences between lower grade consecutive stages suggests that every effort should be made to prevent the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, since passing the boundary of a forced expiratory volume in one second of <50% of predicted is likely to herald a dramatic decline of the health status.


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
All participants are indebted to G. Torresin and to the staff of Biomedin (Padua, Italy) for continuous and dedicated technical assistance.

SaRA Scientific Committee members. Napoli: F.Rengo (Coordinator); Palermo: V. Bellia (Coordinator); Brescia: V. Grassi; Florence: G. Masotti; Padua: S. Maggi; Parma: D. Olivieri; Naples: G.Melillo; Rome: R. Antonelli-Incalzi, M. Palleschi, R. Pistelli, M. Trabucchi, S. Zuccaro.

List of participating centres, principal investigator and associated investigators (the latter in brackets). Divisione di Medicina 1, Osp. Geriatrico INRCA, Ancona; D.L. Consales (P. Paggi, D. Lo Nardo). Divisione di Geriatria, Osp. Civile, Asti; F. Goria, P. Fea, (G. Iraldi, R. Corradi). Cattedra di Gerontologia e Geriatria, University of Bari; A.Capurso (R. Flora, F. Torres, G. Venezia, M. Mesto, R. Valerio, R. Noya, G. Argentieri). 5° Divisione di Geriatria, Osp. Malpighi, Bologna; S. Semeraro (L. Bellotti, A. Tansella). Istituto di Medicina Interna, University of Brescia; V. Grassi (S. Cossi, G. Guerini, C. Fantoni, M. De Martinis, L. Pini, V. Pinelli). Divisione di Pneumologia, Fondazione "E. Maugeri", Telese (BN); G. Melillo (R. Battiloro, C. Gaudiosi, S.De Angelis). Istituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, University of Catania; L. Motta, D. Mugeri (I.Alessandria, S. Savia). Cattedra di Geriatria, University of Florence; G. Masotti (M. Chiarlone, D. Matteuzzi, S. Zacchei). Divisione di Geriatria, Osp. Morgagni, Forlì; V. Pedone (D. Angelini, D.Cilla). Divisione di Geriatria, Osp. Galliera, Genova; E. Palummeri (D. Torriglia, M. Agretti, P. Costelli, A. Giusti). Divisione di Geriatria, Osp. Richiedei, Gussago (Brescia); M. Trabucchi (P. Ranieri, F. Guerini, P. Barbisoni, P. Calabrese). Divisione di Geriatria, Osp. Generale, L'Aquila; F. Caione (D. Caione, M. La Chiara). I Div. Geriatria, Osp. San Gerardo, Monza; G. Galetti (A. Cantatore, D. Casarotti, G. Anni, B. Grumelli). Cattedra di Gerontologia e Geriatria, Federico II University of Naples; F. Rengo (F. Cacciatore, A.I. Pisacreta, C. Calabrese, V. Carnevale, P.Abete). Clinica geriatria, University of Padua, Padova; G. Enzi (S. Peruzza, P. Dalla Montà, P.Albanese, F. Tiozzo). Istituto di Malattie Apparato Respiratorio, University of Parma; D.Olivieri (V. Bocchino, A. Comel, N. Barbarito, M. Barbera). Cattedra di Gerontologia e Geriatria, University of Perugia; U. Senin (S. Peretti, F. Arnone, L. Camilli). Divisione di Geriatria, Osp. Israelitico, Roma; S.M. Zuccaro (M. Marchetti, L. Palleschi). Divisione di Geriatria 1°, Osp. Gen. Addolorata, Roma; M. Palleschi (C. Cieri, F. Vetta). Istituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, Catholic University of Rome; P.U. Carbonin (F.Pagano, P. Ranieri, C. Romano). Istituto i Medicina Interna e Geriatria, University of Siena; S. Forconi (G. Abate, G. Marotta, E. Pagni). Fondazione San Raffaele, Cittadella della Carità, Taranto; R. Antonelli-Incalzi (C. Imperiale, C.Spada). Cattedra di Gerontologia e Geriatria, University of Milan, Milano; C. Vergani (M.C. Sandrini, G. Giardini, I. Dallera). Cattedra di Malattie dell'Apparato Respiratorio, Istituto di Medicina Generale e Pneumologia, University of Palermo; V. Bellia (F. Catalano, N. Scichilone, S.Battaglia, F. Tartamella).

Coordinating centre: Cattedra di Malattie dell'Apparato Respiratorio, Istituto di Medicina Generale e Pneumologia, University of Palermo; V. Bellia (F. Catalano, N. Scichilone, S. Battaglia, F. Tartamella).


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Pauwells RA, Buist S, Calverley PMA, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS, the GOLD Scientific Committee (NHLBI-WHO workshop summary). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1256–1276.[Free Full Text]
  2. Seemungal TA, Donaldson GC, Paul EA, Bestall JC, Jeffries DJ, Wedzicha JA. Effect of exacerbation on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:1418–1422.
  3. Ferrer M, Alonso J, Morera J, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage and health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:1072–1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bellia V, Pistelli R, Catalano F, et al. Quality control of spirometry in the elderly: the SA.RA. Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1094–1100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Antonelli-Incalzi RA, Bellia V, Maggi S, et al. Reversible bronchial obstruction and disease-related health status in COPD. Qual Life Res 2002;11:517–525.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Bavestock CM, Littlejohns P. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:1321–1327.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. Mini mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Burke WJ, Roccaforte WH, Wengel SP. The short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a comparison with the 30-item form. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1991;4:173–178.
  9. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J 1965;14:61–65.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, et al. The six minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 1985;132:919–923.[Abstract]
  11. Maggi S, Langlois JA, Minicuci N, et al. Sleep complaints in community-dwelling older person: prevalence, associated factors, and reported causes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:161–168.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Jones RN, Gallo JJ. Dimensions of the Mini Mental State Examination among community dwelling older adults. Psychol Med 2000;30:605–618.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1384–1387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Antonelli-Incalzi RA, Bellia V, Catalano F, et al. Evaluation of health outcomes in elderly patients with asthma and COPD using disease-specific and generic instruments. The Salute Respiratoria nell'Anziano (Sa.R.A.) Study. Chest 2001;120:734–742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Foy CG, Rejeski J, Berrjy MJ, Zaccaro D, Woodard M. Gender moderates the effects of exercise therapy on health-related quality of life among COPD patients. Chest 2001;119:70–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Carhart RL Jr, Ades PA. Gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiol Clin 1998;16:37–43.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kanner RE, Connett JE, Altose MD, et al. Gender difference in airway hyperresponsiveness in smokers with mild COPD: the Lung Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:956–961.[Abstract]
  18. Prescott B, Bjerg AM, Andersen PK, Lange P, Vestbo J. Gender difference in smoking effects on lung function and risk of hospitalization for COPD: results from a Danish longitudinal population study. Eur Respir J 1998;11:792–793.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349:1498–1504.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152: Suppl. 5, s77–s121.
  21. The COPD Guidelines Group of the Standards of Care Committee of the BTS. BTS guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1997;52: Suppl. 5, s1–s28.
  22. Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, et al. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The European Respiratory Society Task Force. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1398–1420.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Braman SS, Kaemmerlen JT, Davis SM. Asthma in the elderly. A comparison between patients with recently acquired and long-standing disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:336–340.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Jenkins and R. Rodriguez-Roisin
Quality of life, stage severity and COPD
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2009; 33(5): 953 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P-O Bridevaux, M W Gerbase, N M Probst-Hensch, C Schindler, J-M Gaspoz, and T Rochat
Long-term decline in lung function, utilisation of care and quality of life in modified GOLD stage 1 COPD
Thorax, September 1, 2008; 63(9): 768 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
F. Cardoso, A. T. Tufanin, M. Colucci, O. Nascimento, and J. R. Jardim
Replacement of the 6-min Walk Test With Maximal Oxygen Consumption in the BODE Index Applied to Patients With COPD: An Equivalency Study
Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 477 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Laurin, K. L. Lavoie, S. L. Bacon, G. Dupuis, G. Lacoste, A. Cartier, and M. Labrecque
Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders and Psychological Distress in Patients With COPD
Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 148 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
D. D. Sin, N. R. Anthonisen, J. B. Soriano, and A. G. Agusti
Mortality in COPD: role of comorbidities
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2006; 28(6): 1245 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. P.M.H. Rutten-van Molken, J. B. Oostenbrink, D. P. Tashkin, D. Burkhart, and B. U. Monz
Does Quality of Life of COPD Patients as Measured by the Generic EuroQol Five-Dimension Questionnaire Differentiate Between COPD Severity Stages?
Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1117 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Stavem, L. Sandvik, and J. Erikssen
Can Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage 0 Provide Prognostic Information on Long-term Mortality in Men?
Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 318 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
N. Chavannes, M. Huibers, T. Schermer, A Hendriks, C van Weel, E. Wouters, and C. van Schayck
Associations of depressive symptoms with gender, body mass index and dyspnea in primary care COPD patients
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2005; 22(6): 604 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
N F Schlecht, K Schwartzman, and J Bourbeau
Dyspnea as clinical indicator in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2005; 2(4): 183 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M Decramer, R Gosselink, M Rutten-Van Molken, J Buffels, O Van Schayck, P-A Gevenois, R Pellegrino, E Derom, and W De Backer
Assessment of progression of COPD: report of a workshop held in Leuven, 11-12 March 2004
Thorax, April 1, 2005; 60(4): 335 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. Laghi, A. Antonescu-Turcu, E. Collins, J. Segal, D. E. Tobin, A. Jubran, and M. J. Tobin
Hypogonadism in Men with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prevalence and Quality of Life
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2005; 171(7): 728 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
E Haavel, M E Hyland, and H Engvik
Physical and emotional aspects of self-reported health status: a two-factor model of the short-form BreathingProblems Questionnaire
Chronic Respiratory Disease, January 1, 2005; 2(1): 21 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. M. A. Calverley
The GOLD Classification Has Advanced Understanding of COPD
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2004; 170(3): 211 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J Vestbo
COPD in the ECRHS
Thorax, February 1, 2004; 59(2): 89 - 90.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antonelli-Incalzi, R.
Right arrow Articles by the SaRA investigators
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antonelli-Incalzi, R.
Right arrow Articles by the SaRA investigators,


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS