Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003 Reduced lung function and risk of atrial fibrillation in The Copenhagen City Heart Study1 Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2 Dept of Cardiovascular Medicine, Bispebjerg University Hospital, 3 The Copenhagen City Heart Study, Bispebjerg University Hospital, 4 Institute of Preventive Medicine, Kommunehospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark CORRESPONDENCE: P. Buch, Dybboelsgade 14, 3. tv., DK-1721 Copenhagen, Denmark. Fax: 45 39751803. E-mail: pbuch@dadlnet.dk Keywords: atrial fibrillation, epidemiology, follow-up studies, forced expiratory volume in one second, risk factors
Received: June 16, 2002
The Copenhagen City Heart Study was funded by the Danish Heart Foundation. P. Buch was the recipient of a Danish Heart Foundation introduction grant (01-1-9-F3-22880).
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been associated with a high frequency of arrhythmias. Few studies have analysed the role of reduced lung function in predicting atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and risk of first episode of AF in a prospective study. Data from 13,430 males and females without previous myocardial infarction, who participated in the Copenhagen City Heart Study, were analysed. New AF was assessed at re-examination after 5 yrs and by hospital admission for AF during a period of 13 yrs. Multivariate analyses were used with adjustment for cardiopulmonary risk factors. There were 62 new cases of AF at 5-yr follow-up (0.58%) and 290 cases (2.20%) diagnosed at hospitalisations.
Risk of new AF at re-examination was 1.8-times higher for FEV1 between 6080% of predicted compared with FEV1 The authors conclude that reduced lung function is an independent predictor for incident atrial fibrillation. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been associated with a high frequency of cardiac arrhythmias. Hypoxaemia 1, 2, acidosis 3, cor pulmonale and coexisting ischaemic heart disease (IHD) 4, 5 have been proposed as major causes for the relationship between COPD and arrhythmias. The risk of arrhythmias in patients with COPD is influenced by the state of the disease, with a higher frequency of supraventricular tachycardia during exacerbations 1, 2, 5. However, even in patients with stable COPD the incidence ofcardiac arrhythmias is considerable 6, and, in clinical practice, it is not uncommon to find atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients hospitalised for COPD. AF is by far the most common arrhythmia in the elderly population but only a few studies have analysed the relationship between lung function and the risk of developing AF in detail. It is important to investigate the correlation between reduced lung function and AF since the incidence of COPD is expected to increase considerably in the future, reflecting prior smoking habits of an ageing population 7, 8. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to investigate the role of reduced lung function in development of AF based on a representative sample of the general population free of IHD at baseline.
Study population This study was based on data from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS). The original cohort of CCHS comprised a random age-stratified sample of 19,329 males and females aged 20 yrs from an area of Copenhagen, Denmark. A total of 14,223 persons participated in the first examination between 19761978. Re-examination took place after 5 yrs (19811983). The overall response rates were of 74% and 70%, respectively. At each examination, cardiovascular and respiratory risk factors were obtained by a detailed self-administered questionnaire and several laboratory tests. Details of the examination procedure have been described previously 9. Since the aim of this study was to investigate lung function asa predictor of AF, only baseline data from the first examination were used. Subjects with pre-existing AF (n=87) were excluded from further analyses. To diminish contribution of pre-existing IHD, an additional 386 subjects with prior myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. Among the remaining participants, 25 subjects with extreme values of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted lower than 10% or higher than 140%, and subjects with missing FEV1 % pred or electrocardiograms (ECGs; n=295) were excluded. Thus, a total of 13,430 subjects (6,084 males and 7,346 females) were included at baseline. At 5-yr follow-up, 10,670 subjects (79%) were re-examined and were eligible for analyses of new AF detected at examination. Cox regression analyses of hospitalisations with AF were restricted to 13,181 subjects because of lack of one or more covariates at baseline (n=249). Between the first and second examination, 756 subjects died. Of those who were eligible for hospitalisation analyses a total of 2,956 subjects had died at the end of follow-up (December 31, 1990). Compared with responders at re-examination, nonresponders had lower FEV1 % pred, higher systolic blood pressure, higher nonfasting blood sugar, more frequent diabetes and were more often current smokers, all measured at baseline. There was no difference in age and body mass index (BMI). Thus, nonresponders in general had a poorer cardiopulmonary risk profile than responders.
New cases of atrial fibrillation Hospital discharge diagnoses were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Register and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for new AF or atrial flutter in any coding position were identified (ICD-8 codes 427.93 or 427.94). As AF in subjects with, for example, COPD or IHD leading to hospital admission is more likely to be diagnosed than in subjects with lone AF, this might cause bias 11. Separate analyses using only hospital admission with AF as the main diagnosis (first code) were therefore performed. Furthermore, the primary cause (main diagnosis) for hospital admission for those subjects who had AF diagnosed in the second or higher coding position, according to the National Hospital Discharge Register, was obtained. All analyses were based on the first ever hospitalisation with AF for participants without AF or IHD at baseline. Follow-up was limited to 13 yrs (December 31, 1990), since it was assumed that exposure measured at baseline would be too imprecise compared with the end-point if a longer follow-up period was chosen.
Pulmonary function tests
80%.
Confounders
Statistics Association between risk factors and AF detected by hospital discharge diagnosis was analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression models 18 with the first hospitalisation for AF as end-point. Age and delayed entry were used as the underlying time axes with subjects entering analyses at their age of study inclusion. Subjects who experienced an event (AF) only contributed with observation time until the time of this event. Those who died before the end of follow-up contributed with observation time until the time of their death at which time they were censored. Relative risk (RR) for FEV1 % pred did not differ between males and females and the final analyses were performed on the whole sample stratified by sex. The limit of significance was 5% for all analysis.
Baseline characteristics Table 1
Risk of incident atrial fibrillation at 5-yr follow-up examination At the re-examination, 62 new cases of AF were registered. Table 2
There was an inverse relationship between FEV1 and risk of AF after 5 yrs in the model, adjusting for age and sex only (table 3
In subanalyses, degrees of obstruction (FEV1/FVC) and risk of AF were investigated but no association was found in the age- and sex-adjusted model, and therefore this parameter was not included in the following analyses.
Risk of incident atrial fibrillation at hospitalisations
Figure 1
In the present prospective cohort study, the authors found reduced lung function to be significantly associated with new onset of AF measured as point prevalence after 5 yrs and as subsequent hospital admission with AF. The risk of AF with reduced lung function was unaffected by adjustment for several confounding factors. The risk for AF hospitalisation showed a trend towards a linear dose/response relationship with reduced lung function, except for the group with FEV1 % pred <40% This could be partly explained by the small number of subjects with AF in this group (n=23), making the estimate more imprecise as reflected in the wider confidence interval. In contrast to hospitalisations, the number of deaths in the group with the lowest level of lung function was considerably higher, i.e. 55 (22%) subjects with FEV1 <40% pred died during the 5-yr follow-up. Therefore the probability of having AF diagnosed was limited, which could have contributed to the lower estimate. The results from previous multivariate cohort studies are controversial. In agreement with the current findings, the Cardiovascular Health Study (n=5,201) 16 found an independent inverse relationship between FEV1 and AF with an RR of 0.75 (confidence interval 0.590.94) per measured litre of FEV1 during a relatively short-term follow-up period of 4 yrs. In contrast, the Renfrew/Paisley Study (n=15,406) 17 did not demonstrate any significant correlation between FEV1 level and AF. Similarly, the Framingham Study (n=4,731) 13 found no relationship between FEV1 % pred and AF in biennial investigations during 38 yrs of follow-up. The Renfrew/Paisley Study only observed a small number of cases with new AF (n=19) after a short follow-up, and hence, only the strongest predictors would be significant. They also compared FEV1 and other variables with incident hospital admission for AF during 20 yrs. This follow-up is long compared with the present study and it is likely that this could have affected the results. For instance, the risk of cardiomegaly, which was a very strong predictor at shorter follow-up, was reduced nearly 10 times at longer follow-up. In the Framingham Study, there was a high rate of heart disease. For instance, the prevalence of valvular heart disease was 7% for males and 9% for females. Therefore, their population was different from the present one and probably not quite comparable. Furthermore, new cases of AF in the Framingham Study included recurrent episodes of AF, which could also have contributed to the different results because predictors of new onset AF and recurrence of AF need not be the same. The present results could not entirely be explained by smoking. The relationship between smoking and risk of AF was only present in the heaviest smoking group at hospitalisations but not at re-examination. None of the above-mentioned prospective studies have found smoking to be an independent predictor. Besides, the smoking rate of participants in the Renfrew/Paisley study was similar to the smoking rate in the CCHS. The authors did not have any methods to assess the prevalence of valvular disease or congestive heart failure in this population. It could be argued that subjects with heart failure have some reduction in lung function that could explain the relationship between FEV1 and AF in the CCHS. Against this argument is the fact that the Cardiovascular Health Study included both ejection fraction and atrial size in their analyses and reached similar results to the present study. The present study found that <2% of hospital diagnoses could be attributed to valvular heart disease when investigating main diagnoses for hospitalisations associated with AF as second discharge diagnosis. Therefore, valvular heart disease was assumed to be a rare cause of AF in this population. An association between AF and use of diuretics was not found, although use of diuretics is an imprecise measurement of chronic heart failure. Still, it would probably include most cases of symptomatic heart failure in the study population because angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were not commonly used drugs at the time of data collections. Unfortunately there was no available data on asthma medications at baseline. The literature on ß2-agonist-induced AF is sparse and contains only casuistic reports. In general, inhaled sympathomimetics, studied extensively for treatment of asthma, have been found to be safe from cardiac arrhythmias 19. It is thus unlikely that this would have confounded the results.
AF detected at examinations would include all cases of chronic AF (or frequently recurrent cases), whereas using hospital discharge records would tend to identify subjects with more symptomatic AF. Still, the results were similar regardless of whether AF was detected at examination or at hospitalisation. Using all AF hospitalisations as end-points could cause a selection bias, since subjects admitted for COPD, for example, would be more likely to have concurrent AF diagnosed. However, only The mechanism connecting reduced lung function with AF is not clear. Recent observations have revealed that ectopic beats initiating AF often originate in the walls of the pulmonary veins 20, and it is possible that this could be triggered by changes in gas composition or pulmonary hypertension. In the present study, hypoxia and cor pulmonale could only account for some of this effect since the relationship was also found in subjects with mild to moderately reduced FEV1. Reduced lung function has been shown to be an independent predictor of IHD 2123 and of stroke 24, 25, and it is possible that the biological mechanism for development of AF could be linked to atherosclerosis via a common pathway of the development of vascular and airways disease, e.g. foetal or early childhood exposure. In conclusion, this study indicates that reduced forced expiratory volume in one second % predicted is an independent predictor of new onset atrial fibrillation. Since atrial fibrillation, if untreated, causes high morbidity from stroke and is associated with increased mortality 26, this indicates the importance of routine electrocardiograms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study was not designed to detect causal mechanisms and further investigations are needed to clarify the biological pathways that connect reduced lung function with atrial fibrillation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||