ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walters, E.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Walters, E.H.
Eur Respir J 2003; 21:556
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003


From the Authors

E.H. Walters

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

From the authors:

The letter from J. Knox and D. Jarvis about the outcome of the dosimeter quality control programme for the measurement of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) II is reassuring. Although our initial worries about excessive variation between MefarTM dosimeter (MefarTM, Brescia, Italy) driving pressures from our own observations 1 do not seem to have been confirmed in most of the ECRHS centres, the value of the quality control programme does seem to have been validated.

Although the variations in driving pressures reported to the Coordinating Centre were not as great as we had observed with a number of dosimeters from a small number of international centres, the range of mean pressures quoted still seems to be outside the manufacturer's specifications of 180 (±5%) kPa. We made a proposal to the ECHRS II for our laboratory to act as a "neutral" and a confidence reference agency to collect and collate the calibration information obtained by study centres following the instructions we provided on our website. For the sake of complete objectivity, it is perhaps a pity that this did not occur. Even so, we are pleased that our work to highlight a potential difficulty with the MefarTM dosimeter has been very worthwhile, and will certainly have even greater confidence in the data generated by ECHRS II.

References

  1. Ward RJ, Ward C, Johns DP, Skoric B, Abramson M, Walters EH. European Community Respiratory Health Survey calibration project of dosimeter driving pressures. Eur Respir J 2002;19:252–256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ward RJ, Liakakos P, Leonard RF, Reid DW, Johns DP, Walters EH. A critical evaluation of the MefarTM dosimeter. Eur Respir J 1999;14:430–434.[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walters, E.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Walters, E.H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS