|
|
||||||||
1 Laboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Free University of Brussels, and 2 Dept of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
CORRESPONDENCE: M. Leeman, Dept of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, 808, Lennik road, B-1070, Brussels, Belgium. Fax: 32 25556713. E-mail: marc.leeman@ulb.ac.be
Keywords: endothelins, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, nitric oxide, pulmonary hypertension
Received: March 28, 2002
Accepted August 16, 2002
This study was supported by grant n° 3.4567.00 from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale (Belgium).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) was evaluated in anesthetised dogs by the increase in the mean pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa) minus occluded Ppa (Ppao) gradient in response to hypoxia (inspiratory oxygen fraction of 0.1) at constant pulmonary blood flow.
Bosentan, an endothelin A and B receptor antagonist, did not affect baseline Ppa, Ppao or systemic arterial pressure (Psa) and did not alter HPV (n=8). The NO synthase inhibitor NGnitro-L-arginine (L-NA) did not affect baseline Ppa and Ppao, but increased Psa and enhanced HPV (n=12). The addition of bosentan in these dogs did not affect baseline Ppa or Ppao, but decreased Psa and inhibited HPV. Exhaled NO was decreased by L-NA and by bosentan and abolished by L-NA+bosentan (n=9).
The authors conclude that endogenous nitric oxide is released by, and opposes the vasoconstricting effects of, endothelins in vivo, reducing systemic blood pressure and limiting hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.
Endothelins are potent endotheliumderived vasoconstrictors 1. The endothelin system has been reported to be activated in various types of experimental or clinical pulmonary hypertension 1. However, whether endogenous endothelins play a role in the control of systemic and pulmonary vascular tone in vivo remains uncertain. Endothelin receptor antagonists have been shown to increase forearm blood flow in humans 2, 3, to reduce brachial artery pressure in patients with essential hypertension 4 and to decrease pulmonary artery pressure in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension 5, 6. However, some investigators have been unable to demonstrate pulmonary or systemic vascular effects of these compounds in vivo 7–17. The failure to show a vasoconstrictor effect of endogenous endothelins appears related, at least in part, to the release of nitric oxide (NO) by the endothelium, which either counteracts the effect and/or inhibits the synthesis of endothelins 16–19.
Endothelins have been hypothesised to play a role in the mediation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). Hypoxia has been reported to increase the level of immunoreactive endothelin-1 in the plasma and of endothelin-1 messenger ribonucleic acid in the lung and right atrium 12, 20. However, selective as well as nonselective endothelin receptor blockers have been shown to inhibit HPV in some studies 8–14 but not in others 15, 21–23. These discrepancies might be explained, at least in part, by variable release of endogenous NO, which has been shown to limit HPV in intact animals 24, 25.
In this study, the effects of endogenous endothelins on hyperoxic and hypoxic vascular tone, with and without NO synthase inhibition by NGnitro-L-arginine (L-NA), were examined. The hypothesis was that endothelin antagonism may inhibit HPV, but if not, would do so after NO synthase inhibition. Because endothelins have opposite vascular effects, possibly mediated by different receptors 1, complete blockade of the actions of endogenous endothelins requires antagonism of both endothelin A and endothelin B receptors, as exerted by the combined nonpeptide blocker bosentan 26. The effects of hypoxia and drugs on vascular tone were evaluated at constant cardiac output (Q') to allow for the discrimination between passive and active tone dependent changes in pulmonary vascular pressure 24, 25.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal preparation
Mongrel dogs (16–45 kg) were anaesthetised (pentobarbital 25 mg·kg–1 intravenously followed by 2 mg·kg–1 hourly), paralysed (pancuronium 0.2 mg·kg–1 intravenously followed by 0.2 mg·kg–1 hourly), intubated and ventilated (Elema 900 B Servo ventilator; Siemens, Solna, Sweden) with an inspiratory oxygen fraction (FI,O2) of 0.4. This higher than normal FI,O2 was selected to maintain the lungs above the threshold for HPV 25. Catheters were placed in the jugular vein, in the femoral artery and in the pulmonary artery as described previously 24, 25. Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution. A balloon catheter was advanced into the inferior vena cava through a right femoral venotomy and a largebore cannula was inserted into the left femoral artery and vein to act as an arteriovenous bypass. Stepwise inflations of the balloon catheter or opening of the bypass decreased or increased Q', respectively 24, 25.
Effect of big endothelin-1 without and with bosentan
Bosentan (Actelion, Allschwil, Switzerland) was diluted in heated distilled water just before the experiments and administered as an intravenous bolus of 3 mg·kg–1 followed by a constant infusion of 7 mg·kg–1·h–1 7. This dose has been shown to provide optimal endothelin receptor blockade in dogs 7. The ability of this dose of bosentan to antagonise the effects of big endothelin-1 (Novabiochem, Läufelfingen, Switzerland), the precursor of endothelins, was checked. Big endothelin-1 was diluted in sodium chloride 0.9% just before the experiments. After two baseline hypoxic challenges (FI,O2 0.4–0.1 for 6 min), the dogs received 1 nmol·kg–1 of big endothelin-1 alone (n=3) or after bosentan (n=2), and two additional hypoxic challenges were performed thereafter. Q' was kept constant using the femoral bypass and the inferior vena caval balloon. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa), occluded Ppa (Ppao), systemic artery pressure (Psa), Q' and blood gases were measured after 3 min stabilisation.
Effect of bosentan
The response of the Ppa–Ppao gradient to changes in FI,O2 (0.4, 0.21, 0.12, 0.1) was examined, with Q' kept constant, before and after bosentan. Each FI,O2 was maintained for at least 6 min to allow stabilisation.
Effect of bosentan after NGnitro-L-arginine
Two hypoxic challenges (FI,O2 0.4–0.1) were performed at baseline, after L-NA (SigmaAldrich, Bornem, Belgium) 5 mg·kg–1 intravenous bolus followed by a constant infusion of 5 mg·kg–1·h–1, and again after bosentan. This dose of L-NA has been shown to enhance canine HPV 24, 25. Q' was kept constant as described above.
Effect of NGnitro-L-arginine and bosentan on exhaled nitric oxide
The concentration of NO was continuously monitored at the tip of the endotracheal tube using a chemiluminescence analyser (Model LR2000; Logan Research, Rochester, UK) 27. Exhaled NO concentrations were read in triplicate at the maximum value of expired carbon dioxide. These measurements were performed after bosentan alone (n=4), after L-NA (n=5) and after bosentan given after L-NA (n=4).
Analysis of the data
Results are expressed as means±SEM. A twofactor analysis of variance for multiple measurements and modified t-tests were used as appropriate 24, 25, 28. Values of p<0.05 were considered as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Big endothelin-1 alone
At FI,O2 0.4, big endothelin-1 increased Psa from 104 to 132 mmHg and had no effect on Ppa–Ppao which was 8 mmHg before and after big endothelin-1. The increase in Ppa–Ppao in response to hypoxia was 2 mmHg before and 4 mmHg after big endothelin-1 (n=3).
Bosentan followed by big endothelin-1
At FI,O2 0.4, bosentan slightly reduced Psa from 118 to 109 mmHg. Big endothelin-1 given after bosentan had no effect on Psa, which remained at 105 mmHg. Ppa–Ppao remained at 8 mmHg at baseline, 8 mmHg after bosentan and 8 mmHg after big endothelin-1. Hypoxiainduced increases in Ppa–Ppao were 11 mmHg at baseline, 11 mmHg after bosentan and 10 mmHg after big endothelin-1 (n=2).
Effects of bosentan alone
Hypoxia increased the Ppa–Ppao gradient measured at constant Q' (table 1
and fig. 1
). Administration of bosentan did not affect Ppa–Ppao in hyperoxia, normoxia and hypoxia (fig. 1
). Neither hypoxia nor bosentan significantly affected Psa (table 1
) (n=8).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulmonary and systemic vascular tone during hyperoxia and normoxia
The present results are in agreement with a previous observation that combined endothelin A and B receptor blockade by bosentan does not affect pulmonary nor systemic haemodynamics in welloxygenated dogs 7, and may suggest that endogenous endothelins do not contribute to basal vascular control. However, an alternative explanation could be that a tonic release of endothelins occurs without demonstrable vasoconstriction because of antagonistic release of NO or other endogenous vasodilator mediators 16–19. The current data suggest that this is the case for the systemic but not the pulmonary circulation, since inhibition of NO synthesis did not affect pulmonary vascular resistance but was associated with a bosentanreversible increase in systemic vascular resistance 17.
Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction
In the present study, HPV was not affected by bosentan, given at a dose verified to block the vascular effects of the endothelin precursor big endothelin-1. It is of interest that big endothelin-1 alone markedly increased systemic vascular resistance but had no effect on hyperoxic or hypoxic pulmonary vascular resistance. Other authors have also been unable to inhibit HPV with endothelin receptor antagonists, including bosentan 15, 21–23. Variable results of effects of endothelin receptor blockers on HPV in different experimental models may be explained by variable antagonism of tonic effects of endothelins by circulating or endotheliumderived vasodilating mediators.
Bosentan after nitric oxide inhibition
The current authors previously reported that inhibition of NO synthase enhances HPV in intact anesthetised dogs 24, 25. Therefore, the effects of endothelin receptor blockade by bosentan after inhibition of NO synthase were tested. The present results confirm that NO synthase inhibition does not affect pulmonary vascular tone in well oxygenated dogs, but that it increases HPV 24, 25. They additionally show that NO synthase inhibition unmasks a pulmonary vasoconstrictor effect of endothelins but only in acute hypoxia. This result is in agreement with a previous observation that combined endothelin A and B receptor antagonism inhibits the pulmonary vasoconstrictor response to L-NA in isolated perfused lungs from rats with chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension 19. The hypertensive foetal pulmonary circulation also dilates in response to the administration of endothelin receptor antagonists 29, 30. These studies indicate that pulmonary hypertension may result from an imbalance of endothelin-1 receptor activation favouring pulmonary vasoconstriction 29, or from a combination of enhanced endothelin A receptormediated vasoconstriction together with a decreased NO synthase activity 30.
In the present study, bosentan reduced L-NAinduced systemic hypertension. In anesthetised rats, mixed endothelin A and endothelin B receptor antagonism and selective endothelin A receptor antagonism did not affect Psa when given alone, but decreased it after NO synthase inhibition 16, 17. Blockade of NO synthase also increased the plasma levels of endothelin-1 17. Compared to normotensive controls, hypertensive patients had larger vasodilation in response to endothelin antagonism and smaller vasoconstriction in response to NO synthase inhibition, both responses being inversely correlated 2. In accordance with these results, the present data suggest that the systemic hypertensive effect of NO synthase inhibition could be endothelinmediated.
Exhaled nitric oxide
As expected, a decrease in exhaled NO was observed after NO synthase inhibition. The current results additionally show, for the first time, that bosentan also reduces exhaled NO. This observation suggests that the vasoconstrictive effects of endothelins are selflimited by an endothelininduced synthesis of endogenous NO. Although it is generally proposed that endothelial NO synthesis is related to endothelin B receptor stimulation 1, 31, 32, a recent study shows that activation of endothelin A receptors also can enhance NO production in the vasculature 33. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome have arterial hypoxaemia partially due to inefficient HPV, possibly related to the release of NO 34. The current results show that bosentan does not inhibit HPV and decreases NO release. It could be speculated that bosentan might be given to reduce pulmonary hypertension in patients with ventilationtoperfusion impairment, without further deteriorating gas exchange, as usually observed after systemic administration of vasodilators. This hypothesis could be tested in experimental models of lung injury.
Clinical relevance and conclusions
The current authors propose that endothelins stimulate nitric oxide production in pulmonary vessels, which counteracts their own constricting effect, and that the vasoconstricting action of endothelins can appear only when endogenous nitric oxide synthesis is deficient. The present results are in keeping with the concept that increased pulmonary vascular tone may result from an imbalance between the antagonistic effects of nitric oxide and endothelins, and that pharmacological manipulation of this imbalance offers therapeutic possibilities in pulmonary hypertension. The lungs of patients with severe pulmonary hypertension show a reduced expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase 35 and an increased expression of endothelin-1 36. Endothelin receptor antagonism with bosentan has been reported recently to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance and to improve functional class and exercise capacity in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension 5, 6.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. E. Girgis, H. C. Champion, G. B. Diette, R. A. Johns, S. Permutt, and J. T. Sylvester Decreased Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Response to Bosentan Therapy Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2005; 172(3): 352 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Schwartz, C. A. White, and B. A. Freeman Do we kNOw how HSP90 and eNOS mediate lung injury in sickle cell disease? Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): L701 - L704. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |