Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002 Cooperative effect of adenosine deaminase and ABO-secretor genetic complex on susceptibility to childhood asthma1 The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. 2 Institute of Pediatric Clinic, University of Rome La Sapienza, and 3 Dept of Biopathology and Imaging Diagnostics, Division of Medical Statistics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy To the Editor: In a cohort of asthmatic children, we have recently shown that the ABO-secretor genetic complex influences susceptibility to asthma in children 1. Since previous studies have shown an association of asthma with adenosine deaminase (ADA) genotype 2, we have searched for possible interactions between the two systems concerning their effects on susceptibility to asthma in children. The sample study has been described in a previous paper 1 and was composed of 165 children, 109 males and 56 females, aged from 1 month15 yrs. The criterion for inclusion in the study was the occurrence of two or more episodes of wheezing in the last 6 months, irrespective of aetiology/pathogenesis of the attack. A consecutive series of 362 newborn infants from the same Caucasian population in Rome, Italy, was used as the control sample. ADA phenotype was determined by starch gel electrophoresis according to the method of Spencer et al. 3. ABO and secretor phenotypes were determined according to a standard laboratory procedure 1.
Table 1
The proportion of nonsecretor/O subjects with the ADA*1/*1 genotype was much higher in asthmatic children than in controls. On the contrary, the proportion of subjects with other phenotypes of secretor-ABO complex carrying the ADA*2 allele was much lower in asthmatic children than in controls. The other two phenotypic categories showed a similar proportion in asthmatic children and controls.
The lack of three-way interaction among secretor/ABO complex, ADA and disease (table 2
The Chi-squared test of independence (table 3
The secretor gene (FUT2) and the ABO system act in concert to build up oligosaccharide structures in exocrine secretions, including secretions in the respiratory tract. Specific oligosaccharide epitopes are necessary for recognition and adherence of microorganisms to the cell membrane, suggesting that genetic variation in these systems may influence susceptibility to viral and bacterial respiratory infections 4. In purine metabolism, the classical function of the ADA enzyme is considered to be the regulation of intra- and extracellular levels of adenosine. Recently, it has been demonstrated that ADA is present on the surface of many cell types, including lymphocytes and neurons, where it can act as an ectoenzyme 5. A costimulatory role has been observed for ADA bound with CD26 on the lymphocyte surface, while ADA bound with adenosine 1 receptors (A1R) on the neuronal surface seems to act as a direct local modulator of adenosine action on A1R, and also as a cell adhesion molecule thus having a role in neural development and plasticity processes 5. Since the ADA*2 allele is associated with lower ADA enzymatic activity, the negative association of the ADA*2 carrier genotype with the disease could indicate a role of decreased local and/or systemic adenosine levels in the pathogenesis of asthma. The suppressive effects of adenosine on lymphocyte function suggests that the ADA*2 allele could, in part, protect against higher immune reactivity. Four adenosine receptors (A1, A2a, A2b and A3) have been discovered on the surface of many different cell types 6. In the respiratory system, the bronchoconstrictor effects of adenosine are well known 7. Thus, ADA polymorphism could modulate adenosine receptor activity in the respiratory tract with effects on the signal transduction pathway of adenosine and other mediators. Based on the different roles of the ABO-secretor complex and ADA in the functional integrity of the respiratory tract, it is likely that the effects of the two systems on susceptibility to asthma follow different pathways: the ABO-secretor complex acting on the bacterial-viral infective component and ADA on the cellular reactivity component. Thus, a priori, an epistatic interaction was unlikely and our analysis has confirmed the expectation. At present the genetic analysis of multifactorial disorders is a central problem in medical genetics and there is a general consensus on the necessity of a nonreductionist approach 8. The analysis of single genetic factors, based on a mendelian perspective, cannot solve the problem. It would be more productive to define a set of genes functionally related to the disease and to study simultaneously genetic and environmental factors involved in the susceptibility to the disease. A comprehensive approach will help to evaluate gene-to-gene and gene-to-environment interactions and will help in the understanding of pathogenic mechanisms.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||