HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Permissions Request Permissions Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

Respiratory intermediate care units: a European survey

European Respiratory Society Task Force on epidemiology of respiratory intermediate care in Europe

CORRESPONDENCE: A. Corrado, Unita' di Terapia Intensiva Polmonare e Fisiopatologia Toracica, Azienda Ospedaliera di Careggi, CTO, Largo Palagi 1, I-50136, Florence, Italy. Fax: 39 0554277559. E-mail: acorrado@qubisoft.it

Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, especially those with chronic respiratory failure, may frequently require periods of intensive treatment, monitoring, nursing and, occasionally, ventilatory assistance in order to overcome acute exacerbations. Ventilatory assistance is only rarely provided in the conventional ward 1, therefore admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is often needed 2. ICU, however, are very precious and expensive resources where nursing costs represent a major expense 3. Patients with acute on chronic respiratory failure may experience a prolonged stay in the ICU not only because of the severity of their illness which precipitates the underlying acute respiratory failure (ARF) 2, but also because of ICU-related complications 4. For these reasons the treatment of acute on chronically ill patients in these areas creates ethical 5 and economic concerns 6, 7.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.—

A recent Italian survey carried out on 99 ICUs showed that COPD was the dominant underlying chronic disease in patients admitted to the Italian ICU, and the need for cardiorespiratory monitoring was the most frequent indication for admission (31.2%) 13.

These studies clearly indicate that in some centres there is an "overutilisation" of ICU resources for monitoring purposes, and that acute on chronic respiratory failure could be managed in many patients without invasive ventilation.

Patients with chronic respiratory failure, especially those with underlying COPD, very often suffer from a high frequency of acute exacerbations, which, when requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, may be associated with life-threatening complications 4. Furthermore, it has been reported that in COPD patients with ARF the greater part of their ICU stay was devoted to weaning the patient from mechanical ventilation, and this weaning period accounted for 59% of the total duration of mechanical ventilation 14.

All the above considerations can be cited to justify the increased number of specialised respiratory intermediate care units (RICU) in the USA 15–18. The direct and indirect economic advantages of these settings compared to the traditional ICU have been reported previously. The advantages are linked to lower nursing staff requirements 18 and to the better utilisation of the ICU through the appropriate admission of patients who really need intensive treatment 19. Conversely, the discharge from the ICU to RICU becomes possible in chronic patients who have recovered from the most acute phase of the critical illness, but still require intensive nursing or physiotherapy, before they can be weaned from the ventilator 20.

Besides the economical factors, there are other advantages which favour the RICU as a care site for these patients. Unlike the ICU, the RICU offers greater privacy and easier visitor access for the patients. This may contribute to the "healing" process and may help facilitate the discharge from hospital, especially for those patients who require long-term oxygen therapy and/or home ventilatory support 21, 22.

While North American pneumologists embrace intensive respiratory care within their specialty, in many European countries specialists in respiratory medicine have no, or only a marginal, role in the treatment of severe ARF due to pulmonary and thoracic insufficiency, even though these conditions fall within their field of specialisation 23. Despite this situation, in Europe there are several RICUs headed by pneumologists 22, which are specifically devoted to the treatment and monitoring of acute on chronic respiratory insufficiency. The organisational models and resources utilised differ between countries and frequently within individual countries 24–29.

The Intensive Care Assembly of the European Respiratory Society has formed a Task Force (TF) "Epidemiology of Respiratory Intermediate Care in Europe" for the purpose of evaluating the exact distribution, organisation and levels of service provision in respiratory units which treat or monitor patients with severe ARF in Europe.

Methods

The aim of this survey, conducted from November 1999 to January 2000, was to collect data on all the respiratory units within Europe by means of a questionnaire. Although the initial goal was to obtain a census of respiratory units in as many European countries as possible, for organisational reasons, such as the lack of contacts able to provide data in certain countries, the census mainly concerned European Community countries, Turkey and Norway.

The questionnaire was located on the website devoted to the TF 30 and was sent by e-mail to the members of TF of the following European Countries: Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, and the UK. Each member of the TF was a guarantor of the survey in their own country. Data from Austria, the Netherlands, Finland, Norway and Portugal were collected by TF members from Germany, Belgium, Sweden and Spain. Each member of the TF, upon their own knowledge of the health system of their own country and/or of the countries assigned to them, sent a questionnaire to the pneumology and emergency departments, and general ICUs which, in their opinion, were potentially able to have a respiratory unit. When no reply was received, a telephone reminder was made until the data relative to all the questionnaires sent were obtained.

The questionnaire is shown in the appendix and included 59 items. Two months were allowed for questionnaire completion and data collection. Any point of ambiguity was clarified by e-mail and phone survey. In order to enter the requested data, each centre to whom the questionnaire was sent and each TF member accessed the website by means of specific passwords.

The criteria reported in table 1 were adopted in order to define an RICU. Furthermore, in order to evaluate all the levels of care currently existing in Europe, the following criteria were used: staffing, equipment, admission criteria, and type of mechanical ventilation employed. Thus, three levels of care were identified: the respiratory ICU, the RICU and the respiratory monitoring unit (table 2). In order to better understand the level of care provided by each unit, these were classified as either independent wards or as wards inside other wards. In the first case, the unit was run by a devoted, specialised physician and staffed with nurses and doctors specifically assigned to the unit; in the second case, the unit shared its personnel with the unit in which it was located.

The data of the census were collected from November 1999 to January 2000. Seventy-eight questionnaires were returned from the following countries: Italy (26; 33.3%), Germany (21; 26.9%), France (11; 14.1%), Turkey (9; 11.5%), UK (8; 10.2%), Spain (2; 2.6%), and Austria (1; 1.3%). In the other countries where the census was also carried out (Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Portugal and Sweden) there were no respiratory units. Data from Denmark were missing. From the 78 questionnaires received, the following information was obtained: 1) type of hospital where the units were located (university hospitals 39.5%, university-affiliated hospitals 22.4%, community hospitals 25%, rehabilitation centres 6.6%, other hospitals 6.6%); and 2) number of beds devoted to the treatment and monitoring of critically ill patients with respiratory disorders.

From a total of 4,886 pneumology beds in the hospitals where these units were located, 472 beds were devoted to the treatment and monitoring of critically ill patients. The number of pneumology beds was underestimated because 10 units did not provide this data.

Among the 78 questionnaires received, 10 (12.8%) were discarded because critical information was missing and they could not be correctly classified according to the criteria adopted in tables 1 and 2. Consequently, the 68 units which provided sufficient information were included in the analysis.

Geographical distribution and type of units
The distribution of units in each country is reported in table 3. Whereas these units were lacking in seven countries, the majority of them were present in Italy, Germany and France, followed by the UK, Turkey, Spain and Austria.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.— Location of the three different levels of care. : independent ward; : inside pneumology ward; : inside general intensive care unit; : inside emergency area.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.— Type of intervention according to the three different levels of care. : invasive mechanical ventilation; : noninvasive mechanical ventilation; : monitoring.

Patient population and infective complications
During 1999 the total number of patients admitted to the 55 units which provided the requested data was 11,890; 3,123 in intensive units, 6,276 in intermediate units, and 2,491 in monitoring units. Among these, 34 units, which admitted 6,803 patients, reported a rate of nosocomial pneumonia of 8%. The reported rate of nosocomial pneumonia in the three levels of care was 10%, 8%, and 5% in the intensive, intermediate, and monitoring units, respectively. Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 39% and 29% of cases, respectively.

Discussion

To the authors' knowledge, few studies 22, 31 have been published on this topic before the present survey. These papers 22, 31 contain specific indications on technical equipment, location, architectural structure and staffing of the RICU. The report by Nava et al. 22 on the European situation was based on a personal communication given by recognised authorities in some countries.

The data from this census show that, despite the lack of specific rules and a recognised specific training for pneumologists in intensive care, pneumonologists run many respiratory care units offering different levels of care in Europe. However, the distribution of these units throughout Europe is markedly uneven. A possible explanation may be the different traditions for the treatment of patients with acute on chronic respiratory failure in specifically dedicated settings. Whereas in France and Italy at the end of the 1960s and at the beginning of the 1970s, the need for a close monitoring and intensive treatment in critically ill patients with acute on chronic respiratory failure, led to the opening of an ICU in some respiratory departments 26, 28, in other European countries, such as the UK and Spain, there has never been a similar tradition 24, 29.

In Italy, the European country with the highest number of respiratory units, the adoption of models such as the RICU, has been strongly conditioned by the Associazione Italiana Pneumologi Ospedalieri, the most representative association of respiratory medicine, through: 1) the promotion of cultural and educational activities which, despite the lack of laws on formal training in this sector, have stimulated the interest of pneumologists in the field of respiratory intensive care; and 2) an intensive campaign aimed at stimulating the awareness of administration and political bodies at local and regional level for the formal recognition of the role of the RICU within the organisation of the health system, despite the lack of relevant national laws.

Another important factor which has contributed to the opening of RICUs directed by pneumologists is the evidence that noninvasive ventilatory techniques are effective for the treatment of acute on chronic respiratory failure in COPD 32, 33. More recently, some papers have suggested that NIV can be successfully used in other conditions, such as ARF in immunocompromised patients, pulmomary oedema and after bilateral lung transplantation 34–37. The confirmation of such data through the use of NIV on a higher number of patients will widen the field of application of NIV and, consequently, create the need to implement RICUs.

Another important result of the census is that there are differently graded levels of care which are provided in these units. The majority of units were classified as offering an intermediate level of care characterised by a nurse:patient ratio of at least 1:4, by the treatment of single organ failure and by the routine use of noninvasive monitoring and ventilatory techniques. Twenty-one per cent of the units were classified as monitoring units, with a lower nurse:patient ratio than intermediate (<1:4), and where invasive ventilation was restricted to a small number of tracheostomised patients. Eighteen per cent of the units were characterised by a nurse:patient ratio >1:3, by the ability to treat multiple organ failure and by the frequent use of invasive ventilatory techniques. These were classified as ICUs (among these, three acted as a general ICU in their hospital).

These data should represent the starting point in characterising the different patterns of care in the field of respiratory medicine. The monitoring unit may be situated in a pneumology ward in hospitals for acute patients, in which the availability of a general ICU is mandatory in order to manage patients needing invasive ventilation and/or monitoring. These units should be able to act as a step-up unit for the treatment of acute on chronic respiratory failure with noninvasive ventilation, and as step-down unit for patients discharged from the general ICU who require a further period of monitoring.

The RICU should be functionally integrated with the emergency room, the general ICU and the medical or other wards. These units should be characterised by a higher autonomy than the monitoring units because of the higher level of care, equipment and expertise in the management of the artificial airways by the medical staff. Consequently, patients with acute on chronic respiratory failure of any degree of severity should be admitted to these units with the exception of those who are already intubated. Furthermore, critically ill patients with weaning problems could be admitted to the RICU, thereby freeing beds in the general ICU for a more appropriate use 38.

The highest level of care reported by the census (respiratory ICUs) partially corresponds, in terms of admission criteria, staffing and equipment, to the model of general ICU which is the most common in all European countries. In some cases (three of 12), these respiratory ICUs, directed by pneumologists, performed general ICU functions in their hospital. It is evident that, before European pneumologists can have a more comprehensive role in the conduction of the medical general ICU, alongside the currently prevailing professional positions (intensivists, anaesthesiologists), it will be necessary to change the process of education and training of the pneumologist in Europe to also include critical medicine, in line with the American system 39. The European Respiratory Society and the European School of Respiratory Medicine should have a key role in the promotion and further enhancement of the training of the pneumologist. This upgrading of the pneumologists' training process in Europe represents an essential step towards the further development of the respiratory intermediate care and monitoring unit in Europe.

The strategic decision to offer different levels of care depends on the following: local epidemiology of chronic respiratory disorders, the organisational model of the hospital, economic resources, and the level of training in the intensive care of chest physicians. The first point has been investigated recently by Plant et al. 40 who found that in a typical UK general hospital serving a population of 250,000, 72 COPD patients each year were admitted needing NIV. This demand is probably an underestimate because the study included only patients with respiratory acidosis on admission and did not take into account those who deteriorated later. Also, patients other than COPD were not included 40.

A low rate of infective complications is expected in RICUs because of the low number of patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation 41. The present survey shows that the rate of nosocomial pneumonia was 8%, ranging from 5–10%, according to the level of care. However, these data were retrospectively collected and diagnostic criteria for nosocomial pneumonia were not defined. This information must therefore be interpreted with caution. Prospective studies are needed to address this issue.

A recent editorial 42, accompanying an analysis of advantages and disadvantages of intermediate care units, concluded with the recommendation to combine intensive and intermediate beds in a single unit instead of separating both, arguing that this is the current situation in many European ICUs. However, this assumption is not supported by epidemiological data, and is in conflict with recent guidelines published on the subject 43. Although to the authors' knowledge there are no data regarding the intermediate care unit as a whole in Europe, the present survey shows that only 9% of RICUs are combined with a general ICU, whereas most of these units are located in pneumology wards (59%) or are independent units (25%).

Few data are available on the activities performed in such respiratory units. A recent three-month prospective cohort study carried out in 26 Italian RICUs examined the characteristics of 756 patients admitted during this period 44. In the majority of cases, upon admission, ARF was caused by COPD exacerbation (60%). The reasons for admission were mechanical ventilation in 63% of cases, weaning in 8%, and monitoring only in 29% of cases; these data are in line with the present survey (fig. 2). The predicted mortality according to the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 22% while the actual mortality rate was 16% 44. This information suggests that in units with a lower level of care than a general ICU, it is possible to treat patients with acute on chronic respiratory failure successfully.

The method used to carry out this census could be criticised in that it is based on the personal knowledge of those responsible for the census in the countries concerned. This could have led to an underestimation of the respiratory units present in the countries where the census was carried out. However, this potential risk should have been minimised by the fact that those responsible for the census have a thorough knowledge of respiratory medicine in their respective countries.

The data from the present survey show a dynamic new reality in the field of respiratory medicine. On the basis of the results, there is a need to consider a significant increase in the number of respiratory care units in Europe. To estimate the overall requirement and impact it is necessary to: 1) carry out a prospective cohort study in order to evaluate the characteristics of patients admitted, type of interventions and outcome; and 2) to perform a cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of respiratory intermediate care units.

Appendix: Items of the questionnaire

Name of institution

Full address

Nation

Public health system/Private system

Chief/Director

Local project leader

Phone/Fax

E-mail

Official acknowledgement of respiratory intermediate care unit

National health system/Regional health system/Other

Year in which the respiratory intermediate care unit became operative

Hospital characteristics

University hospital/University-affiliated hospital/Community hospital/Rehabilitation centre/Other

Number of hospital beds

Total number of pulmonology beds

Number of inhabitants in the area where the hospital is located

Catchment area: Local/Regional/National

Structural characteristics of the respiratory intermediate care unit

Number of beds

Number of rooms containing beds

Maximum of patients per room (n)

Minimum of patients per room (n)

Floor area available for each bed (m²)

Availability of a central nursing station for patient surveillance: Yes/No

Hand-washing facilities: In each room/Only in a few rooms/Outside the room

Unit setting: Open/Closed

Location: Inside the pneumology ward/Inside the medicine ward/Inside the emergency area/General intensive care unit/Independent ward/Other

Location of the general intensive care unit: In the same building (number of beds)/In the same hospital (number of beds)/In other hospitals (distance of the closest (km); number of beds)

Comments

Technical equipment

Mechanical ventilators:

Home positive pressure ventilators (n; not life support)

Volume preset (% of total)

Pressure preset (% of total)

Pressure support (% of total)

Intensive care unit positive pressure ventilators (n; life support)

Iron lung (n)

Poncho, cuirass (n)

Polifunctional monitors (n)

Pulse oxymeters (n)

Electrocardiogram monitors (n)

Respiratory mechanics monitors (n)

Blood gas analyser: Inside respiratory intermediate care unit/Outside respiratory intermediate care unit

Polysomnograph: Inside respiratory intermediate care unit/Outside respiratory intermediate care unit

Facilities

Echocardiography facilities: Yes (inside the ward/outside the ward)/No

Bronchoscopy facilities: Yes (inside the ward/outside the ward)/No

Staff

Presence of a medical coordinator: Yes/No

Qualification: Pneumologist/Intensivist/Anaesthesiologist/Internal medicine/Other

Total number of physicians: Full-time/Part-time

Number of chest physicians: Full-time/Part-time

Number of anaesthesiologists

Number of intensive care specialists

Physicians on duty: At least one 24 h/At least one during the day and on call by night

Need for specific training in intensive care medicine before commencing work in respiratory intermediate care unit for chest physicians? Yes/No

Presence of a nurse coordinator: Yes/No

Number of nurses in the respiratory intermediate care unit

Fixed (total number)

Maximum number of nurses per shift

Minimum number of nurses per shift

Auxiliary nurses per shift (n)

Need for specific training before commencing work in respiratory intermediate care unit for nurses?

Yes/No

Number of physiotherapists: Full-time/Part-time

Number of respiratory therapists: Full-time/Part-time

Characteristics of patients and intervention

Total number of patients admitted in 1999

Patients with invasive mechanical ventilation (%)

Patients with noninvasive mechanical ventilation (%)

Patients not ventilated (%)

Indicate the three most frequent diseases in patients admitted to respiratory intermediate care unit

Total nosocomial pneumonia in the unit

Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia (%)

Pseudomonas pneumonia (%)

Participants to the census. Austria: H. Zwich (Vienna); France: P. Camus (Dijon); P. Krempf (Toulouse); P. Huchon (Paris); P. Chailleux (Nantes); J.F. Derenne (Paris); T. Similowski (Paris); C. Godard (Montpellier); J.M. Polu (Nancy); M. Curnier (Clichy); V. Jounieaux (Amiens); C. Mayaud (Paris); Germany: H. Teschler (Essen); H. Wanke (Oberhausen); T. Podszus (Hof); H. Worth (Fürth); W. Nowak (Wangen); H. Magnussen (Grosshansdorf); K.H. Ruhle (Hagen); G. Goeckenjan (Immenhausen); P. Criée (Bovenden-Lenglerm); G. Siemon (Donaustauf); H. Schatz (Bochum); V. Schulz (Heidelberg); H. Lode (Berlin); W. Bohning (Bad-Lippspringe); Busse (Halle); G. Riegger (Regensburg); O. Karg (Gauting); W. Seeger (Giessen); H. Klein (Magdeburg); P. Von Wichert (Marburg); D. Kohler (Grafschaft); Italy: C. Fracchia (Montescano); R. Negrin (Vicenza); T. Todisco (Perugia); A. Murgia (Cagliari); M. Moretti (Modena); G .Consigli (Parma); D. Sella (Trento); A. Potena (Ferrara); M. Rossi (Arezzo); A. Petraglia (Salerno); L. Pesce (Cittadella); M. Vitacca (Gussago); G. Garuti (Gaiato); C. Sturani (Mantova); E. Guffanti (Casatenovo); A. Vianello (Padova); A. Lo Coco (Palermo); S. Cacciani (Rome); M. Schiavina (Bologna); A. Rossi (Pesaro); C. Mollica (Rome); L. Gandola (Crema); C.F. Donner (Verona); V. Rastelli (Sondalo); A. Cavalli (Bologna); J. Blanquer (Valencia); Turkey: M. Ozhan (Izmir); K. Perim (Izmir); M. Unlu (Ankara); F. Kosar (Istanbul); T. Celikel (Istanbul); D. Alper (Ankara); A. Akkoclu (Izmir); N. Ekim (Ankara); N. Ozyardymcy (Bursa); UK: J.P. Watson (Leeds); J.M. Shneerson (Cambridge); J.A. Wedzicha (London); W. Kinnear (Nottingham); V. Mak (London); C. Davidson (London).

References

1. Plant PK, Owen JL, Elliott MW. Early use of non invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on general respiratory wards: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;335:1931–1935.
2. Rossi A, Ambrosino N. The need for an intermediate cardiorespiratory unit. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1994;49:463–465.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Noseworthy T, Konopad E, Johnston R, Shustack A, Grace M. The cost of intensive care. Chest 1992;102:150S.
4. Pingleton SK. Complication of acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:1463–1493.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Noseworthy TW, Jacobs P. Economic and ethical consideration in the intensive care unit. Health Manage Forum 1990;3:3–18.
6. Douglass PS, Bone RC, Rosen RL. DRG payments for long-term ventilator patients. Chest 1987;91:415–417.
7. Gracey DR, Gillespie D, Nobrega F, Naessens JM, Krishan J. Financial implication of prolonged ventilator care of Medicare patients under the prospective payment system. Chest 1987;91:424–427.[Free Full Text]
8. Henning RJ, McClish D, Daly B, Nearman H, Franklin C, Jackson D. Clinical characteristics and resource utilization of ICU patients: implications for organization of intensive care. Crit Care Med 1987;15:264–269.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sage WM, Rosenthal MH, Silverman JF. Is intensive care worth it? An assessment of input and outcome for the critically ill. Crit Care Med 1986;14:777–782.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Oye RK, Bellamy PE. Patterns of resource consumption in medical intensive care. Chest 1991;99:685–689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Seneff MG, Wagner DP, Wagner RP, Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA. Hospital and 1-year survival of patients admitted to intensive care units with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA 1995;274:1852–1857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Connors AF Jr, Dawson NV, Thomas C, et al. Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:959–967.[Abstract]
13. Apolone G, Bertolini G, D'Amico R, et al. The performance of SAPS II in a cohort of patients admitted to 99 italian ICUs: results from GiViTi. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:1368–1378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Esteban A, Alia I, Ibanez J, Benito S, Tobin MJ, The Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Modes of mechanical ventilation and weaning. A national survey in Spanish hospitals. Chest 1994;106:1188–1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Krieger BP, Ershowsky P, Spivack D, Thorstenson J, Sackner MA. Initial experience with a central respiratory monitoring unit as a cost-saving alternative to the intensive care unit for Medicare patients who require long-term ventilator support. Chest 1988;93:395–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Bone RC, Balk RA. Noninvasive respiratory care unit: a cost effective solution for the future. Chest 1988;93:390–394.[Free Full Text]
17. Krieger BP, Ershowsky P, Spivack D. One year's experience with a non invasively monitored intermediate unit for pulmonary patients. JAMA 1990;264:1143–1146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Elpern EH, Silver MR, Rosen RL, Bone RC. The noninvasive respiratory care unit. Patterns of use and financial of implications. Chest 1991;99:205–208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Byrick RB, Mazer CD, Caskenette GM. Closure of an intermediate care unit. Impact on critical care utilization. Chest 1993;104:876–881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Nava S, Rubini F, Zanotti E, et al. Survival and prediction of successful ventilator weaning in COPD patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days. Eur Respir J 1994;7:1645–1652.[Abstract]
21. Cheng DCH, Byrick RJ, Knobel E. Structural models for intermediate care areas. Crit Care Med 1999;27:2266–2271.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Nava S, Confalonieri M, Rampulla C. Intermediate respiratory intensive care units in Europe: a European perspective. Thorax 1998;53:798–802.[Free Full Text]
23. Roussos C, Rossi A. Pulmonologists and respiratory intensive care. Eur Respir J 1996;9:183–184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Simonds AK. Respiratory high dependency unit care in Great Britain. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:444–447.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Schoenhofer B. Respiratory high dependency unit (RHDU) in Germany. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:448–451.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Muir JF, Mayaud C, Derenne J. Respiratory high dependency care units (RHDCU) in France. Mon Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:452–455.
27. Zakynthinos S, Vassilakopoulos T. Intensive and high dependency care medicine in Greece. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:438–440.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Corrado A, Confalonieri M. Respiratory high dependency care unit in Italy. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:435–437.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Torres A. Respiratory intensive care in Spain. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:441–443.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. QUBIsoft. RICU website. Version 1.5www.pneumonet.it/RICU. Date updated: June 2000; Date accessed: October 1999.
31. Corrado A, Ambrosino N, Rossi A, Donner CF, and il Gruppo di Lavoro Associazione Italiana Pneumologi Ospedalieri. Riabilitazione e Terapia Intensiva Respiratoria. Documento su Unità di Terapia Intensiva Respiratoria. [Respiratory intensive care unit]. Rassegna di patologia dell'Apparato Respiratorio 1994;2:125–138.
32. Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 1995;333:817–822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. International Consensus Conference in Intensive Care Medicine. Non invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:283–291.[Free Full Text]
34. Hilbert G, Gruson D, Vargas F, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in immunosuppressed patients with pulmonary infiltrates, fever and acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2001;344:481–487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Rocco M, Conti G, Antonelli M, et al. Non invasive pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure after bilateral lung transplantation. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:1622–1626.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Masip J, Betbese AJ, Vecilla F, et al. Non invasive pressure support ventilation versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000;356:2126–2132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Antonelli M, Conti G, Bufi M, et al. Non invasive ventilation for treatment of acute respiratory failure in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation: a randomized trial. JAMA 2000;283:235–241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Dept of Health. Guidelines on admission and discharge from intensive care and high dependency unitsLondon, NHS Executive, 1996.
39. Tobin MJ. Pulmonary and critical care medicine: a peculiarly American hybrid?. Thorax 1999;54:286–287.[Free Full Text]
40. Plant PK, Owen JL, Elliott MW. One year period prevalence study of respiratory acidosis in acute exacerbations of COPD: implications for the provision of non-invasive ventilation and oxygen administration. Thorax 2000;55:550–554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Girou E, Schortgen F, Delclaux C, et al. Association of noninvasive ventilation with nosocomial infections and survival in critically ill patients. JAMA 2000;284:2361–2367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Vincent JL, Bruchardi H. Do we need intermediate care units?. Intensive Care Med 1999;25:1345–1349.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Nasraway SA, Cohen IL, Dennis RC, et al. Guidelines on admission and discharge for adult intermediate care units. Crit Care Med 1998;26:607–610.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Confalonieri M, Gorini M, Ambrosino N, Mollica C, Corrado A. Respiratory intensive care unit in Italy: National census and prospective cohort study. Thorax 2001;56:373–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Ambrosino and G. Vagheggini Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the acute care setting: where are we? Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 874 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nava, C. Sturani, S. Hartl, G. Magni, M. Ciontu, A. Corrado, A. Simonds, and on behalf of the European Respiratory Society Task End-of-life decision-making in respiratory intermediate care units: a European survey Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2007; 30(1): 156 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Scala, M. Naldi, I. Archinucci, G. Coniglio, and S. Nava Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Acute Exacerbations of COPD and Varying Levels of Consciousness Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1657 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Cuvelier, C. Viacroze, J. Benichou, L. C. Molano, M-F. Hellot, D. Benhamou, and J-F. Muir Dependency on mask ventilation after acute respiratory failure in the intermediate care unit Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2005; 26(2): 289 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A K Simonds Streamlining weaning: protocols and weaning units Thorax, March 1, 2005; 60(3): 175 - 182. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Paus-Jenssen, J. K. Reid, D. W. Cockcroft, K. Laframboise, and H. A. Ward The Use of Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure at a Tertiary Care Center Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1): 165 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M W Elliott Improving the care for patients with acute severe respiratory disease Thorax, April 1, 2003; 58(4): 285 - 288. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Permissions Request Permissions Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation