Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002 Effects of tracheotomy on respiratory mechanics in spontaneously breathing patients1 Centre for Treatment and Research, Cancer Hospital, Antonio Prudente Foundation and 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil CORRESPONDENCE: V. Moscovici da Cruz, Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital do Câncer, Rua Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211 6° andar, São Paulo SP, Brasil, CEP 01509-010. Fax: 55 1130219787. E-mail: vasco77@hotmail.com Keywords: intrinsic positive-pressure respiration, physiopathology, respiratory mechanics, tracheotomy, work of breathing
Received: August 16, 2001
This study was supported by grants from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa >do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).
Tracheotomy is a method of intubating the trachea, which is employed in several clinical settings, including the treatment of head and neck neoplasms. Tracheotomy is believed to facilitate weaning through changes in respiratory mechanics. Existing information concerning functional changes associated with tracheotomy are limited to comparisons with orotracheal intubation. In this study, respiratory mechanics were monitored in seven spontaneously breathing patients, before and after an elective tracheotomy was performed for surgical treatment of cancer. Campbell diagrams were constructed by plotting pressure, obtained with an oesophageal balloon catheter, against volume, obtained from a pneumotachograph placed at the airway opening. Work of breathing was calculated as the internal area of the Campbell diagram and was partitioned into its elastic and inspiratory and expiratory resistive components. Oesophageal pressure was also used to quantify intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) and the pressure-time product (PTP), which is considered to be proportional to the oxygen cost of breathing. PTP was divided into its resistive and elastic components. Inspiratory resistive work, PEEPi, inspiratory PTP, as well as its resistive and elastic components were significantly reduced by tracheotomy. Tracheotomy significantly reduces work of breathing and pressure-time product in spontaneously breathing patients. Tracheotomy is a standardised and widespread procedure 1, however, its functional implications have been not been exhaustively studied. Tracheotomy is indicated in several clinical conditions, including relief of upper airway obstruction by neoplasms, inflammation or trauma, and is also performed on patients under prolonged mechanical ventilation, where it is believed to facilitate weaning 2. Viewed from a respiratory standpoint, the physiological implications of tracheotomy are related to loss of upper airway and laryngeal function and resistance of the artificial airway. In patients with pulmonary disease these implications may be more important. In a recent study, Diehl et al. 3 studied mechanically ventilated patients submitted to tracheotomy because of prolonged intubation, and observed a reduction in the mechanical work of breathing (WOB) and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) after the procedure, when compared to the condition before with an orotracheal tube. Under normal circumstances, the larynx represents a small fraction of total airflow resistance 4, 5. However, the transition from orotracheal tube to tracheotomy cannula has a significant impact on PEEPi and mechanical WOB. These observations suggest that it is the reduction in airway length that explains the observed variations. The study by Diehl et al. 3 did not evaluate spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients, as is the case in surgically treated head and neck cancer patients and individuals who have been mechanically ventilated and have been successfully weaned. Previous studies 6, 7 have reported the presence of PEEPi in stable, nonintubated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Loss of laryngeal function has not been addressed previously. The Head and Neck Surgery Dept of the São Paulo Cancer Hospital, where this study was conducted, performs around 200 annual elective procedures that include tracheotomy. The aim of the present study was to functionally assess the mechanics of breathing of stable patients submitted to elective tracheotomy.
The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients involved gave informed consent. Analysis of pressure/volume relationships was used to assess changes in respiratory mechanics imposed by tracheotomy. Variations in oesophageal pressure (Poes) variation correlate well with variations in pleural pressure 8. Therefore, Poes was measured using an oesophageal balloon catheter (SmartCath; Allied Healthcare, Irvine, CA, USA) with a 0.8 mL inflation volume automatically delivered by a Bicore CP-100 (Allied Healthcare) pulmonary monitor. Measurements were validated before and after surgery using the technique described by Baydur et al. 9. Flow values were obtained using a variable orifice pneumotachograph (VarFlex Flow Transducer; Allied Healthcare) held between the patient's lips. The oesophageal catheter and the pneumotachograph were connected to a Bicore CP-100 pulmonary monitor. Nostrils were occluded by a noseclip. Measurements were performed with patients in the sitting position before and after surgery. The oesophageal catheter was kept in position during the surgical procedure. A new measurement was taken on the first day after surgery, when the patient was awake and had not required ventilatory support for at least 12 h. For this measurement the pneumotachograph was connected to a cuffed tracheotomy tube (Portex tubes with 7 or 8 mm internal diameter). Variables were recorded in a notebook computer, using the Lab View 5.0 (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) program. The program generated text files relative to time from tracheal pressure, oesophageal pressure and flow. Acquisition frequency was 100 Hz. Pre- and postoperative measurements lasted 5 min. Using files developed at the Discipline of Pulmonology of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, the onset of each respiratory cycle was determined and on-screen visualisation allowed exclusion of spurious cycles (that could correspond to swallowing or cough) which differed from the predominant pattern. A mean cycle was then calculated to minimise artefacts. Mean cycles were exported to Quatro Pro 7 (Corel Word Perfect Suite; Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) where the WOB and pressure-time product (PTP) were estimated from the area under the pressure/volume (Campbell diagram 10) and pressure/times curves 11, respectively. The lung compliance line (Cl,dyn) was plotted on the Campbell diagram by linking end-inspiratory and end-expiratory points of zero flow. Chest-wall compliance (Cw) was not measured, since not all patients were routinely paralysed, but was estimated to be equal to 4% of the predicted forced vital capacity (FVC). Therefore, to avoid possible chest-wall compliance alterations induced by anaesthesia and surgical procedure, measurements were obtained within intervals >12 h before or after the operations. PEEPi was measured as the maximal negative deflection of Poes at the onset of inspiration, in which no volume increment was observed. This approach assumed no expiratory muscle activity. However, this deflection could be interpreted either as the effort necessary to overcome PEEPi or, assuming absence of PEEPi, the relaxation of expiratory muscles activated during expiration. To avoid this problem, the Cw line was positioned on the Campbell diagram according to both situations, as described previously as upper bound and lower bound, respectively 12. WOB was calculated separately in its elastic (WOBel) and inspiratory-resistive (WOBri) components. WOBel was defined by the area between the two compliance lines (Cl,dyn and Cw) and limited by the maximum volume achieved. WOBel was analysed considering upper and lower bound situations separately, as described above. WOBri was defined by the area inside the pressure/volume loop to the left of Cl,dyn. Therefore, WOBri corresponds to the inspiratory phase of the respiratory cycle. WOB values were expressed as joules (J)·L1.
PTP was calculated similarly considering upper and lower bound situations and by plotting a theoretical chest-wall elastic recoil pressure (Poes,CW) curve according to the following equation:
The resistive component of PTP (PTPr) was calculated as the area under the line of lung recoil pressure (Poes,L) in the pressure/time curve, the curve of which was plotted according to the following formula:
The elastic component (PTPel) was calculated as the integral of the area of the pressure/time curve limited by the lung elastic-recoil curve and the chest-wall recoil pressure line upper bound. The elastic component, due to the presence of PEEPi, was calculated as the integral of the area limited by lower- and upper-bound derived chest-wall recoil pressure lines (fig. 1
Variables were found to have a nonparametric distribution, and were compared using the Wilcoxon test.
Twenty-three patients were eligible for the study. Eight patients refused to participate, in four patients progression of the oesophageal-balloon catheter to the necessary position for oesophageal-pressure monitoring was impossible, one patient lost the catheter during surgery and therefore postoperative values could not be obtained, one patient had surgery cancelled and two patients had clinical syndromes at hospital admission (psychotic symptoms and alcoholic intoxication) that rendered the procedures necessary for the study impossible. Therefore, data was obtained pre- and postoperatively for seven patients.
Patient demographics are shown in table 1
Postoperative Campbell diagrams obtained from patients 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 showed loss of the configuration indicative of the presence of PEEPi.
Results of inspiratory resistive work, elastic work and PEEPi from all patients before and after surgery are shown in tables 2 and 3
The results of this study showed a significant reduction in mechanical-work parameters after tracheotomy in spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients. This trend is demonstrated best in data obtained from the PTP measurements. Oxygen consumption has been demonstrated to correlate with PTP better than with mechanical-work measurements 13 as time, a determinant of oxygen consumption by muscle, is not taken into account in WOB calculations, as it is in PTP. Previous work 14, 15, using Bicore crude values to compare ventilation through an orotracheal tube and through tracheotomy, failed to demonstrate any reduction in WOB parameters. In the current authors view this was mainly due to the methods employed. The use of the mean cycle as the source for calculating work values minimised artefacts and allowed the visualisation of a Campbell diagram representative of a long period of observation time. Moreover, it allowed the exclusion of spurious cycles caused by swallowing or coughing, and the treatment of the signals obtained allowed a more accurate scrutiny of the different components of WOB and PTP. Spahija et al. 16 used mean cycles to deal with the mechanics of breathing experimentally and suggested that this procedure should be applied to clinical practice. The current authors assumed that the same theoretical value of Cw could be used to compare the same patient before and after tracheotomy. Direct measurement of Cw would certainly yield different numerical values, but as this study compared the same patient at two different times, the difference would remain. Using an similar approach Diehl et al. 3 demonstrated a reduction in work parameters after tracheotomy in mechanically ventilated patients, in relation to the endotracheal tube. To the best of the authors' knowledge the present report is the first to demonstrate benefit in nonintubated patients. Results have been expressed considering two extreme situations, upper bound and lower bound. These situations occur considering that either the negative deflection of the pressure curve as due only to PEEPi (upper bound) or in the complete absence of PEEPi, considering the negative deflection observed in the pressure curve as due solely to expiratory muscle activity (lower bound). In fact it is theoretically possible that during any respiratory cycle a patient is in an intermediate situation between these extremes. The observations by Campbell and Friends 17 showed that under expiratory muscle activity, Poes increases during expiration. Such a pattern could be seen in only one of the patients in this study (no. 4). Thus, the current authors believe that the upper bound values correctly describe the mechanical alterations observed in the patients studied. Whatever the option, a graphical change in the Campbell diagram was observed in all patients. Expiratory muscle activity can be alternatively observed through the measurement of gastric pressure. Recent work has shown that a large part of the pressure change measured as PEEPi can be attributed to expiratory muscle activity 18. Unfortunately, gastric pressure was not measured here and therefore the real cause of the changes observed cannot be determined. Nonetheless, a parameter independent of whether expiratory muscle activity was considered or not, i.e. upper or lower bound, namely the resistive component of PTP, was shown to decrease significantly. Could the functional benefit observed be due to the relief of tumour-induced upper airway obstruction in this population? Only three of seven patients had tumours in structures that could be implicated in airway obstruction (larynx and tonsil), and all others exhibited numerical and graphic changes, thus the authors believe that these findings are consistent with benefit irrespective of upper airway obstruction. Similarly, observation of preoperative flow/volume curves obtained from the mean cycles (data not shown) did not disclose the usual pattern associated with variable extrathoracic obstruction. In spite of a relatively small number of patients who accepted the insertion of a naso-oesophageal catheter on the evening before surgery, consistent evidence was obtained supporting the hypothesis that tracheotomy reduces the work of breathing, probably by decreasing resistance and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||