Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002 Annual lung function changes in young patients with chronic lung diseaseDept of Paediatrics, Subdivision of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands CORRESPONDENCE: P.J.F.M. Merkus, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Fax: 31 104636772. E-mail: merkus@alkg.azr.nl Keywords: adolescents, chronic lung disease, cystic fibrosis, follow-up, growth spurt, ventilatory function reference equations
Received: June 22, 2001
Reference equations for ventilatory function that use different statistical models may introduce artifacts that affect the estimated change of lung function during growth in young subjects. The effect of differently modelled reference equations on the estimated annual change of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in young patients with chronic lung disease was assessed. Four frequently used reference equations were used to describe the longitudinal changes of FEV1 and FVC in 52 patients (23 females) with cystic fibrosis (CF) during a mean follow-up of 3.9 yrs. Choice of reference equations directly affected value and, most importantly, estimated annual change of FVC and FEV1. Mean±sd annual change of FEV1 varied from 2.2±6.2 to 2.2±3.6% of predicted. For two reference equations the estimated individual changes of FEV1 and FVC in CF were positively correlated with mean individual age. This probably reflects underestimation of deteriorating lung function. Variability of annual change was independent of age only when reference equations that were designed to accurately predict lung function during the pubertal growth spurt were used. These findings have implications for patient care and clinical research. Medium- or long-term follow-up of ventilatory function in children and adolescents requires a correction for lung growth. This correction is not only crucial for monitoring patients with chronic lung disease and to evaluate individual therapeutic interventions, but is also important in longitudinal clinical trials where indices such as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) are often primary end-points. Correction for lung growth is usually achieved by expressing lung function parameters as a percentage of predicted (% pred), although predictions derived from cross-sectional studies may not accurately reflect lung growth within an individual 1, 2. In most pulmonary function reference equations for growing children, standing height is used as a proxy for lung growth. Power functions, exponential functions, and linear functions are used to describe the relationship between standing height and pulmonary function indices 3. Though explained variance using these equations is high, it has been demonstrated that during the pubertal growth spurt these equations do not describe the development of pulmonary function accurately 46. Because of the phase shift in somatic growth and lung growth, ventilatory function appears to lag behind during the peak of somatic (leg) growth. This can result in overestimation of ventilatory function before and after the growth spurt, and in underestimation of ventilatory function during the growth spurt when expressed as % pred. Therefore, including age as an additional independent variable in the reference equations would theoretically improve the validity of the prediction, and such reference equations have been developed based on large numbers of children and adolescents from a general population 4, 6. However, the implications of this issue for patient care, or for long-term clinical trials in teenagers with chronic lung disease have not been evaluated extensively. In a recent study 7 it was demonstrated that the rate of decline of FEV1 in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients varied according to each one out of four American reference equations. FEV1 may be the most robust test of airway function, but if correction for lung growth is unreliable, this test is of limited value when studied longitudinally. Accurate correction of ventilatory function for growth is especially important in children and adolescents with chronic lung disease. In this study, the effect of various reference equations 4, 6, 8, 9, that used different models, and lung-function data of European and American children and adolescents, on the estimated long-term change of FEV1 and FVC in Dutch children and adolescents with CF was assessed. Some of these equations have been used previously in important clinical trials for patients with asthma 10 and in patients with CF 11, 12. The hypothesis was that the choice of reference equations would have a considerable effect on the estimated change of FEV1 and FVC in children and adolescents with chronic lung disease even though their growth spurt is usually delayed and reduced 13, 14.
Data set The data set consisted of measurements of FEV1 and FVC derived from maximal expiratory flow/volume curves obtained from all children and adolescents with CF who attended the outpatient clinic for respiratory medicine between 19941999. These measurements were carried out during annual elective measurements, when children were clinically stable. Procedures were carried out using a Lilly-type heated pneumotachograph (Jaeger, Würzburg, Germany) according to international guidelines 15. Patients were included when at least three measurements were available with 1-yr intervals between measurements. Mean individual age was based on these time points.
Reference equations The latter two reference equations 4, 6 were especially designed to correct, as much as possible, for the effects of the pubertal growth spurt on ventilatory function in adolescents.
Data analyses
In 52 patients (23 females) three or more consecutive annual measurements were obtained. The age ranges for males and females at the start and end of the study were 5.816.4 and 8.819.5 yrs, respectively. Anthropometric and lung-function parameters at the start and end of the analyses are shown in table 1
The mean annual change of FVC and FEV1 varied according to the reference equation used (table 2 12 yrs (fig. 2
Mean annual changes of FEV1 expressed as % pred Z, % pred Q and % pred W were negative and of similar magnitude, but there was a significant age-dependency of these slopes for % pred Z but not for % pred Q or % pred W (table 4 F508, was expressed according to four reference equations and is shown in figure 3
A mathematical exercise was carried out by comparing how four ventilatory function reference equations affected the estimate of the development of FVC and FEV1 in young patients with CF. The conclusions are quite worrisome and confirm the hypothesis that the choice of reference equation would affect the estimate of lung-function development to an important degree. This study demonstrates, that a difference in the mathematical model of the equation directly affects the value and, more importantly, the estimated annual change of FVC and FEV1 in these patients with chronic lung disease.
The biological relationship between standing height and ventilatory function during puberty appears to be difficult, if not impossible, to describe accurately. Ideally, not only age but also pubertal stages should be included in the predictions, but this is not a practical option. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the only attempts to correct lung function appropriately for the pubertal growth spurt are the reported equations by Quanjer et al. 4 and by Wang et al. 6. The equations by Knudson et al. 8 describing FVC or FEV1 as a linear function of height until the age of 12 yrs, and as a linear function of height and age from 12 yrs resulted in a significant mean increase of FEV1 of When reference equations, which were designed especially to limit "pubertal artifacts" 4, 6, were used mean annual changes of FEV1 and FVC (% pred Q and % pred W) were somewhat more negative compared to the other two equations, and this annual change was independent of age. This is not proof that these reference equations reflect reality better, but it suggests that the age-dependent artifacts are minimized. These findings are consistent with the study of Rosenfeld et al. 7. The main difference between this study and that of Rosenfeld et al. 7 is that this study also compared reference equations based on American and European children and adolescents. The present study demonstrates that the mean annual changes of FEV1 and FVC and their variance were similar for % pred Q and % pred W, and that the reference equations by Quanjer et al. 4 and Wang et al. 6 only differed with respect to the absolute values. The values of FEV1 and FVC, expressed as % pred W were systematically higher than when expressed as % pred Q. The authors speculate that this may have a biological background. These reference equations are based on very large populations from the USA and from Europe that have no overlap. The conclusion may be that on average, the European population of children have larger lungs and airways for a given standing height, sex and age than the American children. Whether body proportions, especially leg length, are really different in these two populations remains to be investigated. Obviously, systematic differences are of less concern than age-dependent artifacts. The comparisons were made with two "conventional" reference equations 8, 9 because these were based on completely different mathematical models, and because both have been used in large studies to describe patients with asthma 10 and with CF 11, 12. It seems likely that other reference equations based on similar models, would have compared likewise. This study focused on CF patients because they are a paediatric population in which reliable estimation of decline of function is an important clinical and research end-point, and the hypothesis was that even in this group the "pubertal artifacts" would play an important role. It is expected that these findings can be extrapolated to other respiratory disorders, because by studying differences between reference equations within subjects, the results of the evaluation are essentially independent of disease. Furthermore, in adolescents without severe chronic disease a more pronounced growth spurt can be expected, which implies that the pubertal artifacts described earlier will be even larger than in the patients with CF.
The implications of these findings are important for patient care and for clinical research. For routine follow-up of patients, one should realize that FEV1 (mL) may be the most robust test of airway function, but apparently, longitudinal comparisons within growing individuals are quite difficult to interpret because correction for somatic and/or lung growth is inadequate. Hence, longitudinal reliability of FEV1 (% pred) is not necessarily robust. Due to the "pubertal artifacts", most reference equations will tend to mask true deterioration, or inflate true improvement of FEV1 and FVC near the end of the growth spurt. As a result, discrepancies may develop between lung function (% pred) and the clinical condition in children and adolescents with respiratory disease. These discrepancies should be taken into account when quality of care is assessed from estimated change of FEV1 (% pred) as occurs for patients with CF, and when results of different centres are compared. Figure 3 For scientific purposes these findings imply that interstudy comparisons are only reliable when no differences exist between mean age of the populations, and when the same reference equations are used. Even then, annual change of function can still be artificially age-dependent. Therefore, meta-analyses of longitudinal lung-function studies in children and adolescents should be performed preferably on raw data, using good quality reference equations. In randomized trials, differences in mean age between subgroups may affect outcome. This effect should be minimal after stratification for age. In long-term crossover trials the artifacts may lead to carry-over effects. Guidelines for choosing appropriate reference equations have been published 3, but there have been no consensus reports recommending specific reference equations. The conclusions of the present study imply that age and height are needed as independent variables to improve the quality of paediatric pulmonary reference equations, and that updating these equations is probably necessary because of cohort effects in the age-height relationship in children and adolescents. The suggestion is that large international bodies such as the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society should recommend, and regularly update, specific reference equations to be used for older children and adolescents or develop them, based on large databases. The reference equations for forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity developed by Quanjer et al. 4 and those by Wang et al.5 may be a suitable starting point.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||