| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Brussels and 2 Laboratory of Cardiorespiratory Physiology, Brussels School of Medicine, and Chest Service, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
CORRESPONDENCE: A. De Troyer, Chest Service, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. Fax: 32 25554411
Keywords: control of breathing, dyspnoea, respiratory muscles
Received: May 5, 2001
Accepted October 10, 2001
This work was supported, in part, by a research grant from the Brussels School of Medicine.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 TOP Abstract MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the diaphragm and the changes in pleural (Ppl) and abdominal (Pab) pressure were measured in six anaesthetized, spontaneously-breathing dogs while the rostral, the middle, or the caudal portion of the ribcage was vibrated at intervals during inspiration. The EMG activity of the external and parasternal intercostals was also measured.
Ribcage vibration consistently elicited a marked increase in the inspiratory EMG activity recorded from the external intercostals, thus indicating that the procedure did activate intercostal muscle spindles. However, no alteration in diaphragmatic or parasternal intercostal EMG activity was seen in any animal. Transdiaphragmatic pressure and the relationship between 
Pab and Ppl during inspiration were also unaltered.
The authors conclude that ribcage vibration and, with it, stimulation of external intercostal muscle spindles has no significant influence on phrenic motoneurones or on medullary inspiratory neurones. It is unlikely, therefore, that the beneficial effect of the procedure on dyspnoea results from a specific reduction in central respiratory drive.
Although medical treatment of airflow obstruction has made significant progress in the last 20 yrs, dyspnoea remains a major cause of disability in many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recent studies, however, have shown that this symptom could be significantly relieved by the application of high-frequency mechanical vibration to the parasternal region of the ribcage during inspiration 1. Vibration of the parasternal region has also been shown to reduce the sense of effort in healthy individuals breathing carbon dioxide (CO2)-enriched gas mixtures or breathing against inspiratory resistive loads 3. The mechanism of this beneficial effect is uncertain, but high-frequency vibration is known to be a potent stimulus of spindle primary endings in limb muscles 5. In addition, in agreement with earlier animal experiments by Remmers 7, Homma et al. 9 have reported a decrease in diaphragmatic and parasternal intercostal inspiratory electromyographic (EMG) activity during vibration of the lower intercostal spaces in normal subjects. To the extent that medullary inspiratory neurone activity appears to be one of the determinants of dyspnoea 10–12, the suggestion has therefore been made that the beneficial effect of ribcage vibration might be, in part, related to a reduction in central respiratory drive induced by increased afferent inputs from intercostal muscles 1.
Homma et al. 9, however, have reported also that vibration of the upper portion of the human ribcage during inspiration results in an increased parasternal intercostal inspiratory activity, and that vibration of the lower portion of the ribcage induces an increased activity in the caudal internal intercostal muscles. Conversely, recent studies in dogs have shown that when the upper ribcage is vibrated during inspiration, the inspiratory activity recorded from the external intercostal muscles in the rostral interspaces is consistently and markedly increased, but the activity recorded from the parasternal intercostals is unaltered 13. This greater sensitivity to vibration of the external intercostals is fully consistent with their much greater density in muscle spindles 14. Moreover, internal intercostal activity remained unchanged during vibration of the lower portion of the ribcage 15, and this led to the conclusion that the alterations in respiratory muscle activity reported in humans 9 were probably the result of conscious reactions to the perception of vibration in the ribcage or the abdomen, rather than reflex specific changes in central respiratory drive 13. In the present studies, the validity of this conclusion has been tested further by examining the effects of ribcage vibration on the canine diaphragm; since the animals were anaesthetized, all potential conscious reactions to vibration were eliminated.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Measurements
The animals were allowed to recover for 30 min after instrumentation, after which measurements of EMG activity, airflow, lung volume, and pleural and abdominal pressure were made. The three EMG signals were processed with amplifiers (model 830/1; CWE Inc., Ardmore, PA, USA), bandpass filtered below 100 and above 2,000 Hz, and rectified before their passage through leaky integrators with a time constant of 0.2 s. Airflow was measured at the endotracheal tube with a heated Fleisch pneumotachograph connected to a differential pressure transducer (Validyne, Northridge, CA, USA), volume was obtained by electronic integration of the flow signal, and pleural and abdominal pressures were measured with balloon-catheter systems placed in the middle third of the oesophagus and the abdominal cavity, respectively. The oesophageal balloon contained 0.5 mL of air, and the abdominal balloon was filled with 1.0 mL of air.
Protocol
The measurements were made while the animal was spontaneously breathing room air. The parasternal EMG signal was continuously monitored on a loudspeaker to provide the investigator with a precise phase reference, and every 5–10 breaths, vibrations were applied during inspiration to the parasternal intercostal muscle in the third interspace, immediately medial to the costochondral junction. As in previous studies 13, these vibrations were delivered using a commercially available vibrator (model V. 101; LDS, Royston, UK) which was adjusted so that the amplitude of its moving element and the frequency of vibration were 2.0–2.5 mm and 40 Hz, respectively. The vibrator was held manually throughout, perpendicular to the muscle, so that the site and the force of application could be well controlled; the area of contact between the vibrator and the muscle was approximately 1.8 cm2. In each animal, at least 10 breaths with in-phase vibration were obtained.
When this procedure was completed, the two pairs of EMG electrodes implanted in the third interspace were transferred to the parasternal and external intercostal muscles in the sixth interspace, and in-phase vibration was applied at intervals to the sixth parasternal intercostal. The external intercostal electrodes were finally transferred to the ninth interspace, and in-phase vibration was delivered either to the ventral or the lateral portion of the ninth and tenth interspaces. As for the third interspace, at least 10 breaths with in-phase vibration were obtained for each interspace in every animal.
The animals were maintained under light surgical anaesthesia throughout the measurements. Supplementary doses of anaesthetic (1–2 mg·kg–1) were given at regular intervals to ensure that there was no spontaneous movement of the fore- or hindlimbs, no flexor withdrawal of the forelimb, and no pupillary light reflex; the corneal reflex, however, was kept present. Rectal temperature was also maintained constant between 36–38°C with infrared lamps. At the end of the experiment, the animal was given an overdose of anaesthetic (30–40 mg·kg–1 intravenously).
Data analysis
Phasic inspiratory EMG activity in the diaphragm, parasternal intercostal, and external intercostal during each vibrated breath was compared with the activity recorded during the immediately preceding nonvibrated (control) breathe, by measuring the peak height of the integrated EMG signal in arbitrary units. The duration of inspiration (inspiratory time, tI), defined as the period beginning at the onset of the diaphragmatic inspiratory burst and concluding with the peak diaphragmatic activity, did not show any consistent alteration with vibration in any animal (see Results). The changes in peak activity during vibration were therefore independent of the changes in neural inspiratory time and chemical respiratory drive that might have occurred. One study animal, however, did not have any external intercostal activity in the sixth or third interspace in the control breaths, even though the electrodes were inserted in the most dorsal portion of the muscle. Consequently, to allow comparison between the three muscles in the different animals, the inspiratory EMG activity recorded during each control breath was expressed as a percentage of the activity recorded during the subsequent vibrated breath.
Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) in these breaths was determined by subtracting the change in pleural pressure (Ppl) at peak inspiration from the change in abdominal pressure (Pab). Measurements of EMG activity and pressure were averaged over all trials in each individual animal, and they were then averaged for the animal group. Statistical assessments of the effects of in-phase vibration on inspiratory EMG activity, Pdi, tidal volume, and tI were made by using paired t-tests; the criterion for significance was taken as p<0.05.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
. Phasic inspiratory activity in the external intercostal increased with each vibration in every animal. However, no animal had any consistent increase or decrease in diaphragmatic EMG activity. For the animal group, therefore, peak diaphragmatic activity in the control breaths averaged 99.3±0.9% of the activity in the vibrated breaths (nonsignificant (ns)) whereas peak external intercostal activity in the control breaths was only 23.4±11.4% (p=0.001). Parasternal intercostal activity in the control breaths was also 102.1±3.3% of the activity in the vibrated breaths (ns). Pdi remained also unchanged (control: 9.4±1.9 cmH2O; vibration: 9.3±1.8 cmH2O; ns), as did the relationship between Pab and Ppl (fig. 2a). tI (control: 0.91±0.12 s; vibration: 0.91±0.12 s; ns) and tidal volume (control: 303±52 mL; vibration: 295±52 mL; ns) were unaltered as well.
|
|
) also remained unchanged.
Representative records of diaphragmatic, parasternal, and external intercostal activity during resting, control breathing and during in-phase vibration of the ninth interspace are shown in figure 3. No animal showed any inspiratory activity in the external intercostal muscle of the ninth interspace, and no animal had any consistent decrease or increase in diaphragmatic EMG activity during vibration. For the six animals studied, peak diaphragmatic activity in the control breaths thus averaged 99.4±1.0% of the peak activity recorded in the vibrated breaths (ns). Tidal volume (control: 272±45 mL; vibration: 272±45 mL; ns), tI (control: 0.95±0.12 s; vibration: 0.98±0.14 s; ns), Pdi (control: 8.9±1.2 cmH2O; vibration: 8.9±1.2 cmH2O, ns), and the Pab-Ppl relationship (fig. 2c) did not show any consistent alteration either.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
-motoneurones decreases markedly and continuously from the top to the base of the ribcage during inspiration, such that the muscles below the seventh interspace usually remain silent during breathing. This includes when breathing is stimulated by CO2-enriched gas mixtures or by elevated inspiratory mechanical loads 18. A similar rostro-caudal gradient of neural drive to the external intercostals has been reported in the cat 16, and indeed, no animal in this study had any inspiratory activity in the external intercostal of the ninth interspace during resting, unstimulated breathing. Presumably, the corresponding -motoneurones were well below their activation threshold, such that the increased spindle afferent activity produced by vibration was not sufficient to elicit efferent -motor activity to the muscle.
The main finding of these studies, however, is the observation that ribcage vibration did not induce any alteration in diaphragmatic EMG activity. Whether the vibrator was applied to the rostral, the middle, or the caudal portion of the ribcage, no change was seen either in Pdi or in the relationship between Pab and Ppl, thus indicating that the mechanical contribution of the diaphragm to inspiration was also unaltered 20. Therefore, the conclusion must be drawn that ribcage vibration, while inducing a marked increase in afferent activity from external intercostal muscle spindles, has no inhibitory effect on the diaphragm. This excludes the possibility that the diaphragm would be responsible for the maintainance of tidal volume during this procedure 13. The lack of diaphragmatic response to ribcage vibration, combined with the absence of alteration in tI or in parasternal intercostal inspiratory EMG activity, further indicates that the procedure has little or no supraspinal effect.
Earlier studies in cats and dogs by Remmers 7 have shown a reflex, supraspinal reduction in diaphragmatic EMG activity during chest compression and during intercostal muscle stretch in the middle segments of the ribcage (T4–T7). In additional experiments, Remmers 8 and Decima et al. 21 have reported a similar inhibition of the diaphragm during electrical stimulation of group I and II afferent fibres in external intercostal nerves. Since this inhibitory response was also observed during high-frequency mechanical vibration of the ribs and was accentuated by the administration of succinylcholine, it was attributed to the stimulation of intercostal muscle spindles 7. However, as Bolser et al. 22 have outlined subsequently, these electrical and mechanical stimuli were highly aspecific, and none of them, including rib vibration, could separate the effects of muscle spindle endings from those of Golgi tendon organs. Indeed, these vibrations were applied along the longitudinal axis of intercostal muscle fibres and elicited considerable changes in muscle length (500–3,000 µm). Conversely, the vibrations in the animals in this study were applied perpendicular to the surface of the ribcage such that the changes in intercostal muscle length were only 90–100 µm 13. Furthermore, Bolser et al. 22, in agreement with the current findings, have found in decerebrate, unanaesthetized cats, that low-amplitude (<100 µm) vibration of external and internal intercostal muscles, leading to exclusive stimulation of muscle spindles, has no effect on phrenic or medullary inspiratory activity. Inhibitory responses were observed only when the amplitude of vibration was increased above 700 µm and produced concomitant stimulation of large numbers of intercostal tendon organs, thus indicating that the reflex inhibition of the diaphragm described by Remmers 7 was due to tendon organ afferents, rather than muscle spindle afferents.
The question as to why ribcage vibration reduces dyspnoea in patients with COPD 1 cannot be answered on the basis of the present study. In contrast to the animals in this study, such patients have an increased airflow resistance and a reduced dynamic pulmonary compliance. As a result, the resistive and elastic loads are greater than normal and the inspiratory muscles have to generate a greater reduction in Ppl to inflate the lung. Also, the emphysematous changes in the lung cause hyperinflation, which makes the inspiratory muscles operate at shorter than normal lengths and reduces their ability to lower intrathoracic pressure. Thus, COPD imposes a severe strain on the respiratory muscle pump, and patients accommodate it by increasing neural drive to both the ribcage inspiratory muscles 23 and the diaphragm 24. However, as in this study, vibrations in such patients are applied perpendicular to the surface of the ribcage. Consequently, the changes in length of the intercostal and superficial chest wall muscles are probably small, and since there is no reason to believe that mechanoreceptors in human and canine skeletal muscles differ in their sensitivity to vibration, it would be expected that the procedure in humans would also induce selective or predominant afferent activity from muscle spindles.
Therefore, in view of the current findings and of the observations of Bolser et al. 22, it would be unreasonable to maintain that the beneficial effect of ribcage vibration on dyspnoea results from a specific reduction in central respiratory drive.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
: 8; and f: 10 cmH2O.