ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Schayck, C.P.
Right arrow Articles by Van Weel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Schayck, C.P.
Right arrow Articles by Van Weel, C.
Eur Respir J 2002; 19:240-245
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2002

Potential masking effect on dyspnoea perception by short- and long-acting ß2-agonists in asthma

C.P. van Schayck1,2, I.D. Bijl-Hofland1, S.G.M. Cloosterman1, H.T.M. Folgering3, F.J.J. van der Elshout4 and C. Van Weel1

1 Dept of General Practice, University of Nijmegen, 2 Dept of General Practice, University of Maastricht, 3 Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, Dekkerswald, University of Nijmegen and 4 Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands

CORRESPONDENCE: C.P. van Schayck, Dept of General Practice, University of Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Fax: 31 433884225. E-mail: onno.vanschayck@hag.unimaas.nl

Keywords: asthma, dyspnoea perception, long-acting ß2-agonist, short-acting ß2-agonist

Received: January 18, 2001
Accepted October 20, 2001


   Abstract
TOP
 Abstract
Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Asthma patients evaluate the effect of medication treatment through the degree of their asthma symptoms, which might be affected by their ability to perceive these symptoms. It has been suggested that ß2-agonists may mask the effects of an increase in airway inflammation. This study compared the perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction during monotherapy with short- or long-acting ß2-agonists.

Asthmatic patients (68 male and 60 female, mean age 35±11 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 86±15% of the reference value, provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) geometric mean 0.97 mg·mL–1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–1.30)) were selected and randomly allocated to use either a short-acting (salbutamol, n=41) or long-acting ß2-agonist (formoterol, n=46) or placebo (n=41) for 12 weeks. Perception of dyspnoea provoked by histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was measured at the start and every 4 weeks thereafter. Subjects quantified their sensation of breathlessness during the challenge tests on a modified Borg scale at the start of the study and every 4 weeks thereafter. The sensitivity to changes in FEV1 was analysed by the linear regression slope ({alpha}) Borg versus % fall in FEV1. The absolute perceptual magnitude (PS20) was determined by the perception score at the 20% fall in FEV1.

Although the geometric mean PC20 decreased significantly within the group using short-acting ß2-agonists (in the group with initial PC20 ≥2 mg·mL–1 there was a drop from 5.26–1.94 mg·mL–1; p=0.013), repeated measurement analysis showed no difference in the course of time of perception (both slope {alpha} and PS20) between the three medication groups.

This study showed that chronic use of short- or long-acting ß2-agonists in asthmatics for a period of 12 weeks, did not significantly change the perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction compared with placebo. Further investigation is required to establish whether this suggests that these drugs do not mask a deterioration of asthma.

It has been suggested that ß2-agonists may mask the effects of an increase in airway inflammation 1. This may be particularly true for patients who use little or no anti-inflammatory treatment. There are several reasons why perception of asthma symptoms might be influenced by chronic bronchodilator use. First, chronic bronchodilator use leads to a decrease in bronchoconstriction, which might influence perception of the severity of the disease. The reduced perception of asthma symptoms could influence the patient's healthcare behaviour. For example, a patient might be more exposed to allergens because they have no inclination to stay away from them, as there is no warning against repeated exposure. Patients could also become noncompliant with anti-inflammatory treatment and, in the meantime, develop progressive inflammation with increasing bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Secondly, several studies have observed that chronic use of short-acting ß2-agonists may have detrimental effects, resulting in increased BHR 1–5. Chronic use of ß2-agonists has led to tolerance of their protective effects against bronchoconstrictor stimuli, whereas their bronchodilator properties have remained unchanged 4, 6, 7. Furthermore, it has been found that BHR may have a negative influence on the perception of asthma symptoms 8, 9. Previously, Roisman et al. 10 showed that both the degree of eosinophil inflammation and epithelial damage presented in the airways are negatively related to the patient's ability to perceive bronchoconstriction. Finally, the patient's increased bronchial responsiveness may chronically adapt them to their increased bronchoconstriction 8.

It is therefore important to study the effects of bronchodilator use on the perception of airway obstruction. In this study, it was hypothesized that increased BHR after chronic use of ß2-agonists would lead to a decrease in the perception of airway obstruction. The perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction has been assessed by two indices representing different aspect of the perception: the sensitivity index and the absolute perceptual magnitude (PS20) 9–13.

Recently, the authors showed that in a small group of 64 asthmatic patients, additional use of inhaled corticosteroids resulted in an improved perception of bronchoconstriction in patients using long-acting ß2-agonists 14. In the study, patients used either a short- or long-acting ß2-agonists or placebo over a period of 12 weeks, followed by another period of 12 weeks in which beclomethasone diproprionate was added. However, as the study group was a subgroup of the present population, it was too small to compare the effects of long- and short-acting ß2-agonists. The number of subjects in the present study population was sufficient to study differences between long- and short-acting ß2-agonists.

The perception of bronchoconstriction during chronic use of ß2-agonists was examined both for short-acting and long-acting ß2-agonists. This was performed through measurement of the perception of dyspnoea during histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients who randomly received salbutamol (2 inhalations 100 µg b.i.d.), formoterol (12 µg b.i.d.) or placebo for 12 weeks.


   Methods
TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Patient selection
Selection of the patients was performed through a two-step procedure. Initially, patients (aged 16–60 yrs) were selected by their general practitioner (GP) if they had a history of bronchial symptoms or a clinical diagnosis of asthma 13, 14. Eligible patients then visited the lung function laboratory for an inclusion assessment. Patients had to have lower airway complaints, a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of ≥50% of predicted and either airway hyperresponsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) on histamine{els]8 mg·mL–1)) or reversibility of obstruction (of ≥15% compared to baseline FEV1 after inhalation of 800 mg salbutamol) to be eligible for inclusion in the study. Bronchodilator response was assessed after histamine provocation when the FEV1 had returned to the baseline value. A total of 258 patients met these criteria, of whom 204 agreed to participate in the study. Informed consent was obtained from each patient and the ethical committee of the Academic Hospital of Nijmegen University, the Netherlands, approved the study.

Study design
At the start of the 8-week washout period, patients ceased all their pulmonary medication (inhaled corticosteroids, cromoglycates, bronchodilators), if used, and were instructed to use only rescue medication on demand (Berodual® dry powder inhalation with ipratropium bromide 40 µg and fenoterol hydrobromide 100 µg). After the washout period, each subject randomly received either a short-acting (salbutamol metered-dose inhaler with two inhalations 100 µg b.i.d.) or a long-acting (formoterol metered-dose inhaler with 12 µg b.i.d.) ß2-agonist or a placebo for 12 weeks. Patients came to the laboratory at the start of the treatment period and every 4 weeks thereafter. Patients received the study medication on the entry day and were carefully instructed on how to use the medication (inhaler technique and time schedule). Their use of the medication was then checked during every visit to the laboratory: used canisters were collected and weighed before and after use in order to check compliance.

A subgroup of 64 of these patients was followed up for a second period in which they received additional inhaled corticosteroids. That study has been recently reported elsewhere 14.

Bronchial provocation
During each visit to the laboratory, patients underwent a histamine challenge test according to European Respiratory Society (ERS) standards 15. No study medication was used for ≥12 h before the test. Doubling doses of histamine, starting with 0.03 and going up to 16 mg·mL–1, were administered until FEV1 had dropped by ≥20% compared to baseline value, or a maximum of 16 mg·mL–1 histamine was given. The bronchial response to each dose of histamine was expressed as the reduction in FEV1 as a percentage of baseline value, according to ERS standards 15. The dose of inhaled histamine, causing a 20% fall in FEV1 below baseline, was obtained from the log dose-response curve by linear interpolation of the last two points. PC20 was recorded in noncumulative units.

Assessment of breathlessness
Breathlessness was measured during the histamine challenge, before each measurement of FEV1 with a modified Borg scale 16. The Borg scale is a 12-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no respiratory complaints) and 0.5 (very, very slight respiratory complaints) to 10 (maximal respiratory complaints). Subjects were instructed that the term "respiratory complaints" meant "complaints of respiratory sensation such as shortness of breath, chest tightness and breathlessness". Subjects were asked to score the overall magnitude of all three symptoms together in one assessment. Other histamine-related symptoms, such as pharyngitis or conjunctivitis, headaches or cough, were not scored. In order to determine the patient's "perceptiveness" during the study, they had to have a baseline FEV1 ≥50% pred at the start of the bronchial provocation test, and, during this test, the PC20 value had to be established with at least two doubling doses of histamine.

Analysis
Perception of bronchoconstriction during the histamine challenge test was analysed by calculating the linear regression coefficient (slope {alpha}) between Borg scores and the reduction in FEV1 as a percentage of the baseline value in the linear regression analysis of Borg=y+{alpha}%{Delta}FEV1, indicating the patient's sensitivity towards changes in FEV1 8, 10, 12, 13. Furthermore, Borg scores corresponding to a reduction in FEV1 of 20% were determined by interpolation, reflecting the PS20 9, 11, 13, 17. All PC20 values were log-transformed before analysis. The effect of chronic bronchodilator use on BHR was determined with a paired t-test between baseline and the last follow-up measurement of PC20.

Repeated measurement analysis was used to analyse the changes in PC20 and Borg scores, based on the mixed model (PROC MIXED in SAS) and with special parametric structure on the covariance (correlation) matrices. Both within- and between-group factors can be analysed in this model. All analyses were corrected for baseline perception score, baseline bronchial responsiveness (PC20) and baseline FEV1 % pred by means of covariance analysis. All analyses were performed on the group of patients with either an initially high or low bronchial responsiveness (PC20 <2 mg·mL–1 versus PC20 ≥2 mg·mL–1), in order to investigate the affect on PC20 in asthmatic patients in which there was "enough room for deterioration" (patients with a relatively high baseline PC20). A cut-off point of 2 mg·mL–1 was chosen as this was the median of the PC20 baseline. Finally, the perceptual sensitivity (slope {alpha}) and PS20 of patients with either an initially high or low bronchial responsiveness were compared by an unpaired t-test. This was performed at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter (four measurements).

Power calculation
A clinically relevant difference in perception was assumed to be at least 1.0 step on the Borg scale. Assuming an sd of 1.5 steps (which was found in these allergic asthmatic patients), an {alpha} of 0.05 and a ß of 0.2, ≥36 evaluable patients were needed per group. With a drop-out rate of 15%, the number of patients starting per group was ≥41.


   Results
TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Patients
Of the 204 patients who started the washout period, 42 subjects dropped out before the medication treatment period began, mainly because they could not stop using inhaled corticosteroids. During the medication period, five subjects dropped out because they needed inhaled corticosteroid treatment, five subjects refused to take the study medication, and six patients stopped due to motivational factors. Baseline perception measurement and/or the follow-up perception measurements could not be assessed in 18 subjects, because their FEV1 was <50% pred at the time of assessment. Therefore, the total number of patients left for analysis was 128. The clinical characteristics of these asthmatic patients are presented in table 1Go. During the study, there was no difference in the number of patients using rescue medication (78% in the short-acting, 83% in the long-acting and 83% in the placebo group; p=0.82).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1— Baseline characteristics of the study population

 
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness
The course of BHR during 12 weeks of chronic bronchodilator use in the group with an initially high and low BHR (PC20 <2 mg·mL–1 versus PC20 ≥2 mg·mL–1) is shown in figures 1 and 2GoGo. In the group with an initially low bronchial responsiveness using chronic short-acting ß2-agonists, the PC20 decreased significantly from 5.26 mg·mL–1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.71–7.45) to 1.94 mg·mL–1 (95% CI: 0.84–4.48; p=0. 013).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.— Effects of 12 weeks of chronic ß2-agonist use on the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) in patients with an initially high bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 <2 mg·mL–1). : baseline; {square}: 12 weeks.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2.— Effects of 12 weeks of chronic ß2-agonist use on the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) in patients with an initially low bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 ≥2 mg·mL–1). : baseline; {square}: 12 weeks.

 
Perceptive sensitivity for changes in forced expiratory volume in one second
There were no significant differences in the perceptive sensitivity of changes in FEV1 (slope {alpha}) between the three medication groups at the start of the study (table 1Go). Repeated measurement analysis showed no difference in the course of time of slope {alpha} between the three medication groups both for the total group and the group of patients with either an initially high or low bronchial responsiveness (p=0.98 and p=0.42, respectively, fig. 3Go).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3.— Perceptual sensitivity of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction (slope {alpha}) during regular use of ß2-agonists in subjects with an initially high provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20<2 mg·mL–1; {square}: short-acting; {blacksquare}: long-acting; : placebo) and low bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 ≥2 mg·mL–1; : short-acting; : long-acting; : placebo).

 
Absolute perceptual magnitude
There were no significant differences in the perception score at 20% reduction in FEV1 (PS20) between the three medication groups at the start of the study (table 1Go). Repeated measurement analysis also showed no difference in the course of time of PS20 between the three medication groups both for the total group and for the group of patients with either an initially high or low bronchial responsiveness (p=0.72 and p=0.18, respectively, fig. 4Go).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4.— Absolute perceptual magnitude (PS20) of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction during regular use of ß2-agonists in subjects with an initially high provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20 <2 mg·mL–1; {square}: short-acting; {blacksquare}: long-acting; : placebo) and low bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 ≥2 mg·mL–1; : short-acting; : long-acting; : placebo).

 

   Discussion
TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Acknowledgements
 References
 
This study shows that chronic use of ß2-agonists does not significantly change perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction compared with placebo, either for short- or long-acting ß2-agonists during a period of 12 weeks of daily use. In addition, it confirms the results of Boulet et al. 9, who also studied the perception of induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients and showed that use of long-acting ß2-agonists (salmeterol 1x50 µg b.i.d. during 4 weeks) does not impair the perception of bronchospasm 11.

Chronic use of ß2-agonists might increase the risk of BHR, cause greater airway inflammation and eventually lead to a reduction in the perception of bronchoconstriction. The authors previously reported that chronic use of short-acting ß2-agonists in subgroups of patients resulted in increased BHR and a greater decline in lung function 18. In the present study, BHR increased in the group with an initially low bronchial responsiveness using chronic short-acting ß2-agonists. However, the increase in bronchial responsiveness did not lead to a decrease in the perception of bronchoconstriction.

It could be suggested that a study period of 12 weeks is too short to demonstrate the influence of increased hyperresponsiveness on the perception of bronchoconstriction. This is because the perception of bronchoconstriction may only be influenced after a prolonged reduction in BHR.

It was not possible to measure eosinophilic airway inflammation and epithelial damage in this study. Therefore, the study did not assess whether chronic ß2-agonist use led to increased inflammation in the airways of asthmatic subjects. It is important to emphasize that the perception of bronchoconstriction was measured, whereas the perception of a deteriorating asthma was not. This is important as ß2-agonists may prevent bronchoconstriction despite an increase in airway inflammation, underlying a deterioration of asthma.

An increase in BHR was only observed in the group using short-acting ß2-agonists but not when compared with the placebo group, as the difference in changes between these two groups was not significant. Recently, in a subgroup of the present study population 14, the authors showed that the additional use of inhaled corticosteroids resulted in an improvement in the perception of bronchoconstriction in patients using long-acting ß2-agonists but not in patients using short-acting ß2-agonists. This difference might be related to the increase in BHR in the group using short-acting ß2-agonists, resulting in greater airflow inflammation and perhaps a reduction in perception. Another possibility may be the suggested enhancement of the anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids by long-acting ß2-agonists 19.

The relevance of studying the effects of ß2-agonist monotherapy in asthma may be questioned, as it is advised that long-acting ß2-agonists are used in combination with inhaled steroids, whilst short-acting ß2-agonists should only be used without inhaled steroids in very mild intermittent asthma. However, there is still some concern that ß2-agonists might mask the effects of asthma, particularly because long-acting ß2-agonists suppress bronchoconstriction and may therefore eventually reduce compliance toward inhaled steroids. The present authors therefore believe that it is still clinically relevant to study the potential masking effects of these monotherapy drugs.

In summary, this study has shown that although chronic use of short-acting ß2-agonists led to increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness, it did not significantly change perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction compared with placebo, either for short- or long-acting ß2-agonists after a period of 12 weeks of daily use.


   Acknowledgements
TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
References
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of M. Habes, I. van den Heuvel, E. Snakenborg and M. Thies in measuring the lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and breathlessness of the patients.


   References
TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. McIvor RA, Pizzichini E, Turner MO, Hussach P, Hargreave FE, Sears MR. Potential masking effects of salmeterol on airway inflammation in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:924–930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sears MR, Taylor DR, Print CG, et al. Regular inhaled beta-agonist treatment in bronchial asthma. Lancet 1990;336:1391–1396.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. van Schayck CP, Dompeling E, van Herwaarden CLA, et al. Bronchodilator treatment in moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis: continuous or on demand? A randomised controlled study. BMJ 1991;303:A426–A431.
  4. van Schayck CP, Graafsma SJ, Visch MB, Dompeling E, van Weel C, van Herwaarden CLA. Increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness after inhaling salbutamol during 1 year is not caused by subsensitization to salbutamol. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;86:793–800.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Cockcroft DW, McParland CP, Britto SA, Swystun VA, Rutherford BC. Regular inhaled salbutamol and airway responsiveness to allergen. Lancet 1993;342:833–837.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Arvidsson P, Larsson S, Löfdahl C-G, Melander B, Svedmyr N, Wåhlander L. Inhaled formoterol during one year in asthma: a comparison with salbutamol. Eur Respir J 1991;4:1168–1173.[Abstract]
  7. Cheung D, Timmers MC, Zwinderman AH, Bel EH, Dijkman JH, Sterk PJ. Long-term effects of a long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, on airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1198–1203.[Abstract]
  8. Burdon JGW, Juniper EF, Killian KJ, Hargreave FE, Campbell EJM. The perception of breathlessness in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:825–828.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Boulet LP, Cournoyer I, Deschesnes F, Leblanc P, Nouwen A. Perception of airflow obstruction and associated breathlessness in normal and asthmatic subjects: correlation with anxiety and bronchodilator needs. Thorax 1994;A9:965–970.
  10. Roisman GL, Peiffer C, Lacronique JG, Le Cae A, Dusser DJ. Perception of bronchial obstruction in asthmatic patients. Relationship with bronchial eosinophilic inflammation and epithelial damage and effect of corticosteroid treatment. J Clin Invest 1995;96:12–21.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Boulet L, Turcotte H, Cartier A, et al. Influence of beclomethasone and salmeterol on the perception of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Chest 1998;314:373–379.
  12. Marks GB, Yates DH, Sist M, et al. Respiratory sensation during bronchial challenge testing with methacholine, sodium metabisulphite, and adenosine monophosphate. Thorax 1996;51:793–798.[Abstract]
  13. Bijl-Hofland ID, Cloosterman SGM, Folgering HThM, Akkermans RP, van den Hoogen H, van Schayck CP. Measuring breathlessness during histamine challenge: a simple standardized procedure in asthmatic patients. Eur Respir J 1999;13:955–960.[Abstract]
  14. Bijl-Hofland ID, Cloosterman SG, Folgering HT, van Den Elshout FJ, van Weel C, van Schayck CP. Inhaled corticosteroids, combined with long-acting ß2-agonists, improve the perception of bronchoconstriction in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:764–769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sterk PJ, Fabbri LM, Quanjer PH, et al. Airway responsiveness: standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. Eur Respir J 1993;6:53–83.[Abstract]
  16. Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;A4:377–381.
  17. Turcotte H, Corbeil F, Boulet LP. Perception of breathlessness during bronchoconstriction induced by antigen, exercise, and histamine challenges. Thorax 1990;45:914–918.[Abstract]
  18. van Schayck CP, Cloosterman SG, Hofland ID, van Herwaarden CLA, van Weel C. How detrimental is chronic use of bronchodilators in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;1151:1317–1319.
  19. Knox AJ, Zhu YM, Pang L. Do long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonists enhance the anti-inflammatory effect of glucocorticoids in asthma? Eur Respir J 2001;117:1059–1061.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. R. Salpeter, N. S. Buckley, T. M. Ormiston, and E. E. Salpeter
Meta-Analysis: Effect of Long-Acting {beta}-Agonists on Severe Asthma Exacerbations and Asthma-Related Deaths
Ann Intern Med, June 20, 2006; 144(12): 904 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. R. Salpeter, T. M. Ormiston, and E. E. Salpeter
Meta-Analysis: Respiratory Tolerance to Regular {beta}2-Agonist Use in Patients with Asthma
Ann Intern Med, May 18, 2004; 140(10): 802 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. R. McFadden Jr.
Acute Severe Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 740 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S Panditi and M Silverman
Perception of exercise induced asthma by children and their parents
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 807 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Schayck, C.P.
Right arrow Articles by Van Weel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Schayck, C.P.
Right arrow Articles by Van Weel, C.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS