ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M.M.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M.M.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, G.
Eur Respir J 2001; 18:685-691
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001


Increased detection of interleukin-;5 in sputum by addition of protease inhibitors

M.M. Kelly1, R. Leigh1, S. Carruthers1, P. Horsewood2, G.J. Gleich3, F.E. Hargreave1 and G. Cox1

Asthma Research Group, Depts of 1 Medicine and 2 Pathology, St. Joseph's Hospital-McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. 3 Dept of Immunology, Mayo Clinic Medical School, Rochester, USA

CORRESPONDENCE: G. Cox, Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, Joseph's Hospital, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada. Fax: 1 9055216132

Keywords: asthma, inflammation, interleukin-;5, proteases, protease inhibitors, sputum chemistry

Received: November 21, 2000
Accepted June 12, 2001

This study was supported by the Asthma Society of Canada. R. Leigh is a South African Pulmonology Society Boehringer-Ingelheim Fellow. G. Cox and F.E. Hargreave were supported in part by the Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre at St. Josephs's Hospital, Hamilton. F.E. Hargreave and G.J. Gleich were supported in part by a grant from NIH AI 34577.


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The measurement of interleukin (IL)-;5 in sputum is problematic, with interfering factors affecting immunoassay. The authors investigated whether sputum proteases could be acting as interfering factors by studying the effect of protease inhibitors (PI) on sputum IL-;5 measurement.

Induced sputa from 20 subjects with asthma were divided into aliquots, processed with and without protease inhibitors (in low and high concentrations) and the levels of IL-;5 (spiked and endogenous) measured by enzyme immunoassay were compared.

The concentration of sputum IL-;5 was significantly increased by PI, with median (interquartile range) levels processed with no, low and high PI concentrations being 0 (0), 41.8 (75.6) and 66.1 (124.4) pg·mL–1, respectively. There was also a significant increase in percentage recovery of spiked IL-;5. Although high concentrations of PI reduced cell viability, there was no effect on total or differential cell counts and low concentrations of PI had no effect on cell counts or viability.

Levels of endogenous interleukin-;5 in sputum of asthmatic subjects can be significantly increased by the addition of protease inhibitors, and samples which would be regarded as negative for interleukin-;5 without protease inhibitors may instead have considerable amounts of interleukin-;5 detected.

Examination of induced sputum is a minimally invasive method of studying airway inflammatory cells and mediators. Sputum induction is successful in >80% of subjects who do not produce sputum spontaneously, and is inexpensive, easy to perform, well-tolerated and safe 13. Sputum cell counts are reliable, valid 4, 5, and responsive to treatment 6.

Interleukin (IL)-;5 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine with a selective action on eosinophils, which are regarded as being of central importance in the pathophysiology of asthma 7. Measurement of IL-;5 is used to assess eosinophilic airway inflammation 8, 9 and has recently become a target of drug therapy for asthma 7, 8, 10. However, the authors have previously shown that the validity of IL-;5 measurements in sputum by current methods is poor, with a mean±sd recovery of spiked IL-;5 of 26.1±14.6% 11. The reduced detection was due to poor recognition of IL-;5 epitopes by immunoassay. This may be due to interfering substances, such as soluble receptors to IL-;5 or auto-antibodies, or due to alteration of the epitope by substances such as endogenous proteases.

Sputum from patients with inflammatory airways disease, including those with asthma, can have high proteolytic activity 1117, with the majority of sputum proteases originating from sputum neutrophils 12, 13. These proteases are normally inhibited by complex formation with natural inhibitors present in sputum, such as {alpha}-;1 proteinase inhibitor, antileukocyte protease (secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor) and {alpha}-;2 macroglobulin 14, 15. These complexes are bound to bronchial mucins, and mucolytic agents, such as dithiothreitol (DTT), may increase proteolytic activity by releasing proteases from such complexes 16. In addition, neutrophils possess protease-activated receptors, which, when bound by proteases, produce activation and degranulation of neutrophils 17 with further release of proteases. The authors have demonstrated that the IL-;5 molecule remains intact after sputum processing 11, suggesting that the effects of proteases may be more subtle, possibly by the alteration of epitopes. It has also been shown that DTT does not interfere with the measurement of IL-;5 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) 11.

The objective of this prospective, cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effect of protease inhibitors (PI) on the measurement of IL-;5 in induced sputum. This included adding a known amount of IL-;5 to the sputum (spiking the sputum) and assaying the sample before and after dilution in order to assess the presence of dilutable interfering factors. Since cell counts are an important part of sputum examination, the effect of PI on cellular indices was also investigated.


    Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Subjects
Sputum from 20 subjects with asthma was processed with and without PI and IL-;5 was measured. To determine the effect of PI on cell counts, sputum from a further 31 subjects (18 with asthma, five with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), three with cystic fibrosis (CF) and five with chronic cough) was processed in a similar manner and the cell counts were compared (table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Subject characteristics

 
The diagnosis of asthma was based on the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria 18, and included variable airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness to a provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20 <8 mg·mL–1) 19. The patients with COPD had first experienced respiratory symptoms after the age of 40 yrs, had a >15 pack-yr smoking history and had evidence of chronic airflow limitation (FEV1 <70% predicted, FEV1/vital capacity (VC) <70% and <10% improvement in FEV1 after inhaled salbutamol) 20. Patients were considered to have a chronic cough if they had a nonproductive cough of >3 weeks duration and the cause remained unknown despite careful evaluation, including chest radiography and spirometry 21. The diagnosis of CF was based on clinical details, a positive sweat test and genetic analysis. The study was approved by the St. Joseph's Hospital Research Ethics Committee.

Sputum induction
Sputum was induced as described by Pin et al. 1 and modified by Pizzichini et al. 5. Briefly, after pretreatment with inhaled salbutamol, an aerosol of hypertonic saline was inhaled from a Medix ultrasonic nebulizer (Clement Clarke, Harlow Essex, UK) with a relatively low output (0.87 mL·min–1) and a large particle size (5.58 µm aerodynamic mass median diameter). Concentrations of 3, 4 and 5% saline were each inhaled for 7-;min periods. At the end of each inhalation, subjects were asked to blow their nose, rinse their mouth with water and swallow to minimize contamination with postnasal drip and saliva. They were then asked to cough and expectorate into a polypropylene container.

Sputum processing
Sputum was processed within 2 h of collection as described by Pizzichini et al. 22. Sputum from each of the 20 subjects with asthma was selected from the expectorate and randomly divided into 3–4 (depending on the volume available) approximately equal aliquots and weighed (fig. 1Go). For all 20 samples, two aliquots were processed without PI, one to serve as the no-PI control for IL-;5 measurements, while the other was processed for cell counts. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco Diagnostics, Tucson, AZ, USA) was added to the no-PI control (1 µL to 4 mg of sputum, 0.25 volumes). In 10 samples, four aliquots were available and 0.25 volumes of low concentration PI (low PI) and high concentration PI (high PI) were added to the third and fourth aliquots respectively. In the other 10 samples, only three aliquots were available and low PI was added to six samples and high PI to four.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.— Diagrammatic representation of sputum processing. PI: protease inhibitor; DTT: dithiothreitol; IL-;5: interleukin-;5.

 
The aliquots were dispersed with four volumes of freshly prepared 6.5 mM (0.1%) DTT (Sputolysin, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA), after which, 3.75 volumes of PBS were added (relative to the original volume of sputum) and the sample was then filtered through a 48 µm nylon mesh. Depending on the volume of filtrate available, a portion (250 µL) was "spiked" with a known amount of recombinant human IL-;5 (Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA), such that the expected concentration of spiked IL-;5, if there was 100% recovery, would be ~120 pg·mL–1, which is on the lower part of the standard curve. Of 13 original samples, 13 (no PI), 10 (low PI) and nine (high PI) aliquots were spiked. To serve as a control for each spiked sample, 250 µL of PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was spiked with the same amount of IL-;5. The authors have previously shown that adding exogenous IL-;5 before or after dispersal with DTT has no effect on the recovery 11.

In the aliquots processed for cell counts (not treated with PI), total cell count and viability were assessed by trypan blue exclusion in a haemocytometer, and cytospins were prepared using a Shandon III cytocentrifuge (Shandon Southern Instruments, Sewickley, PA, USA). Total cell count and viability were also measured in 12 aliquots processed with low PI, 10 aliquots processed with high PI and the corresponding no PI aliquots. Cytospins were prepared from the high and no PI aliquots to enable differential cell counts to be made. The filtered suspensions were centrifuged (290xg, 4 min) and the supernatants and the PBS controls stored at –70°C.

Sputum from an additional 31 subjects was divided into three aliquots. One aliquot was processed with high PI and the other two with no PI, in order to evaluate the effect on cell counts and viability. The repeatability of cell counts with high PI versus no PI could then be compared to the within-sample repeatability with no PI.

Protease inhibitors
A combination of four PI was selected to have a broad spectrum of effect. The combination consisted of 4-;(2-;Aminoethyl)-benzensulphonyl fluoride (AEBSF), pepstatin A, leupeptin and the disodium salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA-Na2) (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Ontario, Canada). AEBSF is a broad-spectrum serine-protease inhibitor; pepstatin A inhibits acid proteases including cathepsin D; leupeptin inhibits serine and thiol proteases including cathepsin A and B; and EDTA-Na2 inhibits metalloproteases. The individual PI were reconstituted from powder and combined so as to obtain two mixtures of different concentrations. Low PI consisted of AEBSF, EDTA-Na2, pepstatin A, and leupeptin in concentrations of 41.75 mM, 26.86 mM, 29.16x10–3 mM, and 21.02x10–3 mM, respectively. High PI consisted of twice these concentrations, except for EDTA-Na2, which was left at the same concentration because of concerns of interference with protein stability.

The low or high PI was added to sputum in a ratio of 1 µL of mixture to 4 mg of sputum. After adding four volumes of DTT, the final concentrations of AEBSF, EDTA-Na2, pepstatin A, and leupeptin in the dispersed sputum were 2 mM, 1.29 mM, 1.39x10–3 mM, and 1.01x10–3 mM for low PI and 3.97 mM, 1.29 mM, 2.78x10–3 mM, and 2x10–3 mM for high PI, respectively. The final concentrations achieved with low PI were similar to those recommended by the supplier. Because the optimal working concentration in sputum is unknown, this concentration was doubled (except for the EDTA) for high PI conditions.

Interleukin-;5 immunoassay
IL-;5 in the supernatants and PBS controls was measured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), using a monoclonal capture and a polyclonal detection antibody (Genzyme Diagnostics). All measurements were made in duplicate. The standard curve was generated with the same IL-;5 used for spiking, and the lower limit of detection was regarded as being 4.0 pg·mL–1. The endogenous IL-;5 concentration measured in the nonspiked portion was subtracted from that measured in the corresponding spiked portion. The value obtained (regarded as being the concentration of spiked IL-;5 recovered) was expressed as a percentage of that measured in the spike control (PBS with 1% BSA). In addition, the spiked portions (six processed with high PI, seven with low PI and six with no PI) were diluted 1:2 with PBS and 1% BSA, and IL-;5 was then measured. The recovery was then recalculated after correcting for dilution. To assess potential effects of PI on the assay itself, high PI was added to a set of standards (final concentration of PI similar to that in sputum supernatant) and assayed in parallel with the normal standards.

Statistical analysis
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences was used to analyse the data. Clinical data that were normally distributed were expressed as mean values±sd. Sputum cell counts, IL-;5 measurements and percentage recovery of spiked IL-;5 were not normally distributed and were expressed as median values and interquartile range (IQR). For statistical purposes, a measured IL-;5 concentration >0 pg·mL–1 and <4.0 pg·mL–1 was assigned the value of 2 pg·mL–1 since, although IL-;5 was detectable, the actual figure obtained could not be accurately measured below 4.0 pg·mL–1. All IL-;5 values were corrected for nine-fold dilution during sputum processing.

The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to compare IL-;5 measurements with and without PI. Correlations between individual data were tested for significance with the Spearman rank correlation test. Two-tailed p-;values <0.05 were considered significant. Reproducibility of cell counts with and without PI was expressed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) as the ratio of variance among subjects to total variance.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The addition of PI to the standards in the assay had no effect on IL-;5 measurement. The median (IQR) levels of endogenous IL-;5 measured in sputum processed with no, low and high PI, were 0 (0), 41.8 (75.6) and 66.1 (124.4) pg·mL–1, respectively, when all aliquots were taken into account (fig. 2Go). The addition of PI (low or high), increased detection and measured levels of endogenous IL-;5, compared to paired aliquots with no PI added (p=0.001). In addition, there was a further significant increase in measured endogenous IL-;5 in aliquots processed with high PI compared to low PI (p=0.017), indicating correlation of IL-;5 levels with PI concentration. Total and percentage sputum eosinophils showed no correlation with IL-;5 levels in sputum processed with or without PI.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.— Concentration of endogenous interleukin (IL)-;5 in sputum supernatant aliquots processed with no protease inhibitors (no PI), low concentration protease inhibitors (low PI) and high concentration protease inhibitors (high PI). ***: p=0.001; #: p=0.017.

 
There was a significant increase in spiked IL-;5 percentage recovery in sputum processed with low (p=0.013) and high PI (p=0.036), compared to no PI, respectively, but no significant difference in percentage recovery between low and high PI (table 2Go). The percentage recovery of no, low and high PI increased significantly (p=0.028, p=0.018 and p=0.027, respectively) after a two-fold dilution of the spiked samples, correcting for the dilution (table 3Go). The significant difference in the percentage recovery of spiked IL-;5 between aliquots treated with low or high PI as opposed to no PI (p=0.016 and p=0.045, respectively) persisted after the two-fold dilution (table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Effect of protease inhibitors (PI): comparison of endogenous interleukin (IL)-;5 and per cent recovery of spiked exogenous IL-;5 with and without dilution between no, low and high PI

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Percentage recovery of spiked interleukin (IL)-;5 with no, low and high protease inhibitort (PI): effect of dilution

 
Total and percentage sputum eosinophils showed no correlation with IL-;5 levels in sputum processed with or without PI. There was a significant inverse correlation between the percentage of sputum neutrophils and endogenous IL-;5 when processed with low PI (r=–0.61, p=0.022), but there was no relationship between sputum neutrophils and IL-;5 levels when processed without PI or with high PI. In samples processed without PI, there was an inverse correlation between the recovery of spiked IL-;5 and percentage and total sputum neutrophils (r=–0.66, p=0.029 and r=–0.65, p=0.029, respectively). In sputum processed with low PI there was also an inverse relationship between recovery of spiked IL-;5 and percentage sputum neutrophils (r=–0.79, p=0.026), but there was no correlation between sputum neutrophils and recovery of spiked IL-;5 when processed with high PI. IL-;5 levels with or without PI showed no correlation with sputum cell viability or with FEV1 % predicted.

A total of 40 sputum samples had total cell count and viability assessed for each of three aliquots, two with no PI added and one with high PI added (table 4Go). Twelve pairs of aliquots of sputum were available to assess the effect of low PI on total cell count and viability. Cytospins were considered unsuitable for differential cell counts if there were too few cells present or the cell morphology was poor. The number of cytospins rejected was 21.2% for no PI and 22.7% for high PI, respectively. The ICC for total and differential cell counts showed good repeatability between no PI:low and no PI:high PI, which was comparable to the within-subject repeatability of no PI (no PI:no PI) (table 3Go). These results indicate there is no effect of PI on total or differential cell counts. However, the cell viability was significantly reduced with the addition of high PI, the median (IQR) being reduced from 70.0% (28.3) and 74.25% (33.1) (in pairs processed without PI) to 52.6% (40.6) (p<0.001). In contrast to high PI, low PI did not significantly affect cell viability.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Effect of protease inhibitors (PI) on sputum cell counts

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The addition of PI to sputum before processing resulted in significantly increased measurement of endogenous IL-;5, with higher concentrations of PI resulting in correspondingly higher levels of IL-;5 being measured. Inhibiting the protease activity may prevent alteration of IL-;5 epitopes by proteases. PI may also block further release of proteases during sputum processing by preventing activation of protease-activated receptors on neutrophils 17.

The lack of correlation of sputum IL-;5 processed without PI and sputum neutrophils is probably due to the fact that IL-;5 levels were above the detection limit of the assay in only two of 20 cases. The significant inverse correlation of sputum neutrophils with sputum IL-;5 processed with low PI and per cent recovery of spiked IL-;5 when processed with and without low PI, supports the postulate that neutrophil proteases are at least partly responsible for low IL-;5 levels in sputum. In sputum processed with high PI, levels (endogenous or spiked) and the lack of correlation of IL-;5 with sputum neutrophils could be explained by the presence of an adequate amount of added PI to neutralize neutrophil proteases.

Although the results of this study are reported using an IL-;5 assay from Genzyme, the authors have previously found it difficult to detect IL-;5 using assays from other manufacturers (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA and Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ, USA, data not shown). This suggests that the addition of PI would be similarly applicable when using other immunoassays directed against IL-;5.

The authors have previously shown that the recovery of spiked IL-;5 was improved significantly (p<0.001) when albumin was added to the sputum processing fluids 11. Since it was demonstrated that it was not acting as an IL-;5 carrier agent, perhaps it was acting as an alternative substrate for sputum proteases.

The percentage recovery of spiked IL-;5, although significantly increased by low and high PI, was less dramatic than the improvement in measured endogenous IL-;5. Since the recovery was calculated after subtraction of the endogenous IL-;5 level, the relatively high levels of endogenous IL-;5 measured with added PI, compared to no PI, would have had a disproportionately greater effect on the calculated percentage recovery. This may also explain why the percentage recovery with low PI is greater than that for high PI, despite the addition of the high PI resulting in a higher median endogenous IL-;5 level than with low PI.

The significant increase in percentage recovery when all aliquots were diluted is intriguing, and although the numbers are small, it suggests the presence of soluble dilutable factor(s) which may interfere with the recognition of IL-;5 by the immunoassay. These interfering factors may be soluble receptors for IL-;5 23, 24 or carrier proteins such as {alpha}-;2 macroglobulin, which is known to bind other cytokines 25, 26. IL-;5 has also been reported to bind tightly to heparan sulphate proteoglycan 27, which may be present in airway secretions 28, 29, as well as heparin 27, which may be released by mast cells 30, 31.

There appeared to be a dose-response effect of increasing PI on the measured levels of IL-;5. However, the maximum effect of PI was not pursued, since the reduction in sputum cell viability seen with the high PI suggested that increased concentrations of PI may be detrimental to sputum cells.

In the present study, there was no correlation between IL-;5 (with or without PI) and sputum eosinophils, either total or percentage. An apparent relationship between sputum IL-;5 levels and eosinophils has been shown in some studies. Studies in which bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was examined before and after allergen challenge 3235 found a high correlation of total eosinophils with IL-;5. Studies have also shown a positive correlation between sputum eosinophils and IL-;5 in subjects with asthma 5, 36, and Pizzichini et al. 37 found that sputum eosinophils and IL-;5 decreased significantly after treatment of subjects with severe exacerbations of asthma with prednisone. However, although both were increased, there was no significant correlation between eosinophil counts and IL-;5 before treatment. Similarly, Keatings et al. 8 examined IL-;5 levels in sputum before and after allergen challenge and noted that although IL-;5 levels were significantly increased after allergen challenge, there was no significant correlation between IL-;5 and eosinophils.

A study examining phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-induced IL-;5 generation by sputum cells after allergen challenge 38 noted that sputum eosinophils were significantly increased 4 h after allergen challenge, whereas IL-;5 was only significantly increased after 24 h. The relationship of IL-;5 to eosinophils is probably not straightforward, as other cytokines, including regulated on activation, normal T-;cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), eotaxin and IL-;8, are also important in eosinophil chemotaxis 39, 40. Thus, it appears that IL-;5 levels increase (allergen challenge) or decrease (treatment with prednisone) along with eosinophils, but there is not necessarily a close relationship between their actual levels.

The lack of correlation between sputum IL-;5 with or without PI and FEV1 % pred may be due to the fact that most of the subjects had mild asthma, and a correlation may have been found if subjects with more severe asthma had been included.

It is suggested that the relationship of sputum interleukin-;5 with eosinophil counts, as well as the responsiveness of interleukin-;5 to various therapies can be more accurately determined with the addition of protease inhibitors to sputum. In addition, samples with interleukin-;5 levels below the detection limit of the assay may have measurable levels after the addition of protease inhibitors. This method allows total and differential cell counts to be performed simultaneously, since low and high protease inhibitors did not interfere with total or differential cell counts, although high protease inhibitors did reduce sputum cell viability. It is believed that the addition of protease inhibitors in a concentration equivalent to at least low protease inhibitors would be of value in studies where the investigators plan to measure interleukin-;5. In addition, this method may be useful for the measurement of other cytokines in sputum, such as interleukins-;4 and -;13, and further spiking experiments with and without protease inhibitors are planned.


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors would like to thank M. Pizzichini and E. Pizzichini for their helpful advice, A. Efthimiadis and S. Weston for help with the sputum cell counts, and L. Burch for secretarial assistance.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Pin I, Gibson PG, Kolendowicz R, et al. Use of induced sputum cell counts to investigate airway inflammation in asthma. Thorax 1992;47:25–29.[Abstract]
  2. de la Fuente PT, Romagnoli M, Godard P, Bousquet J, Chanez P. Safety of inducing sputum in patients with asthma of varying severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:1127–1130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Vlachos-Mayer H, Leigh R, Sharon RF, Hussack P, Hargreave FE. Sputum induction for inflammatory indices: safety and success. Eur Respir J 2000;16:997–1000.[Abstract]
  4. Gibson P, Girgis-Gabardo A, Morris MM, et al. Cellular characteristics of sputum from patients with asthma and chronic bronchitis. Thorax 1989;44:693–699.[Abstract]
  5. Pizzichini E, Pizzichini MMM, Efthimiadis A, et al. Indices of airway inflammation in induced sputum: reproducibility and validity of cell and fluid-phase measurements. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:308–317.[Abstract]
  6. Claman DM, Boushey HA, Liu J, Wong H, Fahy JV. Analysis of induced sputum to examine the effects of prednisone on airway inflammation in asthmatic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994;94:861–869.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Djukanovic R, Roche WR, Wilson JW, et al. Mucosal inflammation in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;142:434–457.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Keatings VM, O'Connor BJ, Wright LG, Huston DP, Corrigan CJ, Barnes PJ. Late response to allergen is associated with increased concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IL-;5 in induced sputum. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;99:693–698.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Konno S, Gonokami Y, Kurokawa M, et al. Cytokine concentrations in sputum of asthmatic patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1996;109:73–78.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Pauwels RA, Brusselle GJ, Tournoy KG, Lambrecht BN, Kips JC. Cytokines and their receptors as therapeutic targets in asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 1998;28:1–5.
  11. Kelly MM, Leigh R, Horsewood P, Gleich GJ, Cox G, Hargreave FE. Induced sputum: validity of fluid-phase IL-;5 measurement. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:1162–1168.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Venaille TJ, Ryan G, Robinson BW. Epithelial cell damage is induced by neutrophil-derived, not pseudomonas-derived, proteases in cystic fibrosis sputum. Respir Med 1998;92:233–240.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Vignola AM, Bonanno A, Mirabella A, et al. Increased levels of elastase and alpha1-antitrypsin in sputum of asthmatic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:505–511.
  14. Owen CA, Campbell EJ. The cell biology of leukocyte-mediated proteolysis. J Leukoc Biol 1999;65:137–150.[Abstract]
  15. Stockley RA. Neutrophils and protease/antiprotease imbalance. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1999;160:549–552.
  16. Houdret N, Lamblin G, Scharfman A, Humbert P, Roussel P. Activation of bronchial mucin proteolysis by 4-;aminophenylmercuric acetate and disulphide bond reducing agents. Biochim Biophys Acta 1983;758:24–29.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Howells GL, Macey MG, Chinni C, et al. Proteinase-activated receptor-;2: expression by human neutrophils. J Cell Sci 1997;110:881–887.[Abstract]
  18. American Thoracic Society. American thoracic society; standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:225–244.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Cockcroft DW, Killian DN, Mellon JJA, Hargreave FE. Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy 1997;7:235–243.
  20. BTS guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The COPD Guidelines Group of the Standards of Care Committee of the BTS. Thorax 1997;52:S1–S28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Irwin RS, Boulet LP, Cloutier MM, et al. Managing cough as a defense mechanism and as a symptom. A consensus panel report of the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest 1998;114:133S–181S.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Pizzichini E, Pizzichini MMM, Efthimiadis A, Hargreave FE, Dolovich J. Measurement of inflammatory indices in induced sputum: effects of selection of sputum to minimize salivary contamination. Eur Respir J 1996;9:1174–1180.[Abstract]
  23. Yasruel Z, Humbert M, Kotsimbos TC, et al. Membrane-bound and soluble {alpha}IL-;5 receptor mRNA in the bronchial mucosa of atopic and nonatopic asthmatics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1413–1418.[Abstract]
  24. Kikuchi Y, Migita M, Takaki S, Tominaga A, Takatusu K. Biochemical and functional characterization of soluble form of IL-;5 receptor alpha(sIL-5Ralpha). J Immunol Methods 1994;167:289–298.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Feige J-;J, Negoescu A, Keramidas M, Souchelnitskiy S, Chambaz EM. {alpha}2-Macroglobulin: a binding protein for transforming growth factor-;ß and various cytokines. Horm Res 1996;45:227–232.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Mire-Sluis AJ, Gaines-;Das R, Thorpe R. Immunoassays for detecting cytokines: what are they really measuring? J Immunol Methods 1995;186:157–160.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Lipscombe RJ, Nakhoul A-;M, Sanderson CJ, Coombs RRD. Interleukin-;5 binds to heparin/heparan sulphate. A model for an interaction with extracellular matrix. J Leukoc Biol 1998;63:342–350.[Abstract]
  28. Jeffery PK, Li D. Airway mucosa: secretory cells, mucus and mucin genes. Eur Respir J 1997;10:1655–1662.[Abstract]
  29. Theocharis DA. Glycosaminoglycans in the bronchial mucus of patients with chronic bronchitis and mucoid impaction of the bronchus. Life Sci 1985;36:2287–2293.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Schwartz LB. Mast cells: function and contents. Curr Opin Immunol 1994;6:91–97.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Page CP. Proteoglycans: the "Teflon" of the airways? Thorax 1997;52:924–925.[Abstract]
  32. Kelly EA, Rodriguez RR, Busse WB, Jarjour NN. The effect of segmental bronchoprovocation with allergen on airway lymphocyte function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:1421–1428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sur S, Gleich GJ, Swanson MC, Bartemes KR, Broide DH. Eosinophilic inflammation is associated with elevation of interleukin-;5 in the airways of patients with spontaneous symptomatic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;96:661–668.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Jarjour NN, Calhoun WJ, Kelly EA, Gleich GJ, Schwartz LB, Busse WB. The immediate and late allergic response to segmental bronchopulmonary provocation in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1515–1521.[Abstract]
  35. Shaver JR, Zangrilli JG, Cho S-;K, et al. Kinetics of the development and recovery of the lung from IgE-mediated inflammation: dissociation of pulmonary eosinophilia, lung injury, and eosinophil-active cytokines. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:442–448.[Abstract]
  36. Shoji S, Kanazawa H, Hirata K, Kurihara M, Yoshikawa J. Clinical implication of protein levels of IL-;5 in induced sputum in asthmatic patients. J Asthma 1998;35:243–249.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Pizzichini MMM, Pizzichini E, Clelland L, et al. Sputum in severe exacerbations of asthma. Kinetics of inflammatory indices after prednisone treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1501–1508.[Abstract]
  38. Liu LY, Swensen CA, Kelly EA, Kita H, Busse WW. The relationship of sputum eosinophilia and sputum cell generation of IL-;5. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;106:1063–1069.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Lampinen M, Rak S, Venge P. The role of interleukin-;5, interleukin-;8 and RANTES in the chemotactic attraction of eosinophils to the allergic lung. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29:314–322.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Simon L, Foster PS. Chemokine and cytokine cooperativity: eosinophil migration in the asthmatic response. Immunol Cell Biol 2000;78:415–422.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. M. Erin, G. R. Jenkins, O. M. Kon, A. S. Zacharasiewicz, G. C. Nicholson, H. Neighbour, R. C. Tennant, A. J. Tan, B. R. Leaker, A. Bush, et al.
Optimized Dialysis and Protease Inhibition of Sputum Dithiothreitol Supernatants
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2008; 177(2): 132 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.O. Crapo, R.L. Jensen, and F.E. Hargreave
Airway inflammation in COPD: physiological outcome measures and induced sputum
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2003; 21(41_suppl): 19S - 28s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
Leader of the Working Group: M.M. Kelly, Members of the Working Group:, V. Keatings, R. Leigh, C. Peterson, J. Shute, P. Venge, and R. Djukanovic
Analysis of fluid{-}phase mediators
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(37_suppl): 24S - 39s.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M.M.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M.M.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS