| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Dept of Paediatric Pulmonology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
CORRESPONDENCE: H.G.M. Arets, Dept of Paediatric Pulmonology, KG01.319.0, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands. Fax: 31 302505347
Keywords: American Thoracic Society criteria, children, European Respiratory Society criteria, maximal expiratory flow/volume curves, spirometry
Received: January 10, 2001
Accepted May 25, 2001
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 TOP Abstract Patients and methodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Maximal expiratory flow/volume (MEFV) measurements from 446 school-age children, experienced in performing MEFV manoeuvres, were studied and acceptability (start-of-test (backward extrapolated volume as a percentage of forced vital capacity (FVC) (Vbe%FVC) or as an absolute value (Vbe), end-of-test (forced expiratory time (FET)) and reproducibility criteria (absolute and percentage difference between best and second-best FVC and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (
FVC, FVC %, FEV1 and FEV1 %)) were applied to these manoeuvres.
The Vbe%FVC criterion was met by 91.5%, the Vbe <0.15 L criterion by 94.8% and the Vbe <0.10 L by 60.1% of children. Vbe <0.15 L appeared to be a more useful parameter than Vbe%FVC. The FET criterion was met by only 15.3% of children. FVC <0.2 L and FEV1 <0.2 L were met by 97.1% and 98.4%, and FVC <0.1 L and FEV1 <0.1 L by 79.8% and 84.3% of the children, respectively. These criteria appeared to be less useful compared to percentage criteria (FVC % and FEV1 %). Even experienced children did not meet all international criteria for spirometry. However, most of their MEFV curves are useful for interpretation.
Based on the performance of these children, a re-evaluation of criteria for maximal expiratory flow/volume measurements in children is proposed.
Maximal expiratory flow/volume (MEFV) measurements were introduced as a valuable tool in the assessment of respiratory disease in 1947 1. Since then, MEFV measurement has become the cornerstone of pulmonary function testing (PFT) as well as the most widely used tool in diagnosis and follow-up of both adults and children with respiratory illness.
However, for young children, the technique of MEFV measurement is often complicated, because they may lack coordination and cooperation. For these children, especially those under the age of 7 yrs, the instruction and performance of MEFV manoeuvres can be facilitated by the use of computerized visual incentives 2. In everyday practice, MEFV curves are judged to be acceptable when they show a rapid rise to peak flow at the start and a subsequent gradual decrease of flow during the rest of the maximally prolonged expiratory manoeuvre. However, criteria as described by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 3 and European Respiratory Society (ERS) 4 for acceptability and reproducibility of MEFV manoeuvres, are lacking for (young) children. A summary of these criteria is shown in table 1
. In daily practice, when children perform computer-controlled MEFV manoeuvres, the ATS or ERS criteria will usually be indicated as not having been reached.
|
|
Patients and methods |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Most patients were known to have recurrent respiratory symptoms, mostly due to obstructive pulmonary diseases, such as asthma and cystic fibrosis, or recurrent pulmonary infections. A minority of patients were seen preoperatively (e.g. for scoliosis, pectus excavatum) or after chemotherapy.
In the period January 1997–January 1999, 852 children (436 males) performed 8,388 MEFV tests at the PFT laboratory. All children selected were experienced in performing MEFV measurements, i.e. they had previously performed MEFV manoeuvres on at least two earlier occasions. The children were optimally encouraged, and performed, after full inspiration, a maximally forced and prolonged expiration. According to the trained and experienced pulmonary function technicians, their MEFV manoeuvres were acceptable when the flow/volume curves showed: 1) a rapid rise to peak flow and 2) a full, maximally prolonged expiratory curve, shown by a gradual, asymptotic approach of the curve to the volume axis. If necessary, especially for the first MEFV tests in young children, a computerized visual incentive was used to stimulate this manoeuvre. This consisted of a peak flow-triggered series of burning candles on the computer screen 2. All MEFV curves with a gradual rise to peak flow, with blunt peaks and/or with sudden end expiratory drop of flow to the volume axis, were not accepted for further evaluation. All children performed at least three technician-accepted curves; and for each child, the two curves with the highest sum of forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) during the last PFT were used for the final analysis 5.
Finally, 446 children (aged 5–19 yrs) who had performed MEFV manoeuvres on an average of 16.7 occasions could be evaluated. Patient characteristics are given in table 2.
|
) using backward extrapolated volume (Vbe) as an absolute value and as a percentage of FVC (Vbe%FVC) (fig. 1) for the start-of-test and the forced expiratory time (FET) for the end-of-test. The best value of the two curves for each patient was used for evaluation of acceptability criteria. Reproducibility was evaluated by the absolute and percentage difference between FVCs (FVC and FVC %) and the absolute and percentage difference between FEV1 (FEV1 and FEV1 %) of the two best curves out of a minimum of three curves per individual.
|
Statistical analysis
Values (mean±sd, range) were calculated for all criteria. Correlations between criterion values and age, height and pulmonary function were studied with Pearson's correlation coefficients.
Differences between separate groups were analysed using unpaired t-;tests. A p-;value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
.
|
|
). The Vbe%FVC was weakly, though significantly related to height, age and pulmonary function (table 4). The authors found that 77.2% of children <8-;yrs-old were able to reach this criterion (tables 3 and 4).
Backward extrapolated volume
The Vbe was <0.15 L in 94.8% of the children. The mean best Vbe was 0.09±0.03 L (range 0.04–0.24). The Vbe was significantly related to height and age (table 4).
Time to peak expiratory flow
A tPEF <0.10 s was seen in 84.7% of all children. Mean tPEF was 0.07±0.03 s (range 0.01–0.22). It was found that tPEF was significantly inversely related to height and age, with better results in older children (tables 3 and 4).
Acceptability criteria: end-of-test
Forced expiratory time
During maximal stimulation, the maximal FET was <6 s in 84.7% of all children. Mean FET was 4.3±2.5 s (range 0.5–18.7). There was a significant relationship of FET with age and height, especially with parameters of airway patency (table 4).
Reproducibility criteria
Absolute difference between two highest forced vital capacities
FVC was <200 mL in 97.1% of children. The mean FVC was 58±50 mL (range 0–280). FVC was significantly related to age and height, but not to sex (table 4). All patients in the youngest age group and 95.5% in the oldest age group met this criterion (table 3).
Percentage difference between two highest forced vital capacities
FVC % <5% as a criterion for reproducibility was met by 87.9% of children (table 3). Mean FVC % was 2.3±2.1% (range 0–10.7). In the older age group, a higher proportion of the children reached the criterion, but correlation with both height and age was not statistically significant. There was a weak, although significant correlation between pulmonary function and FVC % (table 4).
Absolute difference between two highest forced expiratory volumes in one second
FEV1 was <200 mL in 98.4% of all children. All patients in the youngest age group and 97.5% in the oldest age group met this criterion (table 3). The mean FEV1 was 51±50 mL (range 0–330). The FEV1 was significantly related to age and height (table 4).
Percentage difference between two highest forced expiratory volumes in one second
FEV1 % was <5% in 87.2% of the children (table 3). The mean FEV1 % was 2.5±2.7% (range 0–14.6) and there was no significant correlation with height or age; however, a weak, although significant correlation with pulmonary function was found (table 4).
Feasibility
Table 5 presents the values of the different criteria, achievable by 90% of the children. The end-of-test criterion of FET >6 s is the least feasible, especially in the younger age group (table 3).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Apart from growth, in childhood many other factors, such as the time and patience of the PFT technician, equipment, use of incentives and disease state, may influence the results of pulmonary function testing. To perform acceptable and reproducible MEFV manoeuvres, the child should be able to blow out forcefully, immediately after maximal inhalation, and to continue forced expiration until no further air can be expired. The instruction and control of technique, combined with sufficient patience, requires a well-trained PFT technician able to cope with and to encourage children and able to judge the expiratory process 7. Several groups reported successful MEFV measurements in young children. Kanengiser and Dozor 8 reported that many 3–5-;yr-old children are able to cooperate and perform rudimentary forced expiratory manoeuvres that are reproducible; however, reliability could not be assumed and few MEFV curves met the ATS criteria for acceptability. Le Soeuf et al. 9 found that children can perform adequate forced expiratory manoeuvres from the age of 4–5 yrs.
The present study investigates the applicability of the current officially accepted reliability criteria, as defined by the ATS 3, 5 and the ERS working groups 4.
Start-of-test criteria
In young children, the initial efforts to produce a sharp peak flow are often not very rapid in onset. The present study shows that with the guidance of a well-trained technician, the majority of experienced children can reach the current start-of-test criteria.
In earlier reports on spirometry criteria, tPEF was described as a start-of-test parameter 6. If applied, a good start of the forced expiratory manoeuvre (i.e. tPEF <0.10 s) was seen in 84.7% of children. For peak expiratory flow (PEF) meters, the use of dwell and rise time for PEF, recently described by Miller et al. 10, needs further study and has not been used in MEFV manoeuvres in children. Their results showed that males and asthmatics, in particular, had shorter "start times" compared to females and nonasthmatics. In the present study, the percentage of children who reached a peak flow within 0.1 s was rather low compared to the current ATS and ERS start-of-test criteria, thus excluding MEFV measurements in a considerable number of children. Therefore, the present study supports the former recommendation that tPEF should not be used as a criterion of acceptability.
The study indicates that the subjective criterion of a "rapid rise to peak flow", often estimated by eye by PFT technicians, is sufficient to select acceptable curves. Optimally, criteria for acceptability should be independent of age or height. However, the present data show that none of the ATS start-of-test criteria are independent of growth. Age and height are negatively correlated with Vbe%FVC and positively correlated with Vbe. This can be explained by the rise in FVC during growth.
The parameter Vbe, although an "absolute" parameter, is the most independent of age and height, and therefore, this parameter seems to be the most appropriate start-of-test criterion. The Vbe <0.15 L criterion was met by >94.5% of children aged <15 yrs and 85.4% of children aged 
15 yrs (table 3). The ERS criterion of Vbe <0.10 L excludes 
50% of MEFV curves in older children. A minimal Vbe of 0.12 L in children aged <15 yrs is advised; 90% of children would then be able to reach the acceptability standard (table 5).
End-of-test criteria
The second part of the MEFV manoeuvre was far more difficult to perform for children. The ATS criterion for acceptability demands an FET of 6 s, unless there is an obvious plateau in the volume/time curve display. The ATS recommendations state that shorter exhalation times are acceptable in children, but they fail to be more specific 3. The ERS working group does not present numerical criteria for maximally prolonged expiration 4. In this study, all children had extensive experience with lung function testing and were encouraged to reach complete exhalation. Nevertheless, only 36% of the eldest group in the study exhaled for >6 s. Although mean FET rises with age, even adolescents did not always exhale (forcefully) during >6 s, thereby making this criterion unsuitable for use in paediatric practice.
Desmond et al. 11 found comparable results. In their study, an FET of 6 s was reached by 28% and 7% of children over and under the age of 7 yrs, respectively. In contrast, a recent study by Enright et al. 12 showed that display of a real-time tracing of exhaled volume versus time, used to stimulate subjects and PFT technicians, allowed for higher FETs in children >9 yrs of age. However, start-of-test criteria were less easily reached, compared to the present study's group of children. These results show that the use of a particular device will enable more children to satisfy specific criteria, but probably not all criteria. In the present study, a complete expiration, rather than an exhalation time of 6 s, was considered as the goal of MEFV measurement. The statement of Enright et al. 12, that underestimation of the FVC is not clinically very important when monitoring children with obstructive pulmonary disease, is endorsed. Therefore, when necessary, especially in inexperienced and young children, the use of computerized visual incentives (e.g. burning candles) that visually stimulate a rapid and forced start of maximal expiration, is recommended 2.
Warwick 13 described that young children may empty their lungs within 1 s as a result of small lung volumes. This causes the FEV1 to be equal to FVC and could reduce the usefulness of FEV1 and FEV1 as a percentage of FVC (FEV1%FVC) as an index of airway obstruction. Kanengiser and Dozor 8 stated that for this age group, the forced expiratory volume in half a second (FEV0.5) could be more appropriate in the determination of airway obstruction.
As would be expected, the degree of airway obstruction was positively related to the FET. The correlation of FET with age was more evident than with height (table 4), which suggests that in addition to lung volume, ageing and, therefore, probably effort and cooperation influence FET. Although Enright et al. 12 found better results using specific stimulation, it may be questioned how many adults can reach this FET criterion during routine pulmonary function testing.
In the present study, time criteria were defined which were reached by 90% of children. Assuming that the flow/volume curve shows no abrupt termination of expiratory flow and/or the volume/time curve shows a plateau (table 5), it is proposed that the minimal FET should be decreased to 2 s for children 8 yrs of age and to 1 s for children <8 yrs of age. Other researchers suggested taking 3 s 11 or 4 s 12 as goals for exhalation times. The present data show that when children reach an FET of 2 s, this confirms a maximal effort in >90% of children.
Reproducibility
In the present study, the children, especially the younger ones, had no problems in meeting the "absolute volume" criteria for reproducibility (table 3). This is to be expected because of their small lung volumes, but it does not guarantee reproducibility. Reproducibility criteria using absolute differences for both FVC and FEV1 are significantly influenced by age and height (table 4). Criteria using the relative difference as mentioned by the ERS 4 are not correlated with either age or height, and, therefore, seem to be more appropriate in paediatric practice. The 5% difference criteria were reached by 87.9% and 87.2% of children for FVC and FEV1, respectively (table 3). Increasing these numbers to 90% would require a cut-off point of 5.3% for FVC and 6.2% for FEV1 (table 5). The current 5% criteria seems to be more useful in childhood than the absolute criterion of either 100 or 200 mL.
Study situation
It should be stressed that all children in the present study were experienced with MEFV manoeuvres. Most children underwent regular PFTs during visits to the outpatient clinic. The mean number of PFTs performed by the children before the study was rather high. This means that, for inexperienced children, several attempts may be necessary to reach the same skills and results. As it could be the start of a "pulmonary testing career" that may last for many decades in children with chronic respiratory symptoms, it is important for inexperienced children to become familiar with the procedure and especially to use their first laboratory visits to adapt to the situation and gain a positive experience from it. If the first "PFT battle" is lost, good compliance and performance may be lost in later visits.
|
Conclusion |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Fauroux, N. Guillemot, G. Aubertin, N. Nathan, A. Labit, A. Clement, and F. Lofaso Physiologic Benefits of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation in Children With Neuromuscular Diseases Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 161 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. W. J. Terheggen-Lagro, H. G. M. Arets, J. van der Laag, and C. K. van der Ent Radiological and functional changes over 3 years in young children with cystic fibrosis Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2007; 30(2): 279 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Nicot, N. Hart, V. Forin, M. Boule, A. Clement, M. I. Polkey, F. Lofaso, and B. Fauroux Respiratory Muscle Testing: A Valuable Tool for Children with Neuromuscular Disorders Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2006; 174(1): 67 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Zanconato, G. Meneghelli, R. Braga, F. Zacchello, E. Baraldi, and on behalf of the Working Group Office Spirometry in Primary Care Pediatrics: A Pilot Study Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): e792 - e797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Aurora, J. Stocks, C. Oliver, C. Saunders, R. Castle, G. Chaziparasidis, and A. Bush Quality Control for Spirometry in Preschool Children with and without Lung Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2004; 169(10): 1152 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Perez-Padilla, J. Regalado-Pineda, L. Mendoza, R. Rojas, V. Torres, V. Borja-Aburto, and G. Olaiz Spirometric Variability in a Longitudinal Study of School-Age Children Chest, April 1, 2003; 123(4): 1090 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
