Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001 Exercise tolerance in children with cystic fibrosis undergoing lung transplantation assessment1 Cardiorespiratory and Critical Care Directorate, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK and 2 Dept of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK CORRESPONDENCE: P. Aurora, Portex Anaesthesia, Intensive Therapy and Respiratory Medicine Unit, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. Fax: 44 2078298634 Keywords: children, cystic fibrosis, exercise, lung transplantation
Received: June 29, 2000
The aim of this study was to compare the 6-min walk test against the recently developed 3-min step test, as measures of exercise tolerance in children with moderate to severe cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease referred for lung transplantation assessment. Twenty-eight children with CF (16 girls, 12 boys), with a mean age of 13.7 yrs (range 7.217.8 yrs) and mean forced expiratory volume in one second of 34% predicted (range 17%67%) were recruited. All subjects performed both the 6-min walk and 3-min step-tests. Outcome measures were maximum rise in heart rate (HR), and maximum fall in arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2). There was no significant difference in resting HR or Sa,O2 prior to starting the two tests. Both step and walk tests produced significant rises in median HR (from 114149 min1, p<0.0005, and 119138 min1, p<0.0005, respectively) and significant falls in Sa,O2 (both from 9492%, p<0.0005). The step test produced a significantly greater percentage rise in HR (30% versus 18%, p<0.0005) and a significantly greater percentage fall in Sa,O2 (4% versus 2%, p=0.002). Bland-Altman analysis gave wide 95% limits of agreement (10.729.3% for rise in HR, 2.14.6% for fall in Sa,O2). The step test was well tolerated. The 3-min step test produced a greater fall in Sa,O2 and a greater rise in HR than the 6-min walk test in children with moderate to severe CF lung disease. It may be of value when assessing a child's suitability for lung transplantation. Measurement of exercise tolerance is considered an essential component of the lung transplantation assessment procedure, since it may predict life expectancy and provide valuable information regarding the patient's quality of life. A variety of tests have been considered for measurement of exercise tolerance in children, the most commonly used being the self-paced walking test. In this test, the subject is asked to walk as far as possible during a set time (2, 6 or 12 min) and the distance covered, the increase in heart rate (HR), and the change in arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) are recorded 13. Although distance covered during a walk test has been shown to correlate with survival in adults with lung disease 4, data from children with cystic fibrosis (CF) suggest this measure may be a less useful prognostic indicator 5, possibly because results from walk tests can vary with encouragement and patient motivation. A 3-min step test has been developed, which might rely less on patient motivation than a self-paced walk test. During a walk test the subjects are asked to cover as much distance as possible in the allotted time but are allowed to choose their own pace of walking and rest during the test. Poorly-motivated subjects may walk more slowly than well-motivated subjects. During a step test the intensity of exercise is predetermined, so a poorly motivated subject may stop the test early (though this is rare in practice), but may not slow down. A previous study demonstrated that, in a diverse population of children with CF, the step test produces a greater increase in HR and greater increase in breathlessness (measured by a modified Borg score) than the 6-min walk. However, the two tests produced a similar fall in Sa,O2 6. In the current study the 3-min step test was compared with a 6-min walk test in a population of children with moderate to severe CF lung disease referred for lung transplantation assessment.
Study subjects All children with CF attending Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK for lung transplantation assessment between January 1998 and November 1998 were recruited to this study. A total of 28 children with moderate-to-severe CF lung disease were enrolled. All children had been referred from CF centres in the UK or Republic of Ireland. There were 16 girls and 12 boys with a mean age of 13.7 yrs (range 7.217.8 yrs), and a mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 34% predicted for height, age and sex 7 (range 1767%).
Study design
Methods
Data analysis
Of the 28 children tested, six had an FEV1>40%, and 22 had an FEV1<40%. There was no significant difference between the resting Sa,O2 or resting HR prior to starting the two tests. Both tests produced a significant fall in Sa,O2 and a significant rise in HR (table 1
Bland-Altman analysis of the two tests gave wide 95% limits of agreement for rise in HR (10.729.3%). Twenty-four of the 28 children had a greater increase in HR with the step test than with the walk test (fig. 3 1%, the majority had greater desaturation with the step test than the walk test, and none had a greater desaturation with the walk test than with the step test.
In the present study, the recently developed 3-min step test was compared with the well-established 6-min walk test in a population of children with moderate to severe CF lung disease. Both tests produced a significant rise in HR, and a significant fall in Sa,O2. The step test produced a significantly greater rise in HR and a significantly greater fall in Sa,O2 than the walk test, with the greatest difference between the two tests noted in those patients with the greatest propensity to desaturate on exercise. This last finding was not observed in a previous study of CF patients with mild-to-moderate lung disease 6, and is the most important finding of this study.
On initial viewing there may appear to be a discrepancy in the data presented in tables 1 and 2 One difficulty when conducting a study that compares two exercise tests, is the effect of fatigue upon the results of the second test. The present study followed a previous protocol 6 of waiting for 30 min after Sa,O2 and HR had returned to baseline before commencing the second test. As these parameters may not measure fatigue or tendency to fatigue, the order of testing was alternated, and it was found that the order of testing had no effect upon results. Measurement of exercise tolerance is considered an essential component of lung transplantation assessment, with reduced exercise tolerance considered a poor prognostic indicator. However, the interpretation of exercise test results is based upon limited data. Nixon et al. 9 reported an 8-yr follow-up of 107 patients with CF (mean age 17 yrs, range 735 yrs, mean FEV1 59%, range 2495%) who had initially undergone maximal exercise testing on a cycle ergometer in the 1970s. They found that aerobic fitness (as measured by maximal oxygen uptake (VO2,max)) was the best predictor of survival over the study period. A similar study reported by Moorcraft et al. 10 in 1997 followed 92 adult patients over a 5-yr period and found that although VO2,max was a predictor of survival, the FEV1 was a better predictor. However, the form of exercise testing employed in these studies is expensive, time consuming, and requires a specialized laboratory. Few transplant centres assess exercise tolerance of lung transplant candidates in this way; the majority of centres use a submaximal test, most commonly the 6-min walk test. The distance walked during self-paced walk tests has been shown to correlate with resting pulmonary function and with aerobic fitness in both adults and children 2, 11, 12. Furthermore, the minimum Sa,O2 recorded during a walk test has been shown to correlate with the minimum Sa,O2 recorded during progressive maximal exercise testing on a cycle ergometer 3. However, there are limited data on the value of the walk test in predicting prognosis in pulmonary disease, with just four published survival studies 4, 5, 13, 14. Three of these studies were performed in adult subjects, one in subjects undergoing lung transplantation assessment 4, and two in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation. All three studies found timed (either 6-min or 12-min) walking distance to be a valuable predictor of survival. None of the studies evaluated minimum Sa,O2 as a predictor of survival. The one paediatric study analysed survival of 181 children with CF referred to Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children for lung transplantation assessment between 1989 and 1999 5. This study suggested that minimum Sa,O2 during a walk test is a better predictor of prognosis than distance covered. Neither the step test nor the self-paced walk test is a true maximal exercise test. In the walk test, subjects are allowed to choose their own pace. In the step test the intensity and duration of the exercise is predetermined. The previous study suggested that the 3-min step test was harder exercise than the 6-min walk test, but also did not demonstrate any difference in desaturation between the two tests 6. In the present study it has been shown that some children with more advanced CF lung disease desaturate dramatically during the 3-min step test, but not during the 6-min walk. This may be a consequence of lower resting arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2) in these children. As the relationship between Pa,O2 and Sa,O2 is not linear, a small fall in Pa,O2 in a child with normal resting Pa,O2 (e.g. a fall from 1211 kPa) will result in little desaturation. However, a small fall in Pa,O2 in a child with mild hypoxia (e.g. a fall from 87 kPa) will produce a much greater desaturation. Thus the dramatic desaturation seen in some children undertaking the 3-min step test may represent greater oxygen consumption in a child who already has mild hypoxia. This has implications for lung transplantation assessment. There is little doubt that resting Pa,O2 and resting arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2) are of value in predicting prognosis of patients with CF 15, 16. However, arterial blood sampling can be painful and technically difficult, so many transplant centres do not include this investigation as part of their paediatric assessment protocol 17. None of the patients included in this study underwent arterial blood gas analysis. If the 3-min step test is able to discriminate between children with normal resting Pa,O2 and good exercise tolerance, and children with lower resting Pa,O2 and poorer exercise tolerance, it may prove to be a valuable prognostic indicator in children being considered for lung transplantation. Longitudinal studies to evaluate this are underway. In conclusion, the 3-min step test is easy to perform and is well tolerated even in children with moderate to severe cystic fibrosis lung disease. Furthermore, it produces a greater rise in heart rate and a greater fall in arterial oxygen saturation, particularly in those patients prone to desaturate during exercise, than the 6-min walk test. The 3-min step test may be of value when assessing a child's suitability for lung transplantation.
The authors would like to thank the children who gave their time to participate in this trial as well as J. Rae and all the staff of the Great Ormond Street Cardiothoracic Transplant Unit for their assistance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||