ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Raeve, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nemery, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Raeve, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nemery, B.
Eur Respir J 2001; 17:916-921
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001

Observer variation in computed tomography of pleural lesions in subjects exposed to indoor asbestos

H. De Raeve1,5,6, J.A. Verschakelen2, P.A. Gevenois3, P. Mahieu4, G. Moens5,6 and B. Nemery1,6

1 Laboratory of Pneumology and 2 Dept of Radiology, U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, leuven, Belgium, 3 Dept of Radiology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, 4 Centre de Radiologie de l'Avenue de Tervuren, Brussels, Belgium, 5 IDEWE Occupational Health Services, Leuven, Belgium and 6 Dept of Occupational Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

CORRESPONDENCE: B. Nemery, Laboratory of Pneumology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat, 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. Fax: 32 16347124

Keywords: computed tomography, observer agreement, pleural lesions, indoor asbestos exposure

Received: May 26, 2000
Accepted January 11, 2001

This study was funded by The Commission of the European Union and by IDEWE.


   Abstract
TOP
 Abstract
Population and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
To assess the reliability of computed tomography (CT) in detecting discrete pleural lesions, the interobserver and intra-observer variability in reading the conventional and high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans of 100 volunteers, who had worked for ≥10 yrs in a building with known asbestos contamination, was evaluated.

In the first session, pleural abnormalities were detected by a single radiologist (A1) in 13 subjects. In the second session, the scans were read again independently by the same radiologist (A2) and two other experienced radiologists (B, C). The final decision for the presence of pleural lesions was made in a final consensus reading.

This gave a diagnosis of pleural abnormalities in 18 subjects, of whom eight (44%) had been detected by all three readers, five (28%) by two readers and four (22%) by only one reader; one scan, rated normal by all readers during the second session, was reconsidered because pleural abnormalities had been noted at the first reading (A1). The intra-observer agreement for reader A was good (kappa ({kappa}) 0.68) but the interobserver agreement between the readers was only fair to moderate (weighted {kappa}: A2-B=0.43, A2-C=0.45, B-C=0.26) in the second reading session.

In conclusion, when looking for the prevalence of pleural lesions in indoor asbestos exposed subjects, the potential lack of consistency in reporting the presence of small pleural abnormalities must be borne in mind and strict precautions must be taken.

Pleural plaques are a marker of prior asbestos exposure 1. However, when assessing the prevalence of pleural changes due to asbestos exposure, the observer variation has been reported to be considerably high when using radiology 2, 3. This observer variation might be even more pronounced in the detection of minor pleural lesions, which can occur after low or environmental exposure 4.

Inter- and intra-observer variation in disciplines such as radiology and pathology is a well-known phenomenon that complicates clinical diagnosis, epidemiological studies and medico-legal evaluation 5, 6. To the authors' knowledge, the inter- and intra-observer variability for the computed tomography (CT) evaluation of discrete pleural changes in relation to asbestos exposure has not been reported previously. Such minor pleural lesions do not produce symptoms nor will they result in an impairment of pulmonary function, but the detection of such lesions can be important from an epidemiological point of view 7, particularly in relation to the critical issue of indoor asbestos exposure in contaminated buildings.

There was particular interest in the latter. Therefore, a study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of pleural abnormalities in subjects having worked for ≥10 yrs in the Berlaymont building, which housed the offices of the European Union (EU) in Brussels from 1968 until its evacuation in 1991, because of indoor pollution by asbestos. In an initial pilot study, 13 subjects were reported to have subtle pleural abnormalities based on CT scans in the first 100 volunteers 8. Because of the generally small extent of these pleural lesions, there was concern about the reproducibility of CT reading in the assessment of such minor pleural abnormalities. This paper reports on this aspect of the study, the full results of which will be published elsewhere.


   Population and methods
TOP
 Abstract
 Population and methods
Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Study group
Present and former EU civil servants were informed, through various channels that those who had worked for ≥10 yrs in the Berlaymont building were entitled to a health screening examination to detect possible health effects of past asbestos exposure. The present study group includes the first 100 consecutive volunteers whowere examined at the University Hospitals Gasthuisberg in Leuven. This group consisted of 45 males and 55 females with a mean±sd age of 54±4 yrs. The subjects had worked in the Berlaymont building for 16±5 yrs with the time since first employment ranging 13–32 yrs. The volunteers underwent a standardized questionnaire, clinical examination, and lung function testing including measurement of lung volumes, maximal expiratory flow rates and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. These results are not described in the present article. The study was carried out with the subjects' informed consent and the approval of the ethical committee of the University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven.

Imaging
Each subject underwent a CT scan, without injection of contrast material, which consisted of a combination of spiral and high- resolution CT (HRCT). All CT studies were performed with a GE Hispeed CT (General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). Spiral scans were obtained in prone body position with a slice thickness of 5 mm and a table increment of 9 mm, using 120 kV and 200 mA. HRCT was performed immediately after spiral CT and images of 1 mm slice thickness were obtained at 10 mm intervals. In addition, HRCT scans were performed in prone body position at 30 mm intervals. All HRCT images were acquired using 120 kV, 150 mA and a 1 s acquisition time. Both spiral and HRCT images were photographed at two window settings, appropriate for viewing the lung parenchyma and the pleura and the mediastinum 9.

Reading of the images
All scans were read by three experienced board-certified radiologists: reader A and B were two chest radiologists, skilled in the interpretation of thoracic CT scans, reader C was a general radiologist. The CT-scans were read twice by reader A and once by readers B and C. The first reading by reader A (A1) took place when the CT scans were performed during the health screening examination (over a period of ~1 yr). Six months after the end of the study, the scans were read again independently by reader A (A2) and two additional readers (B and C). The readers were unaware of any clinical or other information but they knew that the subjects had worked in the Berlaymont building and that abnormal pleural images had already been found in some cases by reader A1.

Since not every pleural thickening is an asbestos-related pleural plaque, the combined CT-scans were rated on a five-point scale on the basis of presence, extent, distribution and appearance of the pleural changes, taking into account the reader's confidence in the diagnosis of a pleural plaque. The scoring system was as follows: 0=normal (including the presence of subcostal fat, intercostal muscles and vessels); 1=abnormal, but no pleural plaque (e.g. sequelae of tuberculosis or pleurisy; subpleural nodule); 2=abnormal with a low probability to correspond to a pleural plaque; 3=abnormal with moderate probability to correspond to a pleural plaque; 4=abnormal with high probability to correspond to pleural plaque. The readers recorded their interpretation on a form with a precise identification of the CT images showing abnormalities. The CT scans of the subjects in whom a pleural abnormality had been identified at least once were reconsidered for a consensus reading session by the three readers using the same scoring system as described.

Statistical analysis
Intra-observer agreement for reader A and interobserver agreement between the three readers were assessed by means of the {kappa} statistics 10. To assess the intra-observer agreement for the detection of pleural abnormalities, the scores 1, 2, 3, and 4 were grouped from the second reading session. To evaluate inter-reader agreement, taking into account the subjective scores of the second reading session, weighted {kappa} statistics were used. The weighted {kappa}-values were compared with a test based on a standard normal statistic using the estimation of the asymptotic standard error on a weighted {kappa} given by Cohen 11. The 95% confidence intervals for the {kappa} statistics were calculated. According to the literature 11, 12: a {kappa}-value of <0.20 indicates poor agreement; a {kappa}-value of 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; a {kappa}-value of 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; a {kappa}-value of 0.61–0.80, good agreement; and a {kappa}-value of 0.81–1.00, excellent agreement. Statistical analyses were performed on a personal computer using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).


   Results
TOP
 Abstract
 Population and methods
 Results
Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Reading of the images
No overt cases of pulmonary fibrosis, diffuse pleural thickening, bronchial cancer or mesothelioma were detected by HRCT. However, in 13 subjects, a pleural abnormality was initially detected by radiologist A. In four of these subjects other possibilities than asbestos plaques were evoked such as sequelae of (tuberculous) infections, which was confirmed by the questionnaire. In total, 12 subjects had mentioned a history of tuberculosis or pleurisy before starting employment in the Berlaymont building.

The second reading session differed from the first readings by reader A in that a grading system was incorporated for scoring the probability that the pleural irregularity corresponded to a pleural plaque. Table 1Go summarizes the scores for each reader separately as well as the score obtained by consensus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1— Pleural irregularity determined by three readers (A,B,C) separately and the final score obtained by consensus in 100 computed tomography scans

 
By consensus, 82 scans were eventually considered as normal based on 64 scans (78%) rated normal by all readers, 16 scans (20%) rated abnormal by just one reader and two scans (2%) where two readers had detected pleural abnormalities. Pleural abnormalities were retained by consensus in 18 subjects of whom eight (44%) had been detected by all three readers, five (28%) by two readers and four (22%) by only one reader. One scan, rated normal by all readers during the second reading session, was reconsidered because pleural abnormalities had been noted at the first reading (A1). Thus, the first (A1) and consensus reading agreed in 95% of the cases, with the consensus reading detecting five additional cases of pleural abnormalities. These five additional cases were graded, by consensus, as follows: two grade 1, one grade 2, and two grade 3. To illustrate the type of pleural lesions found by HRCT, one example of each category score is shown in figure 1Go.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.— Combined computed tomography scans were rated on a five-point scale on the basis of the presence, extent, distribution and appearance of pleural changes, taking into account the reader's confidence in the diagnosis of pleural plaque. a, c, e and g) mediastinal window/centre settings; b, d, f and h) lung window, centre settings. a and b) image with a score 1, i.e. a pleural abnormality which is not considered to be a pleural plaque (e.g. pleuroparenchymal scar); c and d) pleural thickening with a score 2, low probability; e and f) focal thickening of the pleura with a score 3, considered to be a pleural plaque with a moderate probability; and g and h) obvious pleural thickening, internal to a rib, scoring 4 with a high probability to correspond to a pleural plaque. Pleural abnormalities are indicated with arrows.

 
The intra-observer agreement of reader A between the first and the second reading was good ({kappa}=0.68) concerning the detection of pleural abnormalities. The inter-reader agreement for each pair of observers in the second reading session is summarized in table 2Go. These weighted {kappa}-values, evaluating the inter-reader agreement for the subjective scores of the second reading session, were fair to moderate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2— Interobserver agreement for the scores of the second reading session

 

   Discussion
TOP
 Abstract
 Population and methods
 Results
 Discussion
Acknowledgements
 References
 
The use of HRCT has played an increasing role in the detection of pleural lesions due to occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos 7, 13–20. However, besides the pilot study 8, epidemiological studies using HRCT for assessing the prevalence of pleural plaques due to indoor asbestos exposure have not been published. Nevertheless, such epidemiological studies can be important since the prevalence of these pleural changes can be interpreted as a biomarker and early health effect of indoor asbestos exposure 21.

In this epidemiological study, the authors opted to combine the readings of the spiral CT (covering the entire chest wall at the expense of resolution) and HRCT (increasing resolution, but at the expense of the amount of tissue scanned), in order to achieve an optimal detection rate for pleural lesions. Nevertheless, this approach is not recommended for pure screening purposes, since conventional CT is recognized as a relatively high-dose diagnostic procedure. HRCT (consisting of 1 mm thick slices performed every 1 cm) has, conversely, an effective radiation dose, which is much lower than that of conventional CT, even with high-dose techniques 22, 23. The participants of the present study, however, were mature adults who were fully informed about the radiation risk of the procedure and they all volunteered to have these tests performed.

A major problem when undertaking epidemiological studies involving radiology is that trained observers have different thresholds for perceiving the presence or absence of abnormalities. In addition, the technical factors of CT-scanning are very critical for the detection rate of pleural lesions, especially when the extent of the pleural lesions is less pronounced, which will increasingly be the case as a result of strict asbestos legislation 24. This problem of interobserver accuracy can be tested directly when there is a "gold standard", but in the case of minor pleural plaques, accuracy cannot be tested due to the absence of a standard such as that afforded by surgical, autopsy, or other definite pathological evidence 3. In the absence of such a "gold standard", intra- and interobserver comparisons of variability can be used.

The observer variability was measured by using the {kappa} statistic, which allows the removal of the component of agreement attributable by chance 25. The intra-reader agreement for reader A, between the first and second reading, was good, indicating that the reader was consistent in detecting pleural abnormalities. Conversely, there was only a fair to moderate inter-reader agreement for the subjective scores in the second reading session. This can be explained because the main requirement for inter-reader agreement is a commonly accepted language describing the pleural plaques. Pleural plaques are focal areas of pleural thickening (calcified or not) which occur along the lateral chest walls, primarily in the lower portions of the chest. They are seen on the parietal pleura; they are sharply demarcated on all sides and, in particular, from the lung. Pleural lesions with these characteristics are practically pathognomonic for asbestos exposure 26.

However, translating this description of a pleural plaque into radiological diagnostic criteria for HRCT has been a problem. The current International Labour Office classification 27 is not adequate for diagnosing asbestos-related pleural plaques by CT, leaving us without any good criteria for distinguishing other pleural lesions from plaques 28. First, the pleural lesions must be differentiated from normal anatomic structures such as subcostal fat, intercostal muscles or veins that may cause densities that are somewhat focal 29. Secondly, other types of pleural lesions exist which are nonspecific and/or do not have any known connection with exposure to asbestos. This has led to diverging opinions about the radiological definition of plaques diagnosed by CT 15, 30–32.

Furthermore, in the present study, the pleural lesions were not those that are commonly described following obvious occupational asbestos exposure. As shown in figure 1Go, the detected pleural lesions were small, ranging from a few millimetres to at most one centimetre in length. In seven out of the 18 subjects with pleural abnormalities, the lesions were only detected unilaterally. One of the most convincing arguments to make a diagnosis of asbestos plaques is when the lesions are found bilaterally, but this criterion is not absolute and unilateral locations of asbestos-related plaques have been reported 33.

In a number of instances, the possibility that the lesions observed were asbestos-plaques, was only evoked by the radiologist as one of many other possibilities, and with hindsight some of the pleural lesions may have been due to tuberculosis or pleurisy, making it difficult to state that the pleural lesions were asbestos-related. To achieve a higher certainty that the lesions detected on HRCT were pleural plaques, a scoring system was added to the second and consensus reading. Each reader evaluated the pleural abnormalities that were not characteristic of tuberculosis or pleurisy (i.e. score 1), and gave a score of 2, 3, or 4 according to increased probability of being induced by asbestos on the basis of their similarity with frank asbestos plaques. In case of discrepancies between the readers, the decision for the presence of pleural lesions was made in a final consensus reading.

Consensus readings have previously been used in the radiological assessment of asbestos-related abnormalities 7, 34, 35. In the present study, the final consensus reading resulted in a diagnosis of pleural abnormalities in 18 subjects. Seven of the 18 pleural lesions were considered not to be related to asbestos, but more likely to past tuberculosis or pleurisy. The remaining 11 were considered to be pleural plaques with an increasing probability from low (n=2), moderate (n=4) to high (n=5) for a pleural plaque on the basis of experience and textbook descriptions. The advantage of a consensus reading is that a discussion about the disagreements averages out the differences between the readers of whom A was less "liberal" in seeing abnormalities than reader C, but less "severe" than reader B in ruling out abnormalities. A possible disadvantage of consensus readings is that they may operate much like a single-reader interpretation. Although numerous readers may be involved, the information of record is likely to reflect a single, dominant opinion 3, which, however, was not the case in the presented study. The consensus reading detected five additional cases of minor pleural lesions, meaning that a reading by three radiologists increases the detection rate of small pleural lesions compared to a single reading by one radiologist only.

It is important to put so much effort into the detection of subtle pleural lesions, because the diagnostic uncertainties regarding minor asbestos-related pleural changes and the possibly substantial degree of misclassification render it difficult to evaluate the prevalence of these minor pleural changes as an adverse health effect of indoor asbestos exposure 21. In cases with only "passive exposure" to asbestos, the lesions were found to be extremely small and the consensus reading definitely increased the accuracy of detection. The authors are aware that the detected pleural lesions do not all necessarily correspond to the classical definition of pleural plaques. Therefore, a similar high-resolution computed tomography study has been carried out in 100 control subjects without known or suspected asbestos exposure. The data from this control group is being analysed to verify whether the lesions found here are asbestos-related or not. The present study does not answer this question, but shows the importance of diagnostic accuracy.


   Acknowledgements
TOP
 Abstract
 Population and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
References
 
The authors thank V. De Maertelaer, F. Clottens, G. Nackaerts and W. Desmet for their much-appreciated collaboration.


   References
TOP
 Abstract
 Population and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Mossman BT, Gee BL. Asbestos-related diseases. N Engl J Med 1989;1721–1730.
  2. Parker DL, Bender AP, Hankinson S, Aeppli D. Public health implications of the variability in the interpretation of "B-reading" for pleural changes. J Occup Med 1989;31:775–780.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ducatman AM. Variability in interpretations of radiographs for asbestos abnormalities: problems and solutions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;643:108–120.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hillerdal G. Pleural plaques in the general population. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999;430–437.
  5. Bankier AA, De Maertelaer V, Keyzer C, Gevenois PA. Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. Radiology 1999;211:851–858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bankier AA, Fleischmann D, De Maertelaer V, et al. Subjective differentiation of normal and pathological bronchi on thin-section CT: impact on observer training. Eur Respir J 1999;13:781–786.[Abstract]
  7. Gevenois PA, De Vuyst P, Dedeire S, Cosaert J, Vande Weyer R, Struyven J. Conventional and high-resolution CT in asymptomatic asbestos-exposed workers. Acta Radiol 1994;35:226–229.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. De Raeve H, Nemery B, Verschakelen J. A pilot study of effects of residential asbestos exposure in the EU Berlaymont building (Brussels). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:A808.
  9. Gevenois PA, De Maertelaer V, Madami A, Winant C, Sergent G, De Vuyst P. Asbestosis, pleural plaques and diffuse pleural thickening: three distinct benign responses to asbestos exposure. Eur Respir J 1998;11:1021–1027.[Abstract]
  10. Liebetrau AM. Measures of association In: Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Newbury Park, Calif; 1983; series 07–032: 32–36.
  11. Cohen J. Weighted Kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213–220.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Topçu F, Bayram H, Simsek M, Kaya K, Özcan C, Isik R, Senyigit A. High-resolution computed tomographyin cases with environmental exposure to asbestos in Turkey. Respir 2000;67:139–145.[CrossRef]
  14. Aberle DR, Gamsu G, Ray CS, Feuerstein IM. Asbestos-related pleural and parenchymal fibrosis: detection with high-resolution CT. Radiol 1988;166:729–734.
  15. Aberle DR, Gamsu G, Ray CS. High-resolution CT of benign asbestos-related diseases: clinical and radiographic correlation. Am J Radiol 1988;151:883–891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gamsu G, Aberle DR, Lynch D. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of asbestos-related thoracic disease. J Thorac Imag 1989;4:61–67.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Neri S, Antonelli A, Falaschi F, Boraschi P, Baschieri L. Findings from high resolution computed tomography of the lung and pleura of symptom free workers exposed to amosite who had normal chest radiographs and pulmonary function tests. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:239–243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ameille J, Brochard P, Brechot JM, et al. Pleural thickening: a comparison of oblique chest radiographs and high-resolution computed tomography in subjects exposed to low levels of asbestos pollution. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1993;64:545–548.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Friedman AC, Fiel SB, Fisher MS, Radecki PD, Lev-Toaff AS, Caroline DF. Asbestos-related pleural disease and asbestosis: a comparison of CT and chestradiography. AJR Am J Roentgen 1988;150:269–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rockoff SD, Schwartz AM. Noninvasive detection of early asbestos-related disease of the thorax: algorithmic analysis of radiographic, nuclear, and serologic tests. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;643:121–131.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Boffetta P. Health effects of asbestos exposure in humans: a quantitative assessment. Med Lav 1998;89:471–480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Mayo JR, Jackson SA, Müller NL. High-resolution CT of the chest: radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgen 1993;160:479–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. van der Bruggen-Bogaarts BAHA, Broerse JJ, LammersJ-W, van Waes PFGM, Geleijns J. Radiation exposure in standard and high-resolution chest CT scans. Chest 1995;107:113–115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hillerdal G, Henderson DW. Asbestos, asbestosis, pleural plaques and lung cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997;23:93–103.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Maclure M, Willett WC. Reviews and Commentary: Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:161–169.[Free Full Text]
  26. American Thoracic Society. The diagnosis of non malignant diseases related to asbestos. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;134:363–368.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. International Labour Office. Guidelines for the use ofILO international classification of radiographs ofpneumoconiosesRevised ed. International Labour Office Occupational Safety and Health Series 1980; no. 22 (rev 80). Geneva: International Labour Office.
  28. Hillerdal G. Pleural lesions and the ILO Classification: the need for a revision. Am J Ind Med 1991;19:125–130.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Webb WR. HRCT of the normal and abnormal pleura In: Webb WR, Muller ML, Naidich DP, editors. High Resolution CT of the lungNew York, Raven Press, 1992; pp. 134–144.
  30. Miller WT Jr, Gefter WB, Miller WT Sr. Asbestos-related chest diseases: plain radiographic findings. Semin Roentgenol 1992;27:102–120.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Kraus T, Raithel HJ, Hering KG. Evaluation and classification of high-resolution computed tomographic findings in patients with pneumoconiosis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1996;68:249–254.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Kraus T, Raithel HJ, Lehnert G. Computer-assisted classification system for chest X-ray and computer tomography findings in occupational lung disease. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1997;69:482–486.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Withers BF, Ducatman AM, Yang WN. Roentgenographic evidence for predominant left-sided location of unilateral pleural plaques. Chest 1989;95:1262–1264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Zitting AJ. Prevalence of radiographic small lung opacities and pleural abnormalities in a representative adult population sample. Chest 1995;107:126–131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Bégin R, Ostiguy G, Filion R, Colman N, Bertrand P. Computed tomography in the early detection of asbestosis. Brit J Ind Med 1993;50:689–698.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
M. Remy-Jardin, A. Sobaszek, A. Duhamel, I. Mastora, C. Zanetti, and J. Remy
Asbestos-related Pleuropulmonary Diseases: Evaluation with Low-Dose Four-Detector Row Spiral CT
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 182 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Raeve, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nemery, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Raeve, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nemery, B.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS