Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2001 Systemic inflammatory response after bronchoalveolar lavage in critically ill patients1 Institute of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona and 2 Biochemistry, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain CORRESPONDENCE: A. Torres, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut de Pneumologia: Toràcica, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. Fax: +34 93 227 54 54 Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage, diagnosis, intensive care unit, interleukins, inflammatory response, pneumonia
Received: March 23, 2000
This work was supported by: Fondo de investigación Sanitaria (FIS) Grant #: 98/1096, 1997, Suport dels Grups de Recerca (SGR) Grant #: 00086, IDIBAPS, Comissió Interdepartmental de Recerca i Innovació Tecnológica (CIRIT, 1999), the European Respiratory Society (ERS), and the Bochumer Arbeitskreis für Peumologie und Allergologie (BAPA).
Bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may be followed by a systemic inflammatory response. Previous reports have suggested pneumonia as a predisposing condition and systemic cytokines as possible mediators.
To test this hypothesis, systemic levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-
Pa,O2/FI,O2 ratio was lower at 12 h compared to baseline in patients with pneumonia (baseline median 192 (range 65256); 12 h 160 (66190) mmHg, p<0.001) and ventilated controls (baseline 293 (205473); 12 h 226 (153330) mm Hg p=0.011), but returned to baseline levels at 24 h (pneumonia: 194 (92312), p=0.991; controls: 309 (173487) mmHg, p=0.785). No changes in other clinical variables were observed. Systemic TNF- No deterioration of clinical variables and no increase in systemic cytokine release has been observed after bronchoalveolar lavage, in critically ill patients. The potential cytokine increase is probably too small, in relation to the pre-existing inflammatory response, to yield clinical significance in this population otherwise antibiotic therapy may have been protective. Fibreoptic procedures, and particularly bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), are important diagnostic tools, and tolerance is generally good. Side effects such as serious arrhythmia, bleeding, pneumonia, or pneumothorax are rare 1 and acute haemodynamic effects are small even in critically ill intubated patients 2. However, in some cases, BAL may be followed by myalgia, headache or even fever 3. A systematic follow-up after bronchoscopically guided BAL suggested that this systemic inflammatory response, or sepsis-like syndrome, is caused by a proinflammatory cytokine release 4. This study in noncritically ill patients, however, excluded patients with pneumonia, and did not assess the bacterial burden of the lungs. Translocation of bacterial products 5 or even entire micro-organisms 6 from the lungs to the bloodstream, however, may play a crucial role for the pyrogenic response after BAL, particularly in the presence of mechanical ventilation. Systemic cytokine levels have therefore been studied after bronchoscopically guided BAL in mechanically ventilated patients, with and without pneumonia.
This trial was conducted in an 850-bed tertiary care hospital between January 1 1995 and December 31 1997. All patients on ventilatory support for more than 48 h in one respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) were eligible for the study. Patients were included consecutively if they fulfilled clinical criteria of pneumonia: presence of new infiltrates on the chest radiograph and two of the following criteria: fever 38.3°C, purulent secretions, leukocytosis ( 12,000·mm3) or leukopenia ( 4,000·mm3). Pneumonia was classified as community-acquired (occuring <72 h into stay) or nosocomial ( 72 h). The ventilated control group without pneumonia included patients who met the following criteria: 1) mechanical ventilatory support for more than 48 h; 2) absence of any infectious process; or 3) absence of any of the criteria of the pneumonia group. Bronchoscopy was indicated for other reasons (e.g. tube malposition, minor haemoptysis or visual inspection of the tracheobronchial tree) in patients without pneumonia. Exclusion criteria were: 1) unstable clinical condition (e.g. cardiac arrhythmia, acute ischemic heart disease, need for vasoactive drugs); 2) known increased intracranial pressure; 3) small diameter endotracheal tube (<7 mm); 4) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); 5) cerebral injury; or 6) coagulation's disorders. The study was approved by Ethical Committee of our Centre and in each case informed consent was obtained from the next of kin.
Protocol
Arterial oxygenation expressed as arterial partial pressure of oxygen/inspired fraction of oxygen (Pa,O2/FI,O2), arterial blood pressure, cardiac frequency (fC) and axillary body temperature were sequentially recorded and for the purpose of this study were documented before and at 12 h and 24 h after BAL. An increase in body temperature of
Blood sampling
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)
Cytokine assays
Statistical analysis
A total of 30 patients were included in the study, 20 (67%) with pneumonia according to the predefined criteria and 10 control patients without pneumonia (33%) (table 1
Microbiological data were available in 18/20 (90%) patients with pneumonia and all controls. A total of 7/18 (39%) specimens were sterile. The following PPMs were recovered in the group of patients with pneumonia: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=2), Acinetobacter baumanii (n=1), Enterobacter spp. (n=2), Staphylococcus aureus (n=2), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=2), and Aspergillus fumigatus (n=2). BAL cultures of control patients without pneumonia were sterile or showed no growth for PPMs in 8/10 cases (80%). One BAL showed growth for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, respectively. Blood cultures were sterile in all but one patient (29/30, 97%). The pre-BAL blood culture was negative in this particular patient with nosocomial pneumonia, whereas follow-up blood cultures at 12 h and at 24 h showed growth for Streptococcus epidermidis. This micro-organism was also isolated in the BAL fluid of the patient.
Clinical variables
The comparison between patients with pneumonia and controls for mean arterial pressure (MAP), axillary body temperature and fC are illustrated in figure 2 1°C in body temperature during follow-up. The MAP was different at baseline between patients with pneumonia and controls (p=0.172), but was significantly higher in controls at 12 h (p=0.004) and at 24 h (p=0.001), compared to patients with pneumonia.
Axillary body temperature increased significantly, only in control patients at 12 h (p=0.042) and 24 h after BAL (p=0.021; fig. 2
No significant changes were observed for fC after BAL, neither in patients with pneumonia or the control group (fig. 2
Systemic cytokine levels
Subanalysis Data were reanalysed according to the recovery of PPMs in the BAL, because all patients with pneumonia were pre-treated with antibiotics. The results are summarized in table 3
Pneumonia patients and controls were analysed separately for the comparison of subjects with and without an increase of 1°C in body temperature during follow-up, to avoid bias introduced by differences in baseline cytokine levels. Among control patients with an increase in body temperature, only serum IL-6 was significantly higher after 12 h compared to control patients without an increase in body temperature (with increase 81 (51159) pg·mL1, no increase 17 (1255) pg·mL1, p=0.032). No significant differences for baseline cytokine levels were observed for this comparison. In patients with pneumonia, analysis revealed that those who developed an increase in body temperature showed significantly higher values of TNF- 24 h after BAL (with increase 61 (5963) pg·mL1, no increase 25 (049) pg·mL1 p=0.019). In another subanalysis, cytokine levels were compared for patients with and without corticosteroid medication also separated for pneumonia patients and controls. In control patients, no differences were found for this comparison in either baseline cytokine levels or during follow-up. Among the patients with pneumonia, baseline serum levels of IL-6 were lower in patients with corticosteroids, compared to those without pneumonia at baseline (with corticosteroids 97 (92600) pg·mL1, no corticosteroids 914 (354300) pg·mL1, p=0.031) and at 12 h follow-up (with corticosteroids 78 (162560) pg·mL1, no corticosteroids 982 (333778) pg·mL1, p=0.041).
The findings of this study do not support the hypothesis that pneumonia is a predisposing condition leading to development of a systemic inflammatory response after BAL. This conclusion is based on observations that; 1) bronchoscopically guided BAL in critically ill patients was not associated with clinically significant changes of MAP, body temperature or fC at 12 h or 24 h, regardless of the presence of pneumonia; 2) there was no increase in systemic cytokine release after bronchoscopically guided BAL at 12 h and 24 h in either patients with pneumonia or in controls; 3) a systemic inflammatory response after BAL in patients with pneumonia did not depend on the presence or absence of bacterial pathogens in BAL fluid.
BAL is an important diagnostic tool in critically ill patients. The procedure is generally regarded as safe, and severe side effects rarely occur 3. Most previous studies agree on the fact that BAL induces deterioration of arterial oxygenation 1, 1012, but these changes are of transient nature. This observation was confirmed in the present study, where all patients, regardless of whether they had pneumonia or not, showed a lower Pa,O2/FI,O2 ratio at 12 h, but returned to or above baseline at 24 h (fig. 1
Pugin and Suter 13 investigated clinical effects of a fibreoptically guided BAL in critically ill patients with and without pneumonia. They found a significant increase in body temperature and decrease in MAP after the procedure in patients with pneumonia but not in controls. Changes in body temperature correlated significantly with those in MAP, and also with the level of endotoxin in bronchoscopic BAL fluid. These findings suggested that BAL, in critically ill patients with pneumonia, may have caused intravascular translocation of toxins or mediators producing pyrogenic and hypotensive effects. The data from the present study supports this hypothesis only in part, because no general increase in the systemic inflammatory response, as measured by cytokine levels, could be found at 12 h or 24 h. Similarly, no statistically or clinically significant changes in body temperature, MAP or fC could be found after the bronchoscopically guided BAL. It is plausible that differences from the previous study are accounted for by the fact that all but two of our patients had received antibiotic treatment before sampling. Systemic cytokine release, associated with bacterial translocation, may have been blunted by this treatment. On the other hand, one might also argue that the increase in body temperature reported by Pugin and Suter 13 was less likely due to the diagnostic procedure, but due to pneumonia. However, when patients with and without an increase in body temperature
A significant systemic cytokine release after BAL has been observed in previous studies involving noncritically ill patients. In a report of a normal healthy volunteer who underwent bronchoscopy and BAL, Standiford et al. 8 showed rising TNF- This study included one case of possible translocation of S. epidermidis from the pulmonary compartment to the bloodstream after BAL in a 74-yr old female with bilateral nosocomial pneumonia, who had been on mechanical ventilation with zero positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for more than 24 h. Bacteraemia has been described after rigid bronchoscopy, but has never been documented after fibreoptic procedures in humans 4, 14. Animal data suggest that this route of dissemination may have been facilitated by mechanical ventilation 6 or injury to the alveolar epithelium 15. Verbrugge et al. 16 determined the effect of PEEP on the development of bacteraemia with Klebsiella pneumoniae after mechanical ventilation of intratracheally inoculated rats, and concluded that 10 cmH2O PEEP reduced ventilation-induced K. pneumonia bacteraemia. Nevertheless, a causal relationship to the fibreoptic procedure cannot be confidently assumed from the present study, since bacteraemia is a common finding in patients with nosocomial pneumonia, or it may have occurred spontaneously 17. In addition, S. epidermidis is not a common nosocomial pathogen and the assumed translocation from alveolar space to bloodstream may have been unrelated to the underlying inflammatory process. Furthermore, when the systemic inflammatory response was analysed with respect to the presence or absence of potentially pathogenic micro-organisms in the BAL fluid, no significant differences in the systemic inflammatory response after bronchoscopically guided BAL were found. One might argue that this study simply missed the increase in the systemic inflammatory response, because only two time points were assessed (12 h and 24 h). However, Krause et al. 4 observed differences at 6 h and the well documented case report suggested a peak response at 24 h. However, it cannot be ruled out that short-term changes were missed due to the study design, or changes in the local inflammatory response because patients were not investigated with a follow-up bronchoscopy. A major confounding factor in this study was probably the antibiotic treatment. In fact a trend was even observed towards lower IL-6 levels at 24 h, which could possibly reflect the adequacy of treatment and the decreasing systemic inflammatory response. Nevertheless, it is important not to extrapolate the results to a population without pre-emptive antibiotic therapy. To assist bronchodilatation, a considerable proportion of the patients had received corticosteroids prior to the study, which have been shown to interfere with cytokine levels 18. The comparison between patients with and without corticosteroid treatment was hampered by substantial differences in cytokine levels at baseline between patients with pneumonia and controls, as it has been described previously 18. A multivariate analysis would have been interesting to separate effects of BAL and corticosteroids on cytokine kinetics. However, the present study was too small to allow a reasonable application of this statistical method. In conclusion, whereas bronchoscopically guided bronchoalveolar lavage seems to be associated with a clinically significant systemic cytokine release in the noncritically ill patient, no general confirmation of this finding in a population of intubated and mechanically ventilated patients could be made. One possible explanation may be that the magnitude of the induced systemic inflammatory response may be insignificant in critically ill patients with high baseline cytokine levels. A transient increase in interleukin-6 levels was observed among patients without pneumonia after 12 h when patients with and without an increase in body temperature were compared, but limitations apply to this subanalysis. Future trials should assess whether antibiotic or corticosteroid pre-treatment has any effect on the systemic inflammatory response after bronchoscopic procedures.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||