This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Permissions Request Permissions Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bridge, P. Articles by Silverman, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bridge, P. Articles by Silverman, M

Original Articles

A portable device based on the interrupter technique to measure bronchodilator response in schoolchildren

A new device for measuring airway resistance following brief airflow interruption (Microlab 4000; Micromedical Ltd, UK) was evaluated in 25 asthmatic school children in comparison with well-established methods. Airway resistance was measured during brief airflow interruption (Rint), before and after administration of salbutamol 200 micrograms by metered-dose inhaler, and in the spirometric parameters, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF), and total respiratory system resistance at 6 Hz (Rrs,6) measured by the forced oscillation technique (FOT). The sensitivity index (SI) (mean change/baseline standard deviation) was calculated for each subject. At baseline, interrupter conductance, the reciprocal of Rint, correlated well with FEV1 (r = 0.837; p < 0.001) and PEF (r = 0.773; p < 0.001), and Rint correlated highly with Rrs,6 (r = 0.942; p < 0.001). The median intrasubject coefficient of variation of the interrupter method was higher than the FOT or either spirometric parameter; Rint 11%, Rrs,6 9%, FEV1 5% and PEF 5%. However, the sensitivity to detect change after bronchodilator, expressed as the median SI, did not differ significantly between measurements: Rint 3.5, Rrs,6 3.6, FEV1 2.4 and PEF 3.0. A significant response (SI > 2) was shown by the interrupter in 22 of the subjects compared with 16 by FEV1. The interrupter technique is useful for assessing changes in airway calibre in asthmatic school children, with a sensitivity at least as good as standard methods. Such a device could be of particular value in those too young to perform spirometry.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R M J Beelen, H A Smit, R T van Strien, L P Koopman, J E Brussee, B Brunekreef, J Gerritsen, and P J F M Merkus Short and long term variability of the interrupter technique under field and standardised conditions in 3-6 year old children Thorax, September 1, 2003; 58(9): 761 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.J.F.M. Merkus, H.G.M. Arets, T. Joosten, A. Siero, M. Brouha, J.Y. Mijnsbergen, J.C. de Jongste, and C.K. van der Ent Measurements of interrupter resistance: reference values for children 3-13 yrs of age Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2002; 20(4): 907 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S A McKenzie, E Chan, I Dundas, P D Bridge, C S Pao, M Mylonopoulou, and M J R Healy Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2002; 87(3): 248 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. VILOZNI, M. BARKER, H. JELLOUSCHEK, G. HEIMANN, and H. BLAU An Interactive Computer-Animated System (SpiroGame) Facilitates Spirometry in Preschool Children Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2001; 164(12): 2200 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.A. McKenzie, M. Mylonopoulou, and P.D. Bridge Bronchodilator responsiveness and atopy in 5-10-yr-old coughers Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2001; 18(6): 977 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Lombardi, P D Sly, G Concutelli, E Novembre, G Veneruso, G Frongia, R Bernardini, and A Vierucci Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children Thorax, September 1, 2001; 56(9): 691 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.J. Chavasse, Y. Bastian-Lee, and P. Seddon Comparison of resistance measured by the interrupter technique and by passive mechanics in sedated infants Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2001; 18(2): 330 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Child, S. Clayton, S. Davies, A.A. Fryer, P.W. Jones, and W. Lenney How should airways resistance be measured in young children: mask or mouthpiece? Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2001; 17(6): 1244 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. F. M. MERKUS, J. Y. MIJNSBERGEN, W. C. J. HOP, and J. C. de JONGSTE Interrupter Resistance in Preschool Children . Measurement Characteristics and Reference Values Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2001; 163(6): 1350 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text]