An unattended device for sleep-related breathing disorders: validation study in suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

Portable devices for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are considered to be an acceptable alternative to polysomnography (PSG), but their validation is essential. The aim of our study was to validate a device specifically designed for OSA diagnosis. Twenty nine suspected OSA patients were studied with simultaneous nocturnal PSG and an unattended recording device (MicroDigitrapper-S) (M-S). The device measured body position, snoring sound, oronasal flow, thoracic and abdominal effort, heart rate and percentage arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2%). We compared the apnoea plus hypopnoea index (AHI) and Sa,O2% results of PSG with that of the system's automatic analysis (M-SA). We also performed a semiautomatic analysis (M-SS) with visual editing of the raw data. Results at different AHI cut-off levels were analysed to obtain an indication of accuracy in diagnosis and severity. Both M-SA and M-SS showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% at the cut-off level of AHI > 10. When increasing the cut-off levels, M-SA sensitivity decreased (55% for AHI > 40), while specificity remained high (95%). This was improved to a clinically acceptable level of agreement by M-SS analysis (sensitivity 91% and specificity 94%). In conclusion, the MicroDigitrapper-S device showed a good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of OSA. However, the device could not predict the severity of OSA precisely enough. In severe cases (apnoea plus hypopnoea index > 40), semi-automatic scoring was necessary to obtain a more accurate detection of the severity of the disease.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. W. Flemons, M. R. Littner, J. A. Rowley, P. Gay, W. M. Anderson, D. W. Hudgel, R. D. McEvoy, and D. I. Loube Home Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review of the Literature: An Evidence Review Cosponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the American Thoracic Society Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1543 - 1579. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Zucconi, G. Calori, V. Castronovo, and L. Ferini-Strambi Respiratory Monitoring by Means of an Unattended Device in Children With Suspected Uncomplicated Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Validation Study Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 602 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.M. Calleja, S. Esnaola, R. Rubio, and J. Duran Comparison of a cardiorespiratory device versus polysomnography for diagnosis of sleep apnoea Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2002; 20(6): 1505 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Reuveni, E. Schweitzer, and A. Tarasiuk A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Alternative At-Home or In-Laboratory Technologies for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Med Decis Making, December 1, 2001; 21(6): 451 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Sandberg, K.A. Franklin, G. Bucht, S. Eriksson, and Y. Gustafson Nasal continuous positive airway pressure in stroke patients with sleep apnoea: a randomized treatment study Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2001; 18(4): 630 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]