ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Padkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kinnear, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Padkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kinnear, W.
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 834-836
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

Supplemental oxygen and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

AJ Padkin and WJ Kinnear

When supplementary oxygen is necessary with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), the optimal route by which it should be added to the ventilator circuit is unknown. We investigated the oxygen concentration received when oxygen was supplied at flow rates between 0 and 6 L.min-1 into the proximal ventilator tubing or the nasal mask whilst patients were ventilated with air. Eleven patients with stable chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure were studied. A calibration curve was produced for each by supplying different known oxygen concentrations through a Monnal D or DCC ventilator and measuring the arterial oxygen saturations achieved. Oxygen was then supplied into the ventilator tubing or nasal mask and arterial saturation again measured. The oxygen concentration received was estimated using the calibration curve. Tracheal oxygen concentration throughout the respiratory cycle was studied in one patient when oxygen was supplied by both routes. Peak inspired oxygen concentration occurred at end-inspiration when oxygen was supplied into the ventilator tubing, but at mid-inspiration when supplied into the nasal mask. However, there was no significant difference between the two routes in the inspired oxygen concentration achieved at all flow rates: 1 L.min-1 supplied approximately 31% oxygen; 2 L.min-1 37%; 3 L.min-1 40%; and 4 L.min-1 44%. Flow rates above 4 L.min-1 had little additional effect. In conclusion, oxygen supplementation during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation can be provided into the ventilator tubing or the nasal mask with equal efficiency.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.