ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teschler, H
Right arrow Articles by Costabel, U
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teschler, H
Right arrow Articles by Costabel, U
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 680-686
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Clinical Trial

Relevance of asbestos bodies in sputum

H Teschler, AB Thompson, R Dollenkamp, N Konietzko, and U Costabel

The presence of asbestos bodies (ABs) in sputum specimens of individuals with occupational asbestos exposure has been well-documented. The aim of this study was to determine their clinical relevance in comparison to the concentration of AB in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung tissue. Subjects were included following a well-documented exposure of asbestos history (n = 93) or BAL fluid analysis positive for ABs (n = 42). The subjects with a well documented history of AB exposure were divided into three groups: heavy (Group 1, n = 29); moderate (Group 2, n = 31); or occasional exposure (Group 3, n = 33). BAL fluid was available from all subjects, and lung tissue from 21 subjects. To assess the variability, 10 sputum positive subjects collected subsequent sputum on days 2, 7, 14, 30 and 90. ABs were determined by light microscopy after membrane filtration of specimen digests. The mean sputum AB content was highest in Group 1 (2.4 +/- 5.5 AB.mL-1), lower in Group 2 (0.2 +/- 0.3 AB.mL-1) and lowest in Group 3 (0.1 +/- 0.1 AB.mL-1) suggesting a correlation with cumulative exposure. However, many negative sputum samples were noted, when BAL specimens were positive. The AB content of sputum and BAL specimens did not correlate. ABs were found in sputum of all subjects with a tissue content of > 1,000 AB-cm-3, but in none with contents of < 1,000 AB-cm-3. Substantial variability of ABs was found in the five sequentially collected sputa of 10 initially positive patients (coefficient of variation 28-93%), but only two false negatives were found in these 50 samples. Thus, sputum analysis for asbestos bodies is an insensitive method for assessing the lung asbestos burden, much less sensitive than bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis. However, a sputum sample positive for asbestos bodies is suggestive of a high lung asbestos burden.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Vathesatogkit, T. J. Harkin, D. J. Addrizzo-Harris, M. Bodkin, M. Crane, and W. N. Rom
Clinical Correlation of Asbestos Bodies in BAL Fluid
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 966 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Paris, F. Galateau-Salle, C. Creveuil, R. Morello, C. Raffaelli, J.C. Gillon, M.A. Billon-Galland, J.C. Pairon, L. Chevreau, and M. Letourneux
Asbestos bodies in the sputum of asbestos workers: correlation with occupational exposure
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2002; 20(5): 1167 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P Dumortier, L Çoplü, I Broucke, S Emri, T Selcuk, V de Maertelaer, P De Vuyst, and I Baris
Erionite bodies and fibres in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of residents from Tuzkoy, Cappadocia, Turkey
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2001; 58(4): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Fireman, J. Greif, Y. Schwarz, A. Man, E. Ganor, Y. Ribak, and Y. Lerman
Assessment of Hazardous Dust Exposure by BAL and Induced Sputum
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1720 - 1728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.