ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Costabel, U
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Costabel, U
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 603-608
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

Preparation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid with microscope slide smears

AB Thompson, H Teschler, YM Wang, N Konietzko, and U Costabel

The method of preparation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for cytological examination can significantly affect the results of cellular quantitation. Investigations have shown that cytocentrifugation leads to an underestimation of the number of lymphocytes and membrane filter preparation to an underestimation of the number of neutrophils. As a simple alternative to these two techniques, BALF cells could be prepared by the microscope slide smear technique, which is familiar as the means for preparing peripheral blood for differential counts. In order to compare cell differentials determined by microscope slide technique with differentials resulting from cytocentrifugation, cells were isolated from 35 BALF samples using standard methods, and counted using a haematocytometer. Forty thousand cells in 200 microL were prepared by cytocentrifugation (3 min, 57 x g; Cytospin 2) and 5 x 10(5) cells in 5 microL by microscope slide smear. Both samples were air-dried, stained using May-Grunwald Giemsa stain, and 600 cells were counted to obtain differentials. To test the adequacy of sampling by the microscope slide smear technique, known quantities of lymphocytes or neutrophils were added to fixed numbers of BALF cells, microscope slide smears prepared, and differentials determined on 600 cells. The resulting differentials were compared to the calculated differentials. Preparation of BALF cells with the microscope slide smear technique yielded well-preserved cell morphology. Compared to cytocentrifugation, microscope slide smear preparations had significantly higher percentages of lymphocytes. The microscope slide smears for the samples with predetermined numbers of cells yielded lymphocyte and neutrophil percentages which did not differ from the calculated differentials (59.6 +/- 1.5 vs 59.6 +/- 5.2% and 54.6 +/- 6.0 vs 53.1 +/- 6.0%, respectively). Varying the number of cells counted from 100 to 800 confirmed the reproducibility of the counts for counting 600 cells. Using 5 x 10(5), 2.5 x 10(5), or 1 x 10(5) cells per preparation demonstrated that adequate specimens could be obtained from as few as 1 x 10(5) cells. Thus, microscope slide smear preparation is a simple and accurate method for the quantitation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
S. Dehard, F. Bernaerts, D. Peeters, J. Detilleux, K. McEntee, M. J. Day, and C. Clercx
Comparison of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cytospins and Smears in Dogs and Cats
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., November 1, 2008; 44(6): 285 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.