ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur Respir J 1996; 9:596-602
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 1996

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urban, T
Right arrow Articles by Lebeau, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urban, T
Right arrow Articles by Lebeau, B

Original Articles

Colony-stimulating factors as an adjunct to chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer

T Urban, MP Schuller, and B Lebeau

Myelosuppression is the major dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The capacity of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) to stimulate granular neutrophil recovery may be of great value to prevent or cure febrile neutropenia and to increase dose-intensity. The aim of this review was to assess the current use of CSFs in SCLC on the basis of experimental and clinical data. Primary CSF administration has been shown to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia, hospital admission rate, and antibiotic use subsequent to cyclophosphamidedoxorubicin-high dose etoposide (CDE) chemotherapy, without improvement of survival or disease control. Primary CSF administration may be recommended when the expected incidence of febrile neutropenia is at least 40%. This benefit has not been established with less myelosuppressive regimens, such as cisplatin-etoposide (PE), which remains an alternative combination of SCLC when standard doses are used. A trial comparing high-dose CDE + CSF with PE would be of considerable interest. There is currently little clinical basis for the use of CSFs to increase chemotherapy dose-intensity, outside clinical trials. Peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized with CSFs offer interesting prospects. Further studies, with later initiation, shorter duration or lower doses of CSFs, are warranted to improve the cost-effectiveness of CSFs. CSF therapy in addition to antibiotics is normally not justified in febrile neutropenia, except perhaps in selected patients with sepsis syndromes, hypotension or pneumonia.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.