ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verlato, G
Right arrow Articles by de Marco, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verlato, G
Right arrow Articles by de Marco, R
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 506-511
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996

Original Articles

Evaluation of methacholine dose-response curves by linear and exponential mathematical models: goodness-of-fit and validity of extrapolation

G Verlato, I Cerveri, A Villani, M Pasquetto, M Ferrari, F Fanfulla, E Zanolin, B Rijcken, and R de Marco

Several models have been proposed to analyse dose-response curves recorded in bronchoprovocation challenge tests. The aims of the present work were: 1) to investigate which model (linear vs exponential) and which minimization method (trials and errors vs Levenberg-Marquardt) gives better results in terms of data interpolation (goodness-of-fit); and 2) to verify the validity of extrapolation by comparing forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) observed after 4 mg methacholine with values extrapolated after truncation of the curves at 2 mg. For these purposes, methacholine dose-response curves were obtained in 832 subjects from a random population sample, as part of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) in Italy. Methacholine was inhaled up to a maximum dose of 6 mg by dosimeter technique. The coefficient of determination (r2) was significantly higher with the exponential model (0.81 +/- 0.22; mean +/- SD) than with the linear model (0.69 +/- 0.27). With both models, extrapolated values were usually lower than observed values. As a consequence, a 20% fall in FEV1 with respect to postsaline FEV1 was observed in only 24% and 21% of the tests, where a 20% fall had been predicted, respectively, according to the linear and exponential model. In conclusion, exponential models are better than linear models with respect to data interpolation of methacholine dose-response curves. However, they are worse with respect to extrapolation to higher doses. With any model, extrapolation of dose-response curves by one doubling-dose should be avoided.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. I. Banauch, D. Alleyne, R. Sanchez, K. Olender, H. W. Cohen, M. Weiden, K. J. Kelly, and D. J. Prezant
Persistent Hyperreactivity and Reactive Airway Dysfunction in Firefighters at the World Trade Center
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2003; 168(1): 54 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
D. J. Prezant, M. Weiden, G. I. Banauch, G. McGuinness, W. N. Rom, T. K. Aldrich, and K. J. Kelly
Cough and Bronchial Responsiveness in Firefighters at the World Trade Center Site
N. Engl. J. Med., September 12, 2002; 347(11): 806 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. Crapo
Guidelines for Methacholine and Exercise Challenge Testing---1999 . THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY WAS ADOPTED BY THE ATS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, JULY 1999
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2000; 161(1): 309 - 329.
[Full Text]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
S. Chinn
Methodology of bronchial responsiveness
Thorax, November 1, 1998; 53(11): 984 - 988.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.