Misclassification of smoking status among women in relation to exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

In studies of the health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), misclassification of active smokers has the potential to bias the estimates of disease risk. Biochemical validation of exposure to ETS can provide objective evidence of current smoking status in epidemiological studies. Intrinsic to this effort is the establishment of appropriate cut-off points for the measurements of tobacco biomarkers. Within a collaborative study on ETS co-ordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, questionnaire data and urine samples were collected from 1,369 women at 13 centres in 10 countries. Forty seven of these women had urine cotinine levels above 50 ng.mg-1 creatinine, a level used to discriminate smokers from nonsmokers in previous studies. The distributions of the subjects across cotinine values and self-reported exposure to ETS was consistent with the association, at one extreme, of moderate cotinine levels (50-150 ng.mg-1) with very high exposure to ETS, and, at the other extreme, of very high cotinine levels indicating actual use of nicotine-containing products in women with low ETS exposure. Using the cut-off point of 150 ng.mg-1, only 1.5% of the alleged nonsmokers were reclassified as current light smokers. Potential bias due to smoker misclassification is very unlikely to be responsible for the increased health risks observed in epidemiological studies on ETS.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. K. Al-Delaimy and W. C. Willett Measurement of Tobacco Smoke Exposure: Comparison of Toenail Nicotine Biomarkers and Self-Reports Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1255 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Taylor, F. Najafi, and A. Dobson Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 36(5): 1048 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Yano Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions Tob. Control, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 227 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. Moyer, J. R. Charlson, R. J. Enger, L. C. Dale, J. O. Ebbert, D. R. Schroeder, and R. D. Hurt Simultaneous Analysis of Nicotine, Nicotine Metabolites, and Tobacco Alkaloids in Serum or Urine by Tandem Mass Spectrometry, with Clinically Relevant Metabolic Profiles Clin. Chem., September 1, 2002; 48(9): 1460 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Kirsch, I. S. Yuhanna, Z. Chen, Z. German, T. S. Sherman, and P. W. Shaul Estrogen Acutely Stimulates Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase in H441 Human Airway Epithelial Cells Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 658 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Oddoze, J. C. Dubus, M. Badier, X. Thirion, A. M. Pauli, J. Pastor, and B. Bruguerolle Urinary Cotinine and Exposure to Parental Smoking in a Population of Children with Asthma Clin. Chem., April 1, 1999; 45(4): 505 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.N. Lee and A.J. Thornton Review : A Critical Commentary on Views Expressed by IARC in Relation to Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Indoor and Built Environment, May 1, 1998; 7(3): 129 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]