ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Page, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Page, C.
Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 246-252
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1995


Original Articles

The effect of prolonged exposure to NO2 from birth on airways responsiveness in rabbits sensitized at birth

GJ Douglas, JF Price, and CP Page

Our aim was to determine whether daily exposure to 4 ppm nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from birth until 3 months of age influenced the development of airways hyperresponsiveness and atopic sensitivity in immunized rabbits. Littermate New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits were immunized within 24 h of birth by i.p. injection of house dust mite antigen in AI(OH)3 gel, and exposed to either ambient air or 4 ppm NO2 for 2 h.day-1, 5 days.week-1. At 3 months, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and serum samples were obtained. Airways responsiveness was measured as the provocative concentrations (mg.ml-1) of histamine or methacholine required to elicit a 50% increase in airway resistance (RLPC50) and a 35% decrease in dynamic compliance (CdynPC35). There were no differences in total cell or differential cell counts recovered in BAL fluid between control and NO2 exposed animals. Airways responsiveness did not differ between groups of animals (histamine RLPC50 values: air (n = 15) versus NO2 (n = 13), respectively, 9.98 +/- 1.32 versus 16.43 +/- 1.45 mg.ml-1; CdynPC35 values: 16.60 +/- 1.44 versus 14.95 +/- 1.43 mg.ml-1; methacholine RLPC50 values: air (n = 14) versus NO2 (n = 12), respectively, 2.18 +/- 1.51 versus 2.21 +/- 1.32 mg.ml-1; CdynPC35 values: 2.64 +/- 1.41 versus 2.85 +/- 1.31 mg.ml-1). There was no difference in sensitization between groups of animals exposed to air or NO2, evaluated either by cutaneous responsiveness to intradermal antigen, or serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels assessed by the passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) reaction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the European Respiratory Society.