ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hage, R
Right arrow Articles by Bogaard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hage, R
Right arrow Articles by Bogaard, J.
Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 1910-1914
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1995


Original Articles

Detection of flow limitation during tidal breathing by the interruptor technique

R Hage, JG Aerts, AF Verbraak, B van den Berg, and JM Bogaard

In patients with airflow obstruction, flow limitation can be established in various ways. Using body plethysmography, flow limitation is assumed when expiratory flow decreases whilst alveolar pressure increases at the same time. During forced expiration, flow limitation can be established by means of the flow interruptor technique; flow limitation is assumed when, after release of an occlusion, a spike flow superimposed on the ongoing alveolar flow (delta peak flow) is detected. In this study, the flow interruptor technique was applied to detect flow limitation during tidal breathing. The results were compared to those obtained with the body plethysmograph. The expiratory flow pattern, post-interruption, was analysed in 33 subjects; 11 patients with airflow obstruction and flow limitation established with the body plethysmograph (AO+); 11 patients with airflow obstruction without flow limitation (AO-); and 11 healthy volunteers. Mean spike areas were 27.6 +/- 18.3, 4.6 +/- 2.3 and 3.4 +/- 2.0 mL for the AO+, AO- and control group, respectively, showing a highly significant difference between the AO+ patients and the other groups. Also, significantly higher delta peak flows were found in the AO+ patients compared to the other groups. No differences in delta peak flows or spike areas could be established between patients without flow limitation and controls. We conclude that the interruptor technique may be a useful means of assessing flow limitation during tidal breathing.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. YOUNES, J. KUN, B. MASIOWSKI, K. WEBSTER, and D. ROBERTS
A Method for Noninvasive Determination of Inspiratory Resistance during Proportional Assist Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2001; 163(4): 829 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the European Respiratory Society.