ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luyt, D.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luyt, D.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, H
Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 1736-1741
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1995


Original Articles

Wheeze in preschool children: who is followed-up, who is treated and who is hospitalized?

DK Luyt, AM Bourke, P Lambert, P Burton, and H Simpson

This study determined the proportions of children < or = 5 yrs of age with reported wheeze who were undergoing medical follow-up, receiving anti-asthma medication, or admitted to hospital; and investigated factors important in determining which children would receive these treatments. The symptomatic children represented a wheeze prevalence of 16% of the study sample of 1,422 children. The cumulative incidence of treatment and hospitalization and point prevalence of current medical follow-up were determined using a parent-answered postal questionnaire study of a population-based random sample of 222 children. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for wheeze severity, environmental, social, familial and demographic factors found to affect the likelihood of these treatment end-points. Among 222 children with wheeze, 99 (35%) were under current medical review, 165 (75%) had received medication, and 48 (22%) reported being hospitalized. Current follow-up was more likely in girls (OR 2.22; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.12-4.38), with more than three attacks of wheeze in the last year (OR 17.44; 95% CI 5.22-58.3), or with a household pet (cat or dog) where inhalants were wheeze precipitants (OR 13.65; 95% CI 3.16-58.94). Treatment became more likely in older children (OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.10-12.71), with inhalants as wheeze precipitants (OR 4.66; 95% CI 1.08-20.14) or with a household pet (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.04-5.03). Hospitalization was less likely with frequent wheeze (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.12-0.77), but more likely if shortness of breath occurred with wheeze. Medical follow-up and treatment are related to wheeze severity and exposure to inhaled precipitants, whereas hospital admission occurred in children with attacks causing shortness of breath, and with decreasing frequency of attacks per year.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. E Kuehni, A. M Brooke, M.-P. F Strippoli, B. D Spycher, A. Davis, and M. Silverman
Cohort Profile: The Leicester Respiratory Cohorts
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 2, 2007; (2007) dym090v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the European Respiratory Society.