ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwatsubo, Y
Right arrow Articles by Brochard, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwatsubo, Y
Right arrow Articles by Brochard, P
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 901-906
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Measurement of respiratory impedance by forced oscillation: comparison of the standard and head generator methods

Y Iwatsubo, H Lorino, C Hubert, C Duvivier, R Peslin, QT Pham, T Moreau, JJ Hosselet, and P Brochard

Physiological and clinical studies have shown that the standard method of measuring respiratory impedance by forced oscillation leads to less efficient control of the upper airway shunt effect than the head generator method. To test the effects of these two techniques in epidemiological studies, we compared, in a sample of 73 French agricultural workers, the values obtained with each method for five forced oscillation parameters: resistance, frequency dependence of resistance, inertance, compliance and resonant frequency. For these comparisons, subjects were classified according to four respiratory status factors: smoking status, cough, expectoration and airway obstruction assessed from the maximum expiratory flow volume curve. Logistic regression models using the set of four forced oscillation parameters (excluding resonant frequency, which is derived from compliance and inertance) were then used to analyse the ability of each method to classify the subjects in each group. Significant differences between the two methods were observed for the mean values obtained for all five parameters. However, when each parameter was considered separately, the correlations between the values for each method were significant. Each method possessed the necessary ability to separate subjects into our group classification, but the significant relationships were not always found for the same parameters. Finally, logistic regression models showed that the two methods led to almost the same classification of the subjects. According to our results, the standard method of applying forced oscillation at the mouth seems an acceptable device for measuring respiratory impedance for epidemiological purposes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. J. Akerman, M. Yaegashi, Z. Khiangte, A. T. Murugan, O. Abe, and J. D. Marmur
Bronchodilator effect of infused B-type natriuretic Peptide in asthma.
Chest, July 1, 2006; 130(1): 66 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
E. Oostveen, D. MacLeod, H. Lorino, R. Farre, Z. Hantos, K. Desager, and F. Marchal
The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2003; 22(6): 1026 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.