A multicentre comparison of the efficacy of terbutaline Turbuhaler and salbutamol pressurized metered dose inhaler in hot, humid regions

Twenty seven adults and 20 children with previously diagnosed stable asthma, using a salbutamol pressurized metered dose inhaler (P-MDI) and living in Cairns, Townsville and Southport, Queensland, Australia participated in a randomized, open-label cross-over comparison of terbutaline administered via Turbuhaler and salbutamol administered via P-MDI. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and patient acceptance of the two treatments in hot, humid regions. Terbutaline was administered via Turbuhaler and salbutamol via P-MDI on at least two occasions per day during each four week treatment period. Spirometry was performed at the start of the study, after the two week run-in and at the end of each treatment period. Patients used diary cards to record morning and evening peak expiratory flows, daily symptom scores and daily intake of beta 2 agonist medication. At the end of the study, patients answered a treatment preference question. Forty six patients completed the study. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatments in peak expiratory flow, change in morning peak expiratory flow pre- and post-beta-agonist, daily symptom scores, diurnal variability and spirometry. Forty four percent of patients preferred the terbutaline Turbuhaler and 39% preferred salbutamol P-MDI. Both agents were similarly tolerated. Terbutaline delivered by Turbuhaler is as clinically effective as salbutamol delivered by P-MDI in patients with asthma living in hot, humid regions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Anderson Patient preference for and satisfaction with inhaler devices Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2005; 14(96): 109 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]