ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohendy, R
Right arrow Articles by Eledjam, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohendy, R
Right arrow Articles by Eledjam, J.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 286-291
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory resistive properties in anaesthetized paralysed humans

R Cohendy, J Ripart, and JJ Eledjam

The respiratory resistive properties of the normal human respiratory system are volume-dependent. The overall flow resistance (Rmax,rs) can be partitioned into airway resistance (Raw) and the additional resistance (delta Rrs) which may result from the viscoelastic properties of the respiratory system, from inequality of time constants (pendelluft), or from both. Because positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increases end-expiratory lung volume and may equalize ventilation within the lungs, the effect of PEEP on Raw, delta Rrs, and their sum (Rmax,rs) was assessed in anaesthetized surgical patients without evidence of lung disease. Fifteen men were studied during paralysis and isoflow isovolume mechanical ventilation, using the end-inflation occlusion method. Ten men were studied with incremental levels of PEEP, up to 16 cmH2O (Group A). Five men were studied without PEEP (Group B). In Group A, Rmax,rs did not change with PEEP. In contrast, Raw decreased and delta Rrs increased significantly. Moreover, there was a linear relationship between PEEP and the contribution of delta Rrs to Rmax,rs. In Group B, Rmax,rs, Raw and delta Rrs, and the contribution of delta Rrs to Rmax,rs did not change. In both groups, atropine elicited a decrease in Rmax,rs, linked to a decrease in Raw, without any notable effect on the static elastance of the respiratory system (Est,rs) or on delta Rrs. We conclude that the overall flow resistance was not affected by PEEP. In contrast, PEEP clearly modified the contribution of its two components. The decrease in Raw with PEEP could have resulted, at least in part, from modification in the basal vagal tone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Guerin, G. Fournier, and J. Milic-Emili
Effects of PEEP on inspiratory resistance in mechanically ventilated COPD patients
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2001; 18(3): 491 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.